of course this statement, which i doubt you can support, actually has nothing to do with the topic i'm posting on. but i know that lack of a connection won't stop you. because of course Obama didn't promise his support for anti-gun legislation during the primary... no, wait, he did.
As I clearly give reasoning for something, which you chose to deceitfully apply to Obama's support for anti-gun legislation. The fact that here we are, 2 years later, and he's done zero zilch nada nunca regarding gun legislation...does further expose your dishonesty:
you don't even know what the word deceitfully means. let's look at what i actually posted again, the relevant portion in bold:
"surely this has nothing to do with the facts that Obama made pro-AWB statements while running and that the election foretold a presidential/congressional combination that would not prevent anti-gun legislation. surely not. "
the man repeatedly voiced his support for the assault weapon ban and talked about bringing it back if elected; this is why you could read this stance posted on his campaign's website at the time. furthermore, it was an essentially foregone conclusion that the Democrats would capture Congress, thus putting in leadership that a) is largely anti-gun, with a couple of exceptions, and b) would be able to pass legislation that Obama would likely not veto.
THAT is the point that you're not addressing. claiming i'm being deceitful by posting Obama's campaign platform and pointing out the fact that Pelosi is not known as a defender of gun rights is just nonsense driven by the fact that you don't want to actually debate the topic. whether or not a bunch of idiots on Stormfront got emotional does NOT change the platform than Obama ran on.
