Racially Motivated Threads of the Social Lounge...

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
[video=youtube;oW7NV5OzBpY]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oW7NV5OzBpY[/video]
[video=youtube;9To2pXFTOoQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9To2pXFTOoQ[/video]
[video=youtube;AG797bvnly8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AG797bvnly8[/video]
Why do you hate yourself? The third video..is dedicated to the IC
 
Last edited:
Here's a question: Pre-Hajj Malcolm X or post-Hajj Malcolm X? Because these theories Malcolm had changed slightly after his pilgrimage and he realized that his religious faith connected him to people of all colors.
 
Last edited:
arbitration;294256 said:
Here's a question: Pre-Hajj Malcolm X or post-Hajj Malcolm X? Because these theories Malcolm had changed slightly after his pilgrimage and he realized that his religious faith connected him to people of all colors.

Why choose. Ill never say ill completely agree with everything anyone says.. But who he was pre and post...had to do with his experiences. And I dont see anything wrong with who he was an what his goals were at those times
 
Last edited:
Great thread

The speeches are absolutly briliant loved every single one of them. I know lots of people are not going to understand them specially the third one about house negroes and field negroes because that's a mentality that is still predominant and widely accepted in today's society, the second one about equality was what my parents have always told me, equality is not given to you has a birth right people are different but the basis of that diference should be character, do not compare yourself to the white man if indeed you do not do what he does, diference can be a good thing in that field tho...
 
Last edited:
Kimi;294677 said:
This is a very good thread!! This stuff needs to be adressed. Thats why I posted the Willie Lynch syndrome, people need to understand how a speech given almost 300 years ago still has devistating affects today........Good job playmaker:)

Alot of historians concluded that that speech was a hoax, but my question is: Even if a man by the name of Willie Lynch was not born until 30 years had passed from the year people claim the speech was given, is it still not true that that has been the method used by majorities to control minorities and subvert them to their influence throught history and wasn't that the method of choice that white people use to dominate black people?

We all know the answer to that question
 
Last edited:
Kimi;294793 said:
My point exactly, rather or not it was factual, the effect is still the same!!

Alot of people just cannot read between the lines, they stick with what's on the paper without even thinking about the message
 
Last edited:
?uestion;294779 said:
Alot of historians concluded that that speech was a hoax, but my question is: Even if a man by the name of Willie Lynch was not born until 30 years had passed from the year people claim the speech was given, is it still not true that that has been the method used by majorities to control minorities and subvert them to their influence throught history and wasn't that the method of choice that white people use to dominate black people?
We all know the answer to that question

Agreed, Many would like to just say it was a hoax. but as Kimi said below me.. the methods and means were carried out and the effect is undeniable.
 
Last edited:
sounds of jacob;285597 said:
google the apocrypha esau took it out... Further more king james was a negro .. And he sanctioned the translation of the kjv we can show and prove that

1. What I ment waz a joke, which U didn't pick-up on.

2. Your post about "The Apocrypha" CLEARLY proovez U don't know about the Scripturez, here let me explain it in a more simple way so U can understand:

The books called "The Apocrypha" are 17 books of the Old Covenant that the Paypist (Roman Catholic/Protestant Churchez) (the Paypist Church actually took out only 7 of thoze books, it waz the Protestant Churches that took out the complete 17 books to be exact)

the word Apocrypha meanz "doubtful" becauze the protestant Churchez doubted they were written by the Prophets, thats why they call them the Apocrypha, the simple fact I have 2 explain this 2 U showz U don't under/overstand that the Septuigant IZ the original Hebrew tranzlated into Greek, by the 72 Black-Hebrew Scribez in 256-258 B.M. (B.C.) what U and the otha Hebrew Izraelites r reading/ goin by, iza Gentile (white-honkey-man'z Book) 1611/1630 KJV.

3. U gotta b out Yo mind thinkin King Jamez waz black, he waz an will alwayz have been a white-man (Aglo-Saxson) that's Y he invented the Anglo-Church, for the British-England people, man dude where are U gettin yo info from, this IS basic history knowledge.

But az they say, black people will believe ANY-thang that makes it "LOOK" like black history, HAHAHAHAHAA!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Last edited:
sounds of jacob;285217 said:
@ rapluva

NAPTHALI- Argentina/Chile HAWAIANS.. ARE OF THE ORIGINAL SEED OF JAPHET ...... ..

GOOGLE BEN AMMI CARTER .,,, WERE NOT JUST CONSPIRING ABOUT THIS WE ARE BACK IN ISRAEL RIGHT NOW ... HE WAS RECENTLY ASKED TO BE PRIME MINISTER ... DO THE KNOWLEDGE ... THE RASTAS ... HAVE BEEN TEACHING THAT THEY WERE "LIONS OF JUDAH " SOUTHERN KINGDOM "JUDAH BENJAMIN LEVI" BEFORE ALOT OF THE NORTH AMERICAN FACTIONS YOU SEE TODAYTHE LATIN TRIBES WERE NOT SPEAKING LATIN BEFORE 1492 ... THEY WERE SPEAKING HEBREW... CRISTOBAL COLONA .. OR CHRISTOPHER COLOMBIS HAD IBARYA .. OR WHAT YOU NO AS HEBREW INTERPETERS ... FURTHER MORE WHEN YOU READ THE APOCRAPHYA .. WHICH WAS TAKEN OUT THE KJV IT TELLS YOU THE NORTHERN KINGDOM .. THE OTHER 9 TRIBES POST ASSYRIAN CAPTIVITY TOOK BOATS TO "AZERETH" OR WHAT WE NO AS AMERICA LOL... IF YOU NO TORAH YOU NO THE KINGDOM SPLIT AFTER KING SOLOMON DIED 930 BCE .. AND THE NORTHERN KINGDOM WERE NOT IN SAMARIA ... DO YOU SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEW TESTAMENT ?

No they were NOT they were speakin "Azteckian" "Myan" "Tayhano" laungagez home-boy, STOP listening 2 unedicated Hebrewz, and START listening 2 Educated Hebrewz.
 
Last edited:
sounds of jacob;285217 said:
@ rapluva

NAPTHALI- Argentina/Chile HAWAIANS.. ARE OF THE ORIGINAL SEED OF JAPHET ...... ..

GOOGLE BEN AMMI CARTER .,,, WERE NOT JUST CONSPIRING ABOUT THIS WE ARE BACK IN ISRAEL RIGHT NOW ... HE WAS RECENTLY ASKED TO BE PRIME MINISTER ... DO THE KNOWLEDGE ... THE RASTAS ... HAVE BEEN TEACHING THAT THEY WERE "LIONS OF JUDAH " SOUTHERN KINGDOM "JUDAH BENJAMIN LEVI" BEFORE ALOT OF THE NORTH AMERICAN FACTIONS YOU SEE TODAYTHE LATIN TRIBES WERE NOT SPEAKING LATIN BEFORE 1492 ... THEY WERE SPEAKING HEBREW... CRISTOBAL COLONA .. OR CHRISTOPHER COLOMBIS HAD IBARYA .. OR WHAT YOU NO AS HEBREW INTERPETERS ... FURTHER MORE WHEN YOU READ THE APOCRAPHYA .. WHICH WAS TAKEN OUT THE KJV IT TELLS YOU THE NORTHERN KINGDOM .. THE OTHER 9 TRIBES POST ASSYRIAN CAPTIVITY TOOK BOATS TO "AZERETH" OR WHAT WE NO AS AMERICA LOL... IF YOU NO TORAH YOU NO THE KINGDOM SPLIT AFTER KING SOLOMON DIED 930 BCE .. AND THE NORTHERN KINGDOM WERE NOT IN SAMARIA ... DO YOU SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEW TESTAMENT ?

NOW your sayin "NAPTHALI" iz from the seed of Japhet (a gentile seed), dude get OFF this site U don't even know how 2 tell a lie, HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!

BTW that Star of David iz FALSE, thats a Pagan "Caininite smybol", King Soloman learned from 1 of hiz pagan concubines, when he fell into Idolatary, buy your Mr. Know Scripture/Hebrrew History right, I shouldn't b the 1 skoolin U, U should b skoolin me RIGHT???????????

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Last edited:
rapluva;296107 said:
1. What I ment waz a joke, which U didn't pick-up on.

2. Your post about "The Apocrypha" CLEARLY proovez U don't know about the Scripturez, here let me explain it in a more simple way so U can understand:

The books called "The Apocrypha" are 17 books of the Old Covenant that the Paypist (Roman Catholic/Protestant Churchez) (the Paypist Church actually took out only 7 of thoze books, it waz the Protestant Churches that took out the complete 17 books to be exact)

the word Apocrypha meanz "doubtful" becauze the protestant Churchez doubted they were written by the Prophets, thats why they call them the Apocrypha, the simple fact I have 2 explain this 2 U showz U don't under/overstand that the Septuigant IZ the original Hebrew tranzlated into Greek, by the 72 Black-Hebrew Scribez in 256-258 B.M. (B.C.) what U and the otha Hebrew Izraelites r reading/ goin by, iza Gentile (white-honkey-man'z Book) 1611/1630 KJV.

3. U gotta b out Yo mind thinkin King Jamez waz black, he waz an will alwayz have been a white-man (Aglo-Saxson) that's Y he invented the Anglo-Church, for the British-England people, man dude where are U gettin yo info from, this IS basic history knowledge.

But az they say, black people will believe ANY-thang that makes it "LOOK" like black history, HAHAHAHAHAA!!!!!!!!!!!!

lol at all the shit your talking .... LETS CLEAN THIS UP .... ANGLO SAXSON LITERALY MEANS ANGELIC SONS OF ISSAC .... ... AND KING JAMES WAS BLACK .. 100% proof you said " the word Apocrypha meanz "doubtful" your unlearned it means hidden .... and we use the Septuagint so what are you talking about ?? we read the lashawan qudash /greek can you ? every thing you posted is common knowledge ... amongst yasharahla and it was taken out by the "bible destruction group" in 1826 ... the apocrypha tells you the 9 tribes took boats to azereth ... or what we no as america SMH
 
Last edited:
rapluva;296138 said:
NOW your sayin "NAPTHALI" iz from the seed of Japhet (a gentile seed), dude get OFF this site U don't even know how 2 tell a lie, HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!

BTW that Star of David iz FALSE, thats a Pagan "Caininite smybol", King Soloman learned from 1 of hiz pagan concubines, when he fell into Idolatary, buy your Mr. Know Scripture/Hebrrew History right, I shouldn't b the 1 skoolin U, U should b skoolin me RIGHT???????????
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

AGAIN BECAUSE YOU DIDNT MAKE A CRITICAL ANALYSIS . ... THE TRIBE OF NAPTHALI- Argentina/Chile I SAID HAWAIANS ARE THE SEED OF JAPHET THERE NOT ISRAELITES !!! WE DONT TEACH THAT AHCH ... AND I DONT SUBSCRIBE TO THE STAR OF DAVID .. THAT VIDEO IS OVER 10 YEARS OLD
 
Last edited:
rapluva;296124 said:
no they were not they were speakin "azteckian" "myan" "tayhano" laungagez home-boy, stop listening 2 unedicated hebrewz, and start listening 2 educated hebrewz.

what does the word mayan mean > .....
 
Last edited:

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
8,092
Views
1,631
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…