fiat_money
New member
That doesn't affect my vote.its over: 2012!;3885469 said:
So it's cool.
Last edited:
Aristo_V300
New member
Why is this cock polisher still allowed to post?
Last edited:
kingblaze84
New member
Young-Ice;3884959 said:
LOL a Black man invented wi-fi internet bro. Blacks have invented many things and had many libraries in Africa that were visited by people all over the world. And every race has African DNA so your post is off
Last edited:
Swiffness!
New member
I fell out my chair when ol' boul said Teddy Roosevelt was President. Get 'em Janklow.
*Roger Mayweather voice*
"MOST PEOPLE DON'T KNOW SHIT ABOUT HISTORY!"
For the record, the term "Concentration Camp" was a euphemism invented by the British in Africa because it sounds more innocuous than "Prison Camp for people who didn't do anything". It wasn't until the Nazis got exposed for calling their death factories "Concentration Camps" that the phrase REALLY got its Evil Swag. Euphemism treadmill, like how "retarded" was invented to be a gentler replacement for the word "moron".
So when President Bachmann orders that all Black "Muslims" be rounded up, they'll probably shove us into "Freedom Camps".
*Roger Mayweather voice*
"MOST PEOPLE DON'T KNOW SHIT ABOUT HISTORY!"
king bloo;3882046 said:
For the record, the term "Concentration Camp" was a euphemism invented by the British in Africa because it sounds more innocuous than "Prison Camp for people who didn't do anything". It wasn't until the Nazis got exposed for calling their death factories "Concentration Camps" that the phrase REALLY got its Evil Swag. Euphemism treadmill, like how "retarded" was invented to be a gentler replacement for the word "moron".
So when President Bachmann orders that all Black "Muslims" be rounded up, they'll probably shove us into "Freedom Camps".
Last edited:
kingblaze84
New member
Some talk trash about 2012 here but don't front he has many good posts this thread.Young Ice is slowly turning into another Heyslick smh. He had potential too.
Last edited:
kingblaze84
New member
Ok this thread has outlived it's usefulness we should close it now. We all get the point. Young Ice is trolling and people are just repeating themselves.
Last edited:
young-king
New member
this is dedicated to all of them PINKBOYS thats out there n keep talkin chit about blacks. sayin we should go back to out own country we should get out if we dont like it etc... this is what ur own country is about 2 do to u devils n when u locked in that room where the wind dont blow n moon dont glow i dont want to hear chit n wanna be the fly on the wall that sees your azzes scream cry moan bitch whine beg etc u devils are gonna get ur payback 4 what u did whether u believe it or not... trust me!
Think that President Obama will stand by his word and veto the legislation that will allow the government to detain American citizens without charge or trial? Think again.
The Obama administration has insisted that the president will veto the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, a bill that passed through the Senate last week. Under the legislation, the United States of America is deemed a battlefield and Americans suspected of committing a terrorism offense can be held without trial and tortured indefinitely. Despite the grave consequences for citizens and the direct[..]ault on the US Constitution, the act managed to make it through both halves of Congress but President Obama says he won’t let it become a law.
According to Senator Carl Levin, however, Americans should be a bit more concerned about what the president’s actual intentions are. Levin, who sits on the Armed Services Committee as chairman, has revealed to Congress that the Obama administration influenced the wording of the act and shot down text that would have saved American citizens from the indefinite imprisonment and suspension of habeas corpus.
(Click image above for video of Senator Levin's speech)
Senator Levin told Congress recently that under the original wording of the National Defense Authorization Act, American citizens were excluded from the provision that allowed for detention. Once Obama’s officials saw the text though, says Levin, “the administration asked us to remove the language which says that US citizens and lawful residents would not be subject to this section.”
Specifically, the section that Obama asked to be reworded was Section 1031 of the NDAA FY2012, which says that "any person who has committed a belligerent act" could be held indefinitely.
“It was the administration that asked us to remove the very language which we had in the bill which passed the committee…we removed it at the request of the administration,” said Levin. “It was the administration which asked us to remove the very language the absence of which is now objected to.”
John Wood of Change.org writes that President Obama proposed a veto of Section 1032 of the NDAA, which does not pertain to the detention of American citizens. Rather, that section deals with the use of the US military in taking custody of suspected criminals. Section 1031, which actually deals with the indefinite imprisonment of Americans, remains not only unopposed by the Obama administration, but the president has made sure that the law specifically includes Americans, urging Congress to redraft the legislation with increasingly confusing wording that makes the legalization detrimental to America.
President Obama could sign off on the legislation as early as this December 13 if he chooses not to exercise his veto power. The bill, which includes budgetary provisions for the US military, comes at a price-tag several billion dollars cheaper than the president had asked for of Congress.
Think that President Obama will stand by his word and veto the legislation that will allow the government to detain American citizens without charge or trial? Think again.
The Obama administration has insisted that the president will veto the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, a bill that passed through the Senate last week. Under the legislation, the United States of America is deemed a battlefield and Americans suspected of committing a terrorism offense can be held without trial and tortured indefinitely. Despite the grave consequences for citizens and the direct[..]ault on the US Constitution, the act managed to make it through both halves of Congress but President Obama says he won’t let it become a law.
According to Senator Carl Levin, however, Americans should be a bit more concerned about what the president’s actual intentions are. Levin, who sits on the Armed Services Committee as chairman, has revealed to Congress that the Obama administration influenced the wording of the act and shot down text that would have saved American citizens from the indefinite imprisonment and suspension of habeas corpus.
(Click image above for video of Senator Levin's speech)
Senator Levin told Congress recently that under the original wording of the National Defense Authorization Act, American citizens were excluded from the provision that allowed for detention. Once Obama’s officials saw the text though, says Levin, “the administration asked us to remove the language which says that US citizens and lawful residents would not be subject to this section.”
Specifically, the section that Obama asked to be reworded was Section 1031 of the NDAA FY2012, which says that "any person who has committed a belligerent act" could be held indefinitely.
“It was the administration that asked us to remove the very language which we had in the bill which passed the committee…we removed it at the request of the administration,” said Levin. “It was the administration which asked us to remove the very language the absence of which is now objected to.”
John Wood of Change.org writes that President Obama proposed a veto of Section 1032 of the NDAA, which does not pertain to the detention of American citizens. Rather, that section deals with the use of the US military in taking custody of suspected criminals. Section 1031, which actually deals with the indefinite imprisonment of Americans, remains not only unopposed by the Obama administration, but the president has made sure that the law specifically includes Americans, urging Congress to redraft the legislation with increasingly confusing wording that makes the legalization detrimental to America.
President Obama could sign off on the legislation as early as this December 13 if he chooses not to exercise his veto power. The bill, which includes budgetary provisions for the US military, comes at a price-tag several billion dollars cheaper than the president had asked for of Congress.
Last edited:
let's quickly look at some other things 2012 had to say about this:its over: 2012!;3890749 said:
its over: 2012!;3890749 said:
what's interesting here is that he claims i (among others) did this ... and that jay won't do anything for him ... but THEN claims whoever did it got banned by jay. now THAT is a classy contradiction.
...so let it be donekingblaze84;3892948 said:
Last edited:
DoUwant2go2Heaven
New member
So the signs of the times continue to pile up like cow manure, but yet people still won't believe Bible prophecy?
Last edited:
DoUwant2go2Heaven
New member
p-tavern;3901097 said:Why'd you edit your post? I had a funny response to that.
The IC police frown upon my posts, so I had to keep it discreet.
Last edited:
TwistedOrder
New member
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;3901129 said:
IC Gestapo up in this bitch.
Last edited:
HazeNAlize
New member
sboogie;3902088 said:
What's with the racism? it's not cool to disrespect peoples religion just cos you don't believe in that faith
You quick to complain about how hard ya life is quick to moan about how society is racist to you but you onnline disrespecting peoples religion flipping out for no reason fam
Last edited:
Similar threads
Members online
No members online now.