Westie;c-9862037 said:I don't understand how anyone is acting as if black people haven't been taught by society that the darker they are the uglier they are. How is he defensible? With that face on top of it?
You're right. Blacks have been conditioned to dislike their own features, but they're doing it to themselves now.
You whine in this topic, because a wack, uneducated, unattractive (n/h), jailbird, no-talent rapper like Kodak Black not being interested in broads like you touches a nerve... Then turn around and defend a black woman covering her nappy roots with weaves or perms and laying on foundation and having filters on pictures to appear lighter to conform to a European standard of beauty. You defend that blatant manifestation of selfhate, because you either do it yourself or know people who do it. You're part of the problem and the only reason you're complaining now is because Kodak said something about black or skinned women. Only insecure black chicks GAF about what a dumb, molly poppin', in and out of jail a*s n*gga that can't even express himself in his first language got to say anyway. Serena Williams or Eve have said things about black men recently. Guarantee you didn't whine about that though. You pick and choose when to be outraged which makes you a hypocrite.
When I say someone like Amber Rose ain't black, you deny it and force us to see her as black with that one drop rule sh*t that only applies in the US. Talking about "my grandma was Capeverdean and just as light as her" eventhough Amber Rose herself said she ain't black and her family was mad that she procreated with and married to Wiz Khalifah. If you wanna force us to see women like Amber Rose as black, then why can't some of us state their preference for 'em? We were all black, remember? People like you are part of the problem and can't be taken seriously when speaking on racial issues...
Blacks do conform to the European standard of beauty, but in 2017 it's by choice. Miss me with that selective outrage BS you spewing in this thread...