Rewriting Evolution ~ Darwin was wrong

[ohhhla]

since when did a theory become fact?

1st strike. 2 more and you will be certified retarded.

Scientific Theories are observable facts that must be falsifiable.

It's a fact and theory because theories explain shit unlike Creationism which is not even a model.

 

[Drew_Ali]

So how does this involve the article in the first post of this thread?

This thread was established for the sole purpose of "debunking" or "proving" that the theory of evolution is bogus......

And the engine of scientific racism................

I believe that this is a G&S topic........

But will move to the R&R in a few days.............

I will be compiling evidence here that sheds doubt on evolution and Darwinism......

I see.

So you are arguing against specific theories of how biological evolution rather than arguing against the fact the biological evolution occurs?

In the first instance, I am arguing that new research has shown that previous evolutionary theories were incorrect and have to be rewritten.......
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/8...um=referral&utm_source=pulsenews#.USlPyWdnCSo

The second illustrates that the "Tree of Life" accepted by many scientists.........

Has now been shown to be an "antiquated" system of describing life-systems.......
http://postbiota.org/pipermail/tt/2009-February/004416.html

 

[Drew_Ali]

@100 Prime .......

I got this........

 

[Premeer]

negative... a THEORY is just ideas that attempt to explain something.. a fact is something that is proven. nothing about evolution is proven. strictly opinions. weak opinions that hold no weight.

cant be a fact when these "facts" are constantly shifting and changing.

only 1 truth is the truth forever and been the truth since its been spoken.. thats God. if you want the truth, seek God.

if you want to be lied to, and lead in the wrong direction, and pulled this way and that way with their constant evolving theories, then stick with baseless science.

you know just as much as he does.. and you dont know a thing.

 

[Premeer]

strike 2, 1 more and you are certified retarded.

 

[indyman87]

The law of creation is the law of cycles which says that the end point is the same as the beginning point. We came from 'God' not a single cell organism and the universe was not born from a chaotic mass that atheist describe as 'nothing'.

 

[ohhhla]

They're probably creationist scientist.

WHo cares about them??

They believe that the Grand Canyon was because of the Flood.

 

[Drew_Ali]

This isn't a intelligent conversation.

It's ID-iots supporter trying to his/her hardest trying to disprove something that's a fact.

We all share a common ancestor which happened to be a Black Woman.

And Change over time does occur.

Darwin was wrong about a lot of things.

But about Natural selection he wasn't wrong.

everything about evolution is a theory... or did you forget that part.

you do know that gravity is "just a theory" right. why don't you jump off the empire state building since it's just a theory

this is supposed to be t/s compelling/intelligent argument?

evolution is a very simple and very real process of life. it also doesn't require your belief in order to exist, facts are kinda wonderful that way

@kai......

Please do not confuse my argument with that of anyone else.......

 

[Gold_Certificate]

since when did a theory become fact?

1st strike. 2 more and you will be certified retarded.

Scientific Theories are observable facts that must be falsifiable.

It's a fact and theory because theories explain shit unlike Creationism which is not even a model.

Nah b. Scientific theories are basically explanations--that must be falsifiable--about observable phenomena.

For example: Humans observe that hotter water sometimes freezes faster than colder water; then someone says that they think it happens due to convection.

 

[Premeer]

This isn't a intelligent conversation.

It's ID-iots supporter trying to his/her hardest trying to disprove something that's a fact.

We all share a common ancestor which happened to be a Black Woman.

And Change over time does occur.

Darwin was wrong about a lot of things.

But about Natural selection he wasn't wrong.

everything about evolution is a theory... or did you forget that part.

you do know that gravity is "just a theory" right. why don't you jump off the empire state building since it's just a theory

this is supposed to be t/s compelling/intelligent argument?

evolution is a very simple and very real process of life. it also doesn't require your belief in order to exist, facts are kinda wonderful that way

only in science can the they mix up the truth with fantasy.

but this has nothing to do with gravity. its about mankind and where we came from.

slight difference.

 

[Drew_Ali]

They're probably creationist scientist.

WHo cares about them??

They believe that the Grand Canyon was because of the Flood.

Yeah these guys are all creationists.....

Please watch.... only 2 mins.....

 

[ohhhla]

Demonstrate your Magical genie right now.

And inb4 Atheist believes in nothing when there is really no such thing as nothing in terms of science.

 

[ohhhla]

since when did a theory become fact?

1st strike. 2 more and you will be certified retarded.

Scientific Theories are observable facts that must be falsifiable.

It's a fact and theory because theories explain shit unlike Creationism which is not even a model.

Nah b. Scientific theories are basically explanations--that must be falsifiable--about observable phenomena.

For example: Humans observe that hotter water sometimes freezes faster than colder water; then someone says that they think it happens due to convection.

Typo, bruh, and I gave you ether.

 

[Gold_Certificate]

This isn't a intelligent conversation.

It's ID-iots supporter trying to his/her hardest trying to disprove something that's a fact.

We all share a common ancestor which happened to be a Black Woman.

And Change over time does occur.

Darwin was wrong about a lot of things.

But about Natural selection he wasn't wrong.

everything about evolution is a theory... or did you forget that part.

you do know that gravity is "just a theory" right. why don't you jump off the empire state building since it's just a theory

this is supposed to be t/s compelling/intelligent argument?

evolution is a very simple and very real process of life. it also doesn't require your belief in order to exist, facts are kinda wonderful that way

Nah b. Gravity is an observable phenomena. Theories are the attempts to explain how/why gravity occurs.

I'd say it's because mass warps space-time.

 

[ohhhla]

They're probably creationist scientist.

WHo cares about them??

They believe that the Grand Canyon was because of the Flood.

Yeah these guys are all creationists.....

Please watch.... only 2 mins.....

If not, they're using an Argument from Personal Incredulity.

 

[Premeer]

you demonstrate how their ISNT a God..

ok, here-

how did the computer make itself.

quick. answer.

 

[Gold_Certificate]

So how does this involve the article in the first post of this thread?

This thread was established for the sole purpose of "debunking" or "proving" that the theory of evolution is bogus......

And the engine of scientific racism................

I believe that this is a G&S topic........

But will move to the R&R in a few days.............

I will be compiling evidence here that sheds doubt on evolution and Darwinism......

I see.

So you are arguing against specific theories of how biological evolution rather than arguing against the fact the biological evolution occurs?

In the first instance, I am arguing that new research has shown that previous evolutionary theories were incorrect and have to be rewritten.......
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/8...um=referral&utm_source=pulsenews#.USlPyWdnCSo

The second illustrates that the "Tree of Life" accepted by many scientists.........

Has now been shown to be an "antiquated" system of describing life-systems.......
http://postbiota.org/pipermail/tt/2009-February/004416.html

I see. I thought you were trying to "debunk" biological evolution.

 

[Drew_Ali]

So how does this involve the article in the first post of this thread?

This thread was established for the sole purpose of "debunking" or "proving" that the theory of evolution is bogus......

And the engine of scientific racism................

I believe that this is a G&S topic........

But will move to the R&R in a few days.............

I will be compiling evidence here that sheds doubt on evolution and Darwinism......

I see.

So you are arguing against specific theories of how biological evolution rather than arguing against the fact the biological evolution occurs?

In the first instance, I am arguing that new research has shown that previous evolutionary theories were incorrect and have to be rewritten.......
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/8...um=referral&utm_source=pulsenews#.USlPyWdnCSo

The second illustrates that the "Tree of Life" accepted by many scientists.........

Has now been shown to be an "antiquated" system of describing life-systems.......
http://postbiota.org/pipermail/tt/2009-February/004416.html

I see. I thought you were trying to "debunk" biological evolution.

I am.....

You know what's going on here..............

 

[ohhhla]

you demonstrate how their ISNT a God..

ok, here-

how did the computer make itself.

quick. answer.

You're shifting the burden of proof you can't do that.

Positive claims require extraordinary evidence.

That's like someone who tells me they have an invisible dragon in my garage.

I tell them I don't believe them

And he tells me to disprove it

It's not my job to disprove it, it's your job to prove it to me.

 

[Gold_Certificate]

So how does this involve the article in the first post of this thread?

This thread was established for the sole purpose of "debunking" or "proving" that the theory of evolution is bogus......

And the engine of scientific racism................

I believe that this is a G&S topic........

But will move to the R&R in a few days.............

I will be compiling evidence here that sheds doubt on evolution and Darwinism......

I see.

So you are arguing against specific theories of how biological evolution rather than arguing against the fact the biological evolution occurs?

In the first instance, I am arguing that new research has shown that previous evolutionary theories were incorrect and have to be rewritten.......
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/8...um=referral&utm_source=pulsenews#.USlPyWdnCSo

The second illustrates that the "Tree of Life" accepted by many scientists.........

Has now been shown to be an "antiquated" system of describing life-systems.......
http://postbiota.org/pipermail/tt/2009-February/004416.html

I see. I thought you were trying to "debunk" biological evolution.

I am.....

You know what's going on here..............

But you're only arguing against theories that attempt to explain how/why biological evolution occurs.

You're not arguing that biological evolution does not occur, right?