Racially Motivated Threads of the Social Lounge...

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
major pain;1012693 said:
How am I taking a ridiculous position, by using the dictionary definition of a term? You are attempting to take that same term, twist it, and apply it to your own theory. I find it hilarious you say my "position" is ridiculous, but you are dismissing the definition of MERRIAM-WEBSTER. You ever heard of Robert Mugabe? Look him up and tell me he isnt racist against not only black people but white people as well.

I'm not twisting anything. the proper definition NEVER EXISTED BECAUSE RACE IN THE WAY IT IS DESCRIBED BY MERRIAM DOESN'T EXIST. it's as simple as that. I base the results of racism off of what WAS AND IS ACTUALLY DONE. not fairy tale stuff like you.

Racism=white supremacy. bottom line.

Mugabe, NOI=affirmative action with useful prejudice.
 
Last edited:
musicology1985;1012749 said:
I'm not twisting anything. the proper definition NEVER EXISTED BECAUSE RACE IN THE WAY IT IS DESCRIBED BY MERRIAM DOESN'T EXIST. it's as simple as that. I base the results of racism off of what WAS AND IS ACTUALLY DONE. not fairy tale stuff like you.

Racism=white supremacy. bottom line.

Mugabe, NOI=affirmative action with useful prejudice.

So, merriam-webster's definition of racism is a fairy tale?

ROFL, this is hilarious. You dislike me that much that you will dismiss a dictionary as a credible source. Now, THAT is some serious hate.
 
Last edited:
major pain;1012795 said:
So, merriam-webster's definition of racism is a fairy tale?

ROFL, this is hilarious. You dislike me that much that you will dismiss a dictionary as a credible source. Now, THAT is some serious hate.

Yes.

And ain't nobody trippin' over you. Race as they explain it never existed to begin with, so describing it is pointless along with your argument as well.
 
Last edited:
musicology1985;1012817 said:
Yes.

And ain't nobody trippin' over you. Race as they explain it never existed to begin with, so describing it is pointless along with your argument as well.

LMAO, good to know we have an authority around here that can dismiss dictionary definitions at will.
 
Last edited:
musicology1985;1012875 said:
only the ones that can't be proven, like the one you presented.

LMAO, you can prove that there are black people out there that do not believe they are superior to white people? DO TELL!?
 
Last edited:
major pain;1012885 said:
LMAO, you can prove that there are black people out there that do not believe they are superior to white people? DO TELL!?

there is no proof of that. case in point, what did black people EVER DO TO WHITE PEOPLE AS A GESTURE OF SUPERIORITY? huh?

matter of fact, what has ANY ethnic group done to whites as a gesture of superiority? u can't find it.

why? BECAUSE WHITES ARE THE ONLY RACISTS THAT'S WHY.
 
Last edited:
musicology1985;1012936 said:
there is no proof of that. case in point, what did black people EVER DO TO WHITE PEOPLE AS A GESTURE OF SUPERIORITY? huh?

matter of fact, what has ANY ethnic group done to whites as a gesture of superiority? u can't find it.

why? BECAUSE WHITES ARE THE ONLY RACISTS THAT'S WHY.

LMAO, a racist white person never has to do anything TO a black person to still be racist. A white guy doesnt have to walk up to a black guy and call him a ****** in his face to be racist.

If you reverse the scenario, all things still apply.

You obviously feel a certain degree of displeasure with all white people, you might be a racist too.
 
Last edited:
major pain;1012962 said:
LMAO, a racist white person never has to do anything TO a black person to still be racist. A white guy doesnt have to walk up to a black guy and call him a ****** in his face to be racist.

If you reverse the scenario, all things still apply.

You obviously feel a certain degree of displeasure with all white people, you might be a racist too.

you are not speaking about facts, but opinion based off of a fallacy. when whites speak against darker peoples, they are speaking from a position of what has already BEEN DONE BY THEIR ETHIC GROUP. so the context is totally different than those speaking in defense of themselves against white supremacy racism.

none of what you say applies because it is ALLLLLL.........FALSE.
 
Last edited:
Major Pain, what is your ethnicity? I know your American culturally and that u maintain U.S. citizenship. But what is your ethnic background?
 
Last edited:
musicology1985;1013003 said:
you are not speaking about facts, but opinion based off of a fallacy. when whites speak against darker peoples, they are speaking from a position of what has already BEEN DONE BY THEIR ETHIC GROUP. so the context is totally different than those speaking in defense of themselves against white supremacy racism.

none of what you say applies because it is ALLLLLL.........FALSE.

Again, you're trying to add things into the mix. Racism is not defined by who is doing what to another group. YOU are making that connection. If someone has the belief that their race is superior to another, THEY ARE RACIST. Be honest here for a second. I get what you are TRYING to say. (If it werent for the original idea that "white people" were superior then there would be no racism.) The problem with that is in today's society, not some "original" racist society, people are FREE to think however they want and as such ANY race can FEEL superior to another. How do you not see that, with all the different groups that promote their own race over others?

musicology1985;1013014 said:
Major Pain, what is your ethnicity? I know your American culturally and that u maintain U.S. citizenship. But what is your ethnic background?

I'm black and what does that have to do with anything?
 
Last edited:
major pain;1013075 said:
Again, you're trying to add things into the mix. Racism is not defined by who is doing what to another group. YOU are making that connection. If someone has the belief that their race is superior to another, THEY ARE RACIST. Be honest here for a second. I get what you are TRYING to say. (If it werent for the original idea that "white people" were superior then there would be no racism.) The problem with that is in today's society, not some "original" racist society, people are FREE to think however they want and as such ANY race can FEEL superior to another. How do you not see that, with all the different groups that promote their own race over others?

I'm black and what does that have to do with anything?

again, your own stance is baseless because Merriam Webster's definition of racism NEVER EXISTED TO BEGIN WITH. white's knew that they weren't superior all along, they just twisted it around to preserve their ethnic group, consolidate resources & express supremacy.

I asked your ethnicity because I have witnessed you take what western white culture puts out at face value like a lot of black people. this is not a good sign.

again, everything that your saying is based on fairy tales and falsehoods. what your doing is no different than what whites do to deflect the reality. the only difference is that you put a black face on it. which implies legitimacy but is not.
 
Last edited:
major pain is working hard to defend a definition based upon something that doesn't exist.

I'm bringing reality, he's bringing fantasy.
 
Last edited:
musicology1985;1013135 said:
again, your own stance is baseless because Merriam Webster's definition of racism NEVER EXISTED TO BEGIN WITH. white's knew that they weren't superior all along, they just twisted it around to preserve their ethnic group, consolidate resources & express supremacy.

I asked your ethnicity because I have witnessed you take what western white culture puts out at face value like a lot of black people. this is not a good sign.

again, everything that your saying is based on fairy tales and falsehoods. what your doing is no different than what whites do to deflect the reality. the only difference is that you put a black face on it. which implies legitimacy but is not.

You're not making any sense. The idea of gravity didnt exist before Newton came up with the theory. Its easily provable today, right? There is a definition of it in that same dictionary. You want to say gravity doesnt exist?

You know nothing of me dude. I live in Texas, what most people consider the racist south, ALL of my family is from Louisiana, another inherently "racist" state, I graduated from an HBCU, used to fight white boys on a daily basis in middle school because of racism, grew up in the hood and still do not let that determine what I think when I encounter a new white person. I've dealt with racism that would probably make your head explode.

You see, I've been discriminated or prejudged and have had to come to physical violence to defend myself and family. I've matured enough to realize that all white people are not like those assholes I dealt with then. I've come to realize that the redneck that I had to chin check because he called my mom a ****** was dealing with an individual and not a race. I've come to realize that the Korean lady that followed me and my cousin around the corner store prejudges just like racist white people. I dont let those types of incidents dictate what I think about all white people or asian people. If I did, I would be no better than them.

Not agreeing with your idea of how a black person should think means absolutely nothing to someone that is educated. Thats probably what you need to be comparing, my education level to yours instead of how I think based off of my skin color. THAT is what the rest of the world would probably call RACIST.
 
Last edited:
theillestrator;1013234 said:
just out of curiosity, what is it called when you just hate another race/other races? Race hating?

LOL, exactly, according to this dude, that scenario only exists for white people.
 
Last edited:
theillestrator;1013234 said:
just out of curiosity, what is it called when you just hate another race/other races? Race hating?

again, the only version of racism that EXISTS WAS AND IS WHITE PEOPLE VS. Everybody else. that's it. Everything else can be appropriately classified as an ethnic, financial or national dispute. case in point.

Japan Vs. China=ethnic & national conflict.

China Vs. Taiwan=national conflict.

Sri Lanka Vs. Tamil Tigers=ethnic & national conflict.

Dafur Arabs Vs. themselves & Christians=ethnic, financial conflict with national boundaries.

Ethiopia Vs. Somalia=national Conflict.

Hausa Vs. Yoruba & Igbo=ethnic, national & financial conflict and sometimes religous.

the entire Balkan Peninsula=ethnic conflict.

NONE OF THOSE AFOREMENTIONED CONFLICTS LISTED HAD ANYTHING TO DO WITH SKIN COMPLEXION. only white people who subscribe to white supremacy racism fight others on the basis of complexion and not legitimate grievances.
 
Last edited:
major pain;1013249 said:
you're not making any sense. The idea of gravity didnt exist before newton came up with the theory. Its easily provable today, right? There is a definition of it in that same dictionary. You want to say gravity doesnt exist?

You know nothing of me dude. I live in texas, what most people consider the racist south, all of my family is from louisiana, another inherently "racist" state, i graduated from an hbcu, used to fight white boys on a daily basis in middle school because of racism, grew up in the hood and still do not let that determine what i think when i encounter a new white person. I've dealt with racism that would probably make your head explode.

You see, i've been discriminated or prejudged and have had to come to physical violence to defend myself and family. I've matured enough to realize that all white people are not like those assholes i dealt with then. I've come to realize that the redneck that i had to chin check because he called my mom a ****** was dealing with an individual and not a race. I've come to realize that the korean lady that followed me and my cousin around the corner store prejudges just like racist white people. I dont let those types of incidents dictate what i think about all white people or asian people. If i did, i would be no better than them.

not agreeing with your idea of how a black person should think means absolutely nothing to someone that is educated. Thats probably what you need to be comparing, my education level to yours instead of how i think based off of my skin color. That is what the rest of the world would probably call racist.

all that u listed in the non-bolded has nothing to do with your stance here because you are still wrong. Newton's theory in the dictionary can be proven. Yours here cannot.

As for the bolded, many black people are just as educated as you and do not hold the same false position as u do. So the amount of degrees you have does not take away from the fact that u defend falsehoods. Which is all that I'm disputing.

P.s. dacrskies, h rap & and step have degrees just like u fool.
 
Last edited:
major pain;1013251 said:
LOL, exactly, according to this dude, that scenario only exists for white people.

Race in that context still doesn't exists. you have degrees so you should know this but unfortunately you don't.
 
Last edited:
musicology1985;1013308 said:
all that u listed in the non-bolded has nothing to do with your stance here because you are still wrong. Newton's theory in the dictionary can be proven. Yours here cannot.

As for the bolded, many black people are just as educated as you and do not hold the same false position as u do. So the amount of degrees you have does not take away from the fact that u defend falsehoods. Which is all that I'm disputing.

P.s. dacrskies, h rap & and step have degrees just like u fool.

I'm talking about formal education.

Its not my theory solely, its the obviously widely accepted definition of racism. You're trying to argue that one race cannot hate another unless the first race is white. And you have the nerve to say I'm making things up.
 
Last edited:

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
8,092
Views
10,427
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…