People in Texas want creationism in textbooks

The user and all related content has been deleted.

 

[Idiopathic Joker]

that's all well and good... but i heard monsters that sounded like from where ever the fuck the Event Horizon traveled, this morning...

can they explain THAT....shit?

crack is wack

 

[Bodhi]

I would love to be in that class.

 

[zombie]

Good nothing is wrong with teaching different ideas.

 

[Lou Cypher]

I want marvel comic to be taught in school too

Imagine watching the avengers for religious studies

god jeremy renner is such a douchebag.

 

[ohhhla]

Hahaahahaha.

Invisie sky daddy poofing shit out of existence is science.

lol

 

[BlackxChild]

Kids the earth is 5000 yrs old...

 

[BlackxChild]

Kids the moon is one of the great lights god created in the sky.... Fuck what science tells you it's a different version of the sun.

 

[jono]

Good nothing is wrong with teaching different ideas.

I could violate you sensibilities right now but I won't. I'm gonna stay on topic.

There IS something wrong with teaching non science in a science book. There's no scientific basis for religion and thus it has no place on a science class, textbook or discussion.

You want to teach creationism? Fine, take them to church. But schools aren't a place to coddle ignorance.

 

[7figz]

How about the teachers just say "We don't really know how the fuck we got here" and call it a day.

 

[zombie]

Good nothing is wrong with teaching different ideas.

I could violate you sensibilities right now but I won't. I'm gonna stay on topic.

There IS something wrong with teaching non science in a science book. There's no scientific basis for religion and thus it has no place on a science class, textbook or discussion.

You want to teach creationism? Fine, take them to church. But schools aren't a place to coddle ignorance.

creationism is a theory, a group of theories it is not a religion. We can teach any theory we want because neither can be 100% proved without doubt. There are creationist who believe in evolution and scientist who believe in God so I really don't see why you can't teach both.

 

[Splackavelli]

that's all well and good... but i heard monsters that sounded like from where ever the fuck the Event Horizon traveled, this morning...

can they explain THAT....shit?

more of those strange sounds people been hearing? I guess we better prepare for some cloverfield shit, pacific rim , or for Godzilla to rise out of the ocean then.

 

[BIGG WILL]

Good nothing is wrong with teaching different ideas.

I could violate you sensibilities right now but I won't. I'm gonna stay on topic.

There IS something wrong with teaching non science in a science book. There's no scientific basis for religion and thus it has no place on a science class, textbook or discussion.

You want to teach creationism? Fine, take them to church. But schools aren't a place to coddle ignorance.

creationism is a theory, a group of theories it is not a religion. We can teach any theory we want because neither can be 100% proved without doubt. There are creationist who believe in evolution and scientist who believe in God so I really don't see why you can't teach both.

Deep down you do. You just don't want to admit it.

Picture the teacher saying the Earth is around 4.6 Billion years old. Then turning the page in her book and teaching that same group of kids that the earth is no older than 10k years old?

So, since you are all for teaching different theories lets include this one as well :

Xenu, an intergalactic ruler, was about to be removed from power, and he wasn’t having any of it. Instead, he got rid of the population that was planning to take him out by paralyzing and taking them to Earth (good old Teegeeack at the time). There, he loaded them into volcanoes, destroying them with hydrogen bombs.

Bodies gone, he gathered the thetans – remember, those are the souls – and implanted misleading data, such as all religions, into their memories.

The thetans began to cluster together and inhabit bodies of aliens that survived the blast (how they survived a hydrogen bomb, one can only guess). Voila! You have the predecessors to modern humans, and these thetans continue to move from body to body and life to life accumulating more misleading data along the way.

 

[Rubato Garcia]

Good nothing is wrong with teaching different ideas.

I could violate you sensibilities right now but I won't. I'm gonna stay on topic.

There IS something wrong with teaching non science in a science book. There's no scientific basis for religion and thus it has no place on a science class, textbook or discussion.

You want to teach creationism? Fine, take them to church. But schools aren't a place to coddle ignorance.

creationism is a theory, a group of theories it is not a religion. We can teach any theory we want because neither can be 100% proved without doubt. There are creationist who believe in evolution and scientist who believe in God so I really don't see why you can't teach both.

Creationism doesn't hold up to the scientific method. And that's all that really matters in this situation since we're talking about science textbooks. Creationism just isn't science.

 

[zombie]

Good nothing is wrong with teaching different ideas.

I could violate you sensibilities right now but I won't. I'm gonna stay on topic.

There IS something wrong with teaching non science in a science book. There's no scientific basis for religion and thus it has no place on a science class, textbook or discussion.

You want to teach creationism? Fine, take them to church. But schools aren't a place to coddle ignorance.

creationism is a theory, a group of theories it is not a religion. We can teach any theory we want because neither can be 100% proved without doubt. There are creationist who believe in evolution and scientist who believe in God so I really don't see why you can't teach both.

Deep down you do. You just don't want to admit it.

Picture the teacher saying the Earth is around 4.6 Billion years old. Then turning the page in her book and teaching that same group of kids that the earth is no older than 10k years old?

So, since you are all for teaching different theories lets include this one as well :

Xenu, an intergalactic ruler, was about to be removed from power, and he wasn’t having any of it. Instead, he got rid of the population that was planning to take him out by paralyzing and taking them to Earth (good old Teegeeack at the time). There, he loaded them into volcanoes, destroying them with hydrogen bombs.

Bodies gone, he gathered the thetans – remember, those are the souls – and implanted misleading data, such as all religions, into their memories.

The thetans began to cluster together and inhabit bodies of aliens that survived the blast (how they survived a hydrogen bomb, one can only guess). Voila! You have the predecessors to modern humans, and these thetans continue to move from body to body and life to life accumulating more misleading data along the way.

once again creationism is not a religion and does not have to get into the particulars of any religion. So alot of what you wrote is irrelevant

science as it relates to the creation of the earth and life is mostly theory and should be taught as such.

 

[zombie]

Good nothing is wrong with teaching different ideas.

I could violate you sensibilities right now but I won't. I'm gonna stay on topic.

There IS something wrong with teaching non science in a science book. There's no scientific basis for religion and thus it has no place on a science class, textbook or discussion.

You want to teach creationism? Fine, take them to church. But schools aren't a place to coddle ignorance.

creationism is a theory, a group of theories it is not a religion. We can teach any theory we want because neither can be 100% proved without doubt. There are creationist who believe in evolution and scientist who believe in God so I really don't see why you can't teach both.

Creationism doesn't hold up to the scientific method. And that's all that really matters in this situation since we're talking about science textbooks. Creationism just isn't science.

all theories of quantum physics do not stack up to the old school scientific method but is still taught

 

[REV_RAGE]

that's all well and good... but i heard monsters that sounded like from where ever the fuck the Event Horizon traveled, this morning...

can they explain THAT....shit?

more of those strange sounds people been hearing? I guess we better prepare for some cloverfield shit, pacific rim , or for Godzilla to rise out of the ocean then.

I guess we can lump the whole thread under MASS HYSTERIA?

 

[Ajackson17]

Quantum physics have one thing backing them and that's the math portion. If your math is not adding up, it don't make no fucking sense and a scientific theory has to have math backing it no matter what it is and it needs several laws. Smh, read about the scientific method and theories and you will understand why this doesn't hold up very well and why Darwin's theory is holding up despite the mad tinkerings over the past century, but the initial hypothesis adds up.

Also, not all creation stories are the same and the bible is the same book that says the earth was before the sun and stars, now come on. That theory falls flat on his face, right there.

 

[jono]

Good nothing is wrong with teaching different ideas.

I could violate you sensibilities right now but I won't. I'm gonna stay on topic.

There IS something wrong with teaching non science in a science book. There's no scientific basis for religion and thus it has no place on a science class, textbook or discussion.

You want to teach creationism? Fine, take them to church. But schools aren't a place to coddle ignorance.

creationism is a theory, a group of theories it is not a religion. We can teach any theory we want because neither can be 100% proved without doubt. There are creationist who believe in evolution and scientist who believe in God so I really don't see why you can't teach both.

Deep down you do. You just don't want to admit it.

Picture the teacher saying the Earth is around 4.6 Billion years old. Then turning the page in her book and teaching that same group of kids that the earth is no older than 10k years old?

So, since you are all for teaching different theories lets include this one as well :

Xenu, an intergalactic ruler, was about to be removed from power, and he wasn’t having any of it. Instead, he got rid of the population that was planning to take him out by paralyzing and taking them to Earth (good old Teegeeack at the time). There, he loaded them into volcanoes, destroying them with hydrogen bombs.

Bodies gone, he gathered the thetans – remember, those are the souls – and implanted misleading data, such as all religions, into their memories.

The thetans began to cluster together and inhabit bodies of aliens that survived the blast (how they survived a hydrogen bomb, one can only guess). Voila! You have the predecessors to modern humans, and these thetans continue to move from body to body and life to life accumulating more misleading data along the way.

once again creationism is not a religion and does not have to get into the particulars of any religion. So alot of what you wrote is irrelevant

science as it relates to the creation of the earth and life is mostly theory and should be taught as such.

There is no scientific basis to support creationism, intelligent design, or however you want to dress it up.

You also seemed to he confused over the scientific meaning of "theory".

Evolution is a fact, the Big Bang is vastly more scientific than intelligent design as there is no scientific basis for such an ideal.

 

[damobb2deep]

show both sides whats wrong with that?