So niggas gonna act like all women=sluts instead of admittin good girls reject them ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
Idi Amin Dada;3254640 said:
See? I don't like these statements either. It's 2011, who the fuck is going to the public library anymore? I haven't stepped foot in that bitch in ages.

And in school? HA! Same bitches that were in the library with me studying during the day where the same bitches that were shakin' ass out at night. I don't understand why a smart good girl can't wanna party.

Im at the library alllll the time.
 
Last edited:
Idi Amin Dada;3254640 said:
See? I don't like these statements either. It's 2011, who the fuck is going to the public library anymore? I haven't stepped foot in that bitch in ages.

And in school? HA! Same bitches that were in the library with me studying during the day where the same bitches that were shakin' ass out at night. I don't understand why a smart good girl can't wanna party.



I know I did and still do once in a while and I know I'm not a slut.
 
Last edited:
MissLeading;3254589 said:
I agree with the point of this thread but not the locations of the good girls. You can be a slut and go to church, be in med school etc.. Religious practices and education level doesn't guarantee a non-smut lifestyle.

it does increase the odds though.

kai_valya;3254581 said:
y'all twisting what poor t/s is saying. you know what he means. the guys do act like all women are hoes on here. and statistically speaking you are more likely to run into a party girl at a party than you are at the library. if i understand correctly, he's saying that just because all you encounter is hoes doesn't mean all women are hoes, just perhaps, you are not looking in the right places, or don't act in way that would attract quality women

Pretty much. Thanks for summarizing it up.
 
Last edited:
and what is wrong with shaking ur ass? Just b/c a chick likes to dance doesnt make her a slut....this is what's wrong wit u niggas...want women to be perfect while ur shit stinks...
 
Last edited:
-Vincenzo-;3254634 said:
Here are the findings from a study called “Smart Teens Don’t Have Sex (or Kiss Much Either)” :

Students with IQs above 100 and below 70 were significantly less likely to have had intercourse than those in between. Each additional point of IQ increased the odds of virginity by 2.7% for males and 1.7% for females. It’s not just home runs they’re talking about, either: a higher IQ decreased the likelihood of romantic contact in any sense, from holding hands to kissing, across the board.

The blog Gene Expression points to a 2001 campus sex survey to illustrate that this trend doesn’t end with high school, though it looks at institutions and majors rather than IQ scores. For instance:

By age 19, 87% of college students have had sex. At MIT, it’s only 51%. (Furthermore, only 65% of MIT graduate students have had sex.) At Wellesley College, 0% of studio art majors were virgins, but 83% of biochem and math majors were.

A simple google search produced plenty more material on this, in case you should be interested i am willing to provide it.

Higher intelligence operates as a protective factor against early sexual activity during adolescence, and lower intelligence, to a point, is a risk factor. More systematic investigation of the implications of individual differences in cognitive abilities for sexual activities and of the processes that underlie those activities is warranted.

Got that from the abstract. The authors of the article are educated, so they know that correlation is not causation. They would probably slap you for misconstruing and butchering their work in an effort to prove your point. There are so many factors that go into sexual and romantic activity that to chalk it up to intelligence is.....irresponsible, which is of course why the authors did NOT do that.

On another note, you keep talking about people who are virgins. Nothing you posted(even if they added merit to your argument) makes mention of frequency of sex. So in other words, you're trying to tell me that simply having sex is being a "slut". Either A. you're using a narrowly focused piece of research to support your broader argument or B. you think that a slut is anyone who's had sex.

Which is it Vinnie?
 
Last edited:
Mindstarter;3254679 said:
and what is wrong with shaking ur ass? Just b/c a chick likes to dance doesnt make her a slut....this is what's wrong wit u niggas...want women to be perfect while ur shit stinks...

There's absolutely nothing wrong with it. Everything I said was descriptive. I added no judgments.
 
Last edited:
Idi Amin Dada;3254687 said:
Great thing. but I have a credit card for amazon, and a computer. There's nothing at the library that I need.

I have a computer too, but I like to go to the library b/c I like to browse through books and read magazines...w/o having to pay for them....especially magazines.
 
Last edited:
Idi Amin Dada;3254680 said:
Higher intelligence operates as a protective factor against early sexual activity during adolescence, and lower intelligence, to a point, is a risk factor.More systematic investigation of the implications of individual differences in cognitive abilities for sexual activities and of the processes that underlie those activities is warranted.

Got that from the abstract. The authors of the article are educated, so they know that correlation is not causation. They would probably slap you for misconstruing and butchering their work in an effort to prove your point. There are so many factors that go into sexual and romantic activity that to chalk it up to intelligence is.....irresponsible, which is of course why the authors did NOT do that.

On another note, you keep talking about people who are virgins. Nothing you posted(even if they added merit to your argument) makes mention of frequency of sex. So in other words, you're trying to tell me that simply having sex is being a "slut". Either A. you're using a narrowly focused piece of research to support your broader argument or B. you think that a slut is anyone who's had sex.

Which is it Vinnie?

It's this one (A). And I don't know if there is a causal relationship all I am saying is that they are more unlikely to have partaken in hoe activities. I really don't know why it is like that but obviously a certain level of intelligence makes it more unlikely to be a slut.
 
Last edited:
Mindstarter;3254704 said:
I have a computer too, but I like to go to the library b/c I like to browse through books and read magazines...w/o having to pay for them....especially magazines.

That's cool. I'm simply saying that going to the library isn't a barometer of intelligence, ambition, or promiscuity.
 
Last edited:
Blacks are statistically more likely to suffer from anemia. Does that mean there are no white people that have this disease? NO. Does that mean every black person suffers from it? NO.

But if you are lookin for a person with anemia your odds might be a lot better if you search in Harlem than in Nebraska.

SMH at niggas not understanding what statistics say and what they clearly don't.
 
Last edited:
-Vincenzo-;3254710 said:
It's this one (A). And I don't know if there is a causal relationship all I am saying is that they are more unlikely to have partaken in hoe activities. I really don't know why it is like that but obviously a certain level of intelligence makes it more unlikely to be a slut.

But neither article said that. Both simply spoke on virginity. virginity and promiscuity are related but aren't the same thing. Your argument has absolutely no ground and you have nothing to back it up with.
 
Last edited:
-Vincenzo-;3254734 said:
Blacks are statistically more likely to suffer from anemia. Does that mean there are no white people that have this disease? NO. Does that mean every black person suffers from it? NO.

But if you are lookin for a person with anemia your odds might be a lot better if you search in Harlem than in Nebraska.

SMH at niggas not understanding what statistics say and what they clearly don't.

But your statistics make NO REFERENCE TO PROMISCUITY! You retarded ass nigga. NONE! ZERO! NADA! No reference to promiscuity. virginity and promiscuity are the same now? We understand stats fine, but your stats have NOTHING to do with your argument.
 
Last edited:
sboogie;3254799 said:
this thread is dumb...
of course every single bitch in the world aint a hoe or slut...
and if a cat is scared to approach a bitch who he deems out of his league, oh well...
in these modern times, sluts come in all styles and can be found in all areas...
u have to take your chances out here...

Simply explained. The T/S tried to make this thread into some type of dissertation and ends up getting sonned left and right.
 
Last edited:
Idi Amin Dada;3254763 said:
But your statistics make NO REFERENCE TO PROMISCUITY! You retarded ass nigga. NONE! ZERO! NADA! No reference to promiscuity. virginity and promiscuity are the same now? We understand stats fine, but your stats have NOTHING to do with your argument.

Idi Amin Dada;3254769 said:
Damn, I actually got mad off this shit. I'll take my "homotional" card and walk away.

These two posts made my day. Now I can go to work in peace lol
 
Last edited:
99.8% of the ILL community men described in a sentence :

Delusional men who think they are top-of-the line prizes when in

actuality they are the male versions of what they consider "not sh*t ho's."

confused.gif
 
Last edited:

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
228
Views
151
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…