Steve Harvey takes an L (along with most of you people)

[KTULU IS BACK]

if any people all came together, they could rule the world as one. Like the white people do.

Maybe you're just joking, but I think you know that white nations are in conflict just as much as anybody else.

You constantly hear American whites talking about how they beat the Germans. The Irish and the English don't get along. The French offend everybody. The Russians scare everybody. Nobody likes the Italians.

 

[politicalthug202]

this thread was hilarious.lol Im staying outof this religous is worse than politics.

 

[glowy]

I voted for the third option. :0

 

[Sovo_Nah]

This isn't correct.

The dehumanization of blacks was not in full effect until North American slavery had been going on for over a hundred years. Before that, Irish and Norwegians were also enslaved here. And slavery ended altogether in the 1860's, so that's only a hypothetical 200 years where black people were considered farm equipment. Still too long, but not 5 centuries.

Does this mean we should already believe that they flew? No.

This is called the "No True Scottsman" fallacy.

You're saying that members of (whatever group) wouldn't do such a thing. Then a member of that group DOES do it. Then you say "Well... he's not a REAL member of that group."

You're moving the goalposts.

Do you honestly believe that a guy can't believe in a god and also want to fuck some dudes? Because there suuuuuuure are a lot of these preachers out here trying to get some male ass. And there always have been, if you study your history. It might even be that religious leaders are MORE likely to be gay.

fuck you talkin bout willis?

when the whites were so-called "slaves" they were, in fact, "indentured servants." Know anything about them peoples? well, they choose to come over, work for a master for 7 years, which was on a contract, then they were free. they women didnt work the fields nor did the children.dey chirren got ta be's edjamacated. it was written. and most of those people were able to own their own plantations after their contract was up. Why? well, cuz they aint know nothing else but to tend cotton/tobacco so what else was they pose to do? they because competition.

Now lets look at black people. they came over by no choice of their own. their slavery contract was for life ESSA! the master owned every offspring and because the women were black and not white, they were able to work in the fields because they werent weak little bitches but STRONG BLACK WOMEN. if they werent, then our ladies would not have been slaving outside in the hot sun from "nigga caint see in da mornins til nigguh kaint see @ nighs.

 

[MC The Rapper]

Ok, im eastside too. African-American even. You seem very passionate on this subject and topic so i just wanted to see where you were coming from. Literally. Dude, we know how and why we came to exist. It's no secret. But you have to have an education to find out. and if u dont have one, then you are relying on the news or celebrities to validate your beliefs because you arent gonna listen to any ol regular person because if he or she dont believe what you do, then well, thats the devil talking. Other than that, you listen to some person who is telling you that they are more special than you are because they were giving a "calling" by God to teach the masses. and they get paid to do it. If God called on me, my integrity would tell me to keep my day job and still spread my word. but do people do that? hell no! too much work lol

Believing in God is one thing, but getting hustled by a pimp who calls himself a pastor is another. That muthafucka aint no special than anybody in this world and you people are stuck. you gotta believe his hype. you gotta dispute the people who are your people but you dont fuck with everyone else. yall dont say shit to the native americans. yall dont say shit to the jews. yall dont say shit to the asians. but yall fight the muslims because they bullshit is more far-fetched than yours.

yes, it does keep people separated. thats the point. if any people all came together, they could rule the world as one. Like the white people do.

but no. yall christians, a-rabs, muslims, jews, democrats, republicans, gays, puerto ricans, aztecs, new yawkers, bostonians, west coast, southerners, ect ect........

no way everyone gonna get on the same page. and its by design. meaning, its like that on purpose.

confusion, misinformation, misdirection are tools used by the skilled. tactics that have been used threw out history and still by the looks of this thread are effective. You have to develop your own belief

system ,you have to do your own research. Going off the knowledge of consensus is not a good thing no matter what you believe. You look at both sides of an agrument , gathering intel, and

then make your own personal decision. Sometimes one side is right , Sometimes both sides are right , and other times both sides are wrong. It's for you to decide for yourself. I could give a fuck what

you believe in but i know what i believe in and i will continue to believe no matter what. My beliefs transcend a category or name.

 

[KTULU IS BACK]

Sovo Nah, you just happen to be wrong about that.

White minorities (those used to exist back then) were actually enslave in the 1600's and enslaved for life. They would often band together with black slaves and escape from the plantation to go try and live with the Natives. Why would an indentured servant run off?

And by the same token, in that same century, some blacks were actually indentured servants and not slaves. They would finish their contract, go free with a bag of money, and start their own plantations and own their own slaves.

It was a weird time.

But remember this: throughout the world's history of slavery, religion has supported it 99% of the time.

 

[Lambent]

________________

Re post .

 

[MC The Rapper]

Sovo Nah, you just happen to be wrong about that.

White minorities (those used to exist back then) were actually enslave in the 1600's and enslaved for life. They would often band together with black slaves and escape from the plantation to go try and live with the Natives. Why would an indentured servant run off?

And by the same token, in that same century, some blacks were actually indentured servants and not slaves. They would finish their contract, go free with a bag of money, and start their own plantations and own their own slaves.

It was a weird time.

But remember this: throughout the world's history of slavery, religion has supported it 99% of the time.

nah i'm not wrong when i sit at lunch counter in mostly white establishment and they look at me like i just raped three white women and interupted taylor swift during a long winded speech in 2011 .

after paying 15 for some bland ass in north eastern ohio no less come on now. What up with that Ktulu why haven't evolved some sense of tolerance.

 

[FieldTripsToTheHood]

This is explained in the video in the first post.

Evolution.

You can read all about it, but that would take a small amount of effort, so I figure you're not going to do it.

There are billions upon billions of planets. Just out of sheer statistical probability, millions of them are going to have enough atomic material (hydrogen and carbon, extremely common stuff) to form the bonds that are the chemical basis of DNA. Earth is a planet like this.

All the life on this planet shares common DNA.

These are taxonomic classifications (names) we gave to these animals. The reason they form differently is due to genetic differences and natural selection pressures.

Well, from the questions you've asked, it seems like you haven't even heard of the most basic things about biology.

Dang..I'm on page2.....I'm still reading but I had to pause and recognize the sonning that is progress right now....I can't wait to see how this dude plays this after getting categorically sonned like this.

edit.....the lack of quotes make it seem like I'm saying Ktulu is the one getting sonned.....Ktulu is the one thats straight killing em right now.

 

[KTULU IS BACK]

I feel bad for anybody who lives in Ohio, white or black.

 

[MC The Rapper]

I feel bad for anybody who lives in Ohio, white or black.

wait a minute don't you live in Seattle. Any time i refer to slavery i mean in america during the 16th.

 

[KTULU IS BACK]

Cleveland is the city... Cleveland is the city... Cleveland is the city where we dumb dumb...

[video=youtube;G1U2d9_TlCY]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1U2d9_TlCY[/video]

 

[KTULU IS BACK]

wait a minute don't you live in Seattle

Seattle's very nice compared to where I'm at. I live on an Indian reservation in the desert on the east side of the state.

 

[FieldTripsToTheHood]

this is appropriate for this thread....

 

[MC The Rapper]

Cleveland is the city... Cleveland is the city... Cleveland is the city where we dumb dumb...

[video=youtube;G1U2d9_TlCY]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1U2d9_TlCY[/video]

hold on pussy , don't talk side ways about my city because of my lackluster agrument over something i deem as trivial but i'm doing for the entertainment of .

 

[KTULU IS BACK]

hold on pussy , don't talk side ways about my city because of my lackluster agrument over something i deem as trivial but i'm doing for the entertainment of .

Your city has been a disintegrating shithole for 20 years.

Deny that.

 

[Sovo_Nah]

Sovo Nah, you just happen to be wrong about that.

White minorities (those used to exist back then) were actually enslave in the 1600's and enslaved for life. They would often band together with black slaves and escape from the plantation to go try and live with the Natives. Why would an indentured servant run off?

And by the same token, in that same century, some blacks were actually indentured servants and not slaves. They would finish their contract, go free with a bag of money, and start their own plantations and own their own slaves.

It was a weird time.

But remember this: throughout the world's history of slavery, religion has supported it 99% of the time.

1600's, thats when it started to take off. Im not as brilliant as you may think to make up what ive said in my last post. its written. it happened. happened just as i posted it did. wasnt possible for them to be enslaved for life. Why? because they WEREN'T!!!! WE WERE!!! why (here i go reverting back to slave mode) why come dems peoples aint have ta fight fo dey civil rights wit us black folk? those whites eventually intergrated. then they said "fuck it. i got mine." they got some racism, but at the end of the day, they were still white and that gave them a pass. no matter how bad it was for them, it was nothing compared to what the Afrikans had to deal with. unless they tried to help the Black people. then they got it too.

that topic can be a whole new thread. all the dirty whites were able to assimulate into white society. they mixed well. Blacks, not so much. we've been climbing ever since 1865. Then when we make it, we dont look back. some do, but most dont.

History is my life. i know what the fuck im talking about. u need to stop disputing on the IC so much and spend some more time google searching. if u gonna play a racist and stick to your guns of daily putting black people down on a message board, then, gets some more facts. If your purpose is to educate us, then, well, do as your current president is advising and become a teacher (to better serve your country) because doing it here is a waste of time and and isnt really benefiting anyone and also, wasting your talents.

why do it for free? The American way is to find something that people will pay you for and capitalize. fuc yu doin? ruffling feathers? lol getting people mad on the internets is your schick? do you. im just sayin.

 

[Disciplined InSight]

I guess you haven't heard this about that book:

"Beware, this is a discredited source, and at the very best, its disputed, and no serious historian relies on this information. After WW2, there was much embarassment over Hitler being a Christian and supported by the Christians and the Catholic and Protestant Churches. Lo and behold, we have this book, of "secret" conversations, which is where we get all the these anti-Christian quotes. Its usually published as "Hitler's Table Talk", and is an exclusively hearsay compilation of "private" conversations in which Hitler was supposedly warned beforehand that everything he said would be recorded for posterity, yet he lowered his guard and supposedly revealed his true feelings anyway. Naturally, these feelings contrast violently with other public and private speeches or conversations, and mysteriously enough, no original documents or recordings can be found (see the excellent discussion of this
book at [...]). Another over-used source is Hermann Rauschning's "The Voice of Destruction: Hitler Speaks", which was already so heavily quoted by 1945 that it was explicitly mentioned and dismissed in OSS documents because of its unreliable nature. In fact, May 1983, Swiss historian Wolfgang Haenel formally gathered together all of the criticisms of Rauschning's book and resoundingly debunked it at a presentation at the annual conference of the Ingolstadt Contemporary History Research Center, showing (among other things) that Hitler was not physically present at the times and places indicated, and that the financially desperate Rauschning was paid a staggering sum of money to produce the book by French and American sources who wished to use it as propaganda. "

and:

"Those who deny Hitler as a Christian will invariably find the recorded table talk conversations of Hitler from 1941 to 1944 as incontrovertible evidence that he could not have been a Christian. The source usually comes from the English translation (from a French translation) edition by Norman Cameron and R. H. Stevens, with an introduction by H.R. Trevor-Roper.

The table-talk has Hitler saying such things such as: "I shall never come to terms with the Christian lie. . .", "Our epoch will certainly see the end of the disease of Christianity".

The problem with these anti-Christian quotes is that the German text of the table-talk does not include them, they were made up by François Genoud, the translator of the French version, the very version that English translations rely on!"

http://www.amazon.com/Hitlers-Secret-Conversations-1941-1944-Hitler/dp/B000CBOR6K
http://www.nobeliefs.com/HitlerSources.htm
http://ffrf.org/legacy/fttoday/2002/nov02/carrier.php

Yeah..you would use atheistic resources to have a stance against your claim. This doesn't rebunk jack.

Even though those military's belt buckles said "Gott mit uns" ("God is with us") the SS were supposedly forbidden to believe in God.

Jehuda Bauer, Professor of Holocaust Studies at Hebrew University in Jerusalem, describes the real "god" of Hitler and the Nazis in his article, "The Trauma of the Holocaust: Some Historical Perspectives," by saying: ""They wanted to go back to a pagan world, beautiful, naturalistic, where natural hierarchies based on the supremacy of the strong would be established, because strong equaled good, powerful equaled civilized. The world did have a kind of God, the merciless God of nature, the brutal God of races, the oppressive God of hierarchies." In other words, definitely non-Christian.

He used Christianity as a smokescreen to commit the atrocities we come to known..he wanted to be "a god" amongst his followers bottom line.
Sorry. Try again.

 

[FieldTripsToTheHood]

Your city has been a disintegrating shithole for 20 years.

Deny that.

LMAO....dayum....cot dayum.....after sonning everyone that came in here defending religion this dude goes ahead and shits on this man's city on some honest ether type shit.

FOF material thread IMO.

 

[Sovo_Nah]

LMAO....dayum....cot dayum.....after sonning everyone that came in here defending religion this dude goes ahead and shits on this man's city on some honest ether type shit.

FOF material thread IMO.

Let me spit a quote from the movie " Friday After Last."

GET OFF HIS DICK DAY DAY.