Mod Feedback

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
BTW there are some users in the "Banned Users" role who aren't actually banned. Should they be?

Code:
USERID	NAME		DATE LAST ACTIVE

283482	autotune	2016-03-17 05:12:17

1022466	bosswop		2016-08-25 02:19:50

273299	ChillaDaKilla	2016-10-26 01:22:46
 
IcyLiquid;9452058 said:
Do you guys need some PMs dismantled?

Sure @IcyLiquid

Go to the banned poster @thatboydizz 's account. There's a mass pm involving nudes that needs to be dismantled

 
IcyLiquid;9452082 said:
BTW there are some users in the "Banned Users" role who aren't actually banned. Should they be?

Code:
USERID	NAME		DATE LAST ACTIVE

283482	autotune	2016-03-17 05:12:17

1022466	bosswop		2016-08-25 02:19:50

273299	ChillaDaKilla	2016-10-26 01:22:46

ChillaDaKilla was banned in the past, but his ban wouldn't 'stick', and the account would become unbanned by itself...I've been speaking with Matthew (Vanilla) about that issue...he doesn't need to be banned at this time though.

I don't recognize the other names

 
IcyLiquid;9452261 said:
I left the actual conversation but just removed everyone's access to it. Do you want the actual messages removed too?

If u can, that would be dope...if not, appreciate u removing everyone's access to it

 
Jay, I was gunna have Matthew ask you whether you were sure about the PM limit being actually 1, or if it should maybe be like 3 or 4 or something. There could be legitimate uses for group messages with a few people in them for coordinating stuff. Something to consider, perhaps.
 
Maybe just keep the PMs 1 on 1 so in that case they have to work 100 times harder to do this fuck shit ever again if it does happen... when it does happen again, because females will will be females and guys will be guys, and the internet will be the internet.
 

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
Busta Carmichael,
Replies
3,857
Views
3,018
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…