The more I learn about the human body..........

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
judahxulu;2036249 said:
ive never said to anyone" you are the whiteman's bitch because you support evolution" so thats a false premise. also, i dont think you comprehend the point of my posts at all. the fact that a pro-evolution article made a liar out o the pro-evolution dude (chozenwun) is quite ironic to me and pretty fucking humorous to me. moreover, its not wise to jump into the midst of a conversation and assume that you will comprehend whats going on. the people ive addressed in this particular thread make it a point to insist that evolution = hard fact = no Creator and I disagree. There can simultaneously exist a form of creative intelligence and evolution. or it just might be one or the other. its all about whose report you believe, and thats the heart of the conflict here. the same posters mislabel and project the silliest aspects of christian mythology on any mode of spirituality expressed on this board. they tout their rationality and reason over our "primitive" faith and/or belief. Yet when someone like myself destroys their weak arguments they abandon their precious reasoning ans rationality and attempt to make appeals to ridicule. they even out right lie, as in the case of the frozenwun. those who's faith and belief rests in whats what in the realm of eurocentric scholarship, especially in lieu of a spiritual understanding - are essentially the whitemans bitch. its dependent on a worldview, not an opinion on a particular scientific theory.but that description is just an opinion. i understand if it made u feel better to cherrypick that part of my post and the bbc part in order to make yourself feel better. its weird, but i understand. Just remember 2 things :1) Darwins seminal work is fully titled On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life (1859). Remember what was going on with africans and the "favoured" races at home and abroad during that epoch in time. 2) however much it may have been pruned and grafted, the "tree" of studying evolution has its roots in the works of Darwin. The biblical axiom "you cannot get a good fruit from a bad tree" holds true here.

All I'm saying is that if you're going to consider that article's rejection of "Ida" as a missing link to be legitimate, you can't pick and choose parts of that article to be factual and parts of it not to be factual based on your own viewpoint. In citing that article as a reference, you are essentially putting your faith in a "eurocentric" media outlet.
 
Last edited:
The GMW;2036990 said:
All I'm saying is that if you're going to consider that article's rejection of "Ida" as a missing link to be legitimate, you can't pick and choose parts of that article to be factual and parts of it not to be factual based on your own viewpoint. In citing that article as a reference, you are essentially putting your faith in a "eurocentric" media outlet.
if one of my points is that the eurocentric sources of information are unreliable then i dont see your point besides a strawman argument. one eurocentric source says ida is the missing link, another said it is not- one thing or the other has to be true.

moreover, me utilizing a quote from a reference material is not my worldview so u are pretty much off in what ure getting at. i just used dudes sources to show him a liar. i find it hilarious that the actual points i made have yet to be addressed. instead this shit....
 
Last edited:
Serious question. Why did god give us a protective shell (?) for our hearts? Why not just make our hearts indestructible?
 
Last edited:
Chike;2037927 said:
Serious question. Why did god give us a protective shell (?) for our hearts? Why not just make our hearts indestructible?

we got stem cells that can regenerate shit . imho, if we were spiritually evolved enough we could use 'em at will
 
Last edited:
judahxulu;2037408 said:
if one of my points is that the eurocentric sources of information are unreliable then i dont see your point besides a strawman argument. one eurocentric source says ida is the missing link, another said it is not- one thing or the other has to be true.

moreover, me utilizing a quote from a reference material is not my worldview so u are pretty much off in what ure getting at. i just used dudes sources to show him a liar. i find it hilarious that the actual points i made have yet to be addressed. instead this shit....

Clearly you are taking the side of one "eurocentric" source over other/previous ones when you call Ida a "fossil fraud" based on the information in the article you posted. If all eurocentric sources are equally unreliable, how do you know that the one rejecting Ida as a missing link is accurate?

I'll refer you to talkorigins if you want to read about transitional fossils...
 
Last edited:
The GMW;2038415 said:
Clearly you are taking the side of one "eurocentric" source over other/previous ones when you call Ida a "fossil fraud" based on the information in the article you posted. If all eurocentric sources are equally unreliable, how do you know that the one rejecting Ida as a missing link is accurate?

I'll refer you to talkorigins if you want to read about transitional fossils...

youre missing my point still. thats ok. im going to look at that link..
 
Last edited:
The GMW;2036054 said:
Just wanted to point out that you accuse people of being "the whiteman's bitch" for supporting evolution but you used a BBC link to support your arguments... in fact the very article you used as your reference is completely pro-evolution.

Here is another BBC link: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/prehistoric_life/human/human_evolution/
lol
youre a jackass.
That's nice...

Hey...look what I found. HUMAN BEINGS WITH TAILS lol

[video=youtube;xnxzqeT466A]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnxzqeT466A[/video]

human_tail8.jpg


human_tail.jpg


I guess God "created" these people with tails. No way its simply a evolutionary hiccup in the DNA passed down over thousands of years.


 
Last edited:
Darxwell;2032657 said:
Oh and congratulations on another "im too stupid to understand science so it must be magic" thread.

So-signage. People don't know enough about LIFE to say that something does/doesn't exist. Evolution is a controvercial topic.
 
Last edited:
Darxwell;2039056 said:
lol

That's nice...

Hey...look what I found. HUMAN BEINGS WITH TAILS lol



[video=youtube;xnxzqeT466A]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnxzqeT466A[/video]

human_tail8.jpg


human_tail.jpg




I guess God "created" these people with tails. No way its simply a evolutionary hiccup in the DNA passed down over thousands of years.




That shit is disturbing... lol
 
Last edited:
Darxwell;2039056 said:
lol

That's nice...

Hey...look what I found. HUMAN BEINGS WITH TAILS lol



[video=youtube;xnxzqeT466A]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnxzqeT466A[/video]

human_tail8.jpg


human_tail.jpg




I guess God "created" these people with tails. No way its simply a evolutionary hiccup in the DNA passed down over thousands of years.




ugh... ol' (extra)dick in the booty ass nigga
 
Last edited:
judahxulu;2029766 said:
the question i have for either side is

why cant some kind creative intelligence and some kind of evolution co-exist?

do u ignore this possibility because it would destroy the concepts that YOU with your LIMITED understanding have defined them to be? the same people that poisoned religion are the same people that poisoned science.

I agree.

Living beings EVOLVED. As technology EVOLVED. Due to intelligent input/direction.

Even for God there was a first time. A start.

Had to make bricks before could make brick buildings. Had to make single cell [something on order of bacteria]

before moving on to combining cells into ever more complicated creatures.

I can just see angels having friendly competition over who could make the most beautiful or interesting

or best tasting etc etc etc fish or birds or plants etc etc etc.
 
Last edited:
John Prewett;2042614 said:
I agree.

Living beings EVOLVED. As technology EVOLVED. Due to intelligent input/direction.

Even for God there was a first time. A start.

Had to make bricks before could make brick buildings. Had to make single cell [something on order of bacteria]

before moving on to combining cells into ever more complicated creatures.

I can just see angels having friendly competition over who could make the most beautiful or interesting

or best tasting etc etc etc fish or birds or plants etc etc etc.

If so then God/the angels must have been feeling pretty sadistic when they made this guy...

[WARNING - pretty disgusting]

[video=youtube;RoXfYvoUsxg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RoXfYvoUsxg[/video]
 
Last edited:
Nope. Not "sadistic." Eventually every living body [let's not quibble about bacteria] gets eaten . By one thing or another. Same God [I think with angelic helpers] that made the peacock, also made the vulture and hyena.
 
Last edited:
KTULU IS BACK;2041971 said:
i whip my tail back and forth

Unless I knew of a darn good reason not to,... I'd have it cut off.

I've never heard of this before,... cetainly rare,...

I wonder if hospitals [especially in modern nations] clip these when still a baby ?

Don't know for a fact,... but I bet in some cultures they would kill the baby. Or maybe worship it,.... ????
 
Last edited:
John Prewett;2042660 said:
Nope. Not "sadistic." Eventually every living body [let's not quibble about bacteria] gets eaten . By one thing or another. Same God [I think with angelic helpers] that made the peacock, also made the vulture and hyena.

There's a world of difference between being eaten after you're dead and being torn open and eaten alive from the inside out. Creating a creature that does the latter to its victims certainly seems unnecessary and sadistic.
 
Last edited:

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
120
Views
0
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…