kai_valya;5550297 said:
Drew_Ali;5522264 said:kai_valya;5522262 said:Drew_Ali;5522199 said:kai_valya;5522131 said:Drew_Ali;5522061 said:LOL.....
I don't want to get embarrassed......
11:7
Sahih International
And it is He who created the heavens and the earth in six days - and His Throne had been upon water - that He might test you as to which of you is best in deed. But if you say, "Indeed, you are resurrected after death," those who disbelieve will surely say, "This is not but obvious magic."
i blame translations, cuz they can be misleading, the word ayyama does not mean day in th literal sense, it means stage or phase
Yes........
Translations are always posing problems with interpretations........
Any known problems surrounding the meaning of creation/إخلق ??????????????
23:14
Sahih International
Then We made the sperm-drop into a clinging clot, and We made the clot into a lump [of flesh], and We made [from] the lump, bones, and We covered the bones with flesh; then We developed him into another creation. So blessed is Allah , the best of creators.
that verse is about embryonic development, what's your point
blessed is Allah , the best of creators.....................
Drew_Ali;5516423 said:kai_valya;5516387 said:Drew_Ali;5516366 said:kai_valya;5516348 said:Drew_Ali;5516322 said:kai_valya;5516307 said:
@kai
Please watch.....
kai_valya;5516312 said:Drew_Ali;5516284 said:kai_valya;5516269 said:Drew_Ali;5516247 said:kai_valya;5516217 said:Drew_Ali;5516149 said:DMTxCannabis;5516105 said:I can't front, this thread makes no sense to me.. Idek what ya'll debating/discussing..
100 Prime;5516073 said:
Well to sum it up......
If you believe in the theory of evolution then......
You also believe in this.......
On the low......
It is more important than you can possibly imagine.........
you're thinking about evolution in linear terms, and it doesn't work like that. individuals don't evolve, species don't evolve, populations evolve. individuals in a population vary and those that survive propgate their genes, over time the populations evolves. as this happens again and agian over millions of years you would end up with a very different species in one population than you would in the other one, based on what genes survived in the population and which were eliminated.
evolution doesn't go in a straight line, it's ever more intricately branching web
Different does not equal a new species.......
"I also think that racial differences are a long way from being cosmetic, and there’s no evolutionary reason for us to be the homogeneous species that a lot of people claim we are- it would mean evolution stopped the day modern humans evolved, which is just anti-logic........
There’s biological evidence to the contrary, like different gestation spans, twinning rates etc, and more recent genetics publications that have outright backed race as valid. Which will instantly label me as a racist in many peoples eyes, which is probably why a lot of publishing Phds don’t comment publicly on race"...........
if it's different enough (as in two pop. not being able to produce viable offspring) yes that does equal a new species
But this has never been observed..........
speciation has never been observed? to different populations diverging and going on to result in different species has never occured? seriously?
Seriously......
Not one new species named from these "observations.......
so you use a video from creationists to support your point? you've got to be kidding me
Everything said in that video is academically correct................
Mutation is the cause for a new flu shot every year........
You don't go get an "ulf" shot one year and the "flu" the next........
From year to year it is the influenza virus.......
Nothing more nothing less.....
The virus mutates but does not "evolve" into a new species........
is it really? show me the studies and evidence that support the assertion that speciation never occurs, i'll wait
Not to be pretentious......
But you should be providing evidence that it does occur.......
The main example used by evolutionists is Diane Dodd's fruit fly experiment........
However......
Diane Dodd's fruit flies are still fruit flies, regardless of whether they prefer mates who eat maltose or starch......
http://wps.pearsoncustom.com/wps/media/objects/5697/5834441/ebook/htm/0cc6e.htm?14.07
Drew_Ali;5516247 said:
*crickets*
Last edited:
Ahhhhhh.....
Where was I ???????
Oh yes.....................
Uprooting the Tree of Life
http://shiva.msu.montana.edu/courses/mb437_537_2005_fall/docs/uprooting.pdf
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View
by WF Doolittle
"This “tree” also lacks a single cell at the root; the three major domains
of life probably arose from a population of primitive cells that differed in their genes."
Where was I ???????
Oh yes.....................
Uprooting the Tree of Life
http://shiva.msu.montana.edu/courses/mb437_537_2005_fall/docs/uprooting.pdf
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View
by WF Doolittle
"This “tree” also lacks a single cell at the root; the three major domains
of life probably arose from a population of primitive cells that differed in their genes."
Neophyte Wolfgang
New member
If you are stuck in a theory and are not willing to change your mind, you're probably wrong, atleast in the long run science adapts to new experiments, discoveries, and information. In 1000 years they will either debunk most of what Darwin thought or simply modify it
I Am Jay Pee;5553292 said:
I see people say that science adapts to new information a lot around here........
This is simply incorrect............
The field of science is similar to many other business models............
A company, or in this case school or institution has put everything that it has into a certain theory or set of ideals..............
New information that changes the destination of money or in this case paradigm..............
Will likely meet resistance..........
Science is not as adaptive as most people think..............
Even questioning established "norms" like evolution or biological human variation can get professionals expelled or banned for questioning "science".........
Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed (full movie)
Last edited:
Will Scientists Ever Be Able to Piece Together Humanity's Early Origins?
http://www.scientificamerican.com/a...e-able-piece-together-humanitys-early-origins
This article was originally published with the title Shattered Ancestry.
*Not with the fossil record*
In Brief
Paleoanthropologists have long thought that humans descended from a chimpanzeelike ancestor and that early human fossils belonged to a single evolving lineage. According to this view, only later did our predecessors diversify into multiple overlapping branches of humans, of which our species is the sole survivor.
Recent fossil discoveries have upended that scenario, however, providing intriguing evidence that the last common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees may not have looked particularly chimplike and that our early forebearers were not alone in Africa.
The findings are forcing researchers to reconsider what traits indicate that a species belongs on the line leading to us—and to question whether it will ever be possible to identify our last common ancestor.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/a...e-able-piece-together-humanitys-early-origins
This article was originally published with the title Shattered Ancestry.
*Not with the fossil record*
In Brief
Paleoanthropologists have long thought that humans descended from a chimpanzeelike ancestor and that early human fossils belonged to a single evolving lineage. According to this view, only later did our predecessors diversify into multiple overlapping branches of humans, of which our species is the sole survivor.
Recent fossil discoveries have upended that scenario, however, providing intriguing evidence that the last common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees may not have looked particularly chimplike and that our early forebearers were not alone in Africa.
The findings are forcing researchers to reconsider what traits indicate that a species belongs on the line leading to us—and to question whether it will ever be possible to identify our last common ancestor.
Last edited:
absentstarseed
New member
Whatever. Look athttp://www.twitter.com/absentstarseed for some shitty details.
Irreversible Evolution? Dust Mites Show Parasites Can Violate Dollo’s Law
By Christie Wilcox | March 8, 2013 5:00 pm
In evolutionary biology, the notion of irreversibility is known as Dollo’s Law after the Belgian paleontologist that first hypothesized it in 1893. He stated that once a lineage had lost or modified organs or structures, that they couldn’t turn back the clock and un-evolve those changes. Or, as he put it, “an organism is unable to return, even partially, to a previous stage already realized in the ranks of its ancestors.”
While this isn’t the first time that Dollo’s Law has been questioned, it’s the first strong evidence that parasitism might not be the evolutionary “blind alley” we tend to describe it as. The more scientists use genetics to study the evolutionary relationships between organisms, the more they find that Dollo’s Law is less law-like than once thought, broadening our understanding of evolution as a whole and challenging our assumptions about how it works.
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/science-sushi/?p=2641#.UT62mRwz0th
Another one bites the dust.................
*BIG PUN*
By Christie Wilcox | March 8, 2013 5:00 pm
In evolutionary biology, the notion of irreversibility is known as Dollo’s Law after the Belgian paleontologist that first hypothesized it in 1893. He stated that once a lineage had lost or modified organs or structures, that they couldn’t turn back the clock and un-evolve those changes. Or, as he put it, “an organism is unable to return, even partially, to a previous stage already realized in the ranks of its ancestors.”
While this isn’t the first time that Dollo’s Law has been questioned, it’s the first strong evidence that parasitism might not be the evolutionary “blind alley” we tend to describe it as. The more scientists use genetics to study the evolutionary relationships between organisms, the more they find that Dollo’s Law is less law-like than once thought, broadening our understanding of evolution as a whole and challenging our assumptions about how it works.
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/science-sushi/?p=2641#.UT62mRwz0th
Another one bites the dust.................
*BIG PUN*
@sion.....@oceanic......
You niggas could never defeat me.............
I am the illest poster these boards have ever seen..........
Only nigga to get banned for ethering average posters as well as the mods........
Come back on some "red dead redemption" shit and get myself unbanned......
On some "Grand Champion" shit........
The whole time pouring hot doses of ether on niggas........
We all know who the real champion is.........
I gave ya'll niggas the opportunity to kneel before the God..........
Now, I send my scourge on you niggas.......
Every wack poster should be on alert............
The SL & R&R are now moderated by the God.............
Any time I see wack shit around here I will attack with a fury that surpasses the Gods..............
With the exception of @janklow......
All posters are in danger......
All the rest of these "mods" have banned me or threatened to ban me for my unadulterated ether......
The only mod that could stand in the presence of hot ether & not act like a lil' bitch.....
*you impress me human*
*Bambu conquers and controls everything he rests his eyes upon*
You niggas could never defeat me.............
I am the illest poster these boards have ever seen..........
Only nigga to get banned for ethering average posters as well as the mods........
Come back on some "red dead redemption" shit and get myself unbanned......
On some "Grand Champion" shit........
The whole time pouring hot doses of ether on niggas........
We all know who the real champion is.........
I gave ya'll niggas the opportunity to kneel before the God..........
Now, I send my scourge on you niggas.......
Every wack poster should be on alert............
The SL & R&R are now moderated by the God.............
Any time I see wack shit around here I will attack with a fury that surpasses the Gods..............
With the exception of @janklow......
All posters are in danger......
All the rest of these "mods" have banned me or threatened to ban me for my unadulterated ether......
The only mod that could stand in the presence of hot ether & not act like a lil' bitch.....
*you impress me human*
*Bambu conquers and controls everything he rests his eyes upon*
Last edited:
I lost no debate here......
& possess full mental capabilities......
I never agreed to that debate.........
Went thru with it for the hell of it.........
The mod told me one thing and did another.......
Exhibit A:
And you of all people know that I have already bodied all you atheists on this subject......
This thread is exhibit P.....
Unless you want to test your skills & show that Darwin was right..........
& possess full mental capabilities......
I never agreed to that debate.........
Went thru with it for the hell of it.........
The mod told me one thing and did another.......
Exhibit A:
And you of all people know that I have already bodied all you atheists on this subject......
This thread is exhibit P.....
Unless you want to test your skills & show that Darwin was right..........
Last edited:
Ajackson17
New member
Sion;5824667 said:
Exactly, man, I wasn't feeling you to your last bit of the debate and even than you lost still. If you can't humble yourself after this man, it will be a rocky road.
Members online
No members online now.