Mod beef

[SixSickSins]

Synopsis of this beef?

I banned a guy for posting disgusting, highly explicit nude gifs on his profile. Asses (male and female) out, dick out, naked girl with dick in her mouth, cum spraying everywhere.

I was told the ban was to be lifted since--here's the magical funny part!--the backstreets (i.e the 'Activity' tab and individual profile pages) are not considered public...on a public site...that has no restrictions to that portion of the site. Imagine how blown my mind was when I learned today that portions of a site that are available and accessible to literally the whole world are not public. Golly gee, was I schooled!

Not.

Had it been a girl who posted such explicit images, she would've been banned without a second thought. Oh, wait. That did happen...to me. Yay, equality!

Next, another fun little tidbit, I was told that since these magical unicorn areas of the site are "non-public", that we're allowed to post ANYTHING on our profiles. Yep, A N Y T H I N G.

Guess the no nudity rule just goes out the window when dealing with the backstreets aka just another public portion of the site. Lol.

And, thus, I shall post as many explicit, disgusting, nude, nsfw, homosexual images on there as I please. Since it can't be peaceable for everyone, it will be disgusting for everyone. If I gotta view naked whores, then everyone will be subjected to whatever I decide to post.

These are the sensible "rules" that have been provided us.

I hope I summed everything up for you well.

 

The user and all related content has been deleted.

 

[Stew]

Wasn't even close to porn

 

The user and all related content has been deleted.

 

[_Jay_]

Backstreets are not considered public because they're not threads, nor are in forums. To be offended by someone's backstreet page, one has to go out of their way to be offended.

As long as someone isn't being @'d to it, what goes on on anyone's back page is nobody's business...granted that no laws are being broken, or anyone being specifically harassed (one poster's pics being placed on another poster's backstreet, for example).

 

[_Jay_]

What I saw a few months ago, was Six having men having guy sex in her sig. Sig, not backstreet. A sig is viewable anywhere on the site, and is considered "public". One does not have to go out of their way to be offended by a sig, they are in plain view.

Therefore, the sig versus backstreet comparison does not hold up.

 

[_Jay_]

*gay, not guy...nh

 

[5th Letter]

If Six posts some gay shit in the backstreets then a second later I click activity how am I going out of my way to be offended? I'm not understanding that part. I could see your point if the forums had the 2009 set up.

 

[MsSouthern]

Wasn't even close to porn

So then why is @SixSickSins‌ saying it was full on nudes ... Dick sucking ... Cum spraying ?

Sounds like porn to me @Stew‌

Again y'all are asking for trouble ... And if males can post ish like that females can too or whatever they feel like

Be prepared to see a bunch of big dicks ....y'all already know how this is gonna turn out

Lol

 

[Stew]

"Aye stew can you do me a favor and unban shottadabeast and gallis.

one of the new mods got power hungry. here is what happened below and after reviewing conflict's post on the activity page and him not being banned is proof of the broad banning ppl she don't like for no reason."

 

[SixSickSins]

I posted fine ass men on my page, too, and was still banned. I'm no longer speaking on the avi/sig issue.

If Six posts some gay shit in the backstreets then a second later I click activity how am I going out of my way to be offended? I'm not understanding that part. I could see your point if the forums had the 2009 set up.

Precisely.

My point is that you don't have to click an individual's profile page to see what they place there. The Activity tab exists for everyone and IS public. You don't have to go out of your way to view the stuff.

"Aye stew can you do me a favor and unban shottadabeast and gallis.

one of the new mods got power hungry. here is what happened below and after reviewing conflict's post on the activity page and him not being banned is proof of the broad banning ppl she don't like for no reason."

Um, no. That was his alias and after making a scene about leaving he came crying back like a lil bitch. Conflict acts like a retard 99% of the time, but he rarely posts explicit shit of the same nature that guy did.

I mean, can anyone here say I have a special place in my heart for CONFLICT of all people? Shit, can that be said about anyone here at all? Lmao. C'mon. He was just scrambling to find something to complain about since he's mad.

If I simply banned folks I didn't like, all the misogynistic posters would be gone, but they still here. I don't operate like that. He better kill that illogical noise.

 

The user and all related content has been deleted.

 

[DOPEdweebz]

Post the image here

 

[DOPEdweebz]

[quote"Parallel;7458786"]It is interesting to me. It's not even logical for the women to want men to not post stuff given the huge difference of males to females.

Would be like me expecting posters to stop saying they want to commit genocide against whites. Seems like it comes with the territory of the overwhelming majority. [/quote]

I see where you going with this. Its either a) majority rules or b) the rules are the rules, no stretching it for your own interpretation or personal interest.

That being said I can see a white poster wanting another poster banned for calling that person a "cracka", or a latino a "spic". Just like a non black poster banned for using the word "nigga" and etc.

How yall wanna go with it?

Anyways the issue is if the pic was even ban worthy in the first place.

 

The user and all related content has been deleted.

 

[SixSickSins]

If images of naked women (no g string floss, no NOTHING...purely naked) isn't considered explicit, then I don't know what is. Is not a female twerking a 50" bare ass not pornographic??

Go scroll back several pages on the user 'Shottadabeast' profile page.

Wouldn't care if it merely showed up on his page and his page alone, but the Activity tab is a COMPILATION (no pun intended) of user activity and therefore should not be exempt from the rules.

Never heard of anyone "going out of their way" to click the Activity tab. If that's what going out of your way means, then we've all went out of way merely browsing & clicking other public parts of the forum.

The only place you can arguably go out of your way to see that type of stuff is illpix, since that is the designated place for such images.

 

[janklow]

That being said I can see a white poster wanting another poster banned for calling that person a "cracka", or a latino a "spic".

INCOMING UNRELATED-TO-THE-TOPIC-AT-HAND REMARKS: my position on this has always been that the latter is a legit complaint, but for the former, white people are just going to have to come to terms with their hurt feelings on the internet

 

[DOPEdweebz]

That being said I can see a white poster wanting another poster banned for calling that person a "cracka", or a latino a "spic".

INCOMING UNRELATED-TO-THE-TOPIC-AT-HAND REMARKS: my position on this has always been that the latter is a legit complaint, but for the former, white people are just going to have to come to terms with their hurt feelings on the internet

It was example of how the game could be played. Didn't say it was my opinion.

 

[_Jay_]

I think I see the problem here...

I don't, and most mods, don't use the "Activities tab". So, we're used to only seeing that kinda activity by specifically clicking on posters' profile pages.

^^That DOES change the issue into a minority vs majority situation...unfortunately. With that said, I'm not changing that "rule". Posters' backstreets are their own.

 

[MsSouthern]

I'm not gonna post anything gay

Maybe just a naked sexy man or two ....