Religious End Time prophecy is actually Reptilian End Game blueprint
jonlakadeadmic
New member
beenwize;3898193 said:
if their demons than it would lead me to believe they are in the same category as angels, but when we refer to them as reptilians that are physical beings i think of them more as other planetary entities
which is more correct?
Last edited:
waterproof
New member
beenwize;3898184 said:
1) I just read the overview and why should i re-read something that i already read Judah-7, this shit might be new to you but it's not new to me. Have you read the book judah-7.
you acting like this is a new discovery, i told your ass that you got a lot of catching up to do.
NOW STOP PUSSY FOOTING AND POST THAT SCRIPTURE FROM NAG HAMMADI THAT YOU SAID YAHUSHUA was talking about the father
Last edited:
waterproof
New member
jonlakadeadmic;3898124 said:
waterproof;3898170 said:
Here's some scriptures about them
Genesis 6 :4 There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of Elohim came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.
Numbers 13 :31 But the men that went up with him said, We be not able to go up against the people; for they are stronger than we.
13:32 And they brought up an evil report of the land which they had searched unto the children of Israel, saying, The land, through which we have gone to search it, is a land that eateth up the inhabitants thereof; and all the people that we saw in it are men of a great stature.
13:33 And there we saw the giants, the sons of Anak, which come of the giants: and we were in our own sight as grasshoppers, and so we were in their sight.
AND THEY INTERBREED with each other that's how they changed sizes and they are the ones that sit on Moses seat and runs this world today, but take this message from YAHUSHUA to heart.
Matthew 24 :37 But as the days of Noe were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.
Who was corrupting this world during the days of Noah, just like in those days it will be again
Last edited:
waterproof
New member
beenwize;3898319 said:
no you is slow with your parnoid ass, i dont need to read it because i read it before, Now you said that you have the exact passage and if you know about what you posting like you have knowledg, then show us/
Need i remind you what you said
i will answer your question but check out those videos i posted in entirety.
Go look up what Yeshua said about the Old Testament God in the Nag Hammadi scriptures.
and i will post what Yeshua said but I also posted the link for u to check as well in my first post
i will post them but if u want look in my first link the book titled "Secret Gospel of John"
Go see what Yeshua says about the God of the Old Testament in the Nag Hammadi scriptures.
Now tell me what he said^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Last edited:
waterproof;3898362 said:
WHAT U ARE REQUESTING IS LOCATED IN THIS LINK! LMAO CAN U NOT READ?
http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/apocjn.html
Last edited:
waterproof
New member
beenwize;3898390 said:
I got the link, but i need you to post what you saw. we could be looking at two different things, now stop acting like a coward and post what you saw so we all in THE R& R can debate what you saw.
Now post it, or shut the fuck up, because you aint read all these books that you like to post. If i claim something i will post it so we call can see, so post the scripture
Last edited:
waterproof
New member
beenwize;3898519 said:
you is a damn lie and dont know shit, lol. you is a fraud and i will stay exposing you. if you can't post what you saw that made you make these claims then you is a coward and dont have faith in what you read or to back up your views.
Last edited:
waterproof
New member
beenwize;3893263 said:
you yellow back coward with a soul of a snake, A MAN IS ALL ABOUT HIS WORD.......... So if you aint about you word then you is a coward.
And your word aint bond, that's why people have a hard time taking you serious
Last edited:
waterproof;3898558 said:
LMAO i already directed you where to read waterproof. if you cannot click a link and read then that's on you. you jus want me to continue in this foolish bs with you. i shouldnt have to copy and paste all the scripture for you when you can click the link and READ it yourself.
u can stop replying in my thread u religious deluded nutcase always saying I AM A HEBREW ISRAELITE LMAO.
The religion you profess practice is described as MONOTHEISM yet ur lost ass worship 2 deities. THAT'S CALLED POLYTHEISM! LOL
Last edited:
waterproof
New member
beenwize;3898589 said:
SHUT UP COWARD YOUR WORD AINT BOND, NEED I REMIND YOU THIS "and i will post what Yeshua said"
Now have some backbone about you for once and stand for what you believe in, POST WHAT YOU SAW!! is it that hard, you cant copy and paste that scripture but you can post pages of white dudes talking about aliens and shit.
We might be looking at two different things, now Post what you saw YOU COWARD!!!!
and I AM HEBREW in which since you came here as Judah-7 i stayed chin checking you with the Tanach, NOW THAT'S TRUTH. Everything that you try to discredit, i bring scripture and it's blow CRATER size holes in your theory and make you look foolish, THAT'S WHAT TRUTH DOES.
Last edited:
waterproof;3898620 said:
click the link and read or stfu and get the fuk out the thread u retard!
You practicing polytheism when according to the old testament you suppose to be monotheism which is the worship of 1 deity and not 2 dumbazz.
Now quit replying to the thread and go read the scriptures i directed your crazy ass too.
Last edited:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nag_Hammadi_library
the Nag Hammadi Library
Main article: Nag Hammadi library
Nag Hammadi is best known for being the site where local farmers found a sealed earthenware jar containing thirteen leather-bound papyrus codices, together with pages torn from another book, in December 1945. The mother of the farmers burned one of the books and parts of a second (including its cover). Thus twelve of these books (one missing its cover) and the loose pages survive.[1] The writings in these codices, dating back to the 2nd century AD,[2] comprised 52 mostly Gnostic tractates (treatises), believed to be a library hidden by monks from the nearby monastery of St Pachomius when the possession of such banned writings, denounced as heresy, was made an offence.[citation needed]
The contents of the Coptic-bound codices were written in Coptic, though the works were probably all translations from Greek. Most famous of these works must be the Gospel of Thomas, of which the Nag Hammadi codices contain the only complete copy.
All the texts have been public since 1975, and are available online.
[edit]Nag Hammadi massacre
The Nag Hammadi library[1] is a collection of early Christian Gnostic texts discovered near the Upper Egyptian town of Nag Hammadi in 1945. That year, twelve leather-bound papyrus codices buried in a sealed jar were found by a local peasant named Mohammed Ali Samman.[2][3] The writings in these codices comprised fifty-two mostly Gnostic treatises, but they also include three works belonging to the Corpus Hermeticum and a partial translation/alteration of Plato's Republic. In his "Introduction" to The Nag Hammadi Library in English, James Robinson suggests that these codices may have belonged to a nearby Pachomian monastery, and were buried after Bishop Athanasius condemned the use of non-canonical books in his Festal Letter of 367AD.
The contents of the codices were written in the Coptic language, though the works were probably all translations from Greek.[4] The best-known of these works is probably the Gospel of Thomas, of which the Nag Hammadi codices contain the only complete text. After the discovery it was recognized that fragments of these sayings attributed to Jesus appeared in manuscripts discovered at Oxyrhynchus in 1898 (P. Oxy. 1), and matching quotations were recognized in other early Christian sources. Subsequently, a 1st or 2nd century date of composition circa 80 AD for the lost Greek originals of the Gospel of Thomas has been proposed, The buried manuscripts themselves date from the 3rd and 4th centuries.
The Nag Hammadi codices are housed in the Coptic Museum in Cairo, Egypt. To read about their significance to modern scholarship into early Christianity, see the Gnosticism article.
The story of the discovery of the Nag Hammadi library in 1945 has been described as 'exciting as the contents of the find itself'.[5] In December of that year, two Egyptian brothers found several papyri in a large earthenware vessel while digging for fertilizer around the Jabal al-Ṭārif caves near present-day Hamra Dom in Upper Egypt. The find was not initially reported by either of the brothers, who sought to make money from the manuscripts by selling them individually at intervals. It is also reported that the brothers' mother burned several of the manuscripts, worried, apparently, that the papers might have 'dangerous effects' (Markschies, Gnosis, 48). As a result, what came to be known as the Nag Hammadi library (owing to the proximity of the find to Nag Hammadi, the nearest major settlement) appeared only gradually, and its significance went unacknowledged until some time after its initial uncovering.
In 1946, the brothers became involved in a feud, and left the manuscripts with a Coptic priest, whose brother-in-law in October that year sold a codex to the Coptic Museum in Old Cairo (this tract is today numbered Codex III in the collection). The resident Coptologist and religious historian Jean Doresse, realizing the significance of the artifact, published the first reference to it in 1948. Over the years, most of the tracts were passed by the priest to a Cypriot antiques dealer in Cairo, thereafter being retained by the Department of Antiquities, for fear that they would be sold out of the country. After the revolution in 1952, these texts were handed to the Coptic Museum in Cairo, and declared national property.[6] Pahor Labib, the director of the Coptic Museum at that time, was keen to keep these manuscripts in their country of origin.
Meanwhile, a single codex had been sold in Cairo to a Belgian antique dealer. After an attempt was made to sell the codex in both New York and Paris, it was acquired by the Carl Gustav Jung Institute in Zurich in 1951, through the mediation of Gilles Quispel. There it was intended as a birthday present to the famous psychologist; for this reason, this codex is typically known as the Jung Codex, being Codex I in the collection.[6]
Jung's death in 1961 caused a quarrel over the ownership of the Jung Codex, with the result that the pages were not given to the Coptic Museum in Cairo until 1975, after a first edition of the text had been published. Thus the papyri were finally brought together in Cairo: of the 1945 find, eleven complete books and fragments of two others, 'amounting to well over 1000 written pages' are preserved there.[7]
[edit]Translation
The first edition of a text found at Nag Hammadi was from the Jung Codex, a partial translation of which appeared in Cairo in 1956, and a single extensive facsimile edition was planned. Due to the difficult political circumstances in Egypt, individual tracts followed from the Cairo and Zurich collections only slowly.
This state of affairs changed only in 1966, with the holding of the Messina Congress in Italy. At this conference, intended to allow scholars to arrive at a group consensus concerning the definition of gnosticism, James M. Robinson, an expert on religion, assembled a group of editors and translators whose express task was to publish a bilingual edition of the Nag Hammadi codices in English, in collaboration with the Institute for Antiquity and Christianity at the Claremont Graduate University in Claremont, California. Robinson had been elected secretary of the International Committee for the Nag Hammadi Codices, which had been formed in 1970 by UNESCO and the Egyptian Ministry of Culture; it was in this capacity that he oversaw the project. In the meantime, a facsimile edition in twelve volumes did appear between 1972 and 1977, with subsequent additions in 1979 and 1984 from publisher E.J. Brill in Leiden, called The Facsimile Edition of the Nag Hammadi Codices, making the whole find available for all interested parties to study in some form.
At the same time, in the German Democratic Republic a group of scholars—including Alexander Bohlig, Martin Krause and New Testament scholars Gesine Schenke, Hans-Martin Schenke and Hans-Gebhard Bethge--were preparing the first German language translation of the find. The last three scholars prepared a complete scholarly translation under the auspices of the Berlin Humboldt University, which was published in 2001.
The James M. Robinson translation was first published in 1977, with the name The Nag Hammadi Library in English, in collaboration between E.J. Brill and Harper & Row. The single-volume publication, according to Robinson, 'marked the end of one stage of Nag Hammadi scholarship and the beginning of another' (from the Preface to the third revised edition). Paperback editions followed in 1981 and 1984, from E.J. Brill and Harper respectively. A third, completely revised edition was published in 1988. This marks the final stage in the gradual dispersal of gnostic texts into the wider public arena—the full complement of codices was finally available in unadulterated form to people around the world, in a variety of languages.
A further English edition was published in 1987, by Yale scholar Bentley Layton, called The Gnostic Scriptures: A New Translation with Annotations (Garden City: Doubleday & Co., 1987). The volume unified new translations from the Nag Hammadi Library with extracts from the heresiological writers, and other gnostic material. It remains, along with The Nag Hammadi Library in English one of the more accessible volumes translating the Nag Hammadi find, with extensive historical introductions to individual gnostic groups, notes on translation, annotations to the text and the organization of tracts into clearly defined movements.
Not all scholars, however, agree that the entire library should be considered Gnostic. Paterson Brown has argued forcefully that the three Nag Hammadi Gospels of Thomas, Philip and Truth cannot be so labeled, since each explicitly affirms the basic reality and sanctity of incarnate life, which Gnosticism by definition considers illusory or evil: 'Are the Coptic Gospels Gnostic?'.[8]
the Nag Hammadi Library
Main article: Nag Hammadi library
Nag Hammadi is best known for being the site where local farmers found a sealed earthenware jar containing thirteen leather-bound papyrus codices, together with pages torn from another book, in December 1945. The mother of the farmers burned one of the books and parts of a second (including its cover). Thus twelve of these books (one missing its cover) and the loose pages survive.[1] The writings in these codices, dating back to the 2nd century AD,[2] comprised 52 mostly Gnostic tractates (treatises), believed to be a library hidden by monks from the nearby monastery of St Pachomius when the possession of such banned writings, denounced as heresy, was made an offence.[citation needed]
The contents of the Coptic-bound codices were written in Coptic, though the works were probably all translations from Greek. Most famous of these works must be the Gospel of Thomas, of which the Nag Hammadi codices contain the only complete copy.
All the texts have been public since 1975, and are available online.
[edit]Nag Hammadi massacre
The Nag Hammadi library[1] is a collection of early Christian Gnostic texts discovered near the Upper Egyptian town of Nag Hammadi in 1945. That year, twelve leather-bound papyrus codices buried in a sealed jar were found by a local peasant named Mohammed Ali Samman.[2][3] The writings in these codices comprised fifty-two mostly Gnostic treatises, but they also include three works belonging to the Corpus Hermeticum and a partial translation/alteration of Plato's Republic. In his "Introduction" to The Nag Hammadi Library in English, James Robinson suggests that these codices may have belonged to a nearby Pachomian monastery, and were buried after Bishop Athanasius condemned the use of non-canonical books in his Festal Letter of 367AD.
The contents of the codices were written in the Coptic language, though the works were probably all translations from Greek.[4] The best-known of these works is probably the Gospel of Thomas, of which the Nag Hammadi codices contain the only complete text. After the discovery it was recognized that fragments of these sayings attributed to Jesus appeared in manuscripts discovered at Oxyrhynchus in 1898 (P. Oxy. 1), and matching quotations were recognized in other early Christian sources. Subsequently, a 1st or 2nd century date of composition circa 80 AD for the lost Greek originals of the Gospel of Thomas has been proposed, The buried manuscripts themselves date from the 3rd and 4th centuries.
The Nag Hammadi codices are housed in the Coptic Museum in Cairo, Egypt. To read about their significance to modern scholarship into early Christianity, see the Gnosticism article.
The story of the discovery of the Nag Hammadi library in 1945 has been described as 'exciting as the contents of the find itself'.[5] In December of that year, two Egyptian brothers found several papyri in a large earthenware vessel while digging for fertilizer around the Jabal al-Ṭārif caves near present-day Hamra Dom in Upper Egypt. The find was not initially reported by either of the brothers, who sought to make money from the manuscripts by selling them individually at intervals. It is also reported that the brothers' mother burned several of the manuscripts, worried, apparently, that the papers might have 'dangerous effects' (Markschies, Gnosis, 48). As a result, what came to be known as the Nag Hammadi library (owing to the proximity of the find to Nag Hammadi, the nearest major settlement) appeared only gradually, and its significance went unacknowledged until some time after its initial uncovering.
In 1946, the brothers became involved in a feud, and left the manuscripts with a Coptic priest, whose brother-in-law in October that year sold a codex to the Coptic Museum in Old Cairo (this tract is today numbered Codex III in the collection). The resident Coptologist and religious historian Jean Doresse, realizing the significance of the artifact, published the first reference to it in 1948. Over the years, most of the tracts were passed by the priest to a Cypriot antiques dealer in Cairo, thereafter being retained by the Department of Antiquities, for fear that they would be sold out of the country. After the revolution in 1952, these texts were handed to the Coptic Museum in Cairo, and declared national property.[6] Pahor Labib, the director of the Coptic Museum at that time, was keen to keep these manuscripts in their country of origin.
Meanwhile, a single codex had been sold in Cairo to a Belgian antique dealer. After an attempt was made to sell the codex in both New York and Paris, it was acquired by the Carl Gustav Jung Institute in Zurich in 1951, through the mediation of Gilles Quispel. There it was intended as a birthday present to the famous psychologist; for this reason, this codex is typically known as the Jung Codex, being Codex I in the collection.[6]
Jung's death in 1961 caused a quarrel over the ownership of the Jung Codex, with the result that the pages were not given to the Coptic Museum in Cairo until 1975, after a first edition of the text had been published. Thus the papyri were finally brought together in Cairo: of the 1945 find, eleven complete books and fragments of two others, 'amounting to well over 1000 written pages' are preserved there.[7]
[edit]Translation
The first edition of a text found at Nag Hammadi was from the Jung Codex, a partial translation of which appeared in Cairo in 1956, and a single extensive facsimile edition was planned. Due to the difficult political circumstances in Egypt, individual tracts followed from the Cairo and Zurich collections only slowly.
This state of affairs changed only in 1966, with the holding of the Messina Congress in Italy. At this conference, intended to allow scholars to arrive at a group consensus concerning the definition of gnosticism, James M. Robinson, an expert on religion, assembled a group of editors and translators whose express task was to publish a bilingual edition of the Nag Hammadi codices in English, in collaboration with the Institute for Antiquity and Christianity at the Claremont Graduate University in Claremont, California. Robinson had been elected secretary of the International Committee for the Nag Hammadi Codices, which had been formed in 1970 by UNESCO and the Egyptian Ministry of Culture; it was in this capacity that he oversaw the project. In the meantime, a facsimile edition in twelve volumes did appear between 1972 and 1977, with subsequent additions in 1979 and 1984 from publisher E.J. Brill in Leiden, called The Facsimile Edition of the Nag Hammadi Codices, making the whole find available for all interested parties to study in some form.
At the same time, in the German Democratic Republic a group of scholars—including Alexander Bohlig, Martin Krause and New Testament scholars Gesine Schenke, Hans-Martin Schenke and Hans-Gebhard Bethge--were preparing the first German language translation of the find. The last three scholars prepared a complete scholarly translation under the auspices of the Berlin Humboldt University, which was published in 2001.
The James M. Robinson translation was first published in 1977, with the name The Nag Hammadi Library in English, in collaboration between E.J. Brill and Harper & Row. The single-volume publication, according to Robinson, 'marked the end of one stage of Nag Hammadi scholarship and the beginning of another' (from the Preface to the third revised edition). Paperback editions followed in 1981 and 1984, from E.J. Brill and Harper respectively. A third, completely revised edition was published in 1988. This marks the final stage in the gradual dispersal of gnostic texts into the wider public arena—the full complement of codices was finally available in unadulterated form to people around the world, in a variety of languages.
A further English edition was published in 1987, by Yale scholar Bentley Layton, called The Gnostic Scriptures: A New Translation with Annotations (Garden City: Doubleday & Co., 1987). The volume unified new translations from the Nag Hammadi Library with extracts from the heresiological writers, and other gnostic material. It remains, along with The Nag Hammadi Library in English one of the more accessible volumes translating the Nag Hammadi find, with extensive historical introductions to individual gnostic groups, notes on translation, annotations to the text and the organization of tracts into clearly defined movements.
Not all scholars, however, agree that the entire library should be considered Gnostic. Paterson Brown has argued forcefully that the three Nag Hammadi Gospels of Thomas, Philip and Truth cannot be so labeled, since each explicitly affirms the basic reality and sanctity of incarnate life, which Gnosticism by definition considers illusory or evil: 'Are the Coptic Gospels Gnostic?'.[8]
Last edited:
waterproof
New member
beenwize;3898631 said:
ohhhhhhhhhhhhh, lol!!!! your skirt have been lifted again ma'am. You dont know what you speak, dont know what you read and dont have faith in yourself to post defend and debate on what you saw. And post that scripture like you said you was going to do
Can you please tell the R&R how i practice polytheism and who the deitys i worship, i and the rest of the R&R like to know?
[video=youtube;kWiJ3JA9tao]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kWiJ3JA9tao[/video].............................................
OK i got it, miss.
Last edited:
waterproof
New member
beenwize;3898821 said:
TELL ME WHO'S THE DEITY'S I WORSHIP you coward, tell us and let's see if you speak truth
You see i was going to let you live in this thread in peace but now im going to make you look stupid on everything you was saying in other threads just off the strength on the lost gospel of John in which you better re-read it again because im going to pull your skirt up again.
REMEMBER YOU SAID THIS "For those that walk around with a distorted Roman Catholic "version" King James Bible or Quran and claim it to be the inerrant infallible word of God u better WAKE UP!
EVERYTHING in this world you have been conditioned to believe as true by the powers that be is a lie. It has been known since Ancient Times that the Roman version Bible was not the word of God. This is why the Romans carried out the Inquisition & Crusades to kill off the ancient true Christians, BURN THEIR SCRIPTURE and replace the truth with a lie and half truths via KJV Bible.
But NOT all scripture was destroyed during the Roman Crusades... Do research on the Nag Hammadi scriptures that are over 2,000 years old which were found in Egypt in 1945... They reveal the truth about the one many ppl worship and claim to be a God and I am not speaking of Jesus/Yeshua. The Nag Hammadi scriptures are the teachings of Yeshua BEFORE they were distorted by the Roman Catholic Church.
Go see what Yeshua says about the God of the Old Testament in the Nag Hammadi scriptures... Also research what the earliest gnostic Christians believed about the God of the Old Testament and this world. Yeshua was a messenger of truth from the true God according to the Nag Hammadi gospels that are over 2,000 years old. You can look them up here.
AND THIS
Even in your KJV Bible in certain scriptures that didn't distort Yeshua speaks contrary to the Old Testament. The Nag Hammadi are more credible because gnostic Christians were killed and persecuted by the Romans for not following Roman Catholic doctrine... The Romans destroyed their scripture and the true teachings of Yeshua but the Nag Hammadi scriptures were hid in Egypt and found in 1945. And they reveal the hidden truth that's backed up by the earliest Christians and stories from many ancient civilizations around the world. The truth is hard to digest. You gotta realize u been conditioned by powerful entities to believe the KJV Bible.
I'm bout to pick you apart, those are your words not mines
Last edited:
