THE OFFICIAL 2017/2018 ATLANTA FALCONS THREAD

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
Shizlansky;c-10136910 said:
Livefromclayco;c-10136773 said:
The 1st one like Numbaz said was Matt trying to draw a flag, the 2nd one was a Hooper drop and the 3rd one was a good idea (Julio 1 on 1) just a horrible throw.

No QB in the nfl throws a pass to draw a flag.

That makes no sense

Wtf?? That shit happens all the time, if nobody's open you throw in the area where you think there's a hold or PI
 
Livefromclayco;c-10137758 said:
Shizlansky;c-10136910 said:
Livefromclayco;c-10136773 said:
The 1st one like Numbaz said was Matt trying to draw a flag, the 2nd one was a Hooper drop and the 3rd one was a good idea (Julio 1 on 1) just a horrible throw.

No QB in the nfl throws a pass to draw a flag.

That makes no sense

Wtf?? That shit happens all the time, if nobody's open you throw in the area where you think there's a hold or PI

Lmao

Ima let you have this one bruh
 
Shizlansky;c-10137876 said:
Livefromclayco;c-10137758 said:
Shizlansky;c-10136910 said:
Livefromclayco;c-10136773 said:
The 1st one like Numbaz said was Matt trying to draw a flag, the 2nd one was a Hooper drop and the 3rd one was a good idea (Julio 1 on 1) just a horrible throw.

No QB in the nfl throws a pass to draw a flag.

That makes no sense

Wtf?? That shit happens all the time, if nobody's open you throw in the area where you think there's a hold or PI

Lmao

Ima let you have this one bruh

QBs do try to force pass-interference calls bro.

Its a fact...It's not an opinion

Inglewood_B;c-10137216 said:
If the point was to draw a flag, Matt still fucked up because Julio never got out his break. He was still within that 5 yards.

5 yard rule is negated if the ball is in the air.

What I seen was the secondary holding again. Julio frustrated by that and gave up on the route. Julio was pissed off at the coaches for a shitty route. Matt seen that Julio was being held so he threw it for a pass interference call.

There was no call because Julio stopped running his route because he was pissed
 
Last edited:
QB's will throw a pass to get a call, shit happens all the time. Matt should have never thrown that ball though, or he should have thrown it at Julio feet.

The 3rd INT Ryan says he meant to throw it high to give Julio a chance to make a play. Terrible throw......Hopefully he got that shit out his system with 3 big games coming up.

Looking like we may go 2-1 over the next 3. I predicted a split with N.O so im sticking to that. I believe we beat TB and Carolina at home. 10-6 should get us in the playoffs as long as Seattle loses another game or the Rams slide.
 
Falcons finally gonna stop playing Vic Beasley at LB. I hate when he dropping into coverage. He looked uncomfortable trying to make tackles. Let him rush the passer and put Takk on the other side. Takk looks better rushing from the right side as oppose to the left. I not sure but id bet most if not all of Takks 5 sacks have came from the right side.

From Falcoholic......

The Vic Beasley-at-linebacker experiment appears to be drawing to a close, for better or for worse. With the team getting a healthy, performing corps of linebackers back on the field, they’re ready to get Beasley closer to the line of scrimmage and back to doing what he should do best: Rushing the passer.

What Quinn is actually suggesting here, though, isn’t quite so straightforward. On one hand, yes, the Falcons are clearly going to play Beasley less at linebacker and give those snaps to De’Vondre Campbell, giving him more time at defensive end. On the other hand, it’s an open question as to whether Vic is actually going to get more pass rushing snaps, or whether he’ll be any more effective doing so than he has been.

vaughn mcclure

@vxmcclure23

Dan Quinn said Vic Beasley Jr. has had less rushing opportunities to get sacks because he's asked Beasley to do a lot more with dropping into coverage. Quinn expects to feature Beasley more as a rusher moving forward the rest of the season with Duke...http://www.espn.com/espn/now?nowId=21-40012539-4

12:24 PM - Dec 14, 2017

11 11 Replies 27 27 Retweets 47 47 likes

Twitter Ads info and privacy

As many have noted, Vic Beasley did not actually spend all that many snaps dropping back into coverage, though it was apparent when he did. The bigger issue with the switch is that it did not lead to increased pass rushing production, and while Beasley could be a tremendous linebacker over the long haul, you’re wasting his best skill if you’re not having him chase quarterbacks. No matter how crowded your rotation at defensive end might be.

In many ways, 2016 was a bit of a curse for Beasley, who had a tremendous season but feasted on weak tackles and put up numbers that virtually ensured his 2017 sack total would be viewed as a disappointment. Beasley’s still generated lots of good pressure, but he’s had some weak games and hasn’t quite closed out a few sacks, which means his overall numbers look very disappointing compared to last year. Such are the hot-and-cold fortunes of many a pass rusher, and Beasley looks like he’ll be streakier than most when it comes to putting up sacks.

So the net effect of this move is not likely to be gobs of sacks, unfortunately. No matter what Beasley does to close out the year, he’ll get some criticism for not coming close to his 15.5 sack effort last year. If he can close out the season on a high note and build some momentum for the (hopefully) inevitable playoff run, though, we’ll all have plenty to celebrate.
https://www.thefalcoholic.com/2017/...rushing-the-passer-over-the-final-three-games
 

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
145
Views
42
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…