LMS Debate rd2. Does not paying child support warrant jail time

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
.........................................
a71j8wqux0gy.png


SolemnSauce;c-9611559 said:
There's no way to argue for jail time for people who don't pay child support. The parent gains a record that will hender them from getting a job.A job that can help them pay child support and survive. Child support can't be paid if the parent is locked up because they aren't working.

In addition to that, women can claim government assistance unbeknownst to a father. And he can get locked up for not paying child support from his wages to the goverment. I mean all of these reasons are why it's not right. But..

1rbkiax3nutc.gif


Wear a condom, beware of the woman you sleep with. Don't cheat and or leave a woman broken heart. Take responsibility for you actions, before the system takes you life. So it might not be right, but it is needed.

 
Last edited:
I think we need a breathalyzer before debates... or this nigga just throwing it.

sion made a behind the page deal to make him a mod, is my guess.
 
@2stepz_ahead I motion we add a word count limit...

Can't be giving these long-winded as world niggas open platforms to present every little piece of information.

Nobody tryna read all that shit..

Plus, much like a TIME LIMIT in an actual debate, it forces the debater to pick and chose which important and relevant information to present.

Edit: In b4 @Sion 17-paragraph response lol
 
Last edited:
yellowtapesport;c-9611928 said:
@2stepz_ahead I motion we add a word count limit...

Can't be giving these long-winded as world niggas open platforms to present every little piece of information.

Nobody tryna read all that shit..

Plus, much like a TIME LIMIT in an actual debate, it forces the debater to pick and chose which important and relevant information to present.

500-600 words should be sufficient per argument
 
yellowtapesport;c-9611928 said:
@2stepz_ahead I motion we add a word count limit...

Can't be giving these long-winded as world niggas open platforms to present every little piece of information.

Nobody tryna read all that shit..

Plus, much like a TIME LIMIT in an actual debate, it forces the debater to pick and chose which important and relevant information to present.

Edit: In b4 @Sion 17-paragraph response lol

Nah cuz sometimes I be in the mood to get thorough and use long examples to make my point lol

I do think 5 replies is too long tho...we should go back to 3. Maybe do 5 as like a championship round type thing.
 
Mastery;c-9611947 said:
No word count limit. No one is forcing y'all to read lol

Tru but maybe u missed my point?

All 'verbal' debates have TIME LIMITS..wouldn't the equivalent for a written debate be a word-count limit?
 
Mastery;c-9611947 said:
No word count limit. No one is forcing y'all to read lol

ol "reading is FUN for the mental" fundemantal ass nigga!! lol

amd if we debating we do have to read all that bullshit!! lol
 
Last edited:
Bruh I've already went through this whole debate (both sides) in my head. I hope these niggas don't let us down and do this debate justice haha
 
Last edited:
Mastery;c-9612146 said:
Bruh I've already went through this whole debate (both sides) in my head. I hope these niggas don't let us down and do this debate justice haha

Yea I played out a couple different ways in my head. This should be good provided allergens don't waste no more posts smmfh.
 
Not going to front, I've been in the shadows, periodically checking on this site for years.

These debates and attempts at genuine conversation, exchanging of ideas and sharpening ones thought process against others within the IC is a great idea.

Props to whomever came up with it and those actually looking to push it down the line as a regular thing.
 
TheNeoShell;c-9612502 said:
Not going to front, I've been in the shadows, periodically checking on this site for years.

These debates and attempts at genuine conversation, exchanging of ideas and sharpening ones thought process against others within the IC is a great idea.

Props to whomever came up with it and those actually looking to push it down the line as a regular thing.

so next debate are you team America or them other niggas?
 
2stepz_ahead;c-9612505 said:
TheNeoShell;c-9612502 said:
Not going to front, I've been in the shadows, periodically checking on this site for years.

These debates and attempts at genuine conversation, exchanging of ideas and sharpening ones thought process against others within the IC is a great idea.

Props to whomever came up with it and those actually looking to push it down the line as a regular thing.

so next debate are you team America or them other niggas?

if he smart he fuckin wit the real!!! hahahaha

lol@ "them other niggas"
 
Last edited:
2stepz_ahead;c-9612505 said:
TheNeoShell;c-9612502 said:
Not going to front, I've been in the shadows, periodically checking on this site for years.

These debates and attempts at genuine conversation, exchanging of ideas and sharpening ones thought process against others within the IC is a great idea.

Props to whomever came up with it and those actually looking to push it down the line as a regular thing.

so next debate are you team America or them other niggas?

Eventually, I'd like to put my name in the hat for some discourse.

Like I said, I check in periodically, but I should be on more often moving forward.

There seems to be some mini-factions here and there or alliances that I'm trying to observe.

I'd be foolish to just dive in and not become somewhat acclimated to the landscape, lol.



Short answer though, I'm team "Which Ever Side is Right"...
Damn, sounded cooler in my head before I typed it out... I'll have to shorten that...
 
yellowtapesport;c-9612447 said:
This musical interlude is brought to you by #ROS Radio...

Some motivation as you 'super-typers' prepare your next responses.


yeh.. ill never understand the point of doin research for a debate..

I mean I'm okay wit brushing up on the subject to form YOUR opinion.. but to research research and use it AS ur argument.. that shit's wack to me..

"Here's excerpts from the article but I recommend the judges read it entirety:"

or.. or

"I leave this for the judges to look at and read."

I mean who's debating?? we may as well call the "experts" to the floor..

"*clears throat* yeh y'all.. sending pops to jail for not paying child support is bad..

here go some articles on it.. read it at ur leisure..

regards,

god bless you PLEEEEEEEEASE vote for me."

hahahaha
 

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
148
Views
0
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…