So, uhh.. was 9/11 an inside job or nah?

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
JokerKing;7357189 said:
The amount of people America would have to have stay quiet for 13 years if they did it would make it impossible.

we live in a Hollywood movie, so of course they can all keep quiet..

fake planes

fake calls

bombs

missiles

pulling buildings

never mind that demo experts say it would be impossible to wire the towers in two weeks

or

the fact that the plane impact and explosion didn't set off the charges

nah. fuck logic
 
Them taking the 24 hour surveillance footage from the gas stations next to the Pentagon on the day of the plane crashing into Pentagon was always fishy to me.
 
Black_Samson;7357196 said:
JokerKing;7357189 said:
The amount of people America would have to have stay quiet for 13 years if they did it would make it impossible.

Really?

As much shit that goes on around us you really believe that bullshit?

We're talking thousands of civilians and government employees. You telling me nobody at all came through with the real story for what would be the biggest payday they've ever had????? Not one person in 13 years of all the people you had to keep quiet.
 
Black_Samson;7357246 said:
JokerKing;7357232 said:
Black_Samson;7357196 said:
JokerKing;7357189 said:
The amount of people America would have to have stay quiet for 13 years if they did it would make it impossible.

Really?

As much shit that goes on around us you really believe that bullshit?

We're talking thousands of civilians and government employees. You telling me nobody at all came through with the real story for what would be the biggest payday they've ever had????? Not one person in 13 years of all the people you had to keep quiet.

Dont take all them to fly 3 PLANES, Dipshit.

You over simplify these things, I think you watch too much movies. You and I both know it ain't just flying 3 planes, you weirdo.
 
AZTG;7357136 said:
I mean to be totally honest its more probable the govt did it then al qeada.



Same govt that admitted to sinking its own ship years later to start the spanish american war, same govt that now claims England warned them 3 days before pearl harbor that the japanese was gonna attack hawaii,
same govt that said only 1 bullet caused 7 entry and exit wounds in president JFK then exited his body and struck the governor sitting in front of him and got placed in his thigh (idk how anyone can believe this bullshit).

So yea our govt does have a history of fucking around. But end of the day wtf cares? Cant prove it, if you prove it most wont believe it and even if everyone believed it those responsible will never admit it and if pressure is applied to that point they'll come up with a new tragedy to preoccupy the people.

So yea man, wtf cares? Just live your life and hope you and yours never have to die in some bs like this the next time it happens.

source for these two? Just curious because the US never admitted the USS Maine sinking.
 
VIBE;7357071 said:
xxCivicxx;7356841 said:
A.J. Trillzynski;7356796 said:
nope. I don't believe any of that conspiracy bullshit and if I ever had any doubts then for every single case or piece of 'evidence' that it was an inside job that can be presented there are at least 10x more legit sources and explanations to debunk that shit.

Ok please debunk the fact that the Bush and bin Laden families have been friends for decades before the attack and that bin Laden had been to the white house either earlier that year or late the previous year.

Please debunk the fact that al queda was and is funded by the CIA

Please debunk the fact that no plane wreckage was found at the Pentagon.

Please debunk the fact that one of the hijackers passports was found in mint condition outside of one of the wtc buildings when almost everything else from both planes was incinerated

Please debunk the fact that a very heavy skyscraper built to withstand very high winds completely falls in on itself twice when only the top 3rd of the buildings were structurally compromised

Please debunk the fact that for the 2 weeks leading up to the attack all night time security and custodial servants were not allowed in the buildings to work their night shifts

Thanks

most of this is false..

but explain how you know these things?

VIBE;7357071 said:
xxCivicxx;7356841 said:
A.J. Trillzynski;7356796 said:
nope. I don't believe any of that conspiracy bullshit and if I ever had any doubts then for every single case or piece of 'evidence' that it was an inside job that can be presented there are at least 10x more legit sources and explanations to debunk that shit.

Ok please debunk the fact that the Bush and bin Laden families have been friends for decades before the attack and that bin Laden had been to the white house either earlier that year or late the previous year.

Please debunk the fact that al queda was and is funded by the CIA

Please debunk the fact that no plane wreckage was found at the Pentagon.

Please debunk the fact that one of the hijackers passports was found in mint condition outside of one of the wtc buildings when almost everything else from both planes was incinerated

Please debunk the fact that a very heavy skyscraper built to withstand very high winds completely falls in on itself twice when only the top 3rd of the buildings were structurally compromised

Please debunk the fact that for the 2 weeks leading up to the attack all night time security and custodial servants were not allowed in the buildings to work their night shifts

Thanks

most of this is false..

but explain how you know these things?

Explain why the onus is on me to explain further when you're the one challenging it without having added any information to refute anything I said?

Was this a troll post?
 
VIBE;7357071 said:
xxCivicxx;7356841 said:
A.J. Trillzynski;7356796 said:
nope. I don't believe any of that conspiracy bullshit and if I ever had any doubts then for every single case or piece of 'evidence' that it was an inside job that can be presented there are at least 10x more legit sources and explanations to debunk that shit.

Ok please debunk the fact that the Bush and bin Laden families have been friends for decades before the attack and that bin Laden had been to the white house either earlier that year or late the previous year.

Please debunk the fact that al queda was and is funded by the CIA

Please debunk the fact that no plane wreckage was found at the Pentagon.

Please debunk the fact that one of the hijackers passports was found in mint condition outside of one of the wtc buildings when almost everything else from both planes was incinerated

Please debunk the fact that a very heavy skyscraper built to withstand very high winds completely falls in on itself twice when only the top 3rd of the buildings were structurally compromised

Please debunk the fact that for the 2 weeks leading up to the attack all night time security and custodial servants were not allowed in the buildings to work their night shifts

Thanks

most of this is false..

but explain how you know these things?

VIBE;7357071 said:
xxCivicxx;7356841 said:
A.J. Trillzynski;7356796 said:
nope. I don't believe any of that conspiracy bullshit and if I ever had any doubts then for every single case or piece of 'evidence' that it was an inside job that can be presented there are at least 10x more legit sources and explanations to debunk that shit.

Ok please debunk the fact that the Bush and bin Laden families have been friends for decades before the attack and that bin Laden had been to the white house either earlier that year or late the previous year.

Please debunk the fact that al queda was and is funded by the CIA

Please debunk the fact that no plane wreckage was found at the Pentagon.

Please debunk the fact that one of the hijackers passports was found in mint condition outside of one of the wtc buildings when almost everything else from both planes was incinerated

Please debunk the fact that a very heavy skyscraper built to withstand very high winds completely falls in on itself twice when only the top 3rd of the buildings were structurally compromised

Please debunk the fact that for the 2 weeks leading up to the attack all night time security and custodial servants were not allowed in the buildings to work their night shifts

Thanks

most of this is false..

but explain how you know these things?

Explain why the onus is on me to explain further when you're the one challenging it without having added any information to refute anything I said?

Was this a troll post?
 
I'm no stranger to conspiracy theories. For instance, there is tons of evidence Fidel Castro had Kennedy killed, and the government was so embarrassed that a nobody like Castro could do it, they covered it up. But this one, doesn't make sense.
 


Deal of the Year: World Trade Center, New York, NY

Weighing in at $3.2 billion, the acquisition of the 99-year leasehold of the World Trade Center was the largest of the year. "Notwithstanding the emotional difficulty of celebrating anything related to the World Trade Center is the fact that upon completion of its acquisition by Larry Silverstein, it was clearly the deal of the year for the industry, and now more than ever, a deal of [a] lifetime for Silverstein" said Ken Zakin, managing director at Insignia/ESG. [iiRealEstate]

Silverstein Makes a Huge

Profit off of the 9/11 Attacks

Six months before the 9/11 attacks the World Trade Center was "privatized" by being leased to a private sector developer. The lease was purchased by the Silverstein Group for $3.2 billion. "This is a dream come true," Larry Silverstein said. "We will be in control of a prized asset, and we will seek to develop its potential, raising it to new heights."

But the World Trade Towers were not the real estate plum we are led to believe.

From an economic standpoint, the trade center -- subsidized since its inception -- has never functioned, nor was it intended to function, unprotected in the rough-and-tumble real estate marketplace. [BusinessWeek]

How could Silverstein Group have been ignorant of this?

Also, the towers required some $200 million in renovations and improvements, most of which related to removal and replacement of building materials declared to be health hazards in the years since the towers were built.

It was well-known by the city of New York that the WTC was an asbestos bombshell. For years, the Port Authority treated the building like an aging dinosaur, attempting on several occasions to get permits to demolish the building for liability reasons, but being turned down due the known asbestos problem. Further, it was well-known the only reason the building was still standing until 9/11 was because it was too costly to disassemble the twin towers floor by floor since the Port Authority was prohibited legally from demolishing the buildings. [Arctic Beacon]

Other New York developers had been driven into bankruptcy by the costly mandated renovations, and $200 million represented an entire year's worth of revenues from the World Trade Towers.

The perfect collapse of the twin towerschanged the picture.

Under a pending agreement, a developer and his investors will get back most of the down payment that they made to lease the World Trade Center just six weeks before a terrorist attack destroyed the twin towers. Developer Larry Silverstein and investors Lloyd Goldman and Joseph Cayre are nearing a deal that would give them about $98 million of their original investment of $124 million, The New York Times reported Saturday. [MontereyHerald 11/22/2003]

Instead of renovation, Silverstein is rebuilding, funded by the insurance coverage on the property which 'fortuitously' covered acts of terrorism. Even better, Silverstein filed TWO insurance claims for the maximum amount of the policy, based on the two, in Silverstein's view, separate attacks. The total potential payout is $7.1 billion, more than enough to build a fabulous new complex and leave a hefty profit for the Silverstein Group, including Larry Silverstein himself.

As reported in The Washington Post, the insurance company, Swiss Re, has gone to court to argue that the 9/11 disaster was only one attack, not two and that therefore the insurance payout should be limited to $3.55 billion, still enough to rebuild the complex.

Update: WTC Leaseholder May Collect Up To $4.6B

A federal jury on Monday ruled that the assault on the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center was in fact two occurrences for insurance purposes. The finding in U.S. District Court in Manhattan means leaseholder Larry Silverstein may collect up to $4.6 billion, according to reports. [Forbes.com 12/06/04]

The result of court ruling: Silverstein makes a huge profit off of the 9/11 attacks.

 
January 1, 1990 & above was the GOAT era until 9/11/2001. That's when the country changed for the worse

Oddly, I didn't go to school on this day. I woke up & turned my TV on to watch Rude Jude clown some people on Jenny Jones & the Fox station was showing the towers. That shit was surreal to a young nigga eyes at that time because it looked like some Hollywood action film, Independence Day type of shit. Then when the second one hit, I was like "that shit ain't no mistake".

What's crazy tho they hijacked the planes with a box cutter
 
xxCivicxx;7357437 said:
VIBE;7357071 said:
xxCivicxx;7356841 said:
A.J. Trillzynski;7356796 said:
nope. I don't believe any of that conspiracy bullshit and if I ever had any doubts then for every single case or piece of 'evidence' that it was an inside job that can be presented there are at least 10x more legit sources and explanations to debunk that shit.

Ok please debunk the fact that the Bush and bin Laden families have been friends for decades before the attack and that bin Laden had been to the white house either earlier that year or late the previous year.

Please debunk the fact that al queda was and is funded by the CIA

Please debunk the fact that no plane wreckage was found at the Pentagon.

Please debunk the fact that one of the hijackers passports was found in mint condition outside of one of the wtc buildings when almost everything else from both planes was incinerated

Please debunk the fact that a very heavy skyscraper built to withstand very high winds completely falls in on itself twice when only the top 3rd of the buildings were structurally compromised

Please debunk the fact that for the 2 weeks leading up to the attack all night time security and custodial servants were not allowed in the buildings to work their night shifts

Thanks

most of this is false..

but explain how you know these things?

VIBE;7357071 said:
xxCivicxx;7356841 said:
A.J. Trillzynski;7356796 said:
nope. I don't believe any of that conspiracy bullshit and if I ever had any doubts then for every single case or piece of 'evidence' that it was an inside job that can be presented there are at least 10x more legit sources and explanations to debunk that shit.

Ok please debunk the fact that the Bush and bin Laden families have been friends for decades before the attack and that bin Laden had been to the white house either earlier that year or late the previous year.

Please debunk the fact that al queda was and is funded by the CIA

Please debunk the fact that no plane wreckage was found at the Pentagon.

Please debunk the fact that one of the hijackers passports was found in mint condition outside of one of the wtc buildings when almost everything else from both planes was incinerated

Please debunk the fact that a very heavy skyscraper built to withstand very high winds completely falls in on itself twice when only the top 3rd of the buildings were structurally compromised

Please debunk the fact that for the 2 weeks leading up to the attack all night time security and custodial servants were not allowed in the buildings to work their night shifts

Thanks

most of this is false..

but explain how you know these things?

Explain why the onus is on me to explain further when you're the one challenging it without having added any information to refute anything I said?

Was this a troll post?

what I'm saying is you're a copy cat guy like I was..

"oh shit, they said it, it looks like it matches, must be true"

all 9/11 "truth" claims have been debunked..

even the Loose Change guys were told, "ok, since u have so much evidence, take it to court" they didn't.. they didn't even make Loose Change as an actual "truth movement" but as a project that turned into a spectacle for them which is why they release 1, 2 and 3 and charged for it..

 
A few things people question now has been known for a while now. For instance I lived on Suitland Rd which is right next to Andrews Air Force Base where AF1 is. The weekend before 9/11 there was tons of military personell going on the base, and this was on the news at the time, something big was coming and they knew it they just were saying they didn't know when.I saw tons of them goin on base with my own eyes. As for the evidence outside the Pentagon that's been debunked too by people who drove 395 and saw everything when it happened. Or are those people who live here all lying about actually seeing the plane hit too?
 
OhMars;7356952 said:
building7.gif

Apparently these dumb azz niggaz are saying a "fire" caused this collapse. Gtfoh

 
blackamerica;7357590 said:
OhMars;7356952 said:

Apparently these dumb azz niggaz are saying a "fire" caused this collapse. Gtfoh

not just fires, the collapse of the towers caused structural damage, there's photographic evidence for this, and every floor was on fire for hours.. there's video evidence for this..

stop being stupid..
 

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
840
Views
161
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…