Racially Motivated Threads of the Social Lounge...

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
ether-i-am;2979314 said:
I'm not surprised.

You should be. Most of those wouldn't really qualify as serial killers.

If you really want to go by the definition of serial killer.
 
Last edited:
heyslick;2979406 said:
Typical black person living in the past and complaining about it, like NO progress has been made in America. I'd like to see ONE black person who can name a country that's lead by a black man that affords him the same opportunities and freedoms as America.

Yeah but that's not what we were talking about homeslice. You just did the same thing i pointed out though so thanks for that.
 
Last edited:
ether-i-am;2985873 said:
...and assumed that most of the of the killers are white.
well this IS true, but it's also just to be expected because of population demographics
 
Last edited:
binstar;2974703 said:
John Prewett doesn't even understand that his whole argument is invalid since he only wants to count the last 10 years of world history.

lol@not going back to slavery days like that doesn't count. Typical whitey trying to alter the rules to his advantage.

I guess the time between slavery and the late 60's don't count either right? WW2?

I am so glad you posted the above. You really put your finger on our different POV.

Whites in general are NOT denying the reality of your long list of sins of SOME White people going back all the way to slavery days.

You know it is wrong to punish an innocent Black for crime committed by some other Black person.

You know it is wrong to blame / condemn all Blacks for the sins / crimes of SOME Blacks.

It is equally wrong to blame currently living Whites for crimes of SOME Whites.

IOW - The crimes of slavery days in no way justify crimes against currently living Whites.

Whites living today have NOTHING to feel guilty about in regard to Blacks.

Nor should a Black feel guilty due to crime committed by some other Black.

Neither you nor I should feel guilty about nor be blamed/punished for a crime committed by another just cause we have same skin color as the criminal.
 
Last edited:
Jonas.dini;2986401 said:
Add serial killing to the seemingly endless list of things whites are best at.

http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/36000.html

NYC population: 20 million

NY City 2009: 60%White - 17% Black - 13% Hispanic

NY City 2009 12 million White 3.4 million Black

homocides per year [2003-2009]: 540

http://projects.nytimes.com/crime/homicides/map

Murder perps: 7% White - 60% Black - 29% Hispanic

540 X 7% = 38 White killers per year

540 X 60% = 324 Black killers per year

Do you understand the above ?

White population of NY is 3 Whites per one Black.

If crime were all equal % color, then there would be 3 White killers per one Black killer.

Yet there are about 8 Black killers per one White killer.

BOTTOM LINE POINT: "All have sinned"

No group has a right to act like they are innocent and the other group is all to blame.

"All have sinned" * "All have sinned" * "All have sinned" * "All have sinned" * "All have sinned"
 
Last edited:
John Prewett;2991414 said:
http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/36000.html

NYC population: 20 million

NY City 2009: 60%White - 17% Black - 13% Hispanic

NY City 2009 12 million White 3.4 million Black

homocides per year [2003-2009]: 540

http://projects.nytimes.com/crime/homicides/map

Murder perps: 7% White - 60% Black - 29% Hispanic

540 X 7% = 38 White killers per year

540 X 60% = 324 Black killers per year

Do you understand the above ?

White population of NY is 3 Whites per one Black.

If crime were all equal % color, then there would be 3 White killers per one Black killer.

Yet there are about 8 Black killers per one White killer.

BOTTOM LINE POINT: "All have sinned"

No group has a right to act like they are innocent and the other group is all to blame.

"All have sinned" * "All have sinned" * "All have sinned" * "All have sinned" * "All have sinned"

So you're gonna tell me that the socioeconomic tricks that your people play to disenfranchise black people amongst other black infused cultures in New York City in particular isn't relevant? We are involved in crime for one reason only, money. You motherfuckers left some of my unequally funded public school educated black people with little to no opportunity. You, with your malicious attempts to deny our rights in the 70's, your ability to destroy our neighborhood with your scientifically engineered toxins, and your ability to take our positive music and with a white face dollar infuse our children's psyche with images of grandiosity, violence, drug culture, and negative auditory minstrel music that we now embrace without fail; are in this very time with your reverse victimization and claiming of our misdeeds as vindication are a damn blind white racist (whip) cracker. Generally speaking.

Black folks aren't interested in you yet you come here with your bullshit trying to tell us to forget our past while you run as far away from yours as possible. All the way to a country that was fortunate enough not the endure the white abuse that affected its neighbors. There is more then one way to skin a cat isn't there. Your attempting to influence their culture with your twisted false white religion as if its any better the the myths that they hold. All the while your plan to enslave their will and make them honor you. What a king of Thailand you are. You would of course post in a thread that exposes the in largely culturally acceptable hate organization that is Stormfront. How many tea party grey hair Nazi's are part of these guns, god and glory for the white man organizations?
 
Last edited:
melanated khemist;2990269 said:
you say "demographics", I say innate
it's "innate" that whites are the largest portion of the population? huh?

also: what is the explanation for the above list of non-white serial killers
 
Last edited:
I am so tired of everyone blaming the "white man" for ALL of racism. If you guys paid attention to history you would know it wasn't just the white man who owned slaves. First off, African Americans that were slaves in early United States were ALREADY SLAVES in their own country. Sorry but the rich kings of Africa sold their own people to the white man....look it up. Second, it was called triangle trade between Europe Africa and America.

Funny though there seems to be a race of people left out of the whole slave trade. Aside from the African Kings who sold their own people away, the French, English and Spaniards.....how did everyone forget them. People from Spain were some of the most racist people, yet no one seems to remember them in the whole slave trade blame. If not for the Conquistadors of Spain, races such as Puerto Ricans, Dominicans, Cubans, and Mexicans and yes even Filipinos wouldn't even exist. Why you think they have Hispanic last names? The Spanish also treated the Mexicans horrible. Slaves have been around in Africa the Roman Empire and dating all the way back to Biblical times. Slavery wasn't about race it was about conquering of nations...if you got conquered or were born into a slave family you were a slave.

As a Sicilian I should tell you I am fair skinned but I will not be pegged with every other "white person" as being the most racist. Sicilians were conquered by the Moors which were an AFRICAN tribe. They raped and pillaged my people. For this reason Sicilians are looked down on by Italians because we are not considered pure as we have Moor blood in us. Moors however were of Arabic decent not Black....again a misconception.

Racism is not passed due to color but rather by ignorance and failure to overcome ignorance and appreciate differences in cultures. I seen Mexicans that hate black people and Filipinos that hate Mexicans (Don't believe me check out the border) and whites that are attracted to blacks, Puerto Ricans marry native Americans and any other combination you can imagine. It is ignorant and bothersome when you focus racism on the generality of being mainly from one race. The white man or any other race is not solely to blame for racism, it's straight up ignorance....and that's the truth!
 
Last edited:
John Prewett;2991363 said:
I am so glad you posted the above. You really put your finger on our different POV.

Whites in general are NOT denying the reality of your long list of sins of SOME White people going back all the way to slavery days.

You know it is wrong to punish an innocent Black for crime committed by some other Black person.
You know it is wrong to blame / condemn all Blacks for the sins / crimes of SOME Blacks.

It is equally wrong to blame currently living Whites for crimes of SOME Whites.

IOW - The crimes of slavery days in no way justify crimes against currently living Whites.

Whites living today have NOTHING to feel guilty about in regard to Blacks.

Nor should a Black feel guilty due to crime committed by some other Black.

Neither you nor I should feel guilty about nor be blamed/punished for a crime committed by another just cause we have same skin color as the criminal.

But you're saying all that as if white people are being punished for something; last time I checked white people in general have it pretty good (as usual) and never actually got "punished" or paid for slavery so your "poor me" complaints are falling on deaf ears with me.

As far as feeling guilty goes, that's a personal thing- I can't make you or anyone feel guilty for anything. I think what you're really talking about is shame though.
 
Last edited:
binstar;2997784 said:
But you're saying all that as if white people are being punished for something; last time I checked white people in general have it pretty good (as usual) and never actually got "punished" or paid for slavery so your "poor me" complaints are falling on deaf ears with me.

As far as feeling guilty goes, that's a personal thing- I can't make you or anyone feel guilty for anything. I think what you're really talking about is shame though.

Following is in the setting of prison. But strking out at random Whites due to anger generated by focus on sins/crimes of some Whites going all the way back to slavery days is a current reality with a segment of Blacks.

This fact is made plain by crime statistics and daily news crime reports.

MAKES ME WANNA HOLLER by Nathan McCall [born 1955]
[Prof Afro Am studies - Emory U] Published 1994 page 151

"A guy called Chicago ran the cellblock. He was a tall, muscular guy with a thick southern accent, and he was very articulate. The jailers addressed him by some alias, but the inmates had named him "Chicago" because that's where he was from. The word was, he was a street‑gang leader who had gotten busted in Norfolk for robbing a bank. Unlike Nutbrain, Charlie Gregg, and me, he was supposedly a black revolutionary, who had done it for a cause. Like me, most of the guys in the jail had never spent time around a revolutionary before, much less talked to one.

We all hated the white man,
but few were committed to fighting him in an organized, disciplined way.
.............................
There were no whites in our cellblock. There were so few whites in the jail that the administrators were careful about where they placed them. I think the jailers knew it would have been unwise to put whites in our cellblock with Chicago around.

When he preached about the legacy of slavery, he got inmates so fired up that they wanted to strike out, and whites in the cellblock would have been convenient targets. ......................"

http://www.amazon.com/Makes-Me-Wanna-Holler-America/dp/0679740708
http://www.nathanmccall.net/

A segment of Blacks truly believes in collective guilt of Whites,
and that crime against currently living Whites is justified by "historic" crimes of some Whites.

But same Blacks would deem it wrong to collectively condemn all Blacks for the crimes of some Blacks.
 
Last edited:
John Prewett;2998093 said:
Following is in the setting of prison. But strking out at random Whites due to anger generated by focus on sins/crimes of some Whites going all the way back to slavery days is a current reality with a segment of Blacks.

This fact is made plain by crime statistics and daily news crime reports.

MAKES ME WANNA HOLLER by Nathan McCall [born 1955]
[Prof Afro Am studies - Emory U] Published 1994 page 151

"A guy called Chicago ran the cellblock. He was a tall, muscular guy with a thick southern accent, and he was very articulate. The jailers addressed him by some alias, but the inmates had named him "Chicago" because that's where he was from. The word was, he was a street‑gang leader who had gotten busted in Norfolk for robbing a bank. Unlike Nutbrain, Charlie Gregg, and me, he was supposedly a black revolutionary, who had done it for a cause. Like me, most of the guys in the jail had never spent time around a revolutionary before, much less talked to one.

We all hated the white man,
but few were committed to fighting him in an organized, disciplined way.
.............................
There were no whites in our cellblock. There were so few whites in the jail that the administrators were careful about where they placed them. I think the jailers knew it would have been unwise to put whites in our cellblock with Chicago around.

When he preached about the legacy of slavery, he got inmates so fired up that they wanted to strike out, and whites in the cellblock would have been convenient targets. ......................"

http://www.amazon.com/Makes-Me-Wanna-Holler-America/dp/0679740708
http://www.nathanmccall.net/

A segment of Blacks truly believes in collective guilt of Whites,
and that crime against currently living Whites is justified by "historic" crimes of some Whites.

But same Blacks would deem it wrong to collectively condemn all Blacks for the crimes of some Blacks.

You're really struggling with this huh? I'm not sure how relevant a passage about prisoners and criminals from 15 year old biography is to the discussion. Maybe you should just read different books.
 
Last edited:

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
8,092
Views
871
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…