Skip Child Support. Go to Jail. Lose Job. Repeat.

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date

2stepz_ahead

New member


In an article about a parenting program published in The Post and Courier of Charleston in 2003, Mr. Scott said that he had fallen behind when the checks he sent to a state agency for his ex-wife were mistakenly directed to the mother of his first children. (The South Carolina Department of Social Services, citing privacy laws, said it could not verify his account.)

Mr. Scott eventually spent two weeks in jail — a stint that cost him a $35,000-a-year job at a filmmaking company, and sent him into isolation and alcohol abuse, he told The Post and Courier.

“I got mad at everybody in the whole world because I just lost the best job I ever had,” he said. “I just stopped doing everything.”

In 2002, Mr. Scott, further behind on his payments, agreed to participate in a parenting program called Father to Father and pay $350 a month. Mr. Scott reunited with his family, turned himself in for the unpaid child support and served another five months in jail.

Still, Charleston County Family Court records show that he remained in a cycle of unpaid child support debt, stints in jail and more threats of time behind bars. The records also show that when Mr. Scott was working in 2011, $125.76 was deducted from his check each week. He paid $11,411 that year, which included a lump-sum payment. But he was behind again in July 2012, and he paid $3,500, his last recorded payment, to avoid jail. The money came from his parents, Mr. Scott’s brother Rodney said.

Rodney Scott said his brother resented that his ex-wife was not required to work and that the pressure was always on him to pay support. Critics of the child support system say this imbalance is reflected in rules that say that if a mother receives public assistance, the father must pay it back, even if he is also poor. In many cases, though not in Mr. Scott’s, child support actions are brought by state officials seeking welfare reimbursement.

Lisa Scott could not be reached at addresses or phone numbers listed in her name. Samantha Scott, a daughter from Mr. Scott’s first relationship, said she had never heard her own mother complain about a lack of support. “If he had money, he would give it to us,” she said.

Ms. Turetsky, the head of the federal child support office, said the system should be based on the expectation that both parents would contribute toward their children’s needs. “It’s nuts,” she said of the policy of making destitute fathers repay welfare. “She gets the assistance; he gets charged with the bill.”

Jahmal Holmes, 28, is a current participant in the Father to Father program in North Charleston. He has two children, 4 and 8, and said he had agreed to court-ordered child support because he had been told that it was a requirement for their mother to receive Medicaid. The two have since broken up and share custody of the younger child, but he is still required to pay support for both.

Mr. Holmes said he did not realize that if he fell behind on payments, he would face jail. “I am behind now, and they are threatening to suspend my driver’s license — and I’m a truck driver,” he said. “When I saw that Walter Scott died, and he was in this program, that touched me emotionally. I see myself trying to get out of that situation.”

Rodney Scott said that he sometimes thought his brother did not do everything he could to catch up, but that Walter seemed to consider it a hopeless cause. He recalled seeing his brother plead to a judge that he just did not make enough money.

“He asked the judge, ‘How am I supposed to live?’ ” Mr. Scott said. “And the judge said something like, ‘That’s your problem. You figure it out.’ ”[/i]
 
It's ridiculous and counterproductive to throw a man in jail over child support, which is why I've never gone after my broke baby daddy.
 
Kat;7976002 said:
It's ridiculous and counterproductive to throw a man in jail over child support, which is why I've never gone after my broke baby daddy.

It is. It's another way to cause deterioration of the cohesive fault structure. But that's beating a dead horse.

 
Its aint even about the child its about getting back. These white folk making these law know this and dont give a fuck. Sit is fucking retarded..... u going to jail cuz u reproduced and crackers are putting price on what raising a kid costs. Our grandparents and great grands were poor as fuck and kids were raised fine. Now its put urself on child support so u can see ur kid.... then if ur poor and cant afford the number put on it u get locked up. smh
 
aneed123;7976937 said:
Its aint even about the child its about getting back. These white folk making these law know this and dont give a fuck. Sit is fucking retarded..... u going to jail cuz u reproduced and crackers are putting price on what raising a kid costs. Our grandparents and great grands were poor as fuck and kids were raised fine. Now its put urself on child support so u can see ur kid.... then if ur poor and cant afford the number put on it u get locked up. smh

our grandparents and great grandparents worked together to raise the kids. now we just having babies to have babies. we don't have the same family structure as they did back in the day. we don't believe in marriage. we have babies with chicks we don't really know and have one or two arguments we are gone outta both the child and the mothers life. then we blame the system cause she runs there and puts us on support. we still don't learn cuz we go out and have another baby with another woman and repeat the cycle and call both of them gold diggers even though we have no goal to dig. bottom line man raise ur kids...pretty simple to me
 
I don't think there is anything wrong with putting a nigga in jail if he don't pay child support...if he CAN pay and just WON'T pay. If he CAN'T pay...what's the fucking point?
 
ultimately dude had 2 options...

go to jail over child support or be murdered by cop for running away

both options were unjust.
 
LUClEN;7977063 said:
Black_Samson;7975975 said:
my son lives with me, and i still have to pay child support.

How does this work?

Jamel is represented by Lionel Hutz

RaAhBBk4Ti518neqKn2zICcGo1_500.jpg
 
7figz;7977347 said:
Do deadbeat bitches go to jail too ?

Nah my sister is living proof of that. She just skipped town and had another kid to make up for the one social services took from her.
 
Men got to be the head of their family and provide. BUT, child support got to be based on a reasonable percentage of income. Why is the first option throwing people in jail for non violent offences? Why not assess the situation or give a fine, community service, or withdraw it directly from pay. If after all that a man still not paying, then time to sit down for a minute
 
My babymomma can't even put me on child support.

Cause she know I'll call defacts and take her ass up through there in court.

It pays to have the upper hand in better living environment and more money.
 
Tay Gettem;7977429 said:
My babymomma can't even put me on child support.

Cause she know I'll call defacts and take her ass up through there in court.

It pays to have the upper hand in better living environment and more money.

But if she ever gets you on child support, you might just end up owing years of back child support that the court believes you should have been paying, whether you were already providing for your son or not. At least that's what Judge Mathis says. The system is fucked up.
 

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
53
Views
38
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…