Steve Harvey takes an L (along with most of you people)

[Niggersauce]

Pic related:

Best poster here..
Fuckin epic

 

[KTULU IS BACK]

But here is a link for African Americans who believe in Evolution.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race,_Evolution,_and_Behavior

A small number of white supremacists try to use science to support their racism.

But they fail.

Evolution proves that we are all human beings, virtually genetically identical.

So your point is moot, bruh.

 

[Stack Money]

Stack, what's wrong being a blk atheist? Is that a disgrace or something?

Nah just means you ain't a real nigga, bein a atheist is white folk shit b.

For Steve Harvey and many other false prophets, this is their God.

Thats that money I be stackin

 

[The_Introvert]

A small number of white supremacists try to use science to support their racism.

But they fail.

Evolution proves that we are all human beings, virtually genetically identical.

So your point is moot, bruh.

I think thats why alot of niggas don't fuck wit evolution like that. Niggas misinterpret human variation for racial superiority and it got em shook.....

cause aint no such things as a halfway homosapiens......

....scared to death and scared to look.

 

[DarcSkies]

Nah just means you ain't a real nigga, bein a atheist is white folk shit b.

Thats that money I be stackin

“It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God” (Matthew 19:24)

 

[Disciplined InSight]

FIRST: Religious humanists regard the universe as self-existing and not created.

SECOND: Humanism believes that man is a part of nature and that he has emerged as a result of a continuous process.

THIRD: Holding an organic view of life, humanists find that the traditional dualism of mind and body must be rejected.

FOURTH: Humanism recognizes that man's religious culture and civilization, as clearly depicted by anthropology and history, are the product of a gradual development due to his interaction with his natural environment and with his social heritage. The individual born into a particular culture is largely molded by that culture.

FIFTH: Humanism asserts that the nature of the universe depicted by modern science makes unacceptable any supernatural or cosmic guarantees of human values. Obviously humanism does not deny the possibility of realities as yet undiscovered, but it does insist that the way to determine the existence and value of any and all realities is by means of intelligent inquiry and by the assessment of their relations to human needs. Religion must formulate its hopes and plans in the light of the scientific spirit and method.

SIXTH: We are convinced that the time has passed for theism, deism, modernism, and the several varieties of "new thought".

SEVENTH: Religion consists of those actions, purposes, and experiences which are humanly significant. Nothing human is alien to the religious. It includes labor, art, science, philosophy, love, friendship, recreation--all that is in its degree expressive of intelligently satisfying human living. The distinction between the sacred and the secular can no longer be maintained.

EIGHTH: Religious Humanism considers the complete realization of human personality to be the end of man's life and seeks its development and fulfillment in the here and now. This is the explanation of the humanist's social passion.

NINTH: In the place of the old attitudes involved in worship and prayer the humanist finds his religious emotions expressed in a heightened sense of personal life and in a cooperative effort to promote social well-being.

TENTH: It follows that there will be no uniquely religious emotions and attitudes of the kind hitherto associated with belief in the supernatural.

ELEVENTH: Man will learn to face the crises of life in terms of his knowledge of their naturalness and probability. Reasonable and manly attitudes will be fostered by education and supported by custom. We assume that humanism will take the path of social and mental hygiene and discourage sentimental and unreal hopes and wishful thinking.

TWELFTH: Believing that religion must work increasingly for joy in living, religious humanists aim to foster the creative in man and to encourage achievements that add to the satisfactions of life.

THIRTEENTH: Religious humanism maintains that all associations and institutions exist for the fulfillment of human life. The intelligent evaluation, transformation, control, and direction of such associations and institutions with a view to the enhancement of human life is the purpose and program of humanism. Certainly religious institutions, their ritualistic forms, ecclesiastical methods, and communal activities must be reconstituted as rapidly as experience allows, in order to function effectively in the modern world.

FOURTEENTH: The humanists are firmly convinced that existing acquisitive and profit-motivated society has shown itself to be inadequate and that a radical change in methods, controls, and motives must be instituted. A socialized and cooperative economic order must be established to the end that the equitable distribution of the means of life be possible. The goal of humanism is a free and universal society in which people voluntarily and intelligently cooperate for the common good. Humanists demand a shared life in a shared world.

FIFTEENTH AND LAST: We assert that humanism will: (a) affirm life rather than deny it; (b) seek to elicit the possibilities of life, not flee from them; and (c) endeavor to establish the conditions of a satisfactory life for all, not merely for the few. By this positive morale and intention humanism will be guided, and from this perspective and alignment the techniques and efforts of humanism will flow.

this is humanism not atheism

Wrong...even though you have religious humanism and secular humanism, both reject the reference to a Creator. No difference. It's obvious you don't know the true origin of the word "atheist" and what it really means.

 

[KTULU IS BACK]

Atheist comes from the Greek "atheos" which means an evil person.

Just another example of religious intolerance and bigotry toward people with other points of view.

 

[Elle_Music]

I just want to know what kind of evidence, or what would it take period for a theist, christian or otherwise, to believe that there is no "God"

 

[thedesolateone]

Wrong...even though you have religious humanism and secular humanism, both reject the reference to a Creator. No difference. It's obvious you don't know the true origin of the word "atheist" and what it really means.

it means a person doesnt have a belief in any god:no more no less
real simple

 

[S2J]

Wait...

This thread still goin????

lmaoooooo

DEAD

 

[Disciplined InSight]

Atheist comes from the Greek "atheos" which means without God.

Just another example of religious intolerance and bigotry toward people with other points of view.

Fixed that for you..

 

[KTULU IS BACK]

You're actually right about something for once, Disciplined. My mistake.

See? See how easy it is to just admit when you're wrong about something?

Where'd my moral sensibility to do that come from without religion?

 

[Disciplined InSight]

it means a person doesnt have a belief in any god:no more no less
real simple

Atheist comes from the Greek "atheos" which means without God.

................................

 

[Disciplined InSight]

You're actually right about something for once, Disciplined. My mistake.

See? See how easy it is to just admit when you're wrong about something?

Where'd my moral sensibility to do that come from without religion?

It's just one thing: I never, NEVER said you were evil or anybody else on here in that stance.

Don't pin that lie on me.

 

[KTULU IS BACK]

The modern meaning of the word atheist doesn't have to be identical to its centuries-old original meaning, btw.

Language evolves.

 

[Disciplined InSight]

The modern meaning of the word atheist doesn't have to be identical to its centuries-old original meaning, btw.

Language evolves.

What about words like amoral, atypical, asymmetrical etc which follows and uses the same original root meaning? You can't just change it the way you want to see it regards of language evolution. If that's the case by your logic, then why the aforementioned words still originates with the same original "centuries-old" root?

 

[KTULU IS BACK]

if words come from other words, why we still got words?

lol

 

[Disciplined InSight]

if words come from other words, why we still got words?

lol

The original root meaning is Greek and it still stands as "without God".. You can play the language game all you want, but the origin of it still rings true regardless of the "modern meaning".

One of my main points of contention with the "absence of belief" position is that one would have had to have no contact with any theist to truly not have any beliefs about God. After just one such interaction, the atheist would have started to form beliefs in relation to the existence/ nonexistence of God, and once the atheist begins to examine the evidence, beliefs would exist.

Atheists also state that the "absence of belief" claim means that atheism is the "default" position. If a person "has no beliefs," or if the theist doesn't present convincing evidence, then atheism wins by default. When Antony Flew used the term "negative atheist" in a debate with theologian Terry Miethe, this was Mr. Meithe's response:

…the "negative atheist" ends up denying God's existence just as much as the "positive atheist." For the believer (and in reality) to deny the idea of God is to deny the actual existence of God no matter what language game you want to play. Remember, Hans Kung is quite correct in pointing out that there is also an "atheistic language game" that is not self-justified…We must not---cannot---arbitrarily "define" out of existence vast ranges of reality simply because they do not meet our predetermined definition. It is not good enough to say that I have no idea of God therefore I am denying nothing about "his" actual existence. You must examine all of reality and answer or explain why millions have had what they thought was an adequate idea or concept of God, from great philosophers to the "common folk."

Continue to play the language game...it won't change anything.

 

[KTULU IS BACK]

I don't really know what you're arguing about. Atheist comes from atheos. This does not mean we use the word in 2011 the exact same way Greeks used it centuries ago. In fact, you'd have to be an idiot to believe that.

And since you've repeatedly shown yourself to be an idiot in this thread, I think that's the correct conclusion.

Cool unsourced copy/paste job from other forums though, bro.

 

[thedesolateone]

................................

these dots were useless by the way.did you have a point?