TheCATthatdidntDIE
New member
melanated khemist;567967 said:
is it so bad that we want to dissapate the hate? i cant find a thread were white people are going on about how great white people are...
Last edited:
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
is it so bad that we want to dissapate the hate? i cant find a thread were white people are going on about how great white people are...
Swiffness!
New member
Does it matter what religion the President is if he SUCKS?
Last edited:
ThaChozenWun
New member
musicology1985;569891 said:[/B]
we ain't never done nothing like that to crackers. what makes u think we gone do it in the future?
we had numerous chances to annihilate the pale faces & every time we refused to do it:
the fall of the hyksos
the fall of the roman empire
the fall of the goths
we have done a lot more for these crackers than u give us credit for. we resurrected them every time they fell. u act like we so ruthless when in all actuality, if it wasn't for us, the cracker would still be chewing fices and human flesh with no language or writing system.
Do you not listen to what militant niggas are sayin, they dont whites around, well not all some understand not all whites are evil but the majority think we have to rid the world of whites for us to proper.
Last edited:
TheCATthatdidntDIE
New member
And Step;568664 said:The "radical" movement coincided with the civil rights movement. They both played a vital role. Truth be told, the hippie movement was more aligned with the black radical movement than the civil rights movement. Muhammad Ali was the most requested speaker on college campuses back then.
okay but still the hippie movement, which had basic principles that promoted love and understanding died out, while the black radicals got more and more popular which is a social commentary on the fact that hate is easier to understand than love
Last edited:
unspoken_respect
New member
Swiffness!;570377 said:Does it matter what religion the President is if he SUCKS?
Does he suck if God told him to do it?
Last edited:
bornnraisedoffCMR
New member
The War on Darker-Skinned, Poorer-Looking Americans
From The FFF
by Jacob G. Hornberger
What lots of Americans don’t realize is that the new Arizona immigration law simply extends to the entire state the requirement that darker-skinned, poorer-looking Americans along the border have had to live with for decades — carrying their papers, just like people in totalitarian countries have to do.
For decades, any darker-skinned, poorer-looking person who travels entirely within the United States but along the U.S.-Mexican border has had to carry his papers with him. There is the possibility that he could be stopped by a U.S. immigration checkpoint as he travels from east to west or vice versa.
Any darker-skinned, poorer-looking person who travels from the border northward must also carry his papers with him. This means people who are traveling north from a U.S. border town to a northern city by car, bus, or plane. Even though the traveler has never entered Mexico, he must nonetheless produce his papers to an immigration official at a highway checkpoint or at the airport prior to boarding, as a prerequisite to leaving the border area.
Any darker-skinned, poorer-looking person in Arizona must now carry his papers with him whenever he travels anywhere within that state. The new immigration law now empowers state and local cops to demand the papers of anyone who they have a “reasonable suspicion” is in the state illegally. Obviously, that standard — “reasonable suspicion,” a standard that is considerably lighter than “probable cause” — is highly subjective and subject to interpretation.
I first pointed out how darker-skinned, poorer-looking people along the border must carry their papers in an op-ed I wrote in 1998 entitled “Domestic Passports for Hispanic-Americans.” As I wrote in that op-ed, I have had first-hand experience with this totalitarian requirement, given that I grew up in a U.S. border town, Laredo, Texas.
To this day, when I fly out of Laredo it boggles my mind that Americans must be subjected to an immigration check at the airport. Mind you, the airport is not at the border. The border is at the Rio Grande, which is located in downtown Laredo. There are huge immigration checkpoints at the international bridges that span the river. The airport is located a few miles north of the Rio Grande. Many, if not most, of the people flying out of Laredo have never traveled into Mexico. They simply have traveled from one American city into another American city.
The immigration official at the airport asks every traveler, “Are you an American citizen?” Most everyone answers yes, and is waved through. But if a person is dark-skinned and not well-dressed, he will be subjected to a closer interrogation. Inevitably he will be required to produce his papers.
It’s no different for travelers going north on the highway to San Antonio. You’re driving along on IH35 and you crest a hill to encounter a surreal sight. It’s an immigration checkpoint that makes you feel like you’re just entering the United States. You are required to stop and answer the question: “Are you an American citizen?” If you’re light-skinned and driving a fairly late-model car and speak English, you’re waved through. But if you’re poor-looking, driving an old car, unable to speak good English, and dark-skinned, you will be required to show your papers.
When I was growing up, my family had a nanny, a woman who is now 80 years old. Her parents were illegal immigrants who were working in Rosenberg, Texas, when she was born there. Like so many other residents of Laredo and other U.S. border towns, she is still unable to speak English, notwithstanding the fact that she has been an American citizen since birth. When she travels to San Antonio, she takes the bus, which is usually filled with very poor, dark-skinned people who cannot speak good English. She tells me that at the immigration checkpoint north of town, immigration officials board the bus and require every passenger to produce his papers. Those who are unable to do so are removed from the bus and detained. Our nanny, who has never driven a car, has had to secure and carry official documents proving she is, in fact, an American. By the way, the feds also confiscate our nanny’s piñatas for my nephews and nieces because, they say, they’re capable of carrying drugs.
As I pointed out in an article last March entitled “Your Papers, Please,” the requirement that people carry their papers with them is an inherent part of totalitarian countries, such as Cuba, North Korea, China, and Burma. The new Arizona law simply expands that totalitarian tradition to a larger portion of the United States.
From The FFF
by Jacob G. Hornberger
What lots of Americans don’t realize is that the new Arizona immigration law simply extends to the entire state the requirement that darker-skinned, poorer-looking Americans along the border have had to live with for decades — carrying their papers, just like people in totalitarian countries have to do.
For decades, any darker-skinned, poorer-looking person who travels entirely within the United States but along the U.S.-Mexican border has had to carry his papers with him. There is the possibility that he could be stopped by a U.S. immigration checkpoint as he travels from east to west or vice versa.
Any darker-skinned, poorer-looking person who travels from the border northward must also carry his papers with him. This means people who are traveling north from a U.S. border town to a northern city by car, bus, or plane. Even though the traveler has never entered Mexico, he must nonetheless produce his papers to an immigration official at a highway checkpoint or at the airport prior to boarding, as a prerequisite to leaving the border area.
Any darker-skinned, poorer-looking person in Arizona must now carry his papers with him whenever he travels anywhere within that state. The new immigration law now empowers state and local cops to demand the papers of anyone who they have a “reasonable suspicion” is in the state illegally. Obviously, that standard — “reasonable suspicion,” a standard that is considerably lighter than “probable cause” — is highly subjective and subject to interpretation.
I first pointed out how darker-skinned, poorer-looking people along the border must carry their papers in an op-ed I wrote in 1998 entitled “Domestic Passports for Hispanic-Americans.” As I wrote in that op-ed, I have had first-hand experience with this totalitarian requirement, given that I grew up in a U.S. border town, Laredo, Texas.
To this day, when I fly out of Laredo it boggles my mind that Americans must be subjected to an immigration check at the airport. Mind you, the airport is not at the border. The border is at the Rio Grande, which is located in downtown Laredo. There are huge immigration checkpoints at the international bridges that span the river. The airport is located a few miles north of the Rio Grande. Many, if not most, of the people flying out of Laredo have never traveled into Mexico. They simply have traveled from one American city into another American city.
The immigration official at the airport asks every traveler, “Are you an American citizen?” Most everyone answers yes, and is waved through. But if a person is dark-skinned and not well-dressed, he will be subjected to a closer interrogation. Inevitably he will be required to produce his papers.
It’s no different for travelers going north on the highway to San Antonio. You’re driving along on IH35 and you crest a hill to encounter a surreal sight. It’s an immigration checkpoint that makes you feel like you’re just entering the United States. You are required to stop and answer the question: “Are you an American citizen?” If you’re light-skinned and driving a fairly late-model car and speak English, you’re waved through. But if you’re poor-looking, driving an old car, unable to speak good English, and dark-skinned, you will be required to show your papers.
When I was growing up, my family had a nanny, a woman who is now 80 years old. Her parents were illegal immigrants who were working in Rosenberg, Texas, when she was born there. Like so many other residents of Laredo and other U.S. border towns, she is still unable to speak English, notwithstanding the fact that she has been an American citizen since birth. When she travels to San Antonio, she takes the bus, which is usually filled with very poor, dark-skinned people who cannot speak good English. She tells me that at the immigration checkpoint north of town, immigration officials board the bus and require every passenger to produce his papers. Those who are unable to do so are removed from the bus and detained. Our nanny, who has never driven a car, has had to secure and carry official documents proving she is, in fact, an American. By the way, the feds also confiscate our nanny’s piñatas for my nephews and nieces because, they say, they’re capable of carrying drugs.
As I pointed out in an article last March entitled “Your Papers, Please,” the requirement that people carry their papers with them is an inherent part of totalitarian countries, such as Cuba, North Korea, China, and Burma. The new Arizona law simply expands that totalitarian tradition to a larger portion of the United States.
Last edited:
TheCATthatdidntDIE
New member
bornnraisedoffCMR;570435 said:The War on Darker-Skinned, Poorer-Looking Americans
From The FFF
by Jacob G. Hornberger
What lots of Americans don’t realize is that the new Arizona immigration law simply extends to the entire state the requirement that darker-skinned, poorer-looking Americans along the border have had to live with for decades — carrying their papers, just like people in totalitarian countries have to do.
For decades, any darker-skinned, poorer-looking person who travels entirely within the United States but along the U.S.-Mexican border has had to carry his papers with him. There is the possibility that he could be stopped by a U.S. immigration checkpoint as he travels from east to west or vice versa.
Any darker-skinned, poorer-looking person who travels from the border northward must also carry his papers with him. This means people who are traveling north from a U.S. border town to a northern city by car, bus, or plane. Even though the traveler has never entered Mexico, he must nonetheless produce his papers to an immigration official at a highway checkpoint or at the airport prior to boarding, as a prerequisite to leaving the border area.
Any darker-skinned, poorer-looking person in Arizona must now carry his papers with him whenever he travels anywhere within that state. The new immigration law now empowers state and local cops to demand the papers of anyone who they have a “reasonable suspicion” is in the state illegally. Obviously, that standard — “reasonable suspicion,” a standard that is considerably lighter than “probable cause” — is highly subjective and subject to interpretation.
I first pointed out how darker-skinned, poorer-looking people along the border must carry their papers in an op-ed I wrote in 1998 entitled “Domestic Passports for Hispanic-Americans.” As I wrote in that op-ed, I have had first-hand experience with this totalitarian requirement, given that I grew up in a U.S. border town, Laredo, Texas.
To this day, when I fly out of Laredo it boggles my mind that Americans must be subjected to an immigration check at the airport. Mind you, the airport is not at the border. The border is at the Rio Grande, which is located in downtown Laredo. There are huge immigration checkpoints at the international bridges that span the river. The airport is located a few miles north of the Rio Grande. Many, if not most, of the people flying out of Laredo have never traveled into Mexico. They simply have traveled from one American city into another American city.
The immigration official at the airport asks every traveler, “Are you an American citizen?” Most everyone answers yes, and is waved through. But if a person is dark-skinned and not well-dressed, he will be subjected to a closer interrogation. Inevitably he will be required to produce his papers.
It’s no different for travelers going north on the highway to San Antonio. You’re driving along on IH35 and you crest a hill to encounter a surreal sight. It’s an immigration checkpoint that makes you feel like you’re just entering the United States. You are required to stop and answer the question: “Are you an American citizen?” If you’re light-skinned and driving a fairly late-model car and speak English, you’re waved through. But if you’re poor-looking, driving an old car, unable to speak good English, and dark-skinned, you will be required to show your papers.
When I was growing up, my family had a nanny, a woman who is now 80 years old. Her parents were illegal immigrants who were working in Rosenberg, Texas, when she was born there. Like so many other residents of Laredo and other U.S. border towns, she is still unable to speak English, notwithstanding the fact that she has been an American citizen since birth. When she travels to San Antonio, she takes the bus, which is usually filled with very poor, dark-skinned people who cannot speak good English. She tells me that at the immigration checkpoint north of town, immigration officials board the bus and require every passenger to produce his papers. Those who are unable to do so are removed from the bus and detained. Our nanny, who has never driven a car, has had to secure and carry official documents proving she is, in fact, an American. By the way, the feds also confiscate our nanny’s piñatas for my nephews and nieces because, they say, they’re capable of carrying drugs.
As I pointed out in an article last March entitled “Your Papers, Please,” the requirement that people carry their papers with them is an inherent part of totalitarian countries, such as Cuba, North Korea, China, and Burma. The new Arizona law simply expands that totalitarian tradition to a larger portion of the United States.
in order to stop illegal immigration, drastic measures have to be taken. yeah, some innocent people are going to lose in every sense of the word, but it is neccesary. my mom is going to be out of a job if all the illegal immigration stops, but you dont hear me complaining. my mom is an english as a second language teacher
Last edited:
TheCATthatdidntDIE
New member
TheCATthatdidntDIE;570453 said:in order to stop illegal immigration, drastic measures have to be taken. yeah, some innocent people are going to lose in every sense of the word, but it is neccesary. my mom is going to be out of a job if all the illegal immigration stops, but you dont hear me complaining. my mom is an english as a second language teacher
and obviously any white person is a citizen. how many illegal immigrants from europe are there? seriously, think. it aint racist, its practical. infinently practical to the point where very few will inderstand
Last edited:
TheCATthatdidntDIE
New member
it is not our fault that everytime we try to promote racial equality and understanding, we die. shakespeare died mysteriously, John Lennon died....the list is longer than i want to look up. but give us a little credit okay? and stfu about the white devil. "im sorry for the demon ive become, you should be sorry for the angel you are not"
Last edited:
Swiffness!
New member
This law is exposing who the real libertarians are....Joe Arpaio's speaking at Tea Party rallies in support of the law.
Joe Arpaio, of course, is about as libertarian as Heinrich Himmler.
nigga please
Joe Arpaio, of course, is about as libertarian as Heinrich Himmler.
TheCATthatdidntDIE;570453 said:in order to stop illegal immigration, drastic measures have to be taken. yeah, some innocent people are going to lose in every sense of the word, but it is neccesary.
nigga please
Last edited:
ThaChozenWun
New member
Most of us dont, dont let the board fool you pimpin. Even alot of black militant ass niggas dont hate average white man, they hate the fact its still an all white government and that of these higher ranking guys there is still alot racism inside of what runs this country.
Trust me most of us dont hate yall, we do have trouble trustin yall at times but thats about it, outside of most government officials I personally aint got issue with none of yall unless you show racism toward me. The amount we grew in the last 25 years proves to me that all whites arent evil, yall have marched with us, fought for us, died for us, alot of shit people who are all evil would never had done.
Trust me most of us dont hate yall, we do have trouble trustin yall at times but thats about it, outside of most government officials I personally aint got issue with none of yall unless you show racism toward me. The amount we grew in the last 25 years proves to me that all whites arent evil, yall have marched with us, fought for us, died for us, alot of shit people who are all evil would never had done.
Last edited:
perspective@100
New member
Swiffness!;570514 said:nigga please
Sho Nuff voice...
Last edited:
TheCATthatdidntDIE;570322 said:fine back to seperate but equal. even though black people worked so hard to even get this far. you act like it works over night. it took the jews forever to get back into normal society after being enslaved. by egyptians who according to you are black. you think you can just keep ignoring that fact. black people owned slaves, black people owned slaves. do jews hate all black people? and have you had a holocaust? you think jewish slaves weren't raped and killed. so have patience, and keep working to become completely equal in this society. dont give up and just leave. but the sad thing is, if all the black people wanted to leave, i dont think anyone but me would try to stop them.
Too bad the Jews you are referring to were also black. These fake ass white jews you see all over tv and in current Israel are impostors. And if they didn't go around claiming to be something they're not, they might not have got the oven back in Nazi Germany.... just saying.
Being equal in THIS society is not a reality... sorry. And if we left, where would we go? It's not like we all know where we come from. Africa is the second largest continent in the world with many countries. 98% of us have no clue exactly where we come from. It's not like you, where you could go back to Ireland since you know you're Irish...
Last edited:
unspoken_respect
New member
The only black people I know that blame white people for EVERYTHING are people looking for excuses.
Last edited:
musicology1985
New member
ThaChozenWun;570382 said:Do you not listen to what militant niggas are sayin, they dont whites around, well not all some understand not all whites are evil but the majority think we have to rid the world of whites for us to proper.
U EXAGGERATING AGAIN. in order for a militant threat to be posed at white America, u have to have some armed combat on a consistent level. yeah, blacks shoot it out with the police sometimes. but no more than Mexicans & poor or radical/militant whites do. everybody likes to blow things out of proportion when it comes to blacks, including u. if we stake a strong position, u Negroes get scared. u spend more time defending white people on here than u do with adding solutions to black America's ills or just simply giving a constructive opinion. why u think white people got this far? "because of Negroes like u." they can always depend on u to come to the rescue. y'all did it in Khemet, Numidia, Spain & now the Americas.
Last edited:
ThaChozenWun
New member
musicology1985;570606 said:U EXAGGERATING AGAIN. in order for a militant threat to be posed at white America, u have to have some armed combat on a consistent level. yeah, blacks shoot it out with the police sometimes. but no more than Mexicans & poor or radical/militant whites do. everybody likes to blow things out of proportion when it comes to blacks, including u. if we stake a strong position, u Negroes get scared. u spend more time defending white people on here than u do with adding solutions to black America's ills or just simply giving a constructive opinion. why u think white people got this far? "because of Negroes like u." they can always depend on u to come to the rescue. y'all did it in Khemet, Numidia, Spain & now the Americas.
Its obvious u aint listenin to shit these niggas are sayin, do you really think Hrap and Darcskies are cool with any white people? Ur delirious nigga.
@ the bolded, thats bullshit you far from know me nigga so shut the fuck up.
FUCK THE PAST. Its a new time we are living in, you go ahead and spend every waking moment mad at the crackas and obsessing over how they holdin u back n ill keep on livin
Last edited:
musicology1985
New member
ThaChozenWun;570637 said:Its obvious u aint listenin to shit these niggas are sayin, do you really think Hrap and Darcskies are cool with any white people? Ur delirious nigga.
@ the bolded, thats bullshit you far from know me nigga so shut the fuck up.
FUCK THE PAST. Its a new time we are living in, you go ahead and spend every waking moment mad at the crackas and obsessing over how they holdin u back n ill keep on livin
it's a difference between what niggas is saying & what niggas is doing. black America has never been a threat to white America idiot. all of our moves have been in retaliation. who gives a fuck if some brothas don't have "white friends." good for them.
also, ain't nobody living in the past and complaining about the white man holding them back. I focus on issues that's going on across the board. but yo bitch ass always wanna focus on the black side and nothing else cause u munching to hard on shitty white ass. scared somebody gone hurt white folk feelings. let the brothers express themselves man.
Last edited:
TheCATthatdidntDIE
New member
ether-i-am;570532 said:WTF are you trying to due fuck shit up? If all white people start apologizing about the past that would me us black folks will have to take responsibility for today! And we ain't ready devil!!! So you go right ahead with your oppresing us and holding us down with your powerful mental shackels. Thank you fuck you whitey black power!
lol. oh dear god that was the best post ever
Last edited:
ThaChozenWun
New member
Word peep the name told yall I was tha chozen wun
Last edited:
sdrawkcabseh
New member
I don't think a white can be "pro-black", than in itself is a closeminded term. They can be pro-humanity. The average black isn't checking for pro-blackness anyways, that day is dead..............................
Last edited:
