Sandy Hook Lawsuit Against Gun Maker Can Move Forward

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
1CK1S;545061 said:
Joshua Koskoff, a lawyer for the families, said an exception to the law applies to the case. Litigation is permitted if the company know or should know their products are likely to be used in a way that risks injury to others, he said.

??? This is literally the whole point of a gun
 
This is a small step towards tyranny against any small business owner (since logically speaking it will only effect small businesses while big business will have their lawyers run a train on the judge for such an asinine train of thought)

By know means is this a victory for the families since it still will likely be thrown out but at the same time it is a very divisive lawsuit.

Oh and @janklow to this bullshit.
 
the lawsuit in question remains bullshit. as stated before: "it's designed to attack a firearms manufacturer because Adam Lanza killed his mother and took her firearm and committed a crime with it, which is shit logic. and it makes the argument that civilians shouldn't be able to purchase an AR-15 in this country because of REASONS."

"the semi-automatic rifle used in the school shooting is a military weapon and should not have been sold to civilians?" the semi-automatic rifle in question isn't an issued military weapon. and the military uses weapons - handguns, shotguns, bolt-action rifles - that supposedly aren't being accused of being "military weapons," and yet the argument is the same.

this is the point of the PLCAA: people want to file disingenuous, shameless lawsuits to financially attack gun manufacturers because they have hurt feelings about their existence. this shouldn't be about firearm laws: this lawsuit is a thinly-veiled, abusively political maneuver and people supporting it should be ashamed of themselves.
 

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
7
Views
1
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…