Scientists Confirm: Darwinism Is Broken

[CapitalB]

one thing i can respect about the science field..

right or wrong they look at shit objectively.. and reasses where need be..

unlike religion.. which would rather take everything as fact then take it to task. lmmfao

So scientists had a meeting saying they're wrong about shit....sounds cool to me. Why havent religious leaders ever done this?

i still got my eye on you two....

something aint right....or might be right for the two of you.

always agreeing, high fiving and posting minutes after each other.

either he smashed, about to smash or waiting until monthly leakage is over to smash.

nigga we Pisces!!

u wouldn't understand..

and u shouldn't try to either..

ull only drive urself crazy..

and its FIRE & BLOOD ON OURS NIGGA!!

 

[xxCivicxx]

At this point the theory of evolution is basically pseudo-science

Darwin was a racist that believed in eugenics(the inferiority of melanated peoples) btw

 

[xxCivicxx]

one thing i can respect about the science field..

right or wrong they look at shit objectively.. and reasses where need be..

unlike religion.. which would rather take everything as fact then take it to task. lmmfao

It's been past time to go back to the drawing board because something in the milk ain't clean! Lol @ this:

Only a fool would believe such nonsense. Get real.

Lol thats not evolution

Please define it then

 

[zzombie]

So scientists had a meeting saying they're wrong about shit....sounds cool to me. Why havent religious leaders ever done this?

That has happened several times already.

Educate me then, brother.

Lol to be fair there has been religious leaders to denounce shit the church has said and done in the past. That's why there's alot of Catholics who don't like the current Pope. He's flat out said "Yeah this some bullshit" on some very old stances the church has maintained throughout history. I'm growing further from religion but I still stay informed about shit and it's not as fucked up as in the past. Alot of changes need to be made and some have been acknowledged

I know about the pope. And whenever I see someone high profile challenging the religion it's always the church/institution. Never the religious tenets, the texts....that's what I'm asking about cuz I've seen time and time again science go back on things they believed to be true for years/decades and be like "yea nvm we off that"

Christian don't challenge the text because there's no reason to, it lasted so long because the truths of the principles in the text remain true to the human experience..... what is challenged is human understanding and application of the principles in the text.

 

[zzombie]

The religious people who have a problem with evolution missing the point.

What really needs to be shown for the bullshit that it is is abiogenesis and you don't have Evolution if you don't have abiogenesis.

 

[marc123]

To quote Steve Harvey...."Then, why we still got monkeys?!" lol smh

 

[blackrain]

So scientists had a meeting saying they're wrong about shit....sounds cool to me. Why havent religious leaders ever done this?

That has happened several times already.

Educate me then, brother.

Lol to be fair there has been religious leaders to denounce shit the church has said and done in the past. That's why there's alot of Catholics who don't like the current Pope. He's flat out said "Yeah this some bullshit" on some very old stances the church has maintained throughout history. I'm growing further from religion but I still stay informed about shit and it's not as fucked up as in the past. Alot of changes need to be made and some have been acknowledged

I know about the pope. And whenever I see someone high profile challenging the religion it's always the church/institution. Never the religious tenets, the texts....that's what I'm asking about cuz I've seen time and time again science go back on things they believed to be true for years/decades and be like "yea nvm we off that"

The actual text...yeah those will probably never change though it would be hilarious to see a massive Bible recall for a new version...thing is though even religious people barely read the actual text. They go more for what they're being told it means so as long as they're being told something different that's what matters

 

[marc123]

one thing i can respect about the science field..

right or wrong they look at shit objectively.. and reasses where need be..

unlike religion.. which would rather take everything as fact then take it to task. lmmfao

It's been past time to go back to the drawing board because something in the milk ain't clean! Lol @ this:

Only a fool would believe such nonsense. Get real.

Talking snake

Virgin birth

Putting every animal/insect on a boat

Earth bein 5,000 years old

Adam and Eve

Reincarnation

Smh

 

[Ajackson17]

At this point the theory of evolution is basically pseudo-science

Darwin was a racist that believed in eugenics(the inferiority of melanated peoples) btw

It's far from pseudo science. Darwin had nothing to do with eugenics that was his cousin

 

[zzombie]

At this point the theory of evolution is basically pseudo-science

Darwin was a racist that believed in eugenics(the inferiority of melanated peoples) btw

It's far from pseudo science. Darwin had nothing to do with eugenics that was his cousin

You know what's basically pseudoscience ?? abiogenesis

 

[blackamerica]

Science is basically a bunch of different scenarios in which they narrow down to one. Y'all athiest niggaz are pathetic. All the different math equations & the only thing science keeps coming back to is GOD. They won't admit this ofcourse. They'll say stupid stuff like "aliens could've put us here". But that's hogwash. How can a athiest crap on religion but put their faith in science with all its holes?

 

[Ajackson17]

Science is basically a bunch of different scenarios in which they narrow down to one. Y'all athiest niggaz are pathetic. All the different math equations & the only thing science keeps coming back to is GOD. They won't admit this ofcourse. They'll say stupid stuff like "aliens could've put us here". But that's hogwash. How can a athiest crap on religion but put their faith in science with all its holes?

What scientist is saying that and is it backed by the science community? No, it isn't. No credible scientist is saying that, they can BELIEVE it, but without scientific evidence and data and testing and reproducing those results over and over no one is writing that in a scientific journal to have it peer review.

And no you do not have a hold on what science is. And deities are considered supernatural and scientists study natural phenomenon not supernatural phenomenon. So they do not say anything on deities.

Here ya'll buy these or download these for free sheesh

 

[Ajackson17]

At this point the theory of evolution is basically pseudo-science

Darwin was a racist that believed in eugenics(the inferiority of melanated peoples) btw

It's far from pseudo science. Darwin had nothing to do with eugenics that was his cousin

You know what's basically pseudoscience ?? abiogenesis

Abiogenesis is only a hypothesis at the moment and it is not psuedoscience, based on RNA and DNA and studying that all living matter is made up of carbon and among other chemicals it's only logical that what we considered life arose out of chemical reaction.
http://gizmodo.com/how-often-does-life-emerge-in-the-universe-1783081976

Everything is made up chemical reactions.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/...pernova-astrophysics-health-space-ngbooktalk/

 

[zzombie]

Many of the conclusions of scientists cannot be tested. The problem with science begins when it starts giving answers to things it is not equipped to answer science is supposed to be nothing more than a methodology is that is used to gain new information this information is then used to create new tools that is all science is for nothing more

 

[zzombie]

At this point the theory of evolution is basically pseudo-science

Darwin was a racist that believed in eugenics(the inferiority of melanated peoples) btw

It's far from pseudo science. Darwin had nothing to do with eugenics that was his cousin

You know what's basically pseudoscience ?? abiogenesis

Abiogenesis is only a hypothesis at the moment and it is not psuedoscience, based on RNA and DNA and studying that all living matter is made up of carbon and among other chemicals it's only logical that what we considered life arose out of chemical reaction.
http://gizmodo.com/how-often-does-life-emerge-in-the-universe-1783081976

Everything is made up chemical reactions.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/...pernova-astrophysics-health-space-ngbooktalk/

Abiogenesis is scientific because hypothesis are part of the scientific method

It does not follow that the Bold is logically at all what would be logical would be to say that we don't know. Life is not a chemical reaction not alone anyway life consist of many many many many chemical reactions that all have to happen exactly the right way for a living cell to come into existence the odds of that happening are basically impossible and not only will it have to happen once it would have to happen consistently over and over and over again you don't get something even as complex as a bacteria by chance

 

[huey]

So scientists had a meeting saying they're wrong about shit....sounds cool to me. Why havent religious leaders ever done this?

I have no idea what you look like, but you are sexy as hell

 

[Ajackson17]

Many of the conclusions of scientists cannot be tested. The problem with science begins when it starts giving answers to things it is not equipped to answer science is supposed to be nothing more than a methodology is that is used to gain new information this information is then used to create new tools that is all science is for nothing more

There is enough information to develop a hypothesis at this state. There is way more than enough observation to form this critical thought. Abiogenesis is really on the back burner for now.

 

[Ajackson17]

At this point the theory of evolution is basically pseudo-science

Darwin was a racist that believed in eugenics(the inferiority of melanated peoples) btw

It's far from pseudo science. Darwin had nothing to do with eugenics that was his cousin

You know what's basically pseudoscience ?? abiogenesis

Abiogenesis is only a hypothesis at the moment and it is not psuedoscience, based on RNA and DNA and studying that all living matter is made up of carbon and among other chemicals it's only logical that what we considered life arose out of chemical reaction.
http://gizmodo.com/how-often-does-life-emerge-in-the-universe-1783081976

Everything is made up chemical reactions.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/...pernova-astrophysics-health-space-ngbooktalk/

Abiogenesis is scientific because hypothesis are part of the scientific method

It does not follow that the Bold is logically at all what would be logical would be to say that we don't know. Life is not a chemical reaction not alone anyway life consist of many many many many chemical reactions that all have to happen exactly the right way for a living cell to come into existence the odds of that happening are basically impossible and not only will it have to happen once it would have to happen consistently over and over and over again you don't get something even as complex as a bacteria by chance

By chance is a perception of humans and it is philosophical. There is no correct path, no up, down, left, right, diagonal path, this is how we humans perceive existence, based on what our ideologies maybe.

 

[Ajackson17]

You can read thishttps://www.britannica.com/science/abiogenesis

I'm going to say, we may need to understand quantum particles better to get a better deal of understanding on how life arose.

 

[DoUwant2go2Heaven]

And lets be clear, im not a stomper for darwin. And im not discrediting god. Im just speaking from the world around me. Lets take it back...lets just look at man. I get and know how the bible said man was created. Not the point. Im asking do u believe man today is the man that had the breath of life blew into his lungs? Yes! Or No! Where were adam and eve on earth? Were there other adam and eves on on other continents? Lets start there. @DoUwant2go2Heaven

1. The man that had the breath of life blown into his lungs by God was perfect. Man fell from his perfected state of innocence when he disobeyed God in the Garden of Eden. Thus mankind is flawed from the original design of God.

BUT GOD! For even though in Adam all die, in CHRIST shall all be made alive! The first man, Adam, messed it up by eating from the tree. But the last man, Christ Jesus, fixed it all up by dying on a tree! Hallelujah! So now mankind can be BORN AGAIN and receive new life in Christ that will be everlasting if you accept King Jesus as being both God and Savior of your life. Hallelujah! It just doesn't get any better than that!

And guess what @"b'mer..." God will make all things new in the world to come! And you have an open invitation to RSVP! Will you say Yes to the LORD today my friend?