Sir Coon Charles Barkley: "A lot of Black People are Full of Sh!t."…

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
2stepz_ahead;c-9683516 said:
so would yall want a nigga talking like barkley to not give money to hbcu's?

is he forcing his opinion on any of yall? is he saying think like him or he wont help?

i agree with him.....alof of black people are full of shit.

this man cant have his own opinion?

why do black people always gotta say the right things...or be in agreement with everyone else?

if he say some shit against black people...ok fukk him for that statement. just that statement...or maybe even a list of statements. but fukk it ...he reached back to help....what are you niggas doing?

will you turn away his help?

where do you nigga think most scholarship money comes from? sure aint level headed white people. racist white people looking for a tax write off.

yall niggas aint hungry enough.....yall the type to turn away a handout even being on the sidewalk homeless for years cause you trynna make a stand against what was said.

if his million puts 15 people thru college, and that gives the a degree where they can support their family and give them a good life and put them thru college so that they can in turn support their family, the fukk are yall talking about?

so his opinions should kill the possibility of helping generations?

yall do know yall in one of the most racist countries in the world, right?

cops having target practice, niggas killing niggas....an we worried about what his opinion is and why he helping a white school help black people?

some of you niggas will never be shit.

the only group of people who needs help, takes help from whitey, but scrutinize a black man for helping because he aint say the right thing. but then get mad at the people who dont want to help. so coons and sellouts are not welcomed by yalls standard? but ya ok with taing it from nigga hating white folk?

yea, yall fukked up in ya head.

ole battered wife syndrome ass niggas

The fact that you continue to assume and at the very least imply that anyone disagreeing with Barkley is, uneducated, broke and unable to support his\her family makes you just as big of a piece of shit as he is.

The problem with those of you riding the coon train is, your go to is, "How much money do you have?" "Have you given as much as ___________?" Get the fuck out of here with this bullshit line of questioning and thinking.

There are scientists, teachers, counselors, mentors, doctors, etc that will never have the wealth that Barkley was allowed by the creator to have. This doesn't make their contributions any less to society or whatever charities and institutions they give too any less.

No Black people aren't the only ones that need to say the right things. We all should be striving to say and do the right things. However, when given the station of being in the public ones sense of etiquette, class and character should rise to the status they have been afforded.
 
The Lonious Monk;c-9683094 said:
desertrain10;c-9682536 said:
Why?

Unfortunately there are many ppl who tend to share the same sentiments or are at least predisposed to

And he's said that he's wanted to pursue a political career. Think he ran for a senate seat in Alabama before

Wouldn't be surprised if he was intentionally trying to position himself to do so or just garner the support of a certain constituency

I mean who knows

But its plausible

I don't disagree, and I don't know for sure. I'm just going by Barkley's history. To me if you look at the totality of what he says and does, he's more of a person that's out of touch with the average black person and doesn't have the sense to keep his mouth closed on these issues than someone who is trying to ingratiate himself to white people. After all, there have been times when he's pissed white people off too by saying shit they don't like. More often than not he just doesn't think before he speaks. On top of that, he's really not that bright of a guy. People are giving him way more credit than he deserves. If it's not about basketball, no one should be taking his comments seriously.

blackamerica;c-9682633 said:
Lebron? This nigga just completely changed the subject lol.

U previously stated Barkley didnt know what he was doing when speaking on race. But its CLEAR as day this nigga is a willful coon much like Lil Wayne, Kanye, Ray Lewis, RZA & the other coons you defend. U still think he aint know what he was doing wearing chains on that cover?

Me and you have been around and around on this topic, but this time you should have no beef with me. I've said multiple times in this topic that I think it's perfectly fine to call Barkley a coon. The only people you listed that I ever defended were Ray Lewis and Rza and I admitted they said some dumb shit, but I also don't believe a few bad comments makes a person a coon. However, Barkley has a body of work that I wouldn't even try to defend. I think calling him a coon is a lazy way of attacking him, but that's really all ya'll are capable of, so have it. It's more appropriate in this case than most, so I wouldn't bother arguing against that.

Trillfate;c-9682817 said:
desertrain10;c-9682515 said:
Lol

Ok ....

Barkley is free to have his opinion. But the real bullshit is this idea he is this purveyor of truth who is being punished by many of the very ppl he is trying to help. Then he goes on to act like he does not want a pat on his back for his donations to HBCUs and then proceeds to pat himself on back

Ppl question his blkness, or allegiances rather, not because they don't like that he "keeps it real". Its in response to when he makes comments like: “The notion that white cops are out there killing Black people is ridiculous. It’s flat-out ridiculous. I challenge any Black person to make that point. Cops are absolutely awesome. They’re the only thing in the ghetto (separating this place) from this place being the Wild, Wild West.” Or when he defends the actions of the officer who killed Eric Garner as being justified

What is even more damning is when he disparages or dismisses the likes of the BLM movement or police detractors, he does so without acknowledging that they do raise valid concerns

I really don't take much he says seriously. This is the same man when asked if he would ever play again for the 76ers, said, "I can be bought. If they paid me enough, I'd work for the Klan." But if this isnt the biggest case of a kettle calling the pot black

@"The Lonious Monk" this is the man u defend?

I guess that quote is no different than when lebron said he's choosing miami huh?

My nigga for real? I swear some of you dudes have the reasoning ability of 2 year olds. In what world what you just did be considered any kind of logical way to discuss something? Like I can't even articulate the stupidity of what you just did.

Look man, I'll say it for the third time this topic. You want to call Barkley a coon, go ahead. I have no problem with that. I probably wouldn't call him that because it's too simplistic and doesn't really describe his stupidity all that well, but he's got more than enough bonafide coonish acts and comments to make the title fit. We weren't debating whether Barkley was a coon or not. We were talking about the merit or potential truth in his recent statements, and almost everyone in this topic has agreed that they weren't really wrong. I'm not sure why you dudes are still arguing so hard about this.

You don't have any data to qualify Barkley's coon statement. Barkley's charitable contributions are not a qualifier neither is the ten people in here agreeing with Barkley's statement.

 
Kwan Dai;c-9683627 said:
You don't have any data to qualify Barkley's coon statement. Barkley's charitable contributions are not a qualifier neither is the ten people in here agreeing with Barkley's statement.

This site, hell, this thread is really the only data needed. How often do we have relatively benign topics like this blow up cause niggas like you want to start calling names and attacking characters every times someone says something you don't particularly like or agree with? Silly niggas like you and the others in this thread aren't unique in the black community or human race in general. There are lots of people out that respond to discourse like 4 year olds and attack the messenger rather than the message. That's why we a crooked buffoon as president because people can't think rationally. They get in their emotions and their bullshit and act based on that.

Barkley isn't wrong about that. You niggas never need data to quantify or qualify the dumb shit you say, so why does Barkley. 9 times out of 10 he just a fool that likes to run of at the mouth. This time his comments just happened to be less foolish than usual. You disagree. Fine, but how about you provide some data to qualify your side? Or you could just keep doing what you always do, which is call people who disagree with you a coon or in other words, nothing.
 
The Lonious Monk;c-9683688 said:
Kwan Dai;c-9683627 said:
You don't have any data to qualify Barkley's coon statement. Barkley's charitable contributions are not a qualifier neither is the ten people in here agreeing with Barkley's statement.

This site, hell, this thread is really the only data needed. How often do we have relatively benign topics like this blow up cause niggas like you want to start calling names and attacking characters every times someone says something you don't particularly like or agree with? Silly niggas like you and the others in this thread aren't unique in the black community or human race in general. There are lots of people out that respond to discourse like 4 year olds and attack the messenger rather than the message. That's why we a crooked buffoon as president because people can't think rationally. They get in their emotions and their bullshit and act based on that.

Barkley isn't wrong about that. You niggas never need data to quantify or qualify the dumb shit you say, so why does Barkley. 9 times out of 10 he just a fool that likes to run of at the mouth. This time his comments just happened to be less foolish than usual. You disagree. Fine, but how about you provide some data to qualify your side? Or you could just keep doing what you always do, which is call people who disagree with you a coon or in other words, nothing.

You are a coon and a clown to boot. Why? Because you are supporting coon\clown rhetoric. If, the IC is your go to source for polling data then you aren't just riding the coon train you're an idiot as well. You support Barkley responding like a 4 year old but are here accusing others of behaving similarly? If, you are going to support one person responding like a 4 year old support them all. Hypocrite.

There is no message in calling people losers and full shit because, they disagree with you or question your person. Barkley's sounding off was rational and unemotional? Man fuck off.

There is no need for me qualify any statements because, I do my utmost to not throw out blanket statements against other people especially my own.
 
Kwan Dai;c-9683727 said:
The Lonious Monk;c-9683688 said:
Kwan Dai;c-9683627 said:
You don't have any data to qualify Barkley's coon statement. Barkley's charitable contributions are not a qualifier neither is the ten people in here agreeing with Barkley's statement.

This site, hell, this thread is really the only data needed. How often do we have relatively benign topics like this blow up cause niggas like you want to start calling names and attacking characters every times someone says something you don't particularly like or agree with? Silly niggas like you and the others in this thread aren't unique in the black community or human race in general. There are lots of people out that respond to discourse like 4 year olds and attack the messenger rather than the message. That's why we a crooked buffoon as president because people can't think rationally. They get in their emotions and their bullshit and act based on that.

Barkley isn't wrong about that. You niggas never need data to quantify or qualify the dumb shit you say, so why does Barkley. 9 times out of 10 he just a fool that likes to run of at the mouth. This time his comments just happened to be less foolish than usual. You disagree. Fine, but how about you provide some data to qualify your side? Or you could just keep doing what you always do, which is call people who disagree with you a coon or in other words, nothing.

You are a coon and a clown to boot. Why? Because you are supporting coon\clown rhetoric. If, the IC is your go to source for polling data then you aren't just riding the coon train you're an idiot as well. You support Barkley responding like a 4 year old but are here accusing others of behaving similarly? If, you are going to support one person responding like a 4 year old support them all. Hypocrite.

There is no message in calling people losers and full shit because, they disagree with you or question your person. Barkley's sounding off was rational and unemotional? Man fuck off.

There is no need for me qualify any statements because, I do my utmost to not throw out blanket statements against other people especially my own.

Nigga please. Do you see me trying write a journal report claiming what Charles said is true using the IC as my source? No, but if your dumb ass can't see that you're doing exactly what he's claiming, I don't know what to tell you. You're stupider than I thought, and I wasn't sure that was possible.

And who ever said Barkley was rational or unemotional? I already said dude is a fool. He's exactly the type of person that doesn't make rational statements. That doesn't mean he's wrong or that his remarks in this case are coonish. You haven't given one rational reason why what he said is coonish and not just critical. All you do is make illogical and childish statements. So I'll let you do you until you can actually post something worthy of discussion. I won't hold my breath on that one.
 
Kwan Dai;c-9683609 said:
2stepz_ahead;c-9683516 said:
so would yall want a nigga talking like barkley to not give money to hbcu's?

is he forcing his opinion on any of yall? is he saying think like him or he wont help?

i agree with him.....alof of black people are full of shit.

this man cant have his own opinion?

why do black people always gotta say the right things...or be in agreement with everyone else?

if he say some shit against black people...ok fukk him for that statement. just that statement...or maybe even a list of statements. but fukk it ...he reached back to help....what are you niggas doing?

will you turn away his help?

where do you nigga think most scholarship money comes from? sure aint level headed white people. racist white people looking for a tax write off.

yall niggas aint hungry enough.....yall the type to turn away a handout even being on the sidewalk homeless for years cause you trynna make a stand against what was said.

if his million puts 15 people thru college, and that gives the a degree where they can support their family and give them a good life and put them thru college so that they can in turn support their family, the fukk are yall talking about?

so his opinions should kill the possibility of helping generations?

yall do know yall in one of the most racist countries in the world, right?

cops having target practice, niggas killing niggas....an we worried about what his opinion is and why he helping a white school help black people?

some of you niggas will never be shit.

the only group of people who needs help, takes help from whitey, but scrutinize a black man for helping because he aint say the right thing. but then get mad at the people who dont want to help. so coons and sellouts are not welcomed by yalls standard? but ya ok with taing it from nigga hating white folk?

yea, yall fukked up in ya head.

ole battered wife syndrome ass niggas

The fact that you continue to assume and at the very least imply that anyone disagreeing with Barkley is, uneducated, broke and unable to support his\her family makes you just as big of a piece of shit as he is.

The problem with those of you riding the coon train is, your go to is, "How much money do you have?" "Have you given as much as ___________?" Get the fuck out of here with this bullshit line of questioning and thinking.

There are scientists, teachers, counselors, mentors, doctors, etc that will never have the wealth that Barkley was allowed by the creator to have. This doesn't make their contributions any less to society or whatever charities and institutions they give too any less.

No Black people aren't the only ones that need to say the right things. We all should be striving to say and do the right things. However, when given the station of being in the public ones sense of etiquette, class and character should rise to the status they have been afforded.

so you just gonna compare people who stand on education to an athlete to make your point right?

the man is an athelete.....plays ball for a living and always said he doesnt want to be a role model. yet you try to make him one?

maybve there is a reason grant hill is not in barkleys position....hes upstand and carries himself with class....but he not in barkleys position.

so you are also saying the status should change you? really?

how do we know barkley doesnt carry himself with all the things you mentioned? we only see him making dumb ass statements....does that mean he cant carry himself any other way?

an yes, "what have you done" should be brought up. until you give your hard earned money away to help and people say you aint shit...you wont know how he feels. so how can you comment on it if you have never done it. and everyone is different but you want all black people the same and think the same and agree with each other.

its obvious ...if he donates and makes statements...his heart wants to help but his mouth say dumb shit...nigga could be bipolar or maybe hes being who he is....now does that make his donations any less?

as long a he is reaching back to help and not forcing his opinions on anyone....i dont see a problem. he can feel how he feels.
 
2stepz_ahead;c-9682972 said:
ineedpussy;c-9682565 said:
2stepz_ahead;c-9682228 said:
blackrain;c-9682167 said:
ineedpussy;c-9680774 said:
blackrain;c-9680726 said:
ineedpussy;c-9680559 said:
farris2k1;c-9680389 said:
No probs wit what he said, and i dont even like that nigga, some of yall niggas on here are against everything said against blacks even if the shits real talk, and thats wack, im pro black as fuck but im also realistic as fuck, of course all races are full of shit but u cant shit on charles cause he didnt say that everybody was or watever,wasnt bout other races he was bein asked bout blacks, some of yall niggas love reachin

but how you know he aint call the news on himself? man just because you put lipstick on a pig.......and why give to auburn? oh its his alma mater but why the fuck did he go there if he felt so strong about hbcu's? hahahaha. he never gave a fuck about them hbcu's. hes just trying to save face. sort of like getting a life insurance. just incase of shit.

You reaching hard as fuck with this post

tell me how pleighboi? he can coon it up real hard but since he "made" contributions to hbcu's hes all good in your book. youre they type that was like hilary is cool because she kept hot sauce in her purse. or you was probably those ones that said clinton was the first black pres because he played the sax. got some head, or smoked weed but didnt inhale. or better yet was all on obamas dick all the while not understanding that he wasnt an african american like you. smmfh. stfu nigga. you need to be shot

You're making up a bunch of shit nobody is saying or even hinting at meanwhile making posts that expose your own insecurities. You got issues you need to deal with.

this just his area.....

hes trying to prove something by using examples, when he doesnt know how the example he is using came to be.

follow that nigga and we all would still be on the plantation

on the plantation? nigga you would rather for the one percent of blacks to live like whites and the rest of us in the poor working class. both of yall never loved blacks. and hugging the block? ha. nigga i dont own none of those blocks so why do i car. and tulsa? well i highly doubt any of those blacks fucked with white people to get their blocks going. so is it wrong that theyre holding down their "blocks"? how did they think outside the box? the only way i can see it, is by fuckin with strictly their own people and then branching off.....but you want blacks to be white and deal with whites and say fuck blacks as a whole. i get you.....you want to be white.

everyone see the bolded?

yall see it...this is what he said...

where did the people in tulsa get their supplies from, genius?

the had planes and an airport.....where they get the planes? how they know how to build an airport?

where they get there movie projectors? their groceries were not all locally grown...

so again ya dumbass....at some point you need to step out of the only black shit to deal with white people to bring back to black and then circle the wagons and protect.

this is how you know you aint got shit and will never have shit....

an you are right ...you dont own the blocks.....why is that?

you love for say someone wants to be white......you are truly a dumbass. like a dumbass as superhero with DA on ya chest.

show me proof that those blacks didnt do those thangs that you say. and hell if you feel like that than the bantu tribe needed the white mans help to jump off them tall ass platforms. because where do you think they got the technology at to figure out the slope they needed.

they needed the white man to tell them how long the vines needed to be to attach to their ankles.

they needed the white man to tell them exactly when to cut the vine so they wouldnt splat on impact.

gtfoh coon ass nigga.
 
ineedpussy;c-9685320 said:
2stepz_ahead;c-9682972 said:
ineedpussy;c-9682565 said:
2stepz_ahead;c-9682228 said:
blackrain;c-9682167 said:
ineedpussy;c-9680774 said:
blackrain;c-9680726 said:
ineedpussy;c-9680559 said:
farris2k1;c-9680389 said:
No probs wit what he said, and i dont even like that nigga, some of yall niggas on here are against everything said against blacks even if the shits real talk, and thats wack, im pro black as fuck but im also realistic as fuck, of course all races are full of shit but u cant shit on charles cause he didnt say that everybody was or watever,wasnt bout other races he was bein asked bout blacks, some of yall niggas love reachin

but how you know he aint call the news on himself? man just because you put lipstick on a pig.......and why give to auburn? oh its his alma mater but why the fuck did he go there if he felt so strong about hbcu's? hahahaha. he never gave a fuck about them hbcu's. hes just trying to save face. sort of like getting a life insurance. just incase of shit.

You reaching hard as fuck with this post

tell me how pleighboi? he can coon it up real hard but since he "made" contributions to hbcu's hes all good in your book. youre they type that was like hilary is cool because she kept hot sauce in her purse. or you was probably those ones that said clinton was the first black pres because he played the sax. got some head, or smoked weed but didnt inhale. or better yet was all on obamas dick all the while not understanding that he wasnt an african american like you. smmfh. stfu nigga. you need to be shot

You're making up a bunch of shit nobody is saying or even hinting at meanwhile making posts that expose your own insecurities. You got issues you need to deal with.

this just his area.....

hes trying to prove something by using examples, when he doesnt know how the example he is using came to be.

follow that nigga and we all would still be on the plantation

on the plantation? nigga you would rather for the one percent of blacks to live like whites and the rest of us in the poor working class. both of yall never loved blacks. and hugging the block? ha. nigga i dont own none of those blocks so why do i car. and tulsa? well i highly doubt any of those blacks fucked with white people to get their blocks going. so is it wrong that theyre holding down their "blocks"? how did they think outside the box? the only way i can see it, is by fuckin with strictly their own people and then branching off.....but you want blacks to be white and deal with whites and say fuck blacks as a whole. i get you.....you want to be white.

everyone see the bolded?

yall see it...this is what he said...

where did the people in tulsa get their supplies from, genius?

the had planes and an airport.....where they get the planes? how they know how to build an airport?

where they get there movie projectors? their groceries were not all locally grown...

so again ya dumbass....at some point you need to step out of the only black shit to deal with white people to bring back to black and then circle the wagons and protect.

this is how you know you aint got shit and will never have shit....

an you are right ...you dont own the blocks.....why is that?

you love for say someone wants to be white......you are truly a dumbass. like a dumbass as superhero with DA on ya chest.

show me proof that those blacks didnt do those thangs that you say. and hell if you feel like that than the bantu tribe needed the white mans help to jump off them tall ass platforms. because where do you think they got the technology at to figure out the slope they needed.

they needed the white man to tell them how long the vines needed to be to attach to their ankles.

they needed the white man to tell them exactly when to cut the vine so they wouldnt splat on impact.

gtfoh coon ass nigga.

you really showing your ignorance....

you trying to hard at trolling now.

comparing a people with private jets in the middle of a racist country to tribal activities in the middle of africa?

ya know...i want to apologize for calling you a dumbass.

dumbasses deserve better representation than you
 
Trillfate;c-9684933 said:
ThaNubianGod;c-9683735 said:
Funny how this thread basically proved Chuck right.

Charles "id work for the klan" Barkley was proven right in your eyes huh? Ok..

Why do you keep doing that? People are discussing one statement, and you keep throwing out something completely different. Are you incapable of looking at the merit of a statement without attacking the person making it or something?
 
The Lonious Monk;c-9685733 said:
Trillfate;c-9684933 said:
ThaNubianGod;c-9683735 said:
Funny how this thread basically proved Chuck right.

Charles "id work for the klan" Barkley was proven right in your eyes huh? Ok..

Why do you keep doing that? People are discussing one statement, and you keep throwing out something completely different. Are you incapable of looking at the merit of a statement without attacking the person making it or something?

Because you wouldn't give a racist the benefit of the doubt if they said something like this. So why should a known coon get the benefit of the doubt?
 
5th Letter;c-9685737 said:
The Lonious Monk;c-9685733 said:
Trillfate;c-9684933 said:
ThaNubianGod;c-9683735 said:
Funny how this thread basically proved Chuck right.

Charles "id work for the klan" Barkley was proven right in your eyes huh? Ok..

Why do you keep doing that? People are discussing one statement, and you keep throwing out something completely different. Are you incapable of looking at the merit of a statement without attacking the person making it or something?

Because you wouldn't give a racist the benefit of the doubt if they said something like this. So why should a known coon get the benefit of the doubt?

Ok, I think that's where the disconnect is. What do you mean by benefit of the doubt? I don't think anyone is looking at this statement and saying that Barkley isn't a coon because of it. I think the general attitude of those who think the statement has merit is the "broken clock is right twice a day" line of thinking. Barkley can make a reasonable statement here and there and still be a coon just like a racist can make a reasonable statement and still be a racist. If David Duke came out tomorrow and said "America has a wealth distribution problem that needs to be address. I'm not going to be like "Duke is a racist so he's wrong. America is just fine in that regard."
 
The Lonious Monk;c-9685740 said:
5th Letter;c-9685737 said:
The Lonious Monk;c-9685733 said:
Trillfate;c-9684933 said:
ThaNubianGod;c-9683735 said:
Funny how this thread basically proved Chuck right.

Charles "id work for the klan" Barkley was proven right in your eyes huh? Ok..

Why do you keep doing that? People are discussing one statement, and you keep throwing out something completely different. Are you incapable of looking at the merit of a statement without attacking the person making it or something?

Because you wouldn't give a racist the benefit of the doubt if they said something like this. So why should a known coon get the benefit of the doubt?

Ok, I think that's where the disconnect is. What do you mean by benefit of the doubt? I don't think anyone is looking at this statement and saying that Barkley isn't a coon because of it. I think the general attitude of those who think the statement has merit is the "broken clock is right twice a day" line of thinking. Barkley can make a reasonable statement here and there and still be a coon just like a racist can make a reasonable statement and still be a racist. If David Duke came out tomorrow and said "America has a wealth distribution problem that needs to be address. I'm not going to be like "Duke is a racist so he's wrong. America is just fine in that regard."

Barkley is known to say slick shit about black people. Barkley said something that on the surface doesn't seem bad at face value. But considering who it's coming from I can't be like well he's a coon but on this statement I give him a pass. Anything that remotely seems suspect I automatically question the comment. No, if Duke said black people are full of shit you wouldn't give him the benefit of the doubt. So why should Barkley get it? Because he's black?
 
5th Letter;c-9685745 said:
The Lonious Monk;c-9685740 said:
5th Letter;c-9685737 said:
The Lonious Monk;c-9685733 said:
Trillfate;c-9684933 said:
ThaNubianGod;c-9683735 said:
Funny how this thread basically proved Chuck right.

Charles "id work for the klan" Barkley was proven right in your eyes huh? Ok..

Why do you keep doing that? People are discussing one statement, and you keep throwing out something completely different. Are you incapable of looking at the merit of a statement without attacking the person making it or something?

Because you wouldn't give a racist the benefit of the doubt if they said something like this. So why should a known coon get the benefit of the doubt?

Ok, I think that's where the disconnect is. What do you mean by benefit of the doubt? I don't think anyone is looking at this statement and saying that Barkley isn't a coon because of it. I think the general attitude of those who think the statement has merit is the "broken clock is right twice a day" line of thinking. Barkley can make a reasonable statement here and there and still be a coon just like a racist can make a reasonable statement and still be a racist. If David Duke came out tomorrow and said "America has a wealth distribution problem that needs to be address. I'm not going to be like "Duke is a racist so he's wrong. America is just fine in that regard."

Barkley is known to say slick shit about black people. Barkley said something that on the surface doesn't seem bad at face value. But considering who it's coming from I can't be like well he's a coon but on this statement I give him a pass. Anything that remotely seems suspect I automatically question the comment. No, if Duke said black people are full of shit you wouldn't give him the benefit of the doubt. So why should Barkley get it? Because he's black?

Again, no one's giving Barkley a pass here. Anyone who thinks he's a coon before this statement, probably still thinks he's a coon after the statement. Just because people think that his statement taken at face value has merit doesn't mean that anyone believes Barkley is any less of a shitty person for saying it. In fact, the common sentiment among people who agree with the statement is that it doesn't change anything regarding Barkley as a person.

And if Duke said "A lot of black people are full of shit." I wouldn't turn around and try to claim that his statement has no merit at all. As we've already agree upon, a lot of people of every race are full of shit.
 
The Lonious Monk;c-9685752 said:
5th Letter;c-9685745 said:
The Lonious Monk;c-9685740 said:
5th Letter;c-9685737 said:
The Lonious Monk;c-9685733 said:
Trillfate;c-9684933 said:
ThaNubianGod;c-9683735 said:
Funny how this thread basically proved Chuck right.

Charles "id work for the klan" Barkley was proven right in your eyes huh? Ok..

Why do you keep doing that? People are discussing one statement, and you keep throwing out something completely different. Are you incapable of looking at the merit of a statement without attacking the person making it or something?

Because you wouldn't give a racist the benefit of the doubt if they said something like this. So why should a known coon get the benefit of the doubt?

Ok, I think that's where the disconnect is. What do you mean by benefit of the doubt? I don't think anyone is looking at this statement and saying that Barkley isn't a coon because of it. I think the general attitude of those who think the statement has merit is the "broken clock is right twice a day" line of thinking. Barkley can make a reasonable statement here and there and still be a coon just like a racist can make a reasonable statement and still be a racist. If David Duke came out tomorrow and said "America has a wealth distribution problem that needs to be address. I'm not going to be like "Duke is a racist so he's wrong. America is just fine in that regard."

Barkley is known to say slick shit about black people. Barkley said something that on the surface doesn't seem bad at face value. But considering who it's coming from I can't be like well he's a coon but on this statement I give him a pass. Anything that remotely seems suspect I automatically question the comment. No, if Duke said black people are full of shit you wouldn't give him the benefit of the doubt. So why should Barkley get it? Because he's black?

Again, no one's giving Barkley a pass here. Anyone who thinks he's a coon before this statement, probably still thinks he's a coon after the statement. Just because people think that his statement taken at face value has merit doesn't mean that anyone believes Barkley is any less of a shitty person for saying it. In fact, the common sentiment among people who agree with the statement is that it doesn't change anything regarding Barkley as a person.

And if Duke said "A lot of black people are full of shit." I wouldn't turn around and try to claim that his statement has no merit at all. As we've already agree upon, a lot of people of every race are full of shit.

So if no one is giving him a pass then what are we having this discussion for? You say no one is giving him a pass, then you proceed to give him a pass. Just stop it. This thread isn't this long for no reason bruh. And any comment that can be perceived as negative against black people said by a coon has no merit. That's the point bruh.
 
5th Letter;c-9685759 said:
So if no one is giving him a pass then what are we having this discussion for? You say no one is giving him a pass, then you proceed to give him a pass. Just stop it. This thread isn't this long for no reason bruh. And any comment that can be perceived as negative against black people said by a coon has no merit. That's the point bruh.

I have not given anyone a pass. The reason this and other topics go on too long is because people like you and Kwan Dai take completely illogical and emotion based stance and try to argue like there is reason behind it.

The bold is an example. Truth doesn't become a lie just because a shitty person says it. In this case it doesn't matter because Barkley didn't say anything all that profound. Again, the only reason that this topic continues is because some of you think we all have to act like his statement is complete bullshit just because he's a coon even though we all know it's not. But it's not uncommon for unfavorable people to raise points that need to be addressed. If everyone thought like you guys, no progress would ever be made.
 
Last edited:
The Lonious Monk;c-9685767 said:
5th Letter;c-9685759 said:
So if no one is giving him a pass then what are we having this discussion for? You say no one is giving him a pass, then you proceed to give him a pass. Just stop it. This thread isn't this long for no reason bruh. And any comment that can be perceived as negative against black people said by a coon has no merit. That's the point bruh.

I have not given anyone a pass. The reason this and other topics go on too long is because people like you and Kwan Dai take completely illogical and emotion based stance and try to argue like there is reason behind it.

The bold is an example. Truth doesn't become a lie just because a shitty person says it. In this case it doesn't matter because Barkley didn't say anything all that profound. Again, the only reason that this topic continues is because some of you think we all have to act like his statement is complete bullshit just because he's a coon even though we all know it's not. But it's not uncommon for unfavorable people to raise points that need to be addressed. If everyone thought like you guys, no progress would ever be made
.

Any suspect comment made about black people by a coon has no merit.

 
5th Letter;c-9685770 said:
The Lonious Monk;c-9685767 said:
5th Letter;c-9685759 said:
So if no one is giving him a pass then what are we having this discussion for? You say no one is giving him a pass, then you proceed to give him a pass. Just stop it. This thread isn't this long for no reason bruh. And any comment that can be perceived as negative against black people said by a coon has no merit. That's the point bruh.

I have not given anyone a pass. The reason this and other topics go on too long is because people like you and Kwan Dai take completely illogical and emotion based stance and try to argue like there is reason behind it.

The bold is an example. Truth doesn't become a lie just because a shitty person says it. In this case it doesn't matter because Barkley didn't say anything all that profound. Again, the only reason that this topic continues is because some of you think we all have to act like his statement is complete bullshit just because he's a coon even though we all know it's not. But it's not uncommon for unfavorable people to raise points that need to be addressed. If everyone thought like you guys, no progress would ever be made
.

Any suspect comment made about black people by a coon has no merit.

lol Ok.
 

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
153
Views
0
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…