Not Only Is Donald Trump A Dumbass, But Gary Johnson Is Just As Dumb
Johnson on the Trans-Pacific Partnership Trade Deal.
"My understanding is that it is more free trade than not. Is it a perfect document? Based upon what I understand it is not, but I could not tell you what the specifics are for why that's not the case other than that it's better than nothing given the current state of trade. So I would be in support of TPP."
"My understanding is that it is more free trade than not. Is it a perfect document? Based upon what I understand it is not, but I could not tell you what the specifics are for why that's not the case other than that it's better than nothing given the current state of trade. So I would be in support of TPP."
infamous114
Moderator
He's an idiot. I'm voting for Hillary lol
SolemnSauce
New member
JJ_Evans;9329517 said:
all 50 of em
A Talented One
New member
This fool didn't even know who Harriet Tubman was.
trilladelic
New member
Peace_79;9390034 said:
Never said I was going to vote for him..
Just saying I respect real speak when it's been spoken..
I'm either voting Stein, writing in Bernie if possible or holding nose n voting for Clinton..
Ajackson17
New member
Interesting..... I haven't even paid attention to the Syrian conflict. I'm sick of western asians.
Last edited:
fortyacres
Moderator
anti intellectulism seems to be whats popping in the US on the right, right now.
Ajackson17
New member
fortyacres;9391595 said:
He is trying to get smarter lol.
fortyacres
Moderator
Come defend your Libertarian saviour
Gary Johnson Now Says That It’s Best If A President Knows Nothing About Foreign Countries And Leaders.
Gary Johnson Now Says That It’s Best If A President Knows Nothing About Foreign Countries And Leaders.
Last edited:
fortyacres
Moderator
Come Defend you Fuhrer
A few short weeks ago, Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson introduced the world to his “Aleppo moment,” in which he failed to name the war-torn city of Syria that’s the subject of so many headlines about nightly airstrikes and barrel bombings. Not too much time passed before Johnson couldn’t name the foreign leader that he most admired. Some people interpreted this as Johnson not admiring any leaders, while others took it as an example of his lack of foreign policy expertise.
Johnson may have settled any ambiguity this week by telling CNN how it’s good for a president to not know much about foreign countries and leaders. A past blunder has resurfaced (which we’ll talk about in a moment) but first comes a Wednesday interview, in which Johnson spoke with the New York Times and may have experienced his latest Aleppo moment:
Mr. Johnson conspicuously sought to avoid another misstep. Asked if he knew the name of North Korea’s leader, Mr. Johnson replied, “I do.”
“You want me to name” the person, he said, then paused, before adding dryly, “Really.” But he declined to supply the name.
Johnson, a non-interventionist by nature, then criticized the media for not calling out Clinton’s interventionist ways because they’re blinded by her foreign policy knowledge. “Because Hillary Clinton can dot the i’s and cross the t’s on geographic leaders, of the names of foreign leaders,” Johnson asserted, people forget all about thousands of deaths in Syria, which he partially blames Clinton on a level of “shared responsibility.” Johnson claims he never would have “put us in that situation.” His Syria discussion leads back to his first Aleppo moment, which also causes more questions about Johnson not naming North Korea’s leader.
Obviously, North Korea is one of the United States’ greatest enemies, which just so happens to have recently conducted its biggest nuclear test and declared the United States to be within striking range of its missiles. Granted, North Korea is often full of garbage, but the latest nuke test appears to have checked out with both South Korea surveillance and seismic detectors. So, anyone who aspires to lead the U.S. really should know the name of North Korea’s leader. Is Johnson seeking to appear purposely obtuse?
Well, a July interview between Johnson and The New Yorker has resurfaced to reveal a discussion about how he entered a room named after Harriet Tubman and asked, “Who’s Harriet Tubman?” Once someone told him who Tubman was, he did remember that she’s going to appear on currency. So, perhaps he knows these things and has a terrible memory? Only Johnson knows for sure.
A few short weeks ago, Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson introduced the world to his “Aleppo moment,” in which he failed to name the war-torn city of Syria that’s the subject of so many headlines about nightly airstrikes and barrel bombings. Not too much time passed before Johnson couldn’t name the foreign leader that he most admired. Some people interpreted this as Johnson not admiring any leaders, while others took it as an example of his lack of foreign policy expertise.
Johnson may have settled any ambiguity this week by telling CNN how it’s good for a president to not know much about foreign countries and leaders. A past blunder has resurfaced (which we’ll talk about in a moment) but first comes a Wednesday interview, in which Johnson spoke with the New York Times and may have experienced his latest Aleppo moment:
Mr. Johnson conspicuously sought to avoid another misstep. Asked if he knew the name of North Korea’s leader, Mr. Johnson replied, “I do.”
“You want me to name” the person, he said, then paused, before adding dryly, “Really.” But he declined to supply the name.
Johnson, a non-interventionist by nature, then criticized the media for not calling out Clinton’s interventionist ways because they’re blinded by her foreign policy knowledge. “Because Hillary Clinton can dot the i’s and cross the t’s on geographic leaders, of the names of foreign leaders,” Johnson asserted, people forget all about thousands of deaths in Syria, which he partially blames Clinton on a level of “shared responsibility.” Johnson claims he never would have “put us in that situation.” His Syria discussion leads back to his first Aleppo moment, which also causes more questions about Johnson not naming North Korea’s leader.
Obviously, North Korea is one of the United States’ greatest enemies, which just so happens to have recently conducted its biggest nuclear test and declared the United States to be within striking range of its missiles. Granted, North Korea is often full of garbage, but the latest nuke test appears to have checked out with both South Korea surveillance and seismic detectors. So, anyone who aspires to lead the U.S. really should know the name of North Korea’s leader. Is Johnson seeking to appear purposely obtuse?
Well, a July interview between Johnson and The New Yorker has resurfaced to reveal a discussion about how he entered a room named after Harriet Tubman and asked, “Who’s Harriet Tubman?” Once someone told him who Tubman was, he did remember that she’s going to appear on currency. So, perhaps he knows these things and has a terrible memory? Only Johnson knows for sure.
People like Gary because they don't know enough about him to hate him yet.
He gets the "new guy" hype. Nigga popped up out the blue and now to appear smart people say their voting for him as if they knew about him more than two months ago. Can't hate a nigga who hasn't been in a position to fail yet is the logic.
He gets the "new guy" hype. Nigga popped up out the blue and now to appear smart people say their voting for him as if they knew about him more than two months ago. Can't hate a nigga who hasn't been in a position to fail yet is the logic.
