No evidence of modern forgery in ancient text mentioning ‘Jesus’s wife’

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
Meroe;6943339 said:
mryounggun;6943318 said:
Meroe;6943302 said:
Yup. Mary magdalene. Thought yall knew. The Romans took a ton of stuff out of the bible... only reason we know these kinds of things on a mainstream level is becuase of Ethiopia and the dead sea scrolls.

Doesn't really matter, on a large scale.

People who have chosen not to believe this are not gonna believe it regardless of what evidence is put forth. They'll dismiss the shit, citing some obscure passage about a prophet predicting that the devil would pop up and try to sully the name of the lord.

People who believe it...will still believe it.

People who don't care (like me)...still won't care.

Well.. maybe for you it doesn't matter, but in the context of christian history, there's been probably millions of monks and priests whom till this have lived a life of sexual abstinence and austere living to emulate the life of a man they thought they knew.

Yeah, that's why I said 'on a large scale'. This isn't really gonna affect Christianity as a whole in any meaningful way.
 
Last edited:
mryounggun;6943443 said:
Meroe;6943339 said:
mryounggun;6943318 said:
Meroe;6943302 said:
Yup. Mary magdalene. Thought yall knew. The Romans took a ton of stuff out of the bible... only reason we know these kinds of things on a mainstream level is becuase of Ethiopia and the dead sea scrolls.

Doesn't really matter, on a large scale.

People who have chosen not to believe this are not gonna believe it regardless of what evidence is put forth. They'll dismiss the shit, citing some obscure passage about a prophet predicting that the devil would pop up and try to sully the name of the lord.

People who believe it...will still believe it.

People who don't care (like me)...still won't care.

Well.. maybe for you it doesn't matter, but in the context of christian history, there's been probably millions of monks and priests whom till this have lived a life of sexual abstinence and austere living to emulate the life of a man they thought they knew.

Yeah, that's why I said 'on a large scale'. This isn't really gonna affect Christianity as a whole in any meaningful way.

Outside of a sect or denomination either popping up or one that exists already gaining further notoriety for this plausible truth.
 
"The results of a carbon dating test found that the papyrus probably dates to eighth-

century Egypt, about 400 years later than King originally thought, but still in ancient times."


This is self ether at it's finest. So they find a document saying that Jesus was married 800 years after HE ROSE FROM THE DEAD????????????????????

What kind of shenanigans is the dude trying to pull?

Folks will believe anything I tell you!

The whole of the New testament was finished before the end of the 1st century. The cannon of scripture closed in the 4th centruy. And here they have a document which comes 400 years later, even after the founding of Islam? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAH!!!!!!!!

This is clown fish food.

Straight trash homey.

 
Last edited:
Focal Point;6943467 said:
mryounggun;6943443 said:
Meroe;6943339 said:
mryounggun;6943318 said:
Meroe;6943302 said:
Yup. Mary magdalene. Thought yall knew. The Romans took a ton of stuff out of the bible... only reason we know these kinds of things on a mainstream level is becuase of Ethiopia and the dead sea scrolls.

Doesn't really matter, on a large scale.

People who have chosen not to believe this are not gonna believe it regardless of what evidence is put forth. They'll dismiss the shit, citing some obscure passage about a prophet predicting that the devil would pop up and try to sully the name of the lord.

People who believe it...will still believe it.

People who don't care (like me)...still won't care.

Well.. maybe for you it doesn't matter, but in the context of christian history, there's been probably millions of monks and priests whom till this have lived a life of sexual abstinence and austere living to emulate the life of a man they thought they knew.

Yeah, that's why I said 'on a large scale'. This isn't really gonna affect Christianity as a whole in any meaningful way.

Outside of a sect or denomination either popping up or one that exists already gaining further notoriety for this plausible truth.

This ain't the first time this type of thing has been widely publicized. Shit ain't gon' change nothing major.
 
Last edited:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6943470 said:
"The results of a carbon dating test found that the papyrus probably dates to eighth-

century Egypt, about 400 years later than King originally thought, but still in ancient times."


This is self ether at it's finest. So they find a document saying that Jesus was married 800 years after HE ROSE FROM THE DEAD????????????????????

What kind of shenanigans is the dude trying to pull?

Folks will believe anything I tell you!

The whole of the New testament was finished before the end of the 1st century. The cannon of scripture closed in the 4th centruy. And here they have a document which comes 400 years later, even after the founding of Islam? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAH!!!!!!!!

This is clown fish food.

Straight trash homey.

You're bugging about "400 years" but when were all the first writings of Jesus written? Hundreds of years later, as well.

 
Black_Samson;6943453 said:
now do yall believe that Movies and shit is a form of preparation?

I really try to understand your posts sometimes but I just don't get some of them.
 
mryounggun;6943482" said:
Focal Point;6943467 said:
mryounggun;6943443 said:
Meroe;6943339 said:
mryounggun;6943318 said:
Meroe;6943302 said:
Yup. Mary magdalene. Thought yall knew. The Romans took a ton of stuff out of the bible... only reason we know these kinds of things on a mainstream level is becuase of Ethiopia and the dead sea scrolls.

Doesn't really matter, on a large scale.

People who have chosen not to believe this are not gonna believe it regardless of what evidence is put forth. They'll dismiss the shit, citing some obscure passage about a prophet predicting that the devil would pop up and try to sully the name of the lord.

People who believe it...will still believe it.

People who don't care (like me)...still won't care.

Well.. maybe for you it doesn't matter, but in the context of christian history, there's been probably millions of monks and priests whom till this have lived a life of sexual abstinence and austere living to emulate the life of a man they thought they knew.

Yeah, that's why I said 'on a large scale'. This isn't really gonna affect Christianity as a whole in any meaningful way.

Outside of a sect or denomination either popping up or one that exists already gaining further notoriety for this plausible truth.

This ain't the first time this type of thing has been widely publicized. Shit ain't gon' change nothing major.

wasn't meaning that it was going to change anything significantly just that those things would likely occur
 
Last edited:
Focal Point;6943510 said:
[mryounggun;6943482"]
Focal Point;6943467 said:
mryounggun;6943443 said:
Meroe;6943339 said:
mryounggun;6943318 said:
Meroe;6943302 said:
Yup. Mary magdalene. Thought yall knew. The Romans took a ton of stuff out of the bible... only reason we know these kinds of things on a mainstream level is becuase of Ethiopia and the dead sea scrolls.

Doesn't really matter, on a large scale.

People who have chosen not to believe this are not gonna believe it regardless of what evidence is put forth. They'll dismiss the shit, citing some obscure passage about a prophet predicting that the devil would pop up and try to sully the name of the lord.

People who believe it...will still believe it.

People who don't care (like me)...still won't care.

Well.. maybe for you it doesn't matter, but in the context of christian history, there's been probably millions of monks and priests whom till this have lived a life of sexual abstinence and austere living to emulate the life of a man they thought they knew.

Yeah, that's why I said 'on a large scale'. This isn't really gonna affect Christianity as a whole in any meaningful way.

Outside of a sect or denomination either popping up or one that exists already gaining further notoriety for this plausible truth.

This ain't the first time this type of thing has been widely publicized. Shit ain't gon' change nothing major.

wasn't meaning that it was going to change anything significantly just that those things would likely occur[/quote]

Gotcha
 
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6943470 said:
"The results of a carbon dating test found that the papyrus probably dates to eighth-

century Egypt, about 400 years later than King originally thought, but still in ancient times."


This is self ether at it's finest. So they find a document saying that Jesus was married 800 years after HE ROSE FROM THE DEAD????????????????????

What kind of shenanigans is the dude trying to pull?

Folks will believe anything I tell you!

The whole of the New testament was finished before the end of the 1st century. The cannon of scripture closed in the 4th centruy. And here they have a document which comes 400 years later, even after the founding of Islam? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAH!!!!!!!!

This is clown fish food.

Straight trash homey.
=42s
 
how does Jesus being married a bad thing?

u nigger don't even know why this is an "attack"... then again christians r the worst followers ever... the whole religion i antithetical to what the nigga told y'all to b doing... dumb motherfuckers...
 
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6943470 said:
"The results of a carbon dating test found that the papyrus probably dates to eighth-

century Egypt, about 400 years later than King originally thought, but still in ancient times."


This is self ether at it's finest. So they find a document saying that Jesus was married 800 years after HE ROSE FROM THE DEAD????????????????????

What kind of shenanigans is the dude trying to pull?

Folks will believe anything I tell you!

The whole of the New testament was finished before the end of the 1st century. The cannon of scripture closed in the 4th centruy. And here they have a document which comes 400 years later, even after the founding of Islam? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAH!!!!!!!!

This is clown fish food.

Straight trash homey.

Your King James bible was written about 900 years after that.
 
Last edited:
So here we go with the Lies now. SMH. The same old song and dance. You ether an argument, and then they start to pull out the lies!

Every CREDIBLE scholar will agree that every book found in the New testament, there are 27, was written before the close of the 1st century!

Paul the apostle wrote 13 of the 27 books and he was martyred around 66 A.D.

The last book that was written was likely Revelation, which was written by John the Apostle on the Island of Patmos around 90 A.D.

Stop with the lies, You're kidding no one over here. Except for yourself. Amen.

 
Real shit, I think if you tried hard enough, you could get the homie @DoUwant2go2Heaven? to say 'Man, fuck you bitch nigga! I ride for this shit!!!'.

I'd be willing to bet money on it.
 
mryounggun;6943606 said:
Real shit, I think if you tried hard enough, you could get the homie @DoUwant2go2Heaven? to say 'Man, fuck you bitch nigga! I ride for this shit!!!'.

I'd be willing to bet money on it.

I'm a redeemed sinner saved by the grace of God and this sinful flesh is still with me. I hope and pray that I will never hurt the cause of Christ by being hateful to another soul who was also made in the image of God.

But I would ride for Christ. As a matter of fact any disciple must be willing to literally die for Christ if push came to shove. And push will come to shove here soon. Amen.
 

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
165
Views
9
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…