Peezy_Jenkins
New member
i think id rather see the ruthless aggression era
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Peezy_Jenkins;6392458 said:i think id rather see the ruthless aggression era
Strictly Business UK;6393234 said:I certainly don't agree with repeating history & rehashing old stuff, but I really do feel the the PG era is missing something.
These days so many moves are banned, & you only see blood if someone has a genuine hardway accident.
I think the sleaziness of the attitude era doesn't need to return, but the hardness does.
Broddie;6393126 said:No way. Move forward never backwards.
I already witnessed the Golden Era, New Generation and Attitude Eras when they were actually fresh and relevant. What worked back then won't necessarily work today because pop culture is completely different and the best wrestling is the one that adapts to how society presently is. Attitude Era for example worked during an age of political incorrectness being the norm and crash TV being the latest fad, you can't really bring that back in an era where none of that is even relevant anymore.
I stopped watching after the alliance fiasco for about 10 years so I never saw even one minute of the Ruthless Agression era but don't regress back to that either. If I do want to see that I could always look back at archives. They're trying to shepherd in a new era and should continue with that.
Killface_toast;6393358 said:The smackdown 6 was incredible.
paul heyman was at his creative peak.
genocidecutter;6393315 said:Broddie;6393126 said:No way. Move forward never backwards.
I already witnessed the Golden Era, New Generation and Attitude Eras when they were actually fresh and relevant. What worked back then won't necessarily work today because pop culture is completely different and the best wrestling is the one that adapts to how society presently is. Attitude Era for example worked during an age of political incorrectness being the norm and crash TV being the latest fad, you can't really bring that back in an era where none of that is even relevant anymore.
I stopped watching after the alliance fiasco for about 10 years so I never saw even one minute of the Ruthless Agression era but don't regress back to that either. If I do want to see that I could always look back at archives. They're trying to shepherd in a new era and should continue with that.
You missed out huge. Smackdown especially was must see t.v.
Broddie;6393510 said:genocidecutter;6393315 said:Broddie;6393126 said:No way. Move forward never backwards.
I already witnessed the Golden Era, New Generation and Attitude Eras when they were actually fresh and relevant. What worked back then won't necessarily work today because pop culture is completely different and the best wrestling is the one that adapts to how society presently is. Attitude Era for example worked during an age of political incorrectness being the norm and crash TV being the latest fad, you can't really bring that back in an era where none of that is even relevant anymore.
I stopped watching after the alliance fiasco for about 10 years so I never saw even one minute of the Ruthless Agression era but don't regress back to that either. If I do want to see that I could always look back at archives. They're trying to shepherd in a new era and should continue with that.
You missed out huge. Smackdown especially was must see t.v.
The one thing from that time I really have been interested in checking out is Shawn Michaels' comeback because
1) I was a huge fan of the guy during his original run from The Rockers to the Heart Break Kid. It was one of the best character developments I've ever seen in that industry and I literally grew up right along with him as he changed into the "showstopper" from 1997.
2) I was always disappointed in WM 14 being where he called it a wrap as a wrestler because it wasn't even one of his best matches from an in ring point of view. Even though the storytelling was nuts especially with the Tyson swerve he deserved better IMO.
3) Most of today's WWE fans know him from his comeback run and they swear by it and with me only being familiar with his fantastic initial run I could only imagine the quality of the matches during his second wind considering how much the younger cats today blab about it and how he's able to do even more in the ring in the 21st century than he did back in the day. Mostly since the structure of matches in the WWF changed from his prime days and became even more "technical" from an overall standpoint by that time.
One of the only reasons I was kinda apprehensive about it was cause of friend of mine who grew up on WWF with HBK as his GOAT back in the day was really disappointed in the comeback run. He just didn't like the christian Shawn Michaels said that he felt very disingenuous and it was a very bland character compared to the icon that we both grew up watching. It's one of the reasons he stopped watching wrestling. He felt that one of his heroes basically "sold out".
But I'm gonna have to sit down one day and look up clips and bite the bullet because again I keep hearing about all these 5 star classics all over the internet that he supposedly put on between 2003 - 2009 and as an HBK fan it's a part of his legacy that I eventually do have to witness for myself. It wouldn't feel right not to do so in the end.
Already Home_17;6393309 said:Strictly Business UK;6393234 said:I certainly don't agree with repeating history & rehashing old stuff, but I really do feel the the PG era is missing something.
These days so many moves are banned, & you only see blood if someone has a genuine hardway accident.
I think the sleaziness of the attitude era doesn't need to return, but the hardness does.
there were hardness in the ruthless aggression era
although i dont necessarily like the PG era, i dont think its the biggest problem. i think the talent pool is extremely weak compared to past eras. there's no stone cold, rock, foley, shawn michaels, jericho, kane, taker, dudely boys, hardy boyz, hhh, benoit, guererro, lita, trish stratus. multiple characters that stood out
those wrestlers kept me glued to the tv when i first started watching wwe back in late 99. and the storylines were great. i couldnt wait to see what was gonna happen next. it was even like this way for me during the RA era. but the wrestlers and storylines now arent that interesting compared to the past
Jamaica;6394561 said:@Broddie
I recommend the following HBK matches
2002 vs HHH Summerslam
2003 vs Chris Jericho WM 19
2003 vs Goldberg MNR
2003 vs Team Bischoff Survivor Series (great performance)
2003 vs Batista Armageddon
2003 vs HHH MNR
2004 vs HHH vs Chris Benoit WM 20
2004 vs Chris Benoit MNR
2004 vs Christian MNR
2005 vs Edge Royal Rumble
2005 vs Kurt Angle WM 21
2005 vs Kurt Angle Vengence
2005 vs Shelton Benjamin (Famous super kick)
2005 vs Hulk Hogan Summerslam
2005 vs Rey Mysterio MNR (Eddie Guerrero tribute show)
2007 vs John Cena WM 23
2007 vs John Cena MNR
2007 vs John Cena vs Edge vs Randy Orton Backlash
2007 vs Randy Orton Survivor Series
2008 vs Ric Flair WM 24
2008 vs Batista Backlash
2008 vs Chris Jericho Vengence
2008 vs Chris Jericho No Mercy
2009 vs JBL No Way Out
2009 vs Undertaker WM 25