Supreme Court: No One Should Pay for Innocent Man’s 18-Year Incarceration

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date

tru_m.a.c

New member
Real talk, somethings wrong with this Supreme Court.

But 15million was an over exaggeration of financial liability. He does need some type of compensation though.

And see this what I hate about the media. This should be a national headline. You have a prosecutor who purposefully hid information. Lord knows how much this goes on. But the media would have you believe that corruption only takes place between republicans and democrats.
 
Last edited:
they dont wanna pay reperations...why they gonna pay 4 a nig they left in jail accidently.........i h8 they way this country is
 
Last edited:
iphucq;2319939 said:
they dont wanna pay reperations...why they gonna pay 4 a nig they left in jail accidently.........i h8 they way this country is
Crackers are evil. Everybody else can at least be reasoned with.

Really the bottom line.
 
Last edited:
tru_m.a.c;2319907 said:
Real talk, somethings wrong with this Supreme Court.

But 15million was an over exaggeration of financial liability. He does need some type of compensation though.

And see this what I hate about the media. This should be a national headline. You have a prosecutor who purposefully hid information. Lord knows how much this goes on. But the media would have you believe that corruption only takes place between republicans and democrats.

yeah, this actually happens pretty often, but they usually get like, a milli for everything they went through, and like, 80 thou for every year of wasted potential
 
Last edited:
The supreme court are losers

they always support the criminals but not the innocent

they dont want to be responsible for their wrongs

i see why it's called,blind justice
 
Last edited:
wow this is deep...good thread though.

and to top it off he probably will still have a record...

these r the stories that should be turned into movies, books and songs.

stay strong john.
 
Last edited:
ekub59y1al0ylay9.jpg

On behalf of the majority, Justice Clarence Thomas said there was an “absence of proof” that such prosecutorial misconduct was a regular occurrence in the New Orleans district attorney’s office or that it was a result of insufficient training.

The brother didnt stand a chance.
 
Last edited:
Clearance Thomas is still alive? Damn. I'da thought someone would've offed him by now.

But yeah, dude got shafted.

Fuck it. Sell the rights for a book. No one's gonna want to see the made-for-TV movie, but they'll love readin about it.
 
Last edited:
tru_m.a.c;2319907 said:
Real talk, somethings wrong with this Supreme Court.



But 15million was an over exaggeration of financial liability.
He does need some type of compensation though.

And see this what I hate about the media. This should be a national headline. You have a prosecutor who purposefully hid information. Lord knows how much this goes on. But the media would have you believe that corruption only takes place between republicans and democrats.

15 million, too much?? This man was within a couple months from death. 15 mill aint shit. He probably would have won with a lower amount but 15 mill is justice due.
 
Last edited:

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
12
Views
0
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…