So, uhh.. was 9/11 an inside job or nah?

[Stiff]

My thing is this, if we know for a fact that they flew planes into the 2 world trade center buildings, because we have it on tape and nobody really disputes that..why would they have to lie about the Pentagon?

What big deal would it be to throw another plane into the Pentagon? What sense does it make to actually fly planes into the twin towers and then go ahead and fake a plane going into the Pentagon?

@blackamerica‌

@xxCivicxx‌

Because Pentagon supposedly guards the area around it very seriously and it took a high level of piloting precision for the Pentagon to be hit like it was. Some people are saying that the plane may have hit the ground first and rollled into the building but then there would be no way that it could have been disintegrated

And again, no one has answered why there's no actual amateur footage of the impact when it's a fact that amateur footage was recorded

But that doesn't answer the motive of faking it though when they actually did it without dispute at the world trade center.

Why would they fly two planes into the world trade center and then say fuck it with the pentagon and just fire a missile and then go to the scene and sprinkle burned plane parts. If the pentagon is such a hard target to hit the government could of attacked another target.

Just to be clear, I think something smells with 9/11 but I don't think whether or not a plane hit the pentagon or not is the thing that should be disputed.

Looking at it objectively it would be a lot harder to hit the pentagon than two of the largest buildings in NY.

The window for error is a lot smaller. You would be a lot more accurate with a missile than a 757 going 500mph.

Whoever flew that plane would have to be an expert to know when to descend. If not they could've easily missed. At that rate you have no control. It's just in a downward spiral.

You would think the plane would've hit the top of the building rather than the side. Come to think of it why wouldn't they do that? Way more damage could've been done flying the plane into the center of the Pentagon.

All true but taking it a step back further, if the Pentagon is so hard to hit, then why "fake attack" it at all? Them hitting the World trade Center alone would have done more than enough to stir public opinion. Why send a missile at the Pentagon, lie and say it was a plane and risk being caught by the public when you already sent actual planes into the twin towers and pretty much got the job done? That's the part that makes no sense

 

[VIBE]

And how many times has the US been attacked on our own soil

there's a first for everything...

 

[VIBE]

This shit is sad people really have faith in a government that has been known to not be trustworthy

the evidence speaks for itself tho.. prove otherwise

My cuz caught a case because a cop had "evidence" that he had to prove otherwise and that's where the problem starts I'm supposed to jus believe a group of people known to not tell the truth jus because of a couple of pictures foh

witnesses? actual ppl?

 

[VIBE]

And how many times has the US been attacked on our own soil

there's a first for everything...

but btw.. this isn't the first terror attack, just the first that was as large as it was..

 

[ericb4prez]

And how many times has the US been attacked on our own soil

there's a first for everything...

If some random terrorist can pull that off how come nobody else has is what I'm asking other than PH I can't think of anybody boldy attacking us and we know how that turned out

 

[VIBE]

idk ask the terrorists

 

[VIBE]

I'm done.

You guys got schooled.

 

[Trillfate]

@vibe is to this thread what @JDSTAYWITIT is to the creepset hate thread

 

[Idiopathic Joker]

And how many times has the US been attacked on our own soil

there's a first for everything...

The War of 1812 was the first

 

[blackrain]

My thing is this, if we know for a fact that they flew planes into the 2 world trade center buildings, because we have it on tape and nobody really disputes that..why would they have to lie about the Pentagon?

What big deal would it be to throw another plane into the Pentagon? What sense does it make to actually fly planes into the twin towers and then go ahead and fake a plane going into the Pentagon?

@blackamerica‌

@xxCivicxx‌

Because Pentagon supposedly guards the area around it very seriously and it took a high level of piloting precision for the Pentagon to be hit like it was. Some people are saying that the plane may have hit the ground first and rollled into the building but then there would be no way that it could have been disintegrated

And again, no one has answered why there's no actual amateur footage of the impact when it's a fact that amateur footage was recorded

But that doesn't answer the motive of faking it though when they actually did it without dispute at the world trade center.

Why would they fly two planes into the world trade center and then say fuck it with the pentagon and just fire a missile and then go to the scene and sprinkle burned plane parts. If the pentagon is such a hard target to hit the government could of attacked another target.

Just to be clear, I think something smells with 9/11 but I don't think whether or not a plane hit the pentagon or not is the thing that should be disputed.

Looking at it objectively it would be a lot harder to hit the pentagon than two of the largest buildings in NY.

The window for error is a lot smaller. You would be a lot more accurate with a missile than a 757 going 500mph.

Whoever flew that plane would have to be an expert to know when to descend. If not they could've easily missed. At that rate you have no control. It's just in a downward spiral.

You would think the plane would've hit the top of the building rather than the side. Come to think of it why wouldn't they do that? Way more damage could've been done flying the plane into the center of the Pentagon.

All true but taking it a step back further, if the Pentagon is so hard to hit, then why "fake attack" it at all? Them hitting the World trade Center alone would have done more than enough to stir public opinion. Why send a missile at the Pentagon, lie and say it was a plane and risk being caught by the public when you already sent actual planes into the twin towers and pretty much got the job done? That's the part that makes no sense

That and when it comes to 9/11 the Pentagon is usually an after thought in public and media discussions. 99.9% of the time people talk about 9/11 it's the WTC. So to go through all that trouble for it to only be a secondary part of the 9/11 story makes less sense too

 

[mrrealone]

Can anyone explain ol' Bushy's precise timing to be playing hero in the time of distress by happening to be "reading" to a class full of kids?? Still ain't seen no answer on that....

And why a lot of ppl are quick to take up for them folks over there in the white house cause there is not much evidence, you do understand that you don't get the same privileges right?? Them laws don't have to have a "smoking gun" on you when they bring a case on you. All they gotta do is plaster your face on tv and say how they suspect you did something and you guilty. Maybe you should think of doing the same to them.......

I wonder how much $$ they got when they invaded the Middle East and not to mention got Sadam mixed up in this mess some how.......

Far as the Pentagon, we know something hit it! Something hit it hard, don't really know the logic behind saying it was a missile either. But didn't them employees partake of some kind of training exercise where they were planning to have planes hit the building, when right then (in reality) a plane did hit the building. That was some kind of project, but I forgot the name of it. Now if that was you in the courts, you'd be guilty for life off circumstantial evidence alone, probably face worse charges. That's no other way to lace that for you who wanna forget where you came from.

You gotta sitting on silly, stuck on stupid, or waiting on dumb to just bypass that Building 7 too. Acting like a whole building just can topple like that and not think any sour intentions were behind it....

You gotta be bout one sap sorry black man to even THINK of siding w/ them and that them ppl are here to protect you smh. Some folk easily forget where they come from.......

 

[stackmaster 313]

Dude our government did it this shit aint happen in no other country but ours are you serious America

 

[trilladelic]

Dude our government did it this shit aint happen in no other country but ours are you serious America

actually hitler supposedly burned down one one germany's most beloved museums or something like that & blamed it on the jews. im no historian so correct me if im wrong.

 

[cobbland]

It was a ritual.

Worth reading if interested:

A STUDY IN MOTION PICTURE PROPAGANDA

Hollywood's Preferred Movie Messages

by John W. Cones
http://www.filmreform.org/study.htm

 

[riddlerap]

there's more but it's not my job to keep providing more pictures, I've done plenty of that and for some reason everyone conviently ignore it.

there's plenty of pictures and video of the aftermath...

don't ignore the evidence...

No you didn't . You posted pics of itty bitty pieces of what looked like aluminum, and a wheel. According to you, the body of the plane disappeared along with the wings (which is physical impossible). Yes you have rebuttals but all of them are weak and sound like government talking points

Where's the plane that hit the towers?

 

[VIBE]

^ they won't answer me..

I've asked them to provide their evidence..

I'll tell you why they won't answer..

they know how silly they sound..

regardless of govt trust issues, lies etc.. The events on 9/11 happened the way they happened... the evidence speaks for itself..

they won't answer bc they have no answers..

 

[Infomiss Purple]

I'm gonna just say it.

If u still have ''Faith'' in this Matrix system please kill yourself cause you're nothing but a hopeless sitting duck waiting to die for nothing if u believe that the govt is a legitamate organization. Just wake the fk up or shut the fk up.

 

[mr.october]

I really think it's a mix of the three options. The middle eastern dudes did the deed more than likely with some covert gov officials helping, making it an "inside job", but I doubt it reached the highest level of gov't as far as people being involved n all that illuminati shit. They were warned n complacent most likely thinking that it couldn't actually be done n when it was it was war. All the people that profit from war always do. History shows that people start wars for money. I personally don't think it's black n white, it's really fucking grey. no one knows the truth just theories n what was presented as true to sway public opinion one way or another. So I don't subscribe to any of it just take what I can from the information out there n form my own opinion. So none of y'all are right or wrong u just see it as a open shut thing but it's never that simple in life. Nothing is.

 

[stackmaster 313]

Why you think Bush stoled the election all this shit been in play probably before we were born or at least the past 20 years.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Bush's_first_term_as_President_of_the_United_States

 

[Me1971]

I'll end this myth.

Does anyone have family or friends that were on the plane that hit the towers?

There's over 1 billion ppl in the U.S. and yet you hardly hear about any victims were on the plane.

Their families spoke in numerous documentaries

I'm talking ppl we personally know. For all we know, they could be actors.

I personally know two people.