PORK! whats wrong with it again?

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
Not a gawd damn thing, i got family in Jamaica who grew up on pig and are healthier and outlive any one of you self righteous kufi mfs

pig2.jpg
 
Last edited:
Most anti-pork arguments are supported by common-repeated anti-pork rhetoric, that's irrelevant when talking about the meat of commercially-domesticated pigs in the US.

Vintage anti-pork argument ether:
fiat_money;176719 said:
It is. The "pork and coke" thing is a myth, properly cooked pork will not have roundworms. Even uncooked pork is regulated well enough so that it won't have parasitic worms in it.
fiat_money;178604 said:
I watched both videos. Neither supported your claim that "the pig has more diseases than any other animal".

The first video was of a preacher describing the pig's diet and digestive process. Firstly, he attempted to use the fact that pigs will scavenge as a means to declare them unfit for consumption, however turkeys will scavenge and goats will attempt to eat almost anything if left alone; additionally, catfish, crabs, lobsters, and shrimp already do so in the wild. Secondly, he tried to compare the pig's digestive process with that of a cow, to imply there was some significance in the differences. When in all actuality, cows are herbivores, while pigs are omnivores, it takes considerably longer to digest grass, because plants such as grass have cell walls; which can not be broken down easily. This is why humans can't eat grass, we can't digest it. So of course different animals with different diets, will have different digestive systems, there no significance in it, for it is accepted that cows and pigs are not the same.

The second video was of another preacher who was trying to use the fact that pigs will eat feces as a means to declare them unfit for consumption. What it seems he doesn't know is that the feces of herbivores is full of semi-digested matter; which contains a lot of nutrients, and corophagia is quite common in the animal kingdom.

But the reason both videos fail, is that commercially domesticated pigs are not fed feces or carrion; so it's moot to use "what they would eat, if able to" to claim that their meat is somehow soiled as a result.

So, do you have a proof to support your "the pig has more diseases than any other animal" claim? Or is it anti-pork rhetoric?
 
Last edited:
Myayoni is bored;1732972 said:
because they are scavengers. if you eat pork you might as well eat rats or vultures. pigs eat their own feces, will eat other pigs, will eat human flesh, rotting food...
have you ever smelled the house or skin of someone who eats a lot of pork. not pleasant.

you know how many animals fall under the category of scavengers that people eat?
Edit...there's not many species that don't do the things you listed actually
 
Last edited:
blackrain;1733301 said:
you know how many animals fall under the category of scavengers that people eat?
Edit...there's not many species that don't do the things you listed actually

And many people refrain from eating any of those specimens ie. Vegetarians, vegans etc.
People have different reasons, some hypocritical and others completely valid.
 
Last edited:
wackestrapper;1732018 said:
lol its funny u say that cuz they do they say cherrios is actually bad for yuo cuz it has something in it i forgot tho,and because it doesnt have omega-3 in it

...........aint that some shit lol

fruit loops and captin crunch (crunch berries) all day
 
Last edited:
fiat_money;1733168 said:
Most anti-pork arguments are supported by common-repeated anti-pork rhetoric, that's irrelevant when talking about the meat of commercially-domesticated pigs in the US.

Vintage anti-pork argument ether:

This^ and all that stuff he quoted

What's the point of the rhetoric? People treat pork hate like a religion.

To answer the thread, it's wrong b/c anything with that much flavor can't be right. But being the gluttonous people we are, many of us are willing to be "wrong."

Truthfully though, it should be eaten in moderation as someone said a few posts up.
 
Last edited:
alot of animals eat human flesh...and pigs will eat whatever theyre fed and they live in whatever theyre kept in by farmers...and most animals are scavengers b/c its safer than hunting and risking injury...

bacon FTW
 
Last edited:
mostvigorousone;1733368 said:
This^ and all that stuff he quoted

What's the point of the rhetoric? People treat pork hate like a religion.

To answer the thread, it's wrong b/c anything with that much flavor can't be right. But being the gluttonous people we are, many of us are willing to be "wrong."

Truthfully though, it should be eaten in moderation as someone said a few posts up.
Word, I don't eat pork, but I don't use bullshit to try to "justify" it.

I just didn't like it enough.
 
Last edited:
because its part rat part cat part dog.

i dont eat catfish no more because they are scavengers. real talk. you eat something that eats something dead you liable to meet an early death yourself. plus huey from the boondocks said not to eat it. and who am i to argue with that nigga.
 
Last edited:
louisvillecardinal;1733912 said:
because its part rat part cat part dog.

i dont eat catfish no more because they are scavengers. real talk. you eat something that eats something dead you liable to meet an early death yourself. .

lolz and smh @ niccas and they nicca logic....
 
Last edited:
blackrain;1733301 said:
you know how many animals fall under the category of scavengers that people eat?
Edit...there's not many species that don't do the things you listed actually

Conscious__Nkechi;1733323 said:
And many people refrain from eating any of those specimens ie. Vegetarians, vegans etc.
People have different reasons, some hypocritical and others completely valid.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Lechon and carnitas post.
 
Last edited:

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
121
Views
0
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…