So, uhh.. was 9/11 an inside job or nah?

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
OhMars;7356952 said:
building7.gif
all three towers fell due to controlled demolition, tower 7 is just the most obvious one..

This one collapsed 7 or 8 hours later, but since the "terrorist attack" seed had been planted successfully they didn't bother to give people a decent legit explanation for its collapse

I'd sooner take a bullet between the eyes before I change my position on that

#insidejob
 
Last edited:
prove it was a controlled demo

you can't

I've tried it too..

the best 'evidence' they have for it is "plumes" coming from the building as it collapsed..

no thermite, no wires, no charges etc have ever been found or reported by the hundreds of volunteers who helped clean debris..
 
All I know is a building don't fall like that unless expert demonlation planned it to.

And we know damn well OBL didn't say let's knock down the twin towers and be carful not to fuck up the other buildings.
 
both towers collapsed at the point of impact..

why didn't the impact/explosion set off the charges?

you guys don't think of this shit
 
Shizlansky;7357670 said:
All I know is a building don't fall like that unless expert demonlation planned it to.

And we know damn well OBL didn't say let's knock down the twin towers and be carful not to fuck up the other buildings.

nope..

there's other buildings that have fallen to fire alone..

never had there been two jets going hundreds of mph, slamming into a building..

never

so you can't say this could never happen, bc it did.. u have nothing to compare it to..
 
A.J. Trillzynski;7357127 said:
blackamerica;7357088 said:
A.J. Trillzynski;7356796 said:
nope. I don't believe any of that conspiracy bullshit and if I ever had any doubts then for every single case or piece of 'evidence' that it was an inside job that can be presented there are at least 10x more legit sources and explanations to debunk that shit.

Debunk or throw out any piece of shit rebuttal you can think of?

-where is other footage from the pentagon crash?

-where is the fuckin plane from the pentagon crash?

-what the fuck was the Bin Laden family doing in America? And why we're they flown out the day of 9/11?

-was the Bin Laden family really in business w/ the Bush family?

-still haven't given a real rebuttal to how the towers fell that quickly. It was 100% accurate with how a controlled demolition looks.

These are only a few things. I can go on for days. If you think it wasn't a inside job, your prolly one of these dumb anti conspiracy ppl who will dismiss every conspiracy because you think it makes you look smart. Everything that's came out points back to the higher levels of the Bush administration

so I link you to legit rebuttals that offer a detailed answer to each of your questions and you just dismiss it as shit without any actual retort? and then post even more questions? yea I didn't see that coming.

look, I'm really over wasting my time with you people. believe what you want it if it gives you some meaning in your life or whatever.. obviously you get a kick out of believing this stuff and you're not willing to be open minded.

If you think it was a inside job, your prolly one of these dumb anti conspiracy ppl who will dismiss every conspiracy explanation because you think it makes you look smart.

you do you, it works both ways though

Dude stop. I read some of the bullshit you linked and it's just more finger pointing. Apparently, George Bush wasn't linked to the Bin Laden family, it was some guy named James Bath who was affiliated with both families? Gtfoh. This same nigga, accused by his business partner of funneling money into the Bush bank from the Saudi's. Is this debunking myths or throwing a bunch of shit at the wall hoping something sticks? I'm convinced you didn't even read those dumb azz links, you just came in here ready to debunk all the credible conspiracies that's been piling up against Bush and 9/11. Why the fuck was the Bin Laden family doing in the US around 9/11? If they truly didn't know, why did Condeleeza call that congressman and tell him not to get on the plane a day before? What about the witnesses popping up dead? Man you mine as well just stfu and sit down somewhere bro
 
Vibe look at that GIF.

It didn't/doesn't pass the eye test. Therefore I am inclined to believe any info supporting my initial beliefs
 
JokerKing;7357232 said:
We're talking thousands of civilians and government employees. You telling me nobody at all came through with the real story for what would be the biggest payday they've ever had????? Not one person in 13 years of all the people you had to keep quiet.

Where the fuck have you been? There have plenty of ppl that have come foward and to say it was a inside job. YOU just haven't been paying attention. There was this military guy who was writing books about Bush and 9/11 who mysteriously was murdered with his kids a few years ago. I can't remember his name but I'll look it up. But it's pointless to even bring it up to niggaz who don't even pay much attention to shit. A lot of ppl have popped up dead trying to expose 9/11. Do ur research

 
Trillfate;7357692 said:
Vibe look at that GIF.

It didn't/doesn't pass the eye test. Therefore I am inclined to believe any info supporting my initial beliefs

Oh well, since you use your eyes, this should be helpful
=UUdNkRyt3S0oTQQdzlKJtXyg

from video maker:

PLEASE NOTE: This video was made in September 2007. The official investigation into the collapse of WTC7 at this time was still ongoing and did its final report was not released until more than a year later, in December 2008.

Therefore, everything in this video was based on their working hypotheses at the time, and it should come as no surprise that when the investigation concluded, some of their findings varied from their early hypotheses (as in any investigation).

Namely, the claim in this video that the fires were "likely fed by a series of diesel generators" turned out not to be the case, and the hypothesis that the collapse started with Truss 1 was also incorrect.

The collapse actually started in the same vicinity only a few floors up, with the collapse of Column 79.

However, neither of these two greatly alter the overall conclusions for the mechanism of the collapse.

I would go in and make these changes in the video itself, but all the video's data was on an old computer that I got rid of literally years ago.
 
Shizlansky;7357718 said:
So y'all trust the same ppl that all made profit from the war?

Ok.

I believe in the evidence.

The evidence only points to govt is the 'LIHOP' theory, which is "let it happen on purpose", but no other hand was in on it; bomb, controlled planes, demo, fake calls etc.. (whatever else is included in ppls theories)
 
Last edited:
VIBE;7357722 said:
Shizlansky;7357718 said:
So y'all trust the same ppl that all made profit from the war?

Ok.

I believe in the evidence.

The evidence only points to govt is the 'LIHOP' theory, which is "let it happen on purpose", but no other hand was in on it; bomb, controlled planes, demo, fake calls etc.. (whatever else is included in ppls theories)

America becomes full of demolition and plane experts on this subject
 
VIBE;7357722 said:
I believe in the evidence.

The evidence only points to govt is the 'LIHOP' theory, which is "let it happen on purpose", but no other hand was in on it; bomb, controlled planes, demo, fake calls etc.. (whatever else is included in ppls theories)

No you don't. You believe the evidence provided by the government. The same government with a history of creating false flags attacks like 9/11. The question is which evidence is credible. Have you even seen a controlled demolition? I have, and it's looks EXACTLY like how building 7 and both towers fell. Fire doesn't make a building collapse in on itself. You lookin real stupid right now
 
I will not sit here like I am an expert on this topic and debate any of you... i just like to blame the government as much as possible. whenever the oppurtunity presents itself

 
blackamerica;7357768 said:
VIBE;7357722 said:
I believe in the evidence.

The evidence only points to govt is the 'LIHOP' theory, which is "let it happen on purpose", but no other hand was in on it; bomb, controlled planes, demo, fake calls etc.. (whatever else is included in ppls theories)

No you don't. You believe the evidence provided by the government. The same government with a history of creating false flags attacks like 9/11. The question is which evidence is credible. Have you even seen a controlled demolition? I have, and it's looks EXACTLY like how building 7 and both towers fell. Fire doesn't make a building collapse in on itself. You lookin real stupid right now

The evidence speaks for itself and the theories debunk themselves..

where's YOUR evidence?

You say I presented none, I presented a couple videos explaining why your theories are silly. Not only that, there's links in the description (on the youtube page itself) that back the video up.

You've presented nothing but "I totally believe the govt is in on this and they orchestrated it"
 
Lemme guess some of yall watched well produced conspiracy vids on youtube and took them as the truth but when met by evidence to the contrary you dismissed outright
 

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
840
Views
169
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…