Kangaye reveals that Tyga is type of n!gga that stunts outside of highschools schemin on young girls

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
zombie;7815199 said:
Huey_C;7815183 said:
taeboo;7815150 said:
There was a time when grown men marrying a 13 or 14 year old was normal, so I guess that should be ok today as well....

There was a time when lynching a black person was ok, it's dumb when they try to make the "good ol days" argument. There's reasons why we don't continue to practice old social norms for good reason. But you get it tho, I'm preaching to the choir.

So what you are saying here is that marrying a 17 year old or even having consensual sex with her is equal to torturing and murdering someone without good evidence of guilt.

The correlation is when saying what was ok in america 40-60 years ago, like girls getting married between the ages of 13-17, is a foolish argument. Shit like that isn't practiced anymore for a reason. I see you like to play devils advocate on this board.
 
zombie;7815202 said:
Let's just be honest, people just arbitrarily chose an age of consent based on feelings.

basically... 17 years and 10 months : Heinous predatory act of pedophilia!

Same girl 2 months later : Cool.

In the next state over, 16 years and 5 months : Cool.

It's women that's 32 that you have no business fuckin either but niggas are still gonna do it. Pedophilia is something completely different.

All that said, I dutifully comply with all of my area's age of consent laws and I suggest all of you do the same.

stay-thirsty-my-friends.jpg
 
Last edited:
Tyga petty simple as that... but the funny part is when she becomes legal she will drop his ass... and she will leave the situation unscratched and he will forever be known as a pedo....

but don't get me wrong Russell Simmons... Snoop... are pedos too.. so the shyt happens... don't make the shyt right tho..
 
Meta_Conscious;7815226 said:
the brain is still developing at 17...

it's still developing well into your 20's tho...

you know what don't even mind me. I'm not really feeling the side of the argument I'm on so good day to you.
 
Stiff;7815230 said:
Meta_Conscious;7815226 said:
the brain is still developing at 17...

it's still developing well into your 20's tho...

you know what don't even mind me. I'm not really feeling the side of the argument I'm on so good day to you.

Lol good job bruh
 
Huey_C;7815218 said:
zombie;7815202 said:
Let's just be honest, people just arbitrarily chose an age of consent based on feelings.

So you would mess with an underage female.

Underage ???no but what defines underage changes from place to place.

So me personally I use my own discretion. But I am not down with bashing 25 year olds for fucking 17 year olds to so makes no fucking sense.

 
Last edited:
Huey_C;7815205 said:
zombie;7815199 said:
Huey_C;7815183 said:
taeboo;7815150 said:
There was a time when grown men marrying a 13 or 14 year old was normal, so I guess that should be ok today as well....

There was a time when lynching a black person was ok, it's dumb when they try to make the "good ol days" argument. There's reasons why we don't continue to practice old social norms for good reason. But you get it tho, I'm preaching to the choir.

So what you are saying here is that marrying a 17 year old or even having consensual sex with her is equal to torturing and murdering someone without good evidence of guilt.

The correlation is when saying what was ok in america 40-60 years ago, like girls getting married between the ages of 13-17, is a foolish argument. Shit like that isn't practiced anymore for a reason. I see you like to play devils advocate on this board.

What's the reason it isn't practiced any more??? What is that reason based on
 
zombie;7815250 said:
Huey_C;7815205 said:
zombie;7815199 said:
Huey_C;7815183 said:
taeboo;7815150 said:
There was a time when grown men marrying a 13 or 14 year old was normal, so I guess that should be ok today as well....

There was a time when lynching a black person was ok, it's dumb when they try to make the "good ol days" argument. There's reasons why we don't continue to practice old social norms for good reason. But you get it tho, I'm preaching to the choir.

So what you are saying here is that marrying a 17 year old or even having consensual sex with her is equal to torturing and murdering someone without good evidence of guilt.

The correlation is when saying what was ok in america 40-60 years ago, like girls getting married between the ages of 13-17, is a foolish argument. Shit like that isn't practiced anymore for a reason. I see you like to play devils advocate on this board.

What's the reason it isn't practiced any more??? What is that reason based on

If you know any kids between those ages then you should know why, adults can exploit adolescent individuals almost enslaving them mentally due to them being extremely impressionable. Like I said earlier you enjoy playing devils advocate.
 
zombie;7814856 said:
desertrain10;7814803 said:
zombie;7814528 said:
desertrain10;7814293 said:
IAmDopeSmoke;7814236 said:
Will Munny;7814225 said:
IAmDopeSmoke;7814204 said:
Tbh I was 19 fckin 16yr olds and up so was a lot of other niggas y'all can play the upstanding citizen role if u want but imma keep it 100. Kids are FCKIN they always have been there's girls in middle school busting they pussy open hell I was 15 when I lost my v card my home girl was 12 kids out here lookin mature now it's a lot of 17yr olds looking like they legal cause there bodies have matured. This is a subject people like to ignore and swipe under the rug cause they know when they was that age they was doing it to. Now that I'm older and look back on it I can say "ya that ain't right" but rewind time and at that age we didn't give no fcks boys wanted pussy and this girls wanted dick plain and simple. Plus if she's 17 and OK with dating and fckin a 25 yr old its pretty safe to say she been fckin older niggas #FACTS

yeah you're not tight

*right cuz ion know wtf tight mean and nigga go to the ghetto and see how many young thots fckin gtfoh with that "the world is a good place shit" ain't nobody ever say what happens in america is right but it happens and its jst the truth live with it

Well yea

We know it happens, at least I witnessed it growing up

I went to school with guys who got locked up for santutory rape

Obviously it doesn't mean everyone endorses it, or that we should just "live with it"

A 16, 17 yr old is barely out of puberty ... They cant even fully grasp the consequences of their actions yet

My niece will turn 16 next yr, I know if me or her father or her 3 uncles find out about any 20+ yr old lame ass nigga tryna hit it's gonna be some problems

So if he waits 2 years will those 24 months really make a difference??? So your uncles will risk an assault charge and your niece will still fuck with dude

My point was the mindset of a 16, 17 is totally different than than that of someone in their mid twenties ... A 16 yr olds brain isn't yet even full developed ... Again they are barely out of puberty ... The power dynamics in such a relationship would be extremely skewed

As far as my niece goes

I hate to admit 2 of her uncles are police officers

They catch wind of a grown man stiffing around her, an ass whipping is the least of his worries

age of consent is 17 in some states so it still comes down to your uncles choosing to break the law if they attack the guy. The brain development argument is kind of weak because at 16-17 your brain is developed enough to make decisions about your body. You can join the military at 17 so a 17 year old choosing to fuck a 25 year old should legally be her decision it may not be the best decision but still it's her decision.

I think people are selling the intelligence and mental development of 17 years olds short they are not that fucking dumb. the power dynamic thing is also a weak argument because there are plenty of relationships among people of the same age where one person is basically in charge.

1.I've always disagreed that we should be sending teens to fight wars

2.Though it wouldnt surprise me that her uncles would physically attack the guy, because they are very protective of their family even to their own detriment, as I already stated that would be the least of someone's worries

U obviously don't understand how consent laws work

Most "legal age of consent" laws for minors have an additional clause that gives an maximum age difference. It is usually no more than a 3 year difference in age.

In other words, in many states, a 16 year old cannot legally have sex with a 25 year old (or anyone over 19)

3. While I do feel as though consent laws need to be reexamined and reformed ... For instance I hate how we indiscriminately label people sex offenders.... I actually like the max age difference clause... I would rather we label 16 as the age of consent and extend the max age difference to 5+yrs

4. Laws aside, I just can't get down with people over the age of 21 dating teen girls if there's more than a 5 yr age difference

While u may disagree, the balance of power in such a relationship more times than not would be entirely unequal (the older person having some advantage by virtue of being older and more experienced), and lead to teens being exploited/pressured into doing something they dont necessarily want to do, would later regret doing

Most people who do engage in sex, relationships with people significantly younger AND still in their teens will readily admit they do so because it's easier to control, manipulate the younger party

^

This may sound arbitrary to you but having life experience makes a difference ... Like everyone now at 27 I'm a better decision maker than I was when I was 16, 17... I'm a better decision maker than I was 2 years ago

And it's a fact, the parts our brain responsible for things judgment calls, critical thinking, cost/benefit analysis, etc is still developing until our early to mid twenties

 
desertrain10;7815288 said:
zombie;7814856 said:
desertrain10;7814803 said:
zombie;7814528 said:
desertrain10;7814293 said:
IAmDopeSmoke;7814236 said:
Will Munny;7814225 said:
IAmDopeSmoke;7814204 said:
Tbh I was 19 fckin 16yr olds and up so was a lot of other niggas y'all can play the upstanding citizen role if u want but imma keep it 100. Kids are FCKIN they always have been there's girls in middle school busting they pussy open hell I was 15 when I lost my v card my home girl was 12 kids out here lookin mature now it's a lot of 17yr olds looking like they legal cause there bodies have matured. This is a subject people like to ignore and swipe under the rug cause they know when they was that age they was doing it to. Now that I'm older and look back on it I can say "ya that ain't right" but rewind time and at that age we didn't give no fcks boys wanted pussy and this girls wanted dick plain and simple. Plus if she's 17 and OK with dating and fckin a 25 yr old its pretty safe to say she been fckin older niggas #FACTS

yeah you're not tight

*right cuz ion know wtf tight mean and nigga go to the ghetto and see how many young thots fckin gtfoh with that "the world is a good place shit" ain't nobody ever say what happens in america is right but it happens and its jst the truth live with it

Well yea

We know it happens, at least I witnessed it growing up

I went to school with guys who got locked up for santutory rape

Obviously it doesn't mean everyone endorses it, or that we should just "live with it"

A 16, 17 yr old is barely out of puberty ... They cant even fully grasp the consequences of their actions yet

My niece will turn 16 next yr, I know if me or her father or her 3 uncles find out about any 20+ yr old lame ass nigga tryna hit it's gonna be some problems

So if he waits 2 years will those 24 months really make a difference??? So your uncles will risk an assault charge and your niece will still fuck with dude

My point was the mindset of a 16, 17 is totally different than than that of someone in their mid twenties ... A 16 yr olds brain isn't yet even full developed ... Again they are barely out of puberty ... The power dynamics in such a relationship would be extremely skewed

As far as my niece goes

I hate to admit 2 of her uncles are police officers

They catch wind of a grown man stiffing around her, an ass whipping is the least of his worries

age of consent is 17 in some states so it still comes down to your uncles choosing to break the law if they attack the guy. The brain development argument is kind of weak because at 16-17 your brain is developed enough to make decisions about your body. You can join the military at 17 so a 17 year old choosing to fuck a 25 year old should legally be her decision it may not be the best decision but still it's her decision.

I think people are selling the intelligence and mental development of 17 years olds short they are not that fucking dumb. the power dynamic thing is also a weak argument because there are plenty of relationships among people of the same age where one person is basically in charge.

1.I've always disagreed that we should be sending teens to fight wars

2.Though it wouldnt surprise me that her uncles would physically attack the guy, because they are very protective of their family even to their own detriment, as I already stated that would be the least of someone's worries

U obviously don't understand how consent laws work

Most "legal age of consent" laws for minors have an additional clause that gives an maximum age difference. It is usually no more than a 3 year difference in age.

In other words, in many states, a 16 year old cannot legally have sex with a 25 year old (or anyone over 19)

3. While I do feel as though consent laws need to be reexamined and reformed ... For instance I hate how we indiscriminately label people sex offenders.... I actually like the max age difference clause... I would rather we label 16 as the age of consent and extend the max age difference to 5+yrs

4. Laws aside, I just can't get down with people over the age of 21 dating teen girls if there's more than a 5 yr age difference

While u may disagree, the balance of power in such a relationship more times than not would be entirely unequal (the older person having some advantage by virtue of being older and more experienced), and lead to teens being exploited/pressured into doing something they dont necessarily want to do, would later regret doing

Most people who do engage in sex, relationships with people significantly younger AND still in their teens will readily admit they do so because it's easier to control, manipulate the younger party

^

This may sound arbitrary to you but having life experience makes a difference ... Like everyone now at 27 I'm a better decision maker than I was when I was 16, 17... I'm a better decision maker than I was 2 years ago


And it's a fact, the parts our brain responsible for things judgment calls, critical thinking, cost/benefit analysis, etc is still developing until our early to mid twenties

Laws cannot nor should they be based on individuals opinion the bolded is just your own personal situation. AND LIKE I SAID THERE are many same age relationships with those same circumstances, one person pressuring the other to do things they don't want to do and if those relationships are not condemned why should tyga be condemned for his relationship????? 17 YEAR olds can be tried as adults in a court of law but cannot decide to fuck men 5 years older does that really make sense to you???? I think that once you turn 16 you should be able to fuck who you want full stop period. the person could be 50 if that's what you want so be it

if brain development is the standard then maybe the age of consent should be pushed up to the mid 20's.

as for your uncles I really hope if a situation like that arises in your family you council them better because nothing they do will change anything and they will be risking there lives and jobs for nothing
 
Last edited:
Black_Samson;7815300 said:
Stiff;7815187 said:
Black_Samson;7815171 said:
Maalik;7815152 said:
Ehh.....I always found the age of consent thing to be weird.

Of course the problem with saying this is people automatically accuse you of being a weirdo for even saying something about it but, shouldn't something as serious as being pedophile be uniform across the board?

How can you be a pedophile in one state, not a pedophile in another state, a pedophile in the next state, not a pedophile in that state. Shit is crazy. Something that serious should a completely uniform decision that EVERYBODY agrees on.

I also find it crazy that England considers 16 yos adults. France, its 15. In Canada, its 16. In China and Italy, it's 14 (smh). These are supposed to be first world nations here. Civilized countries. America is basically saying that all the men in those countries are pedophiles.

blame the differing sects of Christianity.

each one has it's level of tolerance on the subject.

that ain't got nothing to do with Christianity that's more of a cultural thing...the Bible don't lay out age of consent

differing sects of christianity = cultural thing..... dip shit.

differing sects of christianity is a specific cultural thing.

It has nothing to do with that aspect of culture.

@ the bolded really nigga that's what you call people? Like all the insults you coulda used you picked "dip shit" . I'm not even offended honestly. Do better that shit is embarrassing for both of us.
 
Last edited:
Huey_C;7815273 said:
zombie;7815250 said:
Huey_C;7815205 said:
zombie;7815199 said:
Huey_C;7815183 said:
taeboo;7815150 said:
There was a time when grown men marrying a 13 or 14 year old was normal, so I guess that should be ok today as well....

There was a time when lynching a black person was ok, it's dumb when they try to make the "good ol days" argument. There's reasons why we don't continue to practice old social norms for good reason. But you get it tho, I'm preaching to the choir.

So what you are saying here is that marrying a 17 year old or even having consensual sex with her is equal to torturing and murdering someone without good evidence of guilt.

The correlation is when saying what was ok in america 40-60 years ago, like girls getting married between the ages of 13-17, is a foolish argument. Shit like that isn't practiced anymore for a reason. I see you like to play devils advocate on this board.

What's the reason it isn't practiced any more??? What is that reason based on

If you know any kids between those ages then you should know why, adults can exploit adolescent individuals almost enslaving them mentally due to them being extremely impressionable. Like I said earlier you enjoy playing devils advocate.

I am not playing devils advocate, literally the argument you are making makes no sense I know some teenagers and their parents cannot even get them to take the trash out on time. come on man please these 17 year olds are not that fucking stupid or impressionable. at least not when it comes to adults they crack more from peer pressure than anything else.

what you are saying applies to younger children not fucking 17 year olds, they are not as mature as people in their 20's but 17 year olds are not innocent little kids that can be lead astray with candy and ice cream either.
 
Some of ya'll some strange ass dudes, tryna' justify a grown ass man smashing/ wanting to smash a shorty. I've read too much in here. I'm out
 

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
230
Views
0
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…