STILL DOUBT that Google is a front for the CIA?

[ThaChozenWun]

It has been rumored for years that the CIA started, and now funds and runs Google. Which is interesting since it's motto is "Dont Be Evil." You can research CIA/Google on any search engine and a host of things will come up.

Here is 2 for you to research on your own.

1) "Google and CIA invest in web monitoring." Basically a Minority Report system that spies on us everywhere in real time using the internet. If you have half a brain your spidey senses are tingling.

2) Type the word "Bombshell" in Google search. You will notice that Google tries to assist your search with terms like Bombshell McGee, bombshell bakery and bombshell bra. Then add a space and a "B". Then add an "A". Notice Google will still keep trying to assist your search. Keep going until you spell out Bombshell Barack. It will FINALLY lead you to a story about Barack Obama being a CIA creation. Even if you don't agree with the story, why is Google trying to lead you away from the story?

Also notice that there are 358,000 results for Bombshell Mcgee and 105,000 results for bombshell bakery. Yet there are over 660,000 results for the Bombshell Barack story by the time you get to the "C" in his name. More than DOUBLE bombshell McGee. So it isn't as if no one has searched for the article before. And there are 100s of similar examples like this. Google has even admitted to controlling the searches in the past. This is why I use other search engines. I don't want anyone feeding me an answer or researching a topic that they want me to research.

1. Are you serious? Even IF, google was funded and operated by the CIA, why is it shocking they monitor search results? IT'S THE FUCKIN CIA!!! IT'S THEIR JOB TO MONITOR WHATS GOING ON. You know if somebody would type some shit it in like "how to make home made bombs" "ny nuclear radius" w.e the CIA want's to know.

2. I typed in bombshell with no problem. Bombshell was first option that appeared even in the assist box. That theory fails anyway considering probably 90% of all main search engines have assist features on them because people are too fuckin stupid to correctly spell a word and are mad when they keep getting Asian spas when they're trying to find Verizons "Massage" rates or seeing the pricing on photo prints when they're trying to figure out which "collage" to attend.

And the assists go by how many hits those pages get combined. Apparently more people believe in bombshell McGee than they do in a reptilian cia created 33rd degree Mason/Black Belt Illuminati member.

 

[The Prime Minister]

During the years that I've been on the net I've noticed a very clear and decisive censorship of my searches on Google.

Just my observation as a lay person.

*No conspiracy theorist*

 

[jazz93]

1) @ TheChozen

Are you serious? You have NO PROBLEM with your searches being directed to what someone wants you to read? Even though in the back of our minds we think there is total honesty and innocence when we conduct searches?

b) Openly monitoring everything you do on the Internet in real time and controlling your searches is supposed to be the domain of countries like China, Iraq and Russia? How do we consider ourselves a free country if we are being watched at everything we do? Do You know that they can turn on the camera in your iPhone anytime they want and watch what you are doing? And You don't have a problem with that? Are you serious? EVERY SINGLE THING you do on Facebook is stored in the Library of Congress? And they own and control the images and can do whatever they want with them? You DON"T have a problem with that? Not even on a philosophical level? In a "FREE" society? Jesus man, at this rate you are going to lose your "resident smart guy" label on this board.

And you entered Bombshell wrong. It has NOTHING to do with spelling. I clearly stated to spell out Bombshell. Then I said pause and see what comes up. THEN I said add a space and a B. Repeat slowly until you spell out Barack's name. Never does it give you "Bombshell Barack" as a suggestion until you are at the C of his name. EVEN THOUGH that term has more than double the results for McGee. Why does it not link it as soon as you type Bombshell B or Bombshell Ba or Bar?

Reading Comprehension 101

 

[ThaChozenWun]

Are you serious? You have NO PROBLEM with your searches being directed to what someone wants you to read? Even though in the back of our minds we think there is total honesty and innocence when we conduct searches?

Dude it doesn't redirect your searches, it gives you suggestions as to what you might be looking for, I mean come on man where is something evil going on there.

b) Openly monitoring everything you do on the Internet in real time and controlling your searches is supposed to be the domain of countries like China, Iraq and Russia?

They ... DO NOT.... Control your searches, you can search freely and click on anything you want.

How do we consider ourselves a free country if we are being watched at everything we do?

If you want technology, take the risks that come with it. The CIA has a job to do, they have every right to to see what is being searched for online. As do the FBI, Local Police, Internet Company, and childrens parents. If you don't like it don't use the fuckin internet, it ain't hard.

Do You know that they can turn on the camera in your iPhone anytime they want and watch what you are doing?

And You don't have a problem with that? Are you serious?

No they can't.

EVERY SINGLE THING you do on Facebook is stored in the Library of Congress?

And? Since the beginning of the internet everything you did has been stored somewhere, people have been keeping records since civilizations learned to carve and write.

And they own and control the images and can do whatever they want with them? You DON"T have a problem with that? Not even on a philosophical level? In a "FREE" society? Jesus man, at this rate you are going to lose your "resident smart guy" label on this board.

No, they do not own and control your images. There are many cases of government run programs being sued and losing for showing people on video, tape, etc.. who asked not to be shown.

The closest thing to this is facebook monitoring for images to delete those that are inappropriate, which there is nothing wrong with that.

And you entered Bombshell wrong. It has NOTHING to do with spelling. I clearly stated to spell out Bombshell. Then I said pause and see what comes up. THEN I said add a space and a B. Repeat slowly until you spell out Barack's name. Never does it give you "Bombshell Barack" as a suggestion until you are at the C of his name. EVEN THOUGH that term has more than double the results for McGee. Why does it not link it as soon as you type Bombshell B or Bombshell Ba or Bar?

I seen what came up, what you said, in order, in the suggestions box. Didn't force me anywhere or change my words, is suggested the word bombshell first, then others first.

I explained website hits and money putting certain sites higher than others. No one searches for bombshell barack so obviously it wont be high on the list.

Reading Comprehension 101

Something you're lacking.

 

[janklow]

2) Type the word "Bombshell" in Google search. You will notice that Google tries to assist your search with terms like Bombshell McGee, bombshell bakery and bombshell bra. Then add a space and a "B". Then add an "A". Notice Google will still keep trying to assist your search. Keep going until you spell out Bombshell Barack. It will FINALLY lead you to a story about Barack Obama being a CIA creation. Even if you don't agree with the story, why is Google trying to lead you away from the story?

if you were searching for a story about Obama being a CIA creation... why would you be searching for "Bombshell Barack?" why not "Obama CIA?"

 

[jazz93]

Check out Google Wi-Spy scandal. Check out the pervs that have been arrested for being able to remotely access your webcams and cell cams to peep on young women as they undress. A pervert can do this but the high powered tech companies and gov't agencies can't? Riiiigggghhhtttt.

Search Google censors people, google censors americans, google censors charlie sheen. Ignore all of the articles that mention Google/China censorship. Google has admitted to censoring and controlling searches, images and videos. They use some BS reasonings and it is almost ALWAYS "terror related." You can justify anything if you say it's terror related. Like Disorderly Conduct. A cop can arrest you for anything and say you were disorderly. That covers all.

Read all of the fine print that comes when you sign up with Facebook. It is not solely restricted to images. They can take your posts and use them as well. They OWN your activity. Says so when you sign up. Then they turn around and sell your posts, your data, etc to the government. That has also been admitted.

There is a technology I am drawing a blank on but it's created by Apple. It allows them to retrieve all of your images and history. Even long after you have deleted them on your phone. It is not Localis but another program. They dont even physically need your phone. They can access the info remotely. So yes, they can turn on your camera at any time. Which is the new iPhones don't have covers over them.

I am tired, it's after 2am. I will add more to this later.

 

[jazz93]

@ Janklow. There are a ton of things that would come up if you typed Obama/CIA. I was specifically looking for that title. A friend recommended that specific phrase to save me from wading through a ton of Obama related articles.

 

[Swiffness!]

It has been rumored for years that the CIA started, and now funds and runs Google.

Really. Anyone else ever hear of this rumor before today? Anyone?

DAMN YOU JANKLOW MAKE THAT TIN FOIL HAT FORUM

 

[Swiffness!]

if you were searching for a story about Obama being a CIA creation... why would you be searching for "Bombshell Barack?" why not "Obama CIA?"

sonned into fucking oblivion

threadstarter blames the CIA for his parents breaking up

 

[jazz93]

@ Swiffness and Chozen (since Chozen says Google doesn't censor or control searches)

Google Yanks “Kill The Web” Article That Warned Of Internet Takeover

Posted by sakerfa on August 20th, 2010

(PaulWatson) – Having at first appeared as normal, our earlier article about Google’s plan to kill the web has been completely de-listed from Google News. This is completely unprecedented and underscores how keen Google is to prevent people from finding out that it is a CIA-NSA front that is preparing to completely end the Internet as we know it with the Verizon net-neutrality killing deal.

The article, entitled Google Plans To Kill Web In Internet Takeover Agenda, originally appeared on Google News but was pulled shortly after.

A subsequent blurb promoting Alex Jones’ video presentation on the issue made it through to Google News but could also be yanked at any time.

In the face of this censorship, it’s more important than ever that people get the word out about Google’s plan to kill the web and replace it with a sterile clone of cable TV that will ensure all independent voices on the Internet are silenced forever.

Search "Google Yanks "Kill The Web" article or just search Kill Web or Internet Kill Switch. The govt is currently doing drills on how to shut down the net instantly. Obama is pushing for legislation to allow him to control the internet under what else? "Homeland Security" or "Terror Activity" the catch all.

 

[ThaChozenWun]

@ Swiffness and Chozen (since Chozen says Google doesn't censor or control searches)

Google Yanks “Kill The Web” Article That Warned Of Internet Takeover
Posted by sakerfa on August 20th, 2010

(PaulWatson) – Having at first appeared as normal, our earlier article about Google’s plan to kill the web has been completely de-listed from Google News. This is completely unprecedented and underscores how keen Google is to prevent people from finding out that it is a CIA-NSA front that is preparing to completely end the Internet as we know it with the Verizon net-neutrality killing deal.
The article, entitled Google Plans To Kill Web In Internet Takeover Agenda, originally appeared on Google News but was pulled shortly after.

A subsequent blurb promoting Alex Jones’ video presentation on the issue made it through to Google News but could also be yanked at any time.

In the face of this censorship, it’s more important than ever that people get the word out about Google’s plan to kill the web and replace it with a sterile clone of cable TV that will ensure all independent voices on the Internet are silenced forever.

Search "Google Yanks "Kill The Web" article or just search Kill Web or Internet Kill Switch. The govt is currently doing drills on how to shut down the net instantly. Obama is pushing for legislation to allow him to control the internet under what else? "Homeland Security" or "Terror Activity" the catch all.

So no proof on anything outside of tin foil hat sites?

You didn't post a link so I took it upon myself to look up the author of the story. The same author who wrote this is on every conspiracy website. I understand there are conspiracies which won't exactly be on major sites or out in the open, but the things you are using to tie stories together don't even fit and hold no secrets behind them.

 

[janklow]

@ Janklow. There are a ton of things that would come up if you typed Obama/CIA. I was specifically looking for that title. A friend recommended that specific phrase to save me from wading through a ton of Obama related articles.

so Google hides the story about Obama being a CIA creation... and yet there are tons of results that come up if i type in "Obama CIA?"

totally not getting how this conspiracy works

 

[showyouhowtohustle]

Google monitors your searches so they can display relevant ads to you via their google adsense program (their #1 source of revenue)
Lay off the dope for a couple of days OP

 

[shootemwon]

Really. Anyone else ever hear of this rumor before today? Anyone?

DAMN YOU JANKLOW MAKE THAT TIN FOIL HAT FORUM

for real man come on. you got no problem parsing up all the race related threads to r&r but then you said we cant have the psycho talk subforum cause that would split things up too much. just fucking do it already please. i know its probably jays call but do something.

 

[janklow]

for real man come on. you got no problem parsing up all the race related threads to r&r but then you said we cant have the psycho talk subforum cause that would split things up too much.

i don't think that was EXACTLY my argument...

 

[shootemwon]

i don't think that was EXACTLY my argument...

ok so why shouldnt we do it?

 

[b@squ1@t redux]

smokin sherm.. father forgive em

 

[janklow]

ok so why shouldnt we do it?

i think my theory was more that it doesn't really have the traffic to support it, and you still have people claiming their posts are too real to count as conspiracy

eh, i go back and forth on this issue