Official 2017 College Football Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
9140ug27jzg7.gif


It's good
 
Last edited:
Los216;c-9579691 said:
I'm an Ohio State fan til death but College Football is sooo much better when USC is good

Depending on your age you have probably only seen USC be great during the Pete Carrol era that resulted in only one BCS national title.

Outside of that they haven't been really good since the 70s.

The Florida schools mostly ruled CFB for the last 35 years (11 national titles) until recently with Bama's run.

Nebraska did too for a while but fell off after '01.

Ohio State has only 2 titles in those 35 years.

Texas only 1 (2005)

Michigan only 1 (1997)

ND only 1 (1988)

Oklahoma 2 (1985,2000)

 
Last edited:
d.green;c-9579833 said:
Los216;c-9579691 said:
I'm an Ohio State fan til death but College Football is sooo much better when USC is good

Depending on your age you have probably only seen USC be great during the Pete Carrol era that resulted in only one BCS national title.

Outside of that they haven't been really good since the 70s.

The Florida schools have ruled CFB for the last 35 years (11 national titles) until recently with Bama's run.

Ohio State has only 2 titles in those 35 years.

Texas only 1 (2005)

Michigan only 1 (1997)

ND only 1 (1988)

Oklahoma 2 (1985,2000)

Lol @ this thinly disguised flawda nigga history lesson.

Point is... when USC can field a decent team it makes for good TV. All that you posted is true and also irrelevant to his post
 
Inglewood_B;c-9579846 said:
d.green;c-9579833 said:
Los216;c-9579691 said:
I'm an Ohio State fan til death but College Football is sooo much better when USC is good

Depending on your age you have probably only seen USC be great during the Pete Carrol era that resulted in only one BCS national title.

Outside of that they haven't been really good since the 70s.

The Florida schools have ruled CFB for the last 35 years (11 national titles) until recently with Bama's run.

Ohio State has only 2 titles in those 35 years.

Texas only 1 (2005)

Michigan only 1 (1997)

ND only 1 (1988)

Oklahoma 2 (1985,2000)

Lol @ this thinly disguised flawda nigga history lesson.

Point is... when USC can field a decent team it makes for good TV. All that you posted is true and also irrelevant to his post

Its good info tho.

But yeah a good USC is good for CFB because without them, football west of TX is almost irrelevant.
 
Last edited:
Shizlansky;c-9579862 said:
How dare you not post LSU to Chips on that list too

I was just posting some of these traditional, blue blood schools that had been struggling but ESPN and the media act like they have been running shit forever.
 
Last edited:
Inglewood_B;c-9579846 said:
d.green;c-9579833 said:
Los216;c-9579691 said:
I'm an Ohio State fan til death but College Football is sooo much better when USC is good

Depending on your age you have probably only seen USC be great during the Pete Carrol era that resulted in only one BCS national title.

Outside of that they haven't been really good since the 70s.

The Florida schools have ruled CFB for the last 35 years (11 national titles) until recently with Bama's run.

Ohio State has only 2 titles in those 35 years.

Texas only 1 (2005)

Michigan only 1 (1997)

ND only 1 (1988)

Oklahoma 2 (1985,2000)

Lol @ this thinly disguised flawda nigga history lesson.

Point is... when USC can field a decent team it makes for good TV. All that you posted is true and also irrelevant to his post

Because their fan base is so big and market.

But Southern California fans (all sports) are fickle.
 
I was driving home and listening to the game on the radio and the announcer said if Baker comes he would go very high in the draft

Dude ain't gon drafted this year or next year

Undisciplined quarterback fails at a 100% rate in the NFL.
 

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
9,430
Views
11,434
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…