So, uhh.. was 9/11 an inside job or nah?

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
Cain;8360168 said:
Knock_Twice;8360034 said:
a few questions I have

1. Let's say that the gov't did do this, this gives Bush and company to invade into Iraq and do what again? (I assume to overtake oil) but more specifically what was his/their purpose?

2. Let's say that the gov't did do this, What was the purpose for this action, I assume a distraction to get the American ppl to shift towards what again?

3. Let's say that if 9/11 wouldn't have happen, would we still be able to invade Iraq? What kind of shape would the world be, assuming Bin Laden and company wouldn't be a target etc..What kind of state would America be in...Did we gain anything from 9/11 as a country?

@xxCivicxx - I'm not disputing your claims, cuz you presented some good information, that made me dive deep into thought, but those questions that I posted are still unanswered for me..

@anyone

1. Oil means more money. Saddam and company wanted to slow up oil production and run US oil companies out Iraq. Afghanistan was saying no to the placement of the oil and natural gas pipeline that the US was wanting to place in the country. After 911 all that changed US took over oil and Afghanistan pipelines were placed by US contractors

2. It's always about money.....always

3. They wouldve made a another bad guy if not for Hussein and Bin Laden. Dont forget Saddam was the homie when he was going at Iran. Soon as he smartened up he was the big bad man same for Bin Laden when he was waring with Russia. Who you think suppliesld both of those clowns with money and weapons?

American gained a bigger precense in the Middle East, more oil, and basically control over two countries.

America is trying to distance itself from foreign oil hence the shale oil arguments. We have become a bigger Oil producer than many and we also have a partner in Canada that gives us a lot of Oil. We don't even get a lot of oil from Iraq. Our presence was far more stable before the wars. Now we have ISIS.

gr-oilprod-300.gif


 
Last edited:
Cain;8360528 said:
Jabu_Rule;8360485 said:
Cain;8360168 said:
Knock_Twice;8360034 said:
a few questions I have

1. Let's say that the gov't did do this, this gives Bush and company to invade into Iraq and do what again? (I assume to overtake oil) but more specifically what was his/their purpose?

2. Let's say that the gov't did do this, What was the purpose for this action, I assume a distraction to get the American ppl to shift towards what again?

3. Let's say that if 9/11 wouldn't have happen, would we still be able to invade Iraq? What kind of shape would the world be, assuming Bin Laden and company wouldn't be a target etc..What kind of state would America be in...Did we gain anything from 9/11 as a country?

@xxCivicxx - I'm not disputing your claims, cuz you presented some good information, that made me dive deep into thought, but those questions that I posted are still unanswered for me..

@anyone

1. Oil means more money. Saddam and company wanted to slow up oil production and run US oil companies out Iraq. Afghanistan was saying no to the placement of the oil and natural gas pipeline that the US was wanting to place in the country. After 911 all that changed US took over oil and Afghanistan pipelines were placed by US contractors

2. It's always about money.....always

3. They wouldve made a another bad guy if not for Hussein and Bin Laden. Dont forget Saddam was the homie when he was going at Iran. Soon as he smartened up he was the big bad man same for Bin Laden when he was waring with Russia. Who you think suppliesld both of those clowns with money and weapons?

American gained a bigger precense in the Middle East, more oil, and basically control over two countries.

America is trying to distance itself from foreign oil hence the shale oil arguments. We have become a bigger Oil producer than many and we also have a partner in Canada that gives us a lot of Oil. We don't even get a lot of oil from Iraq. Our presence was far more stable before the wars. Now we have ISIS.

gr-oilprod-300.gif

Lol at ISIS

Cs the rest,

Speak on your the ISIS statement. You saying Iraq is more stable than it was when Saddam was actually a United States Ally?
 
Knock_Twice;8360034 said:
a few questions I have

1. Let's say that the gov't did do this, this gives Bush and company to invade into Iraq and do what again? (I assume to overtake oil) but more specifically what was his/their purpose?

2. Let's say that the gov't did do this, What was the purpose for this action, I assume a distraction to get the American ppl to shift towards what again?

3. Let's say that if 9/11 wouldn't have happen, would we still be able to invade Iraq? What kind of shape would the world be, assuming Bin Laden and company wouldn't be a target etc..What kind of state would America be in...Did we gain anything from 9/11 as a country?

@xxCivicxx - I'm not disputing your claims, cuz you presented some good information, that made me dive deep into thought, but those questions that I posted are still unanswered for me..

@anyone

Are u serious with the first two questions?
 
Cain;8360555 said:
Jabu_Rule;8360537 said:
Cain;8360528 said:
Jabu_Rule;8360485 said:
Cain;8360168 said:
Knock_Twice;8360034 said:
a few questions I have

1. Let's say that the gov't did do this, this gives Bush and company to invade into Iraq and do what again? (I assume to overtake oil) but more specifically what was his/their purpose?

2. Let's say that the gov't did do this, What was the purpose for this action, I assume a distraction to get the American ppl to shift towards what again?

3. Let's say that if 9/11 wouldn't have happen, would we still be able to invade Iraq? What kind of shape would the world be, assuming Bin Laden and company wouldn't be a target etc..What kind of state would America be in...Did we gain anything from 9/11 as a country?

@xxCivicxx - I'm not disputing your claims, cuz you presented some good information, that made me dive deep into thought, but those questions that I posted are still unanswered for me..

@anyone

1. Oil means more money. Saddam and company wanted to slow up oil production and run US oil companies out Iraq. Afghanistan was saying no to the placement of the oil and natural gas pipeline that the US was wanting to place in the country. After 911 all that changed US took over oil and Afghanistan pipelines were placed by US contractors

2. It's always about money.....always

3. They wouldve made a another bad guy if not for Hussein and Bin Laden. Dont forget Saddam was the homie when he was going at Iran. Soon as he smartened up he was the big bad man same for Bin Laden when he was waring with Russia. Who you think suppliesld both of those clowns with money and weapons?

American gained a bigger precense in the Middle East, more oil, and basically control over two countries.

America is trying to distance itself from foreign oil hence the shale oil arguments. We have become a bigger Oil producer than many and we also have a partner in Canada that gives us a lot of Oil. We don't even get a lot of oil from Iraq. Our presence was far more stable before the wars. Now we have ISIS.

gr-oilprod-300.gif

Lol at ISIS

Cs the rest,

Speak on your the ISIS statement. You saying Iraq is more stable than it was when Saddam was actually a United States Ally?

Out of nowhere and I mean nowhere ISIS came up to be the deadliest terrorist organization in the world. They have supposedly trillions of dollars and their own navy army and air force out of nowhere. These niggas supposed to be COBRA from GI Joe now. Yet just 2yrs ago nobody heard of them. They roll into countries destroying shit killing innocent lives and US and allied forces fall back and say they'll let the other countries take care of them. YET when al qadia(sp) was strapping homemade bombs to themselves we sent Delta Force and 100k soldier's from different countries to kill them all lol.......think about it

Just remember this saying.........."the best way to hide something is to put it in plain sight"

They didn't come out of nowhere, they have been active sense the start of the Iraq War. They were also active in Syria. Their group was always more ruthless in those Iraqi streets. They are a direct offshoot of Al Qaeda, the group everybody keep sleeping on. It's like the Cali Cartel spinning off from the Mendelian Cartel and doing it better. It's like people are more willing to give credit for organizing groups to crackers like the Mafia than to Arabs\Persians, whom have run empires centuries longer than the white man's existence.

They also have the resources contained in the oil fields they captured which they are selling illegally to countries in Europe and Asia. They have backers from very wealthy countries including some in Saudi Arabia (don't think of that Country as unified when it comes to personal agendas). If the United States gets most of it's oil from elsewhere by an overwhelming amount and wants to pull out further with their own production and alternatives, then what is the point in creating ISIS? The United States have been aiding with Bombing campaigns btw, but don't act like the Citizens were eager to keep their kids over there for a cause they don't give a fuck about.
 
Last edited:
According to these kind of guys, Isis is new and was created after Bin Laden was killed, oh sorry, "killed", just so we can have another big bad wolf.

The conspiracy never dies, it keeps on rolling.
 
Knock_Twice;8360034 said:
a few questions I have

1. Let's say that the gov't did do this, this gives Bush and company to invade into Iraq and do what again? (I assume to overtake oil) but more specifically what was his/their purpose?

2. Let's say that the gov't did do this, What was the purpose for this action, I assume a distraction to get the American ppl to shift towards what again?

3. Let's say that if 9/11 wouldn't have happen, would we still be able to invade Iraq? What kind of shape would the world be, assuming Bin Laden and company wouldn't be a target etc..What kind of state would America be in...Did we gain anything from 9/11 as a country?

@xxCivicxx - I'm not disputing your claims, cuz you presented some good information, that made me dive deep into thought, but those questions that I posted are still unanswered for me..

@anyone

4 hijacked planes into buildings, without having to demo them, would've been enough for whatever agenda the government needed/wanted. Knocking them down intentionally with bombs wouldn't be necessary. People are just idiots and keep saying these things had to happen for them to do what they needed (war, oil, policies, laws etc)

Lames
 
"2 years ago 'nobody' knew who Isis was"

Nigga we talkin about a middle eastern terror threat not the gotdamn 2014 Best Album Grammy winner tha fuk is u talkin about???

As if any of us are in the know enough to know who's who in terror.
 
Last edited:
Imagine shooting somebody, they fall off a ten story building and hit a pedestrian below. Now imagine if the dude falling off the building was a 8 foot 300 pound man, lit up with a flame thrower, and he fell on a little old lady.
 
Last edited:
It wasnt only about oil and pipelines, but about the petrodollar... Saddam wanted to get rid of it and had the backing of other OPEC members and the EU, China and Russians were down with replacement of the petrodollar...Saddam wanted to get paid in Euros instead of dollars...

but nah, us government officials never fabricated evidence, what Colin Powel and co presented that famous night was all true. Right @S2J @vibe

if u dont know what the petrodollar is or why oil producing countries and the EU, China etc want(ed) to get rid of it, I suggest yall do some research.
 
It was about bushes daddy. That's all it came down to. That was a sloppy ass cover up if i ever saw one since they got exposed at every turn. They just didn't give a fuck at the end.
 
Last edited:
I dont know if wikileaks is blocked in the states or something but us government reps had direct contact and sponsored AQ pre and post 9-11...wikileaks went so deep that they even leaked prime minister Blair(uk)'s meetings with rd shell(oil company), pre iraq invasion. Thousands and thousands of convos of us government reps leaked.

the whitehouse wasnt behind 9-11, but Americans were involved in the attacks.

or is wikileaks fake? Made up all that shit?
 
HundredEyes;8361613 said:
I dont know if wikileaks is blocked in the states or something but us government reps had direct contact and sponsored AQ pre and post 9-11...wikileaks went so deep that they even leaked prime minister Blair(uk)'s meetings with rd shell(oil company), pre iraq invasion. Thousands and thousands of convos of us government reps leaked.

the whitehouse wasnt behind 9-11, but Americans were involved in the attacks.

or is wikileaks fake? Made up all that shit?

It's not blocked, so i would advise you to link to those documents for prudence. I'm sure Americans have been involved since a few people convicted of terrorism are were American.
 
Last edited:
And are we all just gonna ignore the hundreds of thousand PMC's that were stationed in Iraq and Afganistan? Who werent bound by any int. Law? Now war has evolved, fuckin drone warfare, US is bombing countries like Yemen and Pakistan without repurcussions...

I mean, they dont even need to colin powel, false flag shit anymore. The public/general consensus doesnt give a fuck, Obama aint explaining why they are droning the shit outta countries they arent officially in war with lmao.

so who won here? If I was part of a major pmc, on that metal gear 'big boss' shit...Id think Id won.

but nah, most people are to callow to comprehend that shit, dont think that there are PMC's out there that have done so much war(africa/middle east). That there are people out there that love war, its their world and for them attacking new york, the congo or iraq and shit but a tuesday.
 
HundredEyes;8361603 said:
It wasnt only about oil and pipelines, but about the petrodollar... Saddam wanted to get rid of it and had the backing of other OPEC members and the EU, China and Russians were down with replacement of the petrodollar...Saddam wanted to get paid in Euros instead of dollars...

but nah, us government officials never fabricated evidence, what Colin Powel and co presented that famous night was all true. Right @S2J @vibe

if u dont know what the petrodollar is or why oil producing countries and the EU, China etc want(ed) to get rid of it, I suggest yall do some research.

Very well said

I was gonna school these mental midgets @s2j and @vibe on the petrodollar and what it means for foreign countries to be OBLIGATED to buy oil using US dollars when I had enough time but you gave them tons of info to start with

Now it's time for them to stop being lazy and go learn something
 

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
840
Views
191
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…