Old white florist may lose her business and cash for not serving gays at a wedding

[zombie]

It's kinda hard to take a black man seriously when he's longing for the good ol' days before the Civil Rights Act was passed.

You sound insane and confused, b.

All because he hates homos. How sad

What sad is blacks sold economic power for crumbs

 

[zombie]

If a neo nazi skinhead with tats on his face decided he wants to stroll into your barbershop, store or enterprise you have to serve him. he could walk in there with a shirt that says all niggers must hang you can't refuse him service. You have to sell him the rope that he'll use to hang a another black person or the gas he'll use to light a cross.

WHY??? because you idiots don't believe in the right of disassociation.

 

[Colin$mackabi$h]

Gay is happy in the english dictionary.....

I guess those who are the opposite gets treated as criminals....

Giving the real crimes to be free to be looked over once again.

 

[brown321]

Gay niggas should have went somewhere else. It's a flower shop not a pharmacy.

 

[zombie]

Gay is happy in the english dictionary.....

I guess those who are the opposite gets treated as criminals....

Giving the real crimes to be free to be looked over once again.

basically it's just another battle against people who have traditional values, it's another attempt to strip people of more freedom until we all turn into pro-homosexual atheist liberals/socialist. They want to all of america to culturally resemble san fanciso or some northern european country.

 

[SneakDZA]

If a neo nazi skinhead with tats on his face decided he wants to stroll into your barbershop, store or enterprise you have to serve him. he could walk in there with a shirt that says all niggers must hang you can't refuse him service. You have to sell him the rope that he'll use to hang a another black person or the gas he'll use to light a cross.

WHY??? because you idiots don't believe in the right of disassociation.

I don't think refusing someone service based on their t-shirt or tattoos is covered under any discrimination laws that I know of. You're all over the place right now.

 

[zombie]

If a neo nazi skinhead with tats on his face decided he wants to stroll into your barbershop, store or enterprise you have to serve him. he could walk in there with a shirt that says all niggers must hang you can't refuse him service. You have to sell him the rope that he'll use to hang a another black person or the gas he'll use to light a cross.

WHY??? because you idiots don't believe in the right of disassociation.

I don't think refusing someone service based on their t-shirt or tattoos is covered under any discrimination laws that I know of. You're all over the place right now.

the point i was trying to make that clearly went over your head was that under the current situation you cannot refuse anyone service based on your own personal feelings. which means you are not free to act on those feelings even through you are supposed to be running a private enterprise.

any one engaged in an activity that i oppose i should have the freedom to not associate with

i am not all over the place i made a direct point you just refuse to address what i am saying because you cannot or don't know how.

 

[(Nope)]

If a neo nazi skinhead with tats on his face decided he wants to stroll into your barbershop, store or enterprise you have to serve him. he could walk in there with a shirt that says all niggers must hang you can't refuse him service. You have to sell him the rope that he'll use to hang a another black person or the gas he'll use to light a cross.

WHY??? because you idiots don't believe in the right of disassociation.

I don't think refusing someone service based on their t-shirt or tattoos is covered under any discrimination laws that I know of. You're all over the place right now.

the point i was trying to make that clearly went over your head was that under the current situation you cannot refuse anyone service based on your own personal feelings. which means you are not free to act on those feelings even through you are supposed to be running a private enterprise.

any one engaged in an activity that i oppose i should have the freedom to not associate with

i am not all over the place i made a direct point you just refuse to address what i am saying because you cannot or don't know how.

There's no truth in what you just said and the false equivalency you made regarding the skinhead shows you don't understand freedom of speech and it's limitations.

 

[zombie]

If a neo nazi skinhead with tats on his face decided he wants to stroll into your barbershop, store or enterprise you have to serve him. he could walk in there with a shirt that says all niggers must hang you can't refuse him service. You have to sell him the rope that he'll use to hang a another black person or the gas he'll use to light a cross.

WHY??? because you idiots don't believe in the right of disassociation.

I don't think refusing someone service based on their t-shirt or tattoos is covered under any discrimination laws that I know of. You're all over the place right now.

the point i was trying to make that clearly went over your head was that under the current situation you cannot refuse anyone service based on your own personal feelings. which means you are not free to act on those feelings even through you are supposed to be running a private enterprise.

any one engaged in an activity that i oppose i should have the freedom to not associate with

i am not all over the place i made a direct point you just refuse to address what i am saying because you cannot or don't know how.

There's no truth in what you just said and the false equivalency you made regarding the skinhead shows you don't understand freedom of speech and it's limitations.

I am not talking about freedom of speech. this case as far as i see if has nothing to do with freedom of speech it's all about freedom of religion and freedom of association. A skin head could come into the store without the shirt i should still have the right to refuse him service based on his activity as a neo nazi skinhead. the shirt is just a visible representation on what he believes or might believes.

 

[semi-auto-mato]

she made the mistake of saying her relationship with jesus. she has the right to deny service but thats where they are getting her. this is nothing more than the gay couple trying to make an example of person who really did no harm to them but wanna do it in the name of equal rights. the court should not let it get this far.

 

[zombie]

homosexual marriage is an activity it's not an identity as free people those of us who oppose such disgusting unions should be able to fully disassociate ourselves from it in all ways.

the attempt to link homosexual marriage with the struggles of black people is disrespectful and fucking stupid, one is an activity and the other is an identity

 

[not_osirus_jenkins]

I support this judgment.

Equality takes precedence over religious belief. That's the bottom line.

then how the fuck is that equality dumbass???? that's you putting your sexual preference over my religious belief and forcing me to do business with you against my conscience

For equality to exist, it must require equal treatment even by private businesses. It's not that hard. It doesn't matter what your conscience says.

Religious belief shouldn't excuse anyone from anti-discrimination laws in the case of race, and it shouldn't excuse anyone in the case of sexual orientation.

then it's not private business now it is??? if the government can force private entities to do business with people they don't want too then it's not truly private it's government controlled.

You sound like those white politicians of the 1960s. Because that is one of the things they said against the Civil Rights Act.

Some of you IC people are so fucking confused that going by what you say you would support the repeal of the landmark civil rights acts of the 60s, and I find it very troubling.

Anyway, there are limits to what you can do with your own business. And that's the way it should be.

as far as I am concerned, The civil rights act was flawed. the devil despite being evil can also be right. I SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO RUN MY BUSINESS ANY FUCKING WAY I WANT TOO. Freedom should always reign supreme for all people. This liberal bullshit has to and will come to an end.

Do you think that whites who own businesses should be able to discriminate on the basis of race in their selection and promotion of employees and in who they want to provide service to?

Thats flawed nigga. The article states that she has EMPLOYED openly gay people and that she has SOLD flowers to these openly gay men. it just goes against her religious beliefs to participate in anyway, a gay marriage. So how the fuck do you compare what you just typed to this?

That makes her looking like an idiot imo. What an oxymoronic woman lol.

Like muslims getting hard on pork but drink more beer than everybody...

but aint nobody ask you for your opinion you french fuck. I really dislike religious people, but i dont think they should be FORCED to do anything that fucks with their beliefs. those gays should of took it on the chin (pun NOT intended) thanked her for her previous business and spent those greenbacks elsewhere, hell i woulda handed them bitches a dozen dandelions for 7 bucks. She is a political sacrifice. They are using this to make a point and spread the agenda. Why is this story as big as it is? there were hundreds of thousands of cases of discriminatiin of minorities in housing, there are thousands of cases where whites follow blacks aroynd stores, when was the last time you heard about any of those. Homos should not compare themselves to blacks or their struggles to the civil rights era. I dont see any of them being hung for being gay.

 

[Gucci Scott King]

On one hand I can see the point of not going somewhere you're not wanted, on the other I also understand the can of worms that could be opened if she was allowed to deny them service.

Overall, instead of denying them, she could've given them shitty service.

 

[(Nope)]

If a neo nazi skinhead with tats on his face decided he wants to stroll into your barbershop, store or enterprise you have to serve him. he could walk in there with a shirt that says all niggers must hang you can't refuse him service. You have to sell him the rope that he'll use to hang a another black person or the gas he'll use to light a cross.

WHY??? because you idiots don't believe in the right of disassociation.

I don't think refusing someone service based on their t-shirt or tattoos is covered under any discrimination laws that I know of. You're all over the place right now.

the point i was trying to make that clearly went over your head was that under the current situation you cannot refuse anyone service based on your own personal feelings. which means you are not free to act on those feelings even through you are supposed to be running a private enterprise.

any one engaged in an activity that i oppose i should have the freedom to not associate with

i am not all over the place i made a direct point you just refuse to address what i am saying because you cannot or don't know how.

There's no truth in what you just said and the false equivalency you made regarding the skinhead shows you don't understand freedom of speech and it's limitations.

I am not talking about freedom of speech. this case as far as i see if has nothing to do with freedom of speech it's all about freedom of religion and freedom of association. A skin head could come into the store without the shirt i should still have the right to refuse him service based on his activity as a neo nazi skinhead. the shirt is just a visible representation on what he believes or might believes.

You don't know what you're talking about, but you're reaction formation speaks volumes.

 

[zombie]

If a neo nazi skinhead with tats on his face decided he wants to stroll into your barbershop, store or enterprise you have to serve him. he could walk in there with a shirt that says all niggers must hang you can't refuse him service. You have to sell him the rope that he'll use to hang a another black person or the gas he'll use to light a cross.

WHY??? because you idiots don't believe in the right of disassociation.

I don't think refusing someone service based on their t-shirt or tattoos is covered under any discrimination laws that I know of. You're all over the place right now.

the point i was trying to make that clearly went over your head was that under the current situation you cannot refuse anyone service based on your own personal feelings. which means you are not free to act on those feelings even through you are supposed to be running a private enterprise.

any one engaged in an activity that i oppose i should have the freedom to not associate with

i am not all over the place i made a direct point you just refuse to address what i am saying because you cannot or don't know how.

There's no truth in what you just said and the false equivalency you made regarding the skinhead shows you don't understand freedom of speech and it's limitations.

I am not talking about freedom of speech. this case as far as i see if has nothing to do with freedom of speech it's all about freedom of religion and freedom of association. A skin head could come into the store without the shirt i should still have the right to refuse him service based on his activity as a neo nazi skinhead. the shirt is just a visible representation on what he believes or might believes.

You don't know what you're talking about, but you're reaction formation speaks volumes.

I know exactly what I am talking about it's just not popular with what are clearly brain washed democratic liberal such as your self

If You want to be forced to associate yourself with activities you oppose just for social harmony that's fine for you but others don't want to live that way