So, uhh.. was 9/11 an inside job or nah?

[xxCivicxx]

The government would kill countless amounts of people to fuel their agenda. It's been done in numerous societies. Don't put ANYTHING past the govt. They plotted to kill a nonviolent civil rights leader. They brought in drugs to fuel a war that wasn't theirs that resulted in the crack epidemic. They injected syphilis into black men to just see what happens.

So you have no actual substance to add about THIS particular event...

But watch this!:

All the US' fuckery is covert and clandestine. Covert, clandestine

They gon try some slick shit (supplying crack) , hide some slick shit (Iran Contra), lie about some shit (WMDs) and/or take out ONE guy

It is not their modus operandi to make wholesale conspiracies with various moving parts, ACROSS multiple agencies, and in BROAD FUKING DAYLIGHT for all the world to see, let alone with thousands of casualties

And ahain there's that THEY again. Niggas dont know any better, but its basically IMPOSSIBLE to get multiple agencies working together, and let yall tell it military, FBI, local police, TSA, and the president of the united states all worked together. They are all in concert working as "the government "

Its truely comical

Exactly. The government has a HISTORY of committing criminal acts against its own ppl. Is it really that far fetched for them to stage a terrorist attack? The funny part is William Cooper PREDICTED the government would stage a attack using airliners prior to it 9/11, and he was eventually murdered. I just laugh at dumb niggaz that act like the government ain't capable of false flag events smh

See, this is what i mean. PLEASE READ:

Here is a transcript of EXACTLY what William Coper said , as well as the context:

Clifnotes: Bill Cooper did NOT predict 9/11. A report had just ran on Bin Laden (yes, he existed proor to 9/11, people knew who he was) and in THAT piece the reporter, based on,interviewing Bin Laden, says: within 3 weeks Bin Laden wil attack he US and Israel.

Cooper then piggybacks off that and says 'if it happens its 'awfully convenient " and OBL must

be a patsy. THAT is what he said. He opined based on an EXISTING report. Thats not a gotdamn prediction

Here's the transcript of Bill Cooper

[Spoiler ]

" Supposedly a CNN reporter found Osama bin Laden, took a television camera crew with him, went in to Osama bin laden's hideout, interviewed him and his top leadership, and he came out and told everybody 'within three weeks Osama bin laden is going to attack the United States and Israel.' Now don't you think that's kind of strange folks? You see because the largest intelligence apparatus in the world with the biggest budget in the history of the world has been looking for osama bin laden for years and years and years and can't find him. some doofus jerkoff reporter with a camera crew waltzes right into his hideout and interviews him and i'm telling you be prepared for a major attack , but it won't be osama bin laden, it will be those behind the new world order. I wonder what "osama bin laden's" targets are supposed to be? And if this doesn't materialize within the next 2-3 weeks it will eventually materialize because they haven't succeeded in getting the guns out of the hand of the American people, nor have they succeeded in taking our freedoms away. And so I can tell you with a certainty they must do something terrible in order to stop this backlash and regain the sympathy of the mass herds of sheeple out there. "

[/spoiler ]

Here's some digging someone did online, bc like i said none of this is new. This is the June 2001 article that has for 15 years made people think Bill Cooper "predicted" 9-11

Spoiler

It looks to me like he was referring to the Reuters article which appeared a few days prior, and in the process replaced MBC with CNN and 'atttack US and Israeli interests' with 'attack the US and Israel':
http://www.afghanistannewscenter.com/news/2001/june/jun...

TV Report: Bin Laden Fighters Plan Anti-US Attack

Saturday, June 23, 2001 5:46 PM EST

LONDON (Reuters) - Followers of exiled Saudi dissident Osama bin Laden are planning a major attack on U.S and Israeli interests in the next two weeks, the Arabic satellite television channel MBC reported on Saturday.

The station, monitored by the BBC, broadcast a report from a correspondent in the Pakistani town of Quetta, who said he had met bin Laden two days ago in Afghanistan.

The MBC correspondent said he had met bin Laden at an unspecified location some three hours' drive from the Afghan city of Kandahar. He had also talked with some of bin Laden's followers.

``All of them affirm that the next two weeks will witness a big surprise. A severe blow is expected against U.S. and Israeli interests worldwide,'' the reporter said.[/spoiler ]

Also, as we now now, reports in the intelligence community came out in June that Bin Laden was 'poised to attack the US' . Clinton the NIGHT BEFORE 9/11 spoke about Bin Laden, as if he was asked about him. Bin Laden was 'trending' . He did not drop into the equation overnight

Bill Cooper was not a threat. He was killed over sme OTHER shit , he was a gun enthusiast who bucked when they served a warrant on him and he got killed

I just killed the fuck outta your little conspiracy theory patron saint.

Spoiler

Huh? Yo, stop embarrassing yourself


Listen to the man's words and make your own decision

 

[VIBE]

He didn't predict it though lol he made a generalization.

 

[brown321]

The feds were involved in some way, but a plane hit the Pentagon homies.

It makes no sense to use planes in all the other attacks and claim one hit the Pentagon & then use something else.

I do want to know how planes can turn 220 floors into powder tho.

 

[xxCivicxx]

He didn't predict it though lol he made a generalization.

At a time when 99% of america had no idea who osama bin laden was?

 

[brown321]

And that bill copper dude is right. CNN could find this nigga, but the CIA can't find him? You have to be the ultimate idiot to believe that shit.

It's more likely the planes were holograms them not knowing where usama was at

 

[wAXed_poetic]

Theory is on some other shit. Very interesting if you make the time

 

[VIBE]

He didn't predict it though lol he made a generalization.

At a time when 99% of america had no idea who osama bin laden was?

That's like me saying "Isis will carry out a successful terrorist attack on U.S. soil and it will be bigger than 9/11."

Then fast forward some time and it happens.

It's too broad of a statement. Of course he was going to be right at some point.

 

[VIBE]

And who gives a shit if Americans knew of him or not, the fact is he did, it's his fucking life to know this type of shit. (or was his life.)

 

[blackamerica]

He didn't predict it though lol he made a generalization.

Watch the video. The proof is there. You dumb niggaz looking real sloppy right now

 

[VIBE]

He said Obama will attack the U.S.

That's pretty much the gist of it. He never predicted 9/11.

Stop.

 

[VIBE]

The government would kill countless amounts of people to fuel their agenda. It's been done in numerous societies. Don't put ANYTHING past the govt. They plotted to kill a nonviolent civil rights leader. They brought in drugs to fuel a war that wasn't theirs that resulted in the crack epidemic. They injected syphilis into black men to just see what happens.

So you have no actual substance to add about THIS particular event...

But watch this!:

All the US' fuckery is covert and clandestine. Covert, clandestine

They gon try some slick shit (supplying crack) , hide some slick shit (Iran Contra), lie about some shit (WMDs) and/or take out ONE guy

It is not their modus operandi to make wholesale conspiracies with various moving parts, ACROSS multiple agencies, and in BROAD FUKING DAYLIGHT for all the world to see, let alone with thousands of casualties

And ahain there's that THEY again. Niggas dont know any better, but its basically IMPOSSIBLE to get multiple agencies working together, and let yall tell it military, FBI, local police, TSA, and the president of the united states all worked together. They are all in concert working as "the government "

Its truely comical

Exactly. The government has a HISTORY of committing criminal acts against its own ppl. Is it really that far fetched for them to stage a terrorist attack? The funny part is William Cooper PREDICTED the government would stage a attack using airliners prior to it 9/11, and he was eventually murdered. I just laugh at dumb niggaz that act like the government ain't capable of false flag events smh

See, this is what i mean. PLEASE READ:

Here is a transcript of EXACTLY what William Coper said , as well as the context:

Clifnotes: Bill Cooper did NOT predict 9/11. A report had just ran on Bin Laden (yes, he existed proor to 9/11, people knew who he was) and in THAT piece the reporter, based on,interviewing Bin Laden, says: within 3 weeks Bin Laden wil attack he US and Israel.

Cooper then piggybacks off that and says 'if it happens its 'awfully convenient " and OBL must

be a patsy. THAT is what he said. He opined based on an EXISTING report. Thats not a gotdamn prediction

Here's the transcript of Bill Cooper

[Spoiler ]

" Supposedly a CNN reporter found Osama bin Laden, took a television camera crew with him, went in to Osama bin laden's hideout, interviewed him and his top leadership, and he came out and told everybody 'within three weeks Osama bin laden is going to attack the United States and Israel.' Now don't you think that's kind of strange folks? You see because the largest intelligence apparatus in the world with the biggest budget in the history of the world has been looking for osama bin laden for years and years and years and can't find him. some doofus jerkoff reporter with a camera crew waltzes right into his hideout and interviews him and i'm telling you be prepared for a major attack , but it won't be osama bin laden, it will be those behind the new world order. I wonder what "osama bin laden's" targets are supposed to be? And if this doesn't materialize within the next 2-3 weeks it will eventually materialize because they haven't succeeded in getting the guns out of the hand of the American people, nor have they succeeded in taking our freedoms away. And so I can tell you with a certainty they must do something terrible in order to stop this backlash and regain the sympathy of the mass herds of sheeple out there. "

[/spoiler ]

Here's some digging someone did online, bc like i said none of this is new. This is the June 2001 article that has for 15 years made people think Bill Cooper "predicted" 9-11

Spoiler

It looks to me like he was referring to the Reuters article which appeared a few days prior, and in the process replaced MBC with CNN and 'atttack US and Israeli interests' with 'attack the US and Israel':
http://www.afghanistannewscenter.com/news/2001/june/jun...

TV Report: Bin Laden Fighters Plan Anti-US Attack

Saturday, June 23, 2001 5:46 PM EST

LONDON (Reuters) - Followers of exiled Saudi dissident Osama bin Laden are planning a major attack on U.S and Israeli interests in the next two weeks, the Arabic satellite television channel MBC reported on Saturday.

The station, monitored by the BBC, broadcast a report from a correspondent in the Pakistani town of Quetta, who said he had met bin Laden two days ago in Afghanistan.

The MBC correspondent said he had met bin Laden at an unspecified location some three hours' drive from the Afghan city of Kandahar. He had also talked with some of bin Laden's followers.

``All of them affirm that the next two weeks will witness a big surprise. A severe blow is expected against U.S. and Israeli interests worldwide,'' the reporter said.[/spoiler ]

Also, as we now now, reports in the intelligence community came out in June that Bin Laden was 'poised to attack the US' . Clinton the NIGHT BEFORE 9/11 spoke about Bin Laden, as if he was asked about him. Bin Laden was 'trending' . He did not drop into the equation overnight

Bill Cooper was not a threat. He was killed over sme OTHER shit , he was a gun enthusiast who bucked when they served a warrant on him and he got killed

I just killed the fuck outta your little conspiracy theory patron saint.

Spoiler

^ destroys the "he predicted 9/11" bullshit

 

[blackamerica]

He didn't predict it though lol he made a generalization.

At a time when 99% of america had no idea who osama bin laden was?

That's like me saying "Isis will carry out a successful terrorist attack on U.S. soil and it will be bigger than 9/11."

Then fast forward some time and it happens.

It's too broad of a statement. Of course he was going to be right at some point.

Stop backpeddling

Nobody knew who Bin Laden was at the time. Yet his name was mentioned 3 weeks prior to the biggest terrorist attack in American history?

 

[Jabu_Rule]

He didn't predict it though lol he made a generalization.

At a time when 99% of america had no idea who osama bin laden was?

That's like me saying "Isis will carry out a successful terrorist attack on U.S. soil and it will be bigger than 9/11."

Then fast forward some time and it happens.

It's too broad of a statement. Of course he was going to be right at some point.

Stop backpeddling

Nobody knew who Bin Laden was at the time. Yet his name was mentioned 3 weeks prior to the biggest terrorist attack in American history?

He was very known because he actually was successful in attacking a Navy ship in 2000, and two US embassies in 98. He was also on the Radar of the government because of the original 93 WTC attack that failed to bring down the buildings even though they actually did explode the bomb in the foundation.

 

[xxCivicxx]

He didn't predict it though lol he made a generalization.

At a time when 99% of america had no idea who osama bin laden was?

That's like me saying "Isis will carry out a successful terrorist attack on U.S. soil and it will be bigger than 9/11."

Then fast forward some time and it happens.

It's too broad of a statement. Of course he was going to be right at some point.

Stop backpeddling

Nobody knew who Bin Laden was at the time. Yet his name was mentioned 3 weeks prior to the biggest terrorist attack in American history?

He was very known because he actually was successful in attacking a Navy ship in 2000, and two US embassies in 98. He was also on the Radar of the government because of the original 93 WTC attack that failed to bring down the buildings even though they actually did explode the bomb in the foundation.

So if this is the case then why wasn't he being monitored more closely in order to prevent another attack since he'd been so successful in the past? Apparently he'd committed multiple terrorist acts in the past but waited until 9/11 to deem him public enemy #1 of our time?

And no he was NOT known by the average american back then.

 

[Jabu_Rule]

He didn't predict it though lol he made a generalization.

At a time when 99% of america had no idea who osama bin laden was?

That's like me saying "Isis will carry out a successful terrorist attack on U.S. soil and it will be bigger than 9/11."

Then fast forward some time and it happens.

It's too broad of a statement. Of course he was going to be right at some point.

Stop backpeddling

Nobody knew who Bin Laden was at the time. Yet his name was mentioned 3 weeks prior to the biggest terrorist attack in American history?

He was very known because he actually was successful in attacking a Navy ship in 2000, and two US embassies in 98. He was also on the Radar of the government because of the original 93 WTC attack that failed to bring down the buildings even though they actually did explode the bomb in the foundation.

So if this is the case then why wasn't he being monitored more closely in order to prevent another attack since he'd been so successful in the past? Apparently he'd committed multiple terrorist acts in the past but waited until 9/11 to deem him public enemy #1 of our time?

And no he was NOT known by the average american back then.

The question was, why was he mentioned when he wasn't on anybodies Radar? That statement was false. Most of his activity happened under Bill Clinton, whom wasn't in the habit of invading countries to get to people unless it was UN sanctioned. A lot of Warhawks weren't thrilled with his response.

 

[xxCivicxx]

He didn't predict it though lol he made a generalization.

At a time when 99% of america had no idea who osama bin laden was?

That's like me saying "Isis will carry out a successful terrorist attack on U.S. soil and it will be bigger than 9/11."

Then fast forward some time and it happens.

It's too broad of a statement. Of course he was going to be right at some point.

Stop backpeddling

Nobody knew who Bin Laden was at the time. Yet his name was mentioned 3 weeks prior to the biggest terrorist attack in American history?

He was very known because he actually was successful in attacking a Navy ship in 2000, and two US embassies in 98. He was also on the Radar of the government because of the original 93 WTC attack that failed to bring down the buildings even though they actually did explode the bomb in the foundation.

So if this is the case then why wasn't he being monitored more closely in order to prevent another attack since he'd been so successful in the past? Apparently he'd committed multiple terrorist acts in the past but waited until 9/11 to deem him public enemy #1 of our time?

And no he was NOT known by the average american back then.

The question was, why was he mentioned when he wasn't on anybodies Radar? That statement was false. Most of his activity happened under Bill Clinton, whom wasn't in the habit of invading countries to get to people unless it was UN sanctioned. A lot of Warhawks weren't thrilled with his response.

Ok so then if he was on people's radar back then then why were news stations able to find him and interview him yet the US government couldn't find him to bring him to justice for his multiple terrorist acts?

 

[S2J]

He didn't predict it though lol he made a generalization.

At a time when 99% of america had no idea who osama bin laden was?

That's like me saying "Isis will carry out a successful terrorist attack on U.S. soil and it will be bigger than 9/11."

Then fast forward some time and it happens.

It's too broad of a statement. Of course he was going to be right at some point.

Stop backpeddling

Nobody knew who Bin Laden was at the time. Yet his name was mentioned 3 weeks prior to the biggest terrorist attack in American history?

Wow

@blackamerica

Sir, you didnt read my post. Bill Cooper, in his "prediction" video, references a journalistic piece done on Osmaa Bin Laden a few days before, and in that piece, based on interviewing Bin Laden, the journalist says: Bin Laden will attack in 3 weeks

Bill Cooper's comments were piggybacking off of that piece.

Bin Laden was known. We later found Bush received a memo 'Bin Laden poised to attack' before 9/11 , Bill Clinton spoke on him the DAY before 9/11 in an interview (which implies he was ASKED about him)

I understand we all get into debate mode,where no wants to budge, but when you are WRONG, you are WRONG. Be a man and own it.

 

[VIBE]

"nobody knew who bin laden was"

not the average American, no, but he was known

you're a fucking idiot, though, don't reply to me anymore

 

[S2J]

"nobody knew who bin laden was"

not the average American, no, but he was known

you're a fucking idiot, though, don't reply to me anymore

That shit is hilarious. Like what does that even mean?!?!

A moot point anyway b 1)OBL was known in the IC---sorry, not Ill Communty, but Intelligence Community, and yes thats the actual terminology for those in the know, 2)Bill Cooper clearly was not the avg American in terms of international politics, and 3) I just proved above that he got OBL name from a journalistic piece days before his video, AND he was already familiar with him

 

[Jabu_Rule]

He didn't predict it though lol he made a generalization.

At a time when 99% of america had no idea who osama bin laden was?

That's like me saying "Isis will carry out a successful terrorist attack on U.S. soil and it will be bigger than 9/11."

Then fast forward some time and it happens.

It's too broad of a statement. Of course he was going to be right at some point.

Stop backpeddling

Nobody knew who Bin Laden was at the time. Yet his name was mentioned 3 weeks prior to the biggest terrorist attack in American history?

He was very known because he actually was successful in attacking a Navy ship in 2000, and two US embassies in 98. He was also on the Radar of the government because of the original 93 WTC attack that failed to bring down the buildings even though they actually did explode the bomb in the foundation.

So if this is the case then why wasn't he being monitored more closely in order to prevent another attack since he'd been so successful in the past? Apparently he'd committed multiple terrorist acts in the past but waited until 9/11 to deem him public enemy #1 of our time?

And no he was NOT known by the average american back then.

The question was, why was he mentioned when he wasn't on anybodies Radar? That statement was false. Most of his activity happened under Bill Clinton, whom wasn't in the habit of invading countries to get to people unless it was UN sanctioned. A lot of Warhawks weren't thrilled with his response.

Ok so then if he was on people's radar back then then why were news stations able to find him and interview him yet the US government couldn't find him to bring him to justice for his multiple terrorist acts?

Because, at that point, you would be invading a foreign land, and Bill Clinton wasn't about that. Remember, Bush requested that the Taliban hand over Osama and only invaded afterward they denied the request. The journalist wasn't a threat, and they go behind the lines all the time, at least until the terrorist started killing them.

You're talking about two different leaders in a post and pre 9\11 world. They handled things differently. Like i said, people weren't thrilled that Clinton didn't do more to capture him, and 9\11 eliminated all need for diplomacy at least when dealing with that particular target.