Will Munny
New member
Myndset;9532978 said:
I was talking about the playoff game last winter that was outdoors. The Blair Walsh miss game.
We aren't shitty fans tho, I'm sure you had a great time as US Bank stadium.
vageneral08
New member
MR.CJ;9532843 said:
That was stupid on ron rivera part
bow to royalty
New member
I don't get all the outrage about Cam not playing the first possession. Anderson didn't throw a bad pass. Tolbert can't catch, and batted the ball up to the Seahawks. Then Cam Cam in to go 14/32, and lead the team to 7 points.
Young_Chitlin
New member
We’ve reached the point in the season when fans are starting to look at playoff tiebreakers, and the tiebreaker scenarios feature some good news for Raiders fans.
If the Raiders and Patriots both win out to finish the season 14-2, the Raiders will be the No. 1 seed in the AFC and have home-field advantage in the playoffs, thanks to a better record against common opponents.
Under that scenario, the first tiebreaker would be head-to-head, but that wouldn’t apply because the Raiders and Patriots don’t play each other this season. The second tiebreaker would be conference record, where both teams would be 11-1. The third tiebreaker would be record in common games, and that’s where the Raiders have the advantage.
The Raiders and Patriots have a total of five games against four common opponents on their schedule: They each play the Texans, Ravens, Bills and Broncos, with the Patriots playing the Bills twice and the Raiders playing the Broncos twice. If both teams win out, the Raiders will be 5-0 in those five games against common opponents, while the Patriots will be 4-1.
The Patriots’ loss came against the Bills when Tom Brady was suspended, Jimmy Garoppolo was injured and rookie Jacoby Brissett was the starting quarterback. That game could turn out to be the reason the Patriots are leaving New England and going to the Black Hole for the AFC Championship Game.
If the Raiders and Patriots both win out to finish the season 14-2, the Raiders will be the No. 1 seed in the AFC and have home-field advantage in the playoffs, thanks to a better record against common opponents.
Under that scenario, the first tiebreaker would be head-to-head, but that wouldn’t apply because the Raiders and Patriots don’t play each other this season. The second tiebreaker would be conference record, where both teams would be 11-1. The third tiebreaker would be record in common games, and that’s where the Raiders have the advantage.
The Raiders and Patriots have a total of five games against four common opponents on their schedule: They each play the Texans, Ravens, Bills and Broncos, with the Patriots playing the Bills twice and the Raiders playing the Broncos twice. If both teams win out, the Raiders will be 5-0 in those five games against common opponents, while the Patriots will be 4-1.
The Patriots’ loss came against the Bills when Tom Brady was suspended, Jimmy Garoppolo was injured and rookie Jacoby Brissett was the starting quarterback. That game could turn out to be the reason the Patriots are leaving New England and going to the Black Hole for the AFC Championship Game.
PanchoYoSancho
New member
That tiebreaker could change if both teams finish 13-3 and Oakland's 3rd loss is against Denver and NE's 3rd loss is against the Jets or Dolphins. They'd both be 4-1 against common opponents and the next tiebreaker would go to New England based on strength of victory. That's not as likely to happen, but very possible.
bow to royalty
New member
804;9533253 said:
Cam is who I thought he was. A average ass QB with running ability. Helluva year last year, but he shouldn't have gotten your hopes up like that. That was fucked up.
HustleThaDon
New member
Texans remain average as fuck. Bill O brien needs the boot hes another one of those belicheck disciples who cant coach. But our owner sucks too so he'll throw a big party once we go 9-7 and get smashed by the chiefs in the fist round again.
VanguardBLK
New member
Ron Rivera knows Cam is his meal ticket so why play yourself!
its....JOHN B
New member
AcresShakers;9533503 said:
He was against the Osweiler signing the worst qb in the league, lost Watt but still got yall on top of the division
HustleThaDon
New member
its....JOHN B;9533529 said:
What? He signed off on getting him lol
Will Munny
New member
Myndset;9533575 said:Will Munny;9533026 said:
Like I said.I was at that game too, with my cowboys jersey on.
its....JOHN B
New member
AcresShakers;9533560 said:
"Numerous league sources have maintained that the impetus to sign Osweiler to a hefty free-agent contract after a brief stint as a starter in Denver began at the ownership/management level, a signing that ratcheted up expectations for the Texans and their offense after a blowout playoff loss last season. The Texans have scored just 75 points on offense this season -- second-worst in the NFL -- and Osweiler enters Week 6 with a woeful quarterback rating of 70.6, 31st in the NFL."
I forget the quarterbacks O'Brien wanted I can't find it online but Osweiler was upper managements choice
its....JOHN B
New member
He's 32nd in qbr now I'm pretty sure
