Muslims want freedom in the US but don't give it to their own people in Mecca

[JokerzWyld]

Norman Borlaug didn't save shit. He had a team of scientists, most of which were indigenous to the areas he worked. Besides, he can held responsible for fucking up the economies of developing and third world nations and making way for companies like ConAgra and Monsato to become super rich, while driving the small farmers out of business, while simultaneously fucking up the soil with this large scale commercial farming that is unnatural and way too quick. the He was a tool for the super rich. The food shortage is caused by greedy crackers who do shit like destroy crops to raise prices and put warlords in place over food supplies to get people to capitulate to their whims.

He is also responsible for the development of genetically modified food, which has been dumped in third world countries which is endangering the health of large populations and killing people by the millions, particularly in Africa, where greedy crackers are trying to remove large populations through poisonous food(Norman), Poisonous vaccines(WHO) and initiating conflicts(insert any colonial cracker). All this is done, so they can have unfettered access to the resources of Africa and other areas, because it is against the religion of white people to share and be moderate in consumption.

You have never cleaned up your mess.

SMH, at crackers wanting credit for fixing something that wasn't broke that they fucked up in the first place. Why you do that?

He was a tool for Rockefeller. And after Rockefeller used him, he threw his ass to the curb. Shame on you armchair communist, big upping a capitalist agent.

Excuse me, I mean wealthy elite whites. The poor crackers are just as victimized and abused.

Somebody get me some tomato soup, I need something to place these crumbled up crackers in. lol

Master Bateman,

Rule No.1. When you come into an argument make sure your shit is correct and make sure you follow the line of dispute, lest you find yourself looking like an ass. Especially when you take time to edit your comments. Rule No.2 when someone makes a claim, you might not want to provide proof in your rebuttal verifying the claim, with phrases like, "The only places that fit this description"....

The point on the floor was that there were cities in Muslim Nations more modern than cities in Europe and America, because of the claim that the Islamic nations were medieval. First of all, Qatar and UAE are not cities. Second Dubai's financial situation is irrelevant to whether it modern ot not(red herring). Third, and I hate to get off point, Dubai is not in a self inflicted crisis. She is in trouble because she is tied to British and US financial markets and like most tourist depend economies and oil rich economies in that region, they failed to develop an infrastructure, besides the ho always gets it before the pimp.

And yes, I have been to those places and many others. Baghdad before the invasion was one of the most beautiful cities in the world. Riyadh is a very modern city. Dubai has architecture and technology that is state of the art, that most Americans and Europeans will never see. I have never been to Vienna but, I just couldn't imagine seeing the modernity there that I saw in Doha or Dubai. But in fairness, they are tourist based economies with small populations so they can develop their cities and amenities more so than aforementioned cities.

LMAO at you saying Dubai in a self inflicted crises, when they are nothing but a glorified holding company for the European elites. If they are self inflicted, then what is the US and Britian. What about the riots in Greece? Turn off Fox, my dude.

That shit that makes your soul burn slow...

 

[IC's Patrick Bateman]

Master Bateman,

Rule No.1. When you come into an argument make sure your shit is correct and make sure you follow the line of dispute, lest you find yourself looking like an ass. Especially when you take time to edit your comments. Rule No.2 when someone makes a claim, you might not want to provide proof in your rebuttal verifying the claim, with phrases like, "The only places that fit this description"....

The point on the floor was that there were cities in Muslim Nations more modern than cities in Europe and America, because of the claim that the Islamic nations were medieval. First of all, Qatar and UAE are not cities. Second Dubai's financial situation is irrelevant to whether it modern ot not(red herring). Third, and I hate to get off point, Dubai is not in a self inflicted crisis. She is in trouble because she is tied to British and US financial markets and like most tourist depend economies and oil rich economies in that region, they failed to develop an infrastructure, besides the ho always gets it before the pimp.

And yes, I have been to those places and many others. Baghdad before the invasion was one of the most beautiful cities in the world. Riyadh is a very modern city. Dubai has architecture and technology that is state of the art, that most Americans and Europeans will never see. I have never been to Vienna but, I just couldn't imagine seeing the modernity there that I saw in Doha or Dubai. But in fairness, they are tourist based economies with small populations so they can develop their cities and amenities more so than aforementioned cities.

LMAO at you saying Dubai in a self inflicted crises, when they are nothing but a glorified holding company for the European elites. If they are self inflicted, then what is the US and Britian. What about the riots in Greece? Turn off Fox, my dude.

interesting reply, greatly appreciated that you provided such a response in length. i was rude so i'll humbly accept the so called 'ether' your nuthuggers here are on about.

but let's put aside everything else you disagree with - whether the people of Dubai could have prevented their own financial crises or the nitpicking over silly shit like the fact that the UAE is a country and not a city, obviously - or hinting that there's anything wrong with editing a post for spelling or grammar - which is just noise i don't see why you take the time to point out such inanities. how about just answer the 1 real question i asked that you completely ignored? it was the first sentence:

what cities exactly and why are they more modern than any city in Europe or America?

so i guess you do mean Dubai, but can you explain what exactly is more modern? i'm just asking i've been all through there i was in and out and making lengthy stays during my 2 year tour of Baghdad. I've also been all through Europe and Asia, and i'm from a modern American city.. i'm just not seeing it man. just being honest with you, when you say there is something more modern in Dubai than what you can find in Vienna or Chicago - i have no idea what the hell you're talking about so please elaborate.

there's more to being modern than the latest modern architecture (lol @ comparing architecture in Dubai to Vienna though, like anything built in the last 10 years can fuck with what was done 500 years ago in Vienna) modern living to me is what makes every expert on the subject put Vienna and Zurich in the top cities in the world for quality of life while there are no Muslim cities anywhere to be found topping such a study. many of the criminal laws are ridiculously outdated and completely anti-modern, there are plenty of slums and a huge disparity between the upper and lower class complimented by a crap social system, the city doesn't have any kind of public transport system besides Taxis.. i could go on. i just want to know what is so modern about these cities to you, saying there are NO European/American cities as modern as the best the Muslim world has to offer sounds borderline delusional to me. thanks in advance and i hope you appreciate the editing..

 

[Arya Tsaddiq]

One white man saved a half a billion lives with his agricultural science. (Norman Borlaug)

We clean up our messes.

Meanwhile, Africa is one giant gutter and the Islamic world is a medieval mess.

Not all of Africa is bad.....But this movie makes some good points as to why some are:

[video=youtube;O19p7oc7Y6U]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O19p7oc7Y6U[/video]

 

[one_manshow]

KTULU been troll posting for years hang it up.....your career is done like Chris Webber

 

[KTULU IS BACK]

Norman Borlaug didn't save shit.

Incorrect, and so is the entire rest of this post.

There are cities in Muslim nations that are way more modern than any city in America or Europe.

hahahhahahha no

Africa is run by crackers

Africa is on the planet Earth, yes, but its provincial governors are blacks.

 

[And Step]

Incorrect, and so is the entire rest of this post.

Gurgle, Gurgle, choke, gasp, cough, .....ahhhhh....thump!

Africa is on the planet Earth, yes, but its provincial governors are blacks.

Some plantations had black overseers. Black Governors of white temporary realities.

 

[Hyde Parke]

damn step in here droppin bombs.

 

[KTULU IS BACK]

Some plantations had black overseers.

Some black folks are ambitious.

 

[And Step]

Some black folks are ambitious.

Commie bastard. When you were talking about Uncle Joe, were you talking about McCarthy?

 

[kingblaze84]

I don't support the random killing of gays, but to be fair, Christians have a much longer body count of killing people.......

 

[Skeratch]

Saudi Arabia and Islam are not the same thing. Just like in Christianity there are extremist Muslims, conservative Muslims, moderate Muslims and liberal Muslims.

Islam is far too diverse for you to paint all Muslims with the same brush, but you probably already know that you're being intellectually dishonest.

 

[KTULU IS BACK]

there are extremist Muslims, conservative Muslims, moderate Muslims and liberal Muslims.

Where are these people and which Islamic republics do they control?

 

[Skeratch]

Where are these people and which Islamic republics do they control?

Disingenuous.

A moderate or liberal Muslim is not going to control any religious republic, they might be persecuted though. Do you really need examples?