So, uhh.. was 9/11 an inside job or nah?

[VIBE]

Bruh, your dumb ass is throwing around that there's "so many holes" there's "tons of evidence it's an inside job" yet you've provided NOTHING to support your claims.

You have asked questions and I have answered them.

Then, you ignore it and ask the same question again.

You're trolling.

 

[VIBE]

his logic 'if there's no pictures of something, it isn't true'

No my logic is that if this was really an "American tragedy" then why aren't Americans(who are the true controllers of this country according to the Constitution) privy to any and all details surrounding the attack? I'm not a "truther" and I'm sure that most of the posters in here shitting on you with logic aren't either. I'm only asking questions. Questions that none of you have been able to answer. I have to admit tho, the "I'm an angry American and I'm always right so you stfu" angle is very convincing but it's a smoke screen

I've been shitted on? Because you feel cool you get reactions?

What questions haven't been answered?

 

[Stiff]

My thing is this, if we know for a fact that they flew planes into the 2 world trade center buildings, because we have it on tape and nobody really disputes that..why would they have to lie about the Pentagon?

What big deal would it be to throw another plane into the Pentagon? What sense does it make to actually fly planes into the twin towers and then go ahead and fake a plane going into the Pentagon?

@blackamerica‌

@xxCivicxx‌

 

[VIBE]

I have showed you the debris...

there is no actual footage clear as you see for the WTC

If your own stupidity and ignorance doesn't let you see the debris I posted, then that's on you..

I asked you questions and showed you the evidence and you ignore it...

You're dodging a lot of shit.... pussy

You've dodged almost everything I posted, which is why I stopped. You're not really trying to debate apparently you think you just being a dick in the thread for long enough then people would just believe you by default.

I say again, you have not posted any info anywhere close to factual enough to to change my opinion on the topic and you won't be able to. It seems like you'd rather change the subject and try and gain some false sense of self-confidence off of incorrectly thinking that I don't know what materials comprise a commercial jet

Once again, show me any plane part on the Pentagon lawn. Explain bin Laden's death. Explain the major shifts in the stock trade with respect to airports in the weeks and days leadingup to 9/11. Disprove the US General vid. Or just try and disprove anything that I've posted tho I know you can't

You haven't proved anything but bullshit theories. You guys who claim it was a conspiracy have no ground to stand on, but the ones who believe that actual terrorists did this event are supposed to prove anything? That's stupid. You can't prove anything beyond bullshit YouTube videos and conspiracies with no basis.

No ground to stand on? Wtf are

What are you talking about? You guys can't prove it was a conspiracy beyond bullshit YouTube videos. There is plenty of proof a plane hit the Pentagon. Don't twist this cause you're dumbfounded.

Just to be clear, I asked for a picture of the 747 plane

that hit the Pentagon, and you posted a picture of a wheel and piece of aluminum the size of a fuckin microwave. The truth is you can't post a picture because there is no photos of the actual plane. I knew this when I asked you, but wanted to see you make a fool out yourself. Moving along

Now let's think, you have no footage or pictures of a huge 747 plane hitting one of the most heavily surveillanced locations in the world? We know the government has the footage, why haven't they released it? Have you asked yourself this? I doubt it. Common sense, why withhold information that would vindicate your story. These basic questions should never be asked if you are innocent

I don't think you understand that an aluminum plane was completely destroyed hitting concrete and steel at that high speeds. Y'all think we have super planes and shit

I don't think you understand the implications of what is being discussed. Please find one news article where a plane crashed and was completely disintegrated with exactly 0 plane parts left. Don't worry I'll wait

That would imply there are other plane crashes similar to 9/11, which there isn't.

But there are plenty instances of planes hitting the ground at high speeds, which would create a just as(if not more) forceful impact than a plane hitting a building

so people are expecting something that slammed into concrete at 500 mph (roughly), and was ignited with jet fuel, to come out completely whole and survive, so pictures can be taken of it?

Nope just 1 part. You see at least 1 part in any and all crashes that have occurred

Show me another instance where an airplane traveling at high speed crashed into a building and parts survived

Once again, there's more "give" in a building than in the ground

Find me one pic where a plane hit the ground and was disintegrated. Don't worry I'll wait

A good argument would be to provide for your argument.

"there's plenty of instances of planes crashing at high speeds hitting the ground"

then u would provide pictures and articles...

but remember, not crash landings, where the plane lands on it's belly... we aren't on that... this is about planes going nose first into buildings, 400-500+ mph, being used as missiles..

so if u can find me a situation, where a plane flew nose first into the ground, at those high speeds, you'll have a better argument.. til then, you're just talking out ur ass for the fuck of it

 

[VIBE]

@xxCivicxx‌

I'm cool having a convo w u, I must've missed your questions or whatever u said..

as for this @blackamerica‌ faggot, he's a dumb ass with 0 reading comprehension skills and has the mental capacity of a dead dinosaur.. fuck him..

 

[Idiopathic Joker]

ppl die everyday... and realize coincidences aren't rare...

So a expert on controlled demolition confirms building 7 was brought down, mysteriously dies 3 days later, and all you say is "ppl die everyday"? Smh. Some niggaz is just too lazy to comprehend their government is corrupt, even when the "evidence" suggest otherwise.

There's TONS of evidence that the government orchestrated 9/11. Still haven't answered why the pentagon footage still hasn't been released [/quote]

This “expert" didn't confirm a damn thing

 

[blackamerica]

Bruh, your dumb ass is throwing around that there's "so many holes" there's "tons of evidence it's an inside job" yet you've provided NOTHING to support your claims.

You have asked questions and I have answered them.

Then, you ignore it and ask the same question again.

You're trolling.

Lmao. I've given you PLENTY of examples of stories that don't add up. Not only did you expose yourself as a idiot by ducking everybody's questions, but the whole "the plane disintegrated into ashes leaving no evidence" theory on the Pentagon really showed you as stupid AF. If you believe that's possible then you probably still think Santa & the tooth fairy are real too. Fuck outta here.

Show us the footage from the Pentagon

 

[xxCivicxx]

My thing is this, if we know for a fact that they flew planes into the 2 world trade center buildings, because we have it on tape and nobody really disputes that..why would they have to lie about the Pentagon?

What big deal would it be to throw another plane into the Pentagon? What sense does it make to actually fly planes into the twin towers and then go ahead and fake a plane going into the Pentagon?

@blackamerica‌

@xxCivicxx‌

Because Pentagon supposedly guards the area around it very seriously and it took a high level of piloting precision for the Pentagon to be hit like it was. Some people are saying that the plane may have hit the ground first and rollled into the building but then there would be no way that it could have been disintegrated

And again, no one has answered why there's no actual amateur footage of the impact when it's a fact that amateur footage was recorded

 

[VIBE]

"plane to ashes theory"

*showed plenty of plane parts*

ignores them

nah troll

 

[xxCivicxx]

I have showed you the debris...

there is no actual footage clear as you see for the WTC

If your own stupidity and ignorance doesn't let you see the debris I posted, then that's on you..

I asked you questions and showed you the evidence and you ignore it...

You're dodging a lot of shit.... pussy

You've dodged almost everything I posted, which is why I stopped. You're not really trying to debate apparently you think you just being a dick in the thread for long enough then people would just believe you by default.

I say again, you have not posted any info anywhere close to factual enough to to change my opinion on the topic and you won't be able to. It seems like you'd rather change the subject and try and gain some false sense of self-confidence off of incorrectly thinking that I don't know what materials comprise a commercial jet

Once again, show me any plane part on the Pentagon lawn. Explain bin Laden's death. Explain the major shifts in the stock trade with respect to airports in the weeks and days leadingup to 9/11. Disprove the US General vid. Or just try and disprove anything that I've posted tho I know you can't

You haven't proved anything but bullshit theories. You guys who claim it was a conspiracy have no ground to stand on, but the ones who believe that actual terrorists did this event are supposed to prove anything? That's stupid. You can't prove anything beyond bullshit YouTube videos and conspiracies with no basis.

No ground to stand on? Wtf are

What are you talking about? You guys can't prove it was a conspiracy beyond bullshit YouTube videos. There is plenty of proof a plane hit the Pentagon. Don't twist this cause you're dumbfounded.

Just to be clear, I asked for a picture of the 747 plane

that hit the Pentagon, and you posted a picture of a wheel and piece of aluminum the size of a fuckin microwave. The truth is you can't post a picture because there is no photos of the actual plane. I knew this when I asked you, but wanted to see you make a fool out yourself. Moving along

Now let's think, you have no footage or pictures of a huge 747 plane hitting one of the most heavily surveillanced locations in the world? We know the government has the footage, why haven't they released it? Have you asked yourself this? I doubt it. Common sense, why withhold information that would vindicate your story. These basic questions should never be asked if you are innocent

I don't think you understand that an aluminum plane was completely destroyed hitting concrete and steel at that high speeds. Y'all think we have super planes and shit

I don't think you understand the implications of what is being discussed. Please find one news article where a plane crashed and was completely disintegrated with exactly 0 plane parts left. Don't worry I'll wait

That would imply there are other plane crashes similar to 9/11, which there isn't.

But there are plenty instances of planes hitting the ground at high speeds, which would create a just as(if not more) forceful impact than a plane hitting a building

so people are expecting something that slammed into concrete at 500 mph (roughly), and was ignited with jet fuel, to come out completely whole and survive, so pictures can be taken of it?

Nope just 1 part. You see at least 1 part in any and all crashes that have occurred

Show me another instance where an airplane traveling at high speed crashed into a building and parts survived

Once again, there's more "give" in a building than in the ground

Find me one pic where a plane hit the ground and was disintegrated. Don't worry I'll wait

A good argument would be to provide for your argument.

"there's plenty of instances of planes crashing at high speeds hitting the ground"

then u would provide pictures and articles...

but remember, not crash landings, where the plane lands on it's belly... we aren't on that... this is about planes going nose first into buildings, 400-500+ mph, being used as missiles..

so if u can find me a situation, where a plane flew nose first into the ground, at those high speeds, you'll have a better argument.. til then, you're just talking out ur ass for the fuck of it

Thought I posted a link too. I'm at work so this is the best I can do right now. Apparently this plane nosedived right before landing at an airport in kazan. It still looks like a plane to me
http://www.google.com/search?biw=360&bih=302&tbm=isch&sa=1&ei=k44ZVKeZMsLBggTZoYDQBA&q=boeing+737+kazan+crash+wreckage&oq=boeing+737+kazacrash+wreckage&gs_l=mobile-gws-serp.1.0.30i10.56153.56987.0.58917.4.4.0.0.0.2.356.895.0j3j0j1.4.0....0...1c.1.53.mobile-gws-serp..2.2.342.OEm-gaZnON0

 

[mc317]

 

[VIBE]

MOSCOW (AP) — A Boeing 737 jetliner crashed and burst into flames Sunday night while trying to land at the airport in the Russian city of Kazan, killing all 50 people aboard in the latest in a string of deadly crashes across the country.

The Tatarstan Airlines plane was trying to make a second landing attempt when it touched the surface of the runway near the control tower, and was "destroyed and caught fire," said Sergei Izvolky, the spokesman for the Russian aviation agency.

Nope, no nosedive..

You want to know why you'll never see a plane going 400-500+mph at a crash site? Because you don't fly them in that manner. Just as was said for the Pentagon crash.

You're going to find that planes are crash LANDING.

Which is not comparable to what happened on 9/11.

 

[blackamerica]

"plane to ashes theory"

*showed plenty of plane parts*

ignores them

nah troll

Vibe "I only support the evidence". When asked to provide photographic evidence of the giant plane that hit the Pentagon, "um, it must've burned in the ground into dirt (then changes subject). A supporter of evidence who can't provide any evidence for his claim smh. U so smart

 

[A.J. Trillzynski]

Why is the planes shown hitting the towers but still till this day we haven't seen the plane hitting the Pentagon?

Always wondered what was the point of not showing that.

dont worry Vibe will explain why the pentagon doesnt appear to have been struck by a Boeing 747

what happened to the wings?

The problem here is it didn't hit straight, it hit from an angle, as the bottom of the building will show... from tip to tip, but as it did, it folded/sheered off the wings,

the engines there in the debris field.. along w more debris of course

but they don't wanna show you that, they want you to believe no plane hit..

btw planes = aluminum..

here is a pic of a bunch of plane parts around the wreckage of the Pentagon that was already posted.

so, let me see if I understand it correctly what you conspiracy folks are proposing.

2 planes crashed into the WTC, you're not disputing that.. another crash landed into a field, ok.

but instead of doing the same to the Pentagon and just to make shit extra complicated, our government conspirators decided to shoot a rocket or whatever else that's not a plane into the Pentagon, and then cover it up by pretending it was a B757. so what you're proposing happened, if I understand you correctly, is that at some time after the event, somebody loaded up a truck load of burnt up half-destroyed aircraft parts, and drove around the site distributing them around like some conspirator Johnny-Appleseed.. so people could take pictures of them to back up the false story that it was not a rocket but a B757. OK gotcha

 

[blackamerica]

The fact 9/11 happened with so many unanswered questions, footage being confiscated, lies being told, there is virtually no way the US government couldn't have been behind this. They even found nano thermite at the site of ground zero confirming both towers were brought down by design. With all the misinformation out there, you just have to research it on your own and see for yourself. Looking at ALL the theories, everything points back to the Bush administration

 

[VIBE]

The fact 9/11 happened with so many unanswered questions, footage being confiscated, lies being told, there is virtually no way the US government couldn't have been behind this. They even found nano thermite at the site of ground zero confirming both towers were brought down by design. With all the misinformation out there, you just have to research it on your own and see for yourself. Looking at ALL the theories, everything points back to the Bush administration

You see the post AJ Trill quoted? Yes, I provided that as evidence that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon.

But, let's go with your theory that "it's impossible the plane hit the pentagon, where is it?!"

If no plane hit it, what did? How did those plane parts from American Airlines end up on the property? Before impact, the lawn was free of any type of debris. Witnesses seen the plane come in. Seen it hit. Eyes were on the Pentagon as soon as it was hit. So, did they plant debris on the field and within the building? All while being watched? What about the bodies still in their seated positions?

NSFW, dead bodies

Spoiler

Don't dodge, either. You seem to do that a lot.

 

[Stiff]

My thing is this, if we know for a fact that they flew planes into the 2 world trade center buildings, because we have it on tape and nobody really disputes that..why would they have to lie about the Pentagon?

What big deal would it be to throw another plane into the Pentagon? What sense does it make to actually fly planes into the twin towers and then go ahead and fake a plane going into the Pentagon?

@blackamerica‌

@xxCivicxx‌

Because Pentagon supposedly guards the area around it very seriously and it took a high level of piloting precision for the Pentagon to be hit like it was. Some people are saying that the plane may have hit the ground first and rollled into the building but then there would be no way that it could have been disintegrated

And again, no one has answered why there's no actual amateur footage of the impact when it's a fact that amateur footage was recorded

But that doesn't answer the motive of faking it though when they actually did it without dispute at the world trade center.

Why would they fly two planes into the world trade center and then say fuck it with the pentagon and just fire a missile and then go to the scene and sprinkle burned plane parts. If the pentagon is such a hard target to hit the government could of attacked another target.

Just to be clear, I think something smells with 9/11 but I don't think whether or not a plane hit the pentagon or not is the thing that should be disputed.

 

[VIBE]

Also, there was no nano-thermite found at any 9/11 scene.

Not at the World Trade Centers for Towers 1, 2 or 7. (Flights 11 and 175)

Not at Shanksville, Pennsylvania where Flight 93 crashed.

Nor at the Pentagon where Flight 77 struck.

If your "evidence" is of the columns cut, such as this one

and you think that "there's no possible other way to do this", you're mistaken..

a lot of column cutting was done for the clean up.. firemen needed to cut them down.. video evidence exists for this... so no, this wasn't nano-thermite, neither painted on, sprayed on or strapped on.

If your evidence is of the "thermite or molten steel", such as,

that's not molten steel, but the aluminum from the plane.. the physics matches how it was struck, where it's debris went, how the fires melted the aluminum and why/how it was clearly seen dripping down the towers.. (nowhere else does this happen besides this spot, where it matches how it should've happened)

or maybe this photo

this photo was heavily circulated by the 'truthers' aka the conspiracy theorists, Alex Jones being one of them, here we supposedly are told that it's firemen huddled around a pit of molten steel and thermite, but you soon find out this was doctored to pass off their theories.. oh and there is actual video footage of this exact picture, what is that orange glow? it's a bright white light, they're looking in a hole for survivors.. "sooooo much evidence" that they have to photoshop images to pass their theories off. "soooooo much evidence"

where is the evidence though? if there's so much, you should be destroying me right now..

 

[VIBE]

who's ready for him to duck and dodge with more "well what about this and that" rather than support his theories?

I am!

 

[Shizlansky]

who's ready for him to duck and dodge with more "well what about this and that" rather than support his theories?

I am!

When has the government been honest about shit like this bruh?

Be real.

The same ppl in charge has their history books saying that they settled here. Not invaded.

Same ppl that shamed black leaders.

Same ppl that's still alive and raised the ppl in charge.

Same ppl that said that said WMDs was their.

Think bruh.

Same ppl