The Recipe
New member
I Am Jay Pee;8418002 said:Its cool, like BO3 gameplay better though
Dog shit vs horse shit pick your poison lol.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I Am Jay Pee;8418002 said:Its cool, like BO3 gameplay better though
achewon87;8417687 said:playmaker88;8417364 said:achewon87;8417351 said:Lou_Cypher;8417294 said:Played a little bit last night. Pretty dope. Im buying when it drops. Campaign is gonna be pretty insane i bet.
There will be no single player campaign or story mode, pretty much online MP or vs. Bots only...
huh
Star Wars: Battlefront will have AI-controlled enemies for single-player/co-op modes like Survival, but there won't be a proper single-player campaign for players to dig into. The reason for that, Electronic Arts Chief Operating Officer Peter Moore told Gamespot, is simple: Hardly anyone would bother playing it anyway.
Moore said decisions like this are made years in advance of a game's release, and that can sometimes lead to problems. "Between when a dev team starts work on a game, and when it finishes, the world becomes a different place. I remember when we started work on Star Wars: The Old Republic; at the time, the model to go for was subscription," he explained. "By the time we had the game ready, the model to go for wasn't subscriptions. That's why we had to stop the game, and rebuilt it as a free-to-play title with microtransactions, but even then there were some people who said they wanted to keep their subscriptions."
Responding to the suggestion that 'triple-A' games like Star Wars: Battlefront "traditionally" sell better with a single-player campaign than without, Moore said "you might be right," but that "very few people actually play the single-player on these kinds of games. That's what the data points to."
EA has said in the past that Star Wars: Battlefront was intended to be a multiplayer game right from the start, but I think this is the first time that anyone has been so open as to exactly why that is. Do you agree? Numbers don't lie, as they say, but would the presence of a single-player campaign make you more likely to buy the game? Or is the online action really where it's at?
http://www.pcgamer.com/ea-skipped-star-wars-battlefront-campaign-because-nobody-would-play-it/
AP21;8418053 said:achewon87;8417959 said:Lou_Cypher;8417948 said:achewon87;8417351 said:Lou_Cypher;8417294 said:Played a little bit last night. Pretty dope. Im buying when it drops. Campaign is gonna be pretty insane i bet.
There will be no single player campaign or story mode, pretty much online MP or vs. Bots only...
Sir, that is a real bummer.
Cosign...
EA fucked up...
you can look at it as they fucked up or they saved themselves and all the backlash and criticism from fanboys if they made some half assed attempt at a story.
I like Titanfall that there is really no story in the traditional sense, but the "single player" stuff they offer is just a glorified tutorial for the MP matches
DWO;8418421 said:Nigga i literallyliterally jumped up when we took a walker down
CashmoneyDux;8418465 said:DWO;8418421 said:Nigga i literallyliterally jumped up when we took a walker down
Being the rebels on Walker assault is an uphill battle
iron man1;8419008 said:The character movements look really clunky
DWO;8418131 said:So yea I suck
2/12 first game
4/9 second game,
Niggaz killing the fuck outta me
AP21;8417104 said:I thought the visuals were pretty damn good tbh. The environment alone was very interesting, BUT, i wasnt impressed with the gameplay in my short time of playing. Gonna try and play some more this weekend, but initially, i wasnt blown away or anything.