G.Avant;6941073 said:daaaaaammmmnnn you really typed alladat bruh?????
First time for everything I suppose.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
G.Avant;6941073 said:daaaaaammmmnnn you really typed alladat bruh?????
5 Grand;6939476 said:G.Avant;6939169 said:The Yacub story is not meant to be taken literally though. It was a teaching tool.
There's no intelligent scientist on earth that would disagree about the Yacub story. I just recently took a biology course and they explained how dominant and recessive genes work. You can most definitely start of with a black gene and graft all the way down to white. There isn't a biologist alive that would say that that can't happen.
5 Grand;6940418 said:hiphop12345;6940402 said:5 Grand;6939476 said:G.Avant;6939169 said:The Yacub story is not meant to be taken literally though. It was a teaching tool.
There's no intelligent scientist on earth that would disagree about the Yacub story. I just recently took a biology course and they explained how dominant and recessive genes work. You can most definitely start of with a black gene and graft all the way down to white. There isn't a biologist alive that would say that that can't happen.
A biology course does not make a evolutionary biologist. Study more
Sir, I assure you that there are dominant and recessive genes in all aspects of life. If you purposely separate the dominant genes from the recessive gene, after a few generations the dominant gene is completely extinct. You can scientifically prove that with any species.
Furthermore, the reason the Black race didn't go extinct is because Yacub took 59,999 followers to the Patmos Islands. So there were still Black people elsewhere. But yeah, it took 200 years to graft from black to brown, another 200 years to graft from brown to yellow and another 200 years before they completed the grafting process and completed the blonde haired, blue-eyed white man (and woman).
Its a fact.
hiphop12345;6941035 said:5 Grand;6940418 said:hiphop12345;6940402 said:5 Grand;6939476 said:G.Avant;6939169 said:The Yacub story is not meant to be taken literally though. It was a teaching tool.
There's no intelligent scientist on earth that would disagree about the Yacub story. I just recently took a biology course and they explained how dominant and recessive genes work. You can most definitely start of with a black gene and graft all the way down to white. There isn't a biologist alive that would say that that can't happen.
A biology course does not make a evolutionary biologist. Study more
Sir, I assure you that there are dominant and recessive genes in all aspects of life. If you purposely separate the dominant genes from the recessive gene, after a few generations the dominant gene is completely extinct. You can scientifically prove that with any species.
Furthermore, the reason the Black race didn't go extinct is because Yacub took 59,999 followers to the Patmos Islands. So there were still Black people elsewhere. But yeah, it took 200 years to graft from black to brown, another 200 years to graft from brown to yellow and another 200 years before they completed the grafting process and completed the blonde haired, blue-eyed white man (and woman).
Its a fact.
What about all the other genes? Sorry but it's not adding up.
sully;6941383 said:5 Grand;6939476 said:G.Avant;6939169 said:The Yacub story is not meant to be taken literally though. It was a teaching tool.
There's no intelligent scientist on earth that would disagree about the Yacub story. I just recently took a biology course and they explained how dominant and recessive genes work. You can most definitely start of with a black gene and graft all the way down to white. There isn't a biologist alive that would say that that can't happen.
So you just recently took a biology course, huh? okay...
i guess theoretically, you COULD graft purely out of recessive genes, but implying in any form that the Yakub story is in any way true proposes a few things:
1. That there was a fundamental understanding of modern genetics thousands of years ago.
2. That there was a scientist who, in all likelihood, captured, and forced mating among hundreds if not thousands of his own people for some sick genetic experiment. An African Josef Mengele, if you will.
3. That such a 'scientist' lived long enough for the results of such experimentation to come to fruition.
5 Grand;6941411 said:sully;6941383 said:5 Grand;6939476 said:G.Avant;6939169 said:The Yacub story is not meant to be taken literally though. It was a teaching tool.
There's no intelligent scientist on earth that would disagree about the Yacub story. I just recently took a biology course and they explained how dominant and recessive genes work. You can most definitely start of with a black gene and graft all the way down to white. There isn't a biologist alive that would say that that can't happen.
So you just recently took a biology course, huh? okay...
i guess theoretically, you COULD graft purely out of recessive genes, but implying in any form that the Yakub story is in any way true proposes a few things:
1. That there was a fundamental understanding of modern genetics thousands of years ago.
2. That there was a scientist who, in all likelihood, captured, and forced mating among hundreds if not thousands of his own people for some sick genetic experiment. An African Josef Mengele, if you will.
3. That such a 'scientist' lived long enough for the results of such experimentation to come to fruition.
1. Its pretty simple. Yacub noticed that some black people were darker than others.
2. Elijah Muhammad explains how it happened. Basically the people were dissatisfied and followed him. Happens all the time. Read any history book about any civilization and there's always a leader/king that steps up and makes history. Really if you study any civilization, there's always a king that known to that era.
3. Yacub didn't live to see the race that he created but his followers carried out his plans.
sully;6941486 said:5 Grand;6941411 said:sully;6941383 said:5 Grand;6939476 said:G.Avant;6939169 said:The Yacub story is not meant to be taken literally though. It was a teaching tool.
There's no intelligent scientist on earth that would disagree about the Yacub story. I just recently took a biology course and they explained how dominant and recessive genes work. You can most definitely start of with a black gene and graft all the way down to white. There isn't a biologist alive that would say that that can't happen.
So you just recently took a biology course, huh? okay...
i guess theoretically, you COULD graft purely out of recessive genes, but implying in any form that the Yakub story is in any way true proposes a few things:
1. That there was a fundamental understanding of modern genetics thousands of years ago.
2. That there was a scientist who, in all likelihood, captured, and forced mating among hundreds if not thousands of his own people for some sick genetic experiment. An African Josef Mengele, if you will.
3. That such a 'scientist' lived long enough for the results of such experimentation to come to fruition.
1. Its pretty simple. Yacub noticed that some black people were darker than others.
2. Elijah Muhammad explains how it happened. Basically the people were dissatisfied and followed him. Happens all the time. Read any history book about any civilization and there's always a leader/king that steps up and makes history. Really if you study any civilization, there's always a king that known to that era.
3. Yacub didn't live to see the race that he created but his followers carried out his plans.
seriously, where did you take your biology course?
5 Grand;6941612 said:sully;6941486 said:5 Grand;6941411 said:sully;6941383 said:5 Grand;6939476 said:G.Avant;6939169 said:The Yacub story is not meant to be taken literally though. It was a teaching tool.
There's no intelligent scientist on earth that would disagree about the Yacub story. I just recently took a biology course and they explained how dominant and recessive genes work. You can most definitely start of with a black gene and graft all the way down to white. There isn't a biologist alive that would say that that can't happen.
So you just recently took a biology course, huh? okay...
i guess theoretically, you COULD graft purely out of recessive genes, but implying in any form that the Yakub story is in any way true proposes a few things:
1. That there was a fundamental understanding of modern genetics thousands of years ago.
2. That there was a scientist who, in all likelihood, captured, and forced mating among hundreds if not thousands of his own people for some sick genetic experiment. An African Josef Mengele, if you will.
3. That such a 'scientist' lived long enough for the results of such experimentation to come to fruition.
1. Its pretty simple. Yacub noticed that some black people were darker than others.
2. Elijah Muhammad explains how it happened. Basically the people were dissatisfied and followed him. Happens all the time. Read any history book about any civilization and there's always a leader/king that steps up and makes history. Really if you study any civilization, there's always a king that known to that era.
3. Yacub didn't live to see the race that he created but his followers carried out his plans.
seriously, where did you take your biology course?
I've taken Biology twice. Both times at community colleges. Here's a diagram if you don't understand how dominant and recessive traits work. Basically, in the diagram bellow, the yellow is the dominant gene(Y) and the green is the recessive gene. There's a 3/4 chance that baby pea will be yellow because if it goes Y/y or y/Y the yellow(Y) would dominate because yellow(Y) is the dominant gene. There's a 1/4 chance that both genes will be green(y/y) and the pea would have recessive traits (i.e. it would appear green).
![]()
sully;6941769 said:5 Grand;6941612 said:sully;6941486 said:5 Grand;6941411 said:sully;6941383 said:5 Grand;6939476 said:G.Avant;6939169 said:The Yacub story is not meant to be taken literally though. It was a teaching tool.
There's no intelligent scientist on earth that would disagree about the Yacub story. I just recently took a biology course and they explained how dominant and recessive genes work. You can most definitely start of with a black gene and graft all the way down to white. There isn't a biologist alive that would say that that can't happen.
So you just recently took a biology course, huh? okay...
i guess theoretically, you COULD graft purely out of recessive genes, but implying in any form that the Yakub story is in any way true proposes a few things:
1. That there was a fundamental understanding of modern genetics thousands of years ago.
2. That there was a scientist who, in all likelihood, captured, and forced mating among hundreds if not thousands of his own people for some sick genetic experiment. An African Josef Mengele, if you will.
3. That such a 'scientist' lived long enough for the results of such experimentation to come to fruition.
1. Its pretty simple. Yacub noticed that some black people were darker than others.
2. Elijah Muhammad explains how it happened. Basically the people were dissatisfied and followed him. Happens all the time. Read any history book about any civilization and there's always a leader/king that steps up and makes history. Really if you study any civilization, there's always a king that known to that era.
3. Yacub didn't live to see the race that he created but his followers carried out his plans.
seriously, where did you take your biology course?
I've taken Biology twice. Both times at community colleges. Here's a diagram if you don't understand how dominant and recessive traits work. Basically, in the diagram bellow, the yellow is the dominant gene(Y) and the green is the recessive gene. There's a 3/4 chance that baby pea will be yellow because if it goes Y/y or y/Y the yellow(Y) would dominate because yellow(Y) is the dominant gene. There's a 1/4 chance that both genes will be green(y/y) and the pea would have recessive traits (i.e. it would appear green).
![]()
lmao....u think i don't know how genetics works? i know more about genetics and biology than you can even imagine. bruh....u don't know enough to speak authoritatively. i'm being nice to you and telling you to fall back b/c you're wrong. I mean, it's good that you know the basics about genetics, but showing me Mendel's work on peas doesn't prove the story of Yakub.
Kwan Dai;6941059 said:My advice to you then is stop responding. Other wise let it ride.
No that wasn't your interpretation. In fact you said "it was a play on him having money to travel...he later said everywhere i go i got land there. again a play on him having the cash to do what he felt." So, we will dismiss your emphasis put on Jays money. In fact you seem to be infatuated by it.
I didn't get upset. In fact I responded by saying "That's your interpretation. No Blackman with an ounce of self respect would refer to themselves as Euro anything. If your interpretation was correct it would still be a contradiction of 5% theology. What you offered us certainly doesn't describe a poor righteous teacher." This is your description of upset? It was your remedial ass that stayed on the Euro Jay kick. Even though I halfway agreed with your interpretation.
What self respecting Blackman titles himself as Euro anything? I don't care if he just came back from vacation and has the means to travel Mars. Only a man infatuated with Euro culture says such a thing. In the very least he's delusional. If, you could not draw this conclusion from my initial responses to you then, every name I have titled you stands.
What I do find interesting is, for someone who is complaining about insults and internet etiquette. You have no problem throwing nigga out there. Any ways.
That's your opinion. And any group that would describe another race as devils has to be prepared to defend themselves against racist attacks. So, the article isn't, that far off based in their implications. I don't agree 100% with NGOE and certainly aint siding with mass media. So, while it aint your place. Your concern should be with anyone misrepresenting a group and not coming forward to express their feelings or level of involvement within the group. So, it would appear Jayz and the Post are doing the exact same thing. Misrepresenting the NGOE.
Jayz going around doing mass media with a NGOE symbol on his neck is, bringing attention to the NGOE and their ideology (dry snitching). If, Jayz wasn't prepared to defend NGOE or explain his level of involvement why wear it? That's right it's not your concern. You are only concerned with surface shit.
You are a Johnny come lately. My first post (quoted below). If, you couldn't come to the conclusion that a religious ideology that teaches the BlackMan is God, and whites are the devil doesn't mix with EURO anything I don't know what to tell you. This isn't rocket science. Any context you try to spin EURO it doesn't mix with 5%.
"Yeah it is the same. You are dismissing his Kufi line. Jay wearing the Universal Flag is similar to Nas wearing a Kufi.
So, is it Euro Jay or 5% Jay?
Stop fronting."
So, continue playing dumb like you can't put two and two together. The answers have been in my posts from the outset. I see you and others getting upset because, you aren't being spoon fed obvious observations. As I said early on. I don't take other people tests. Do your own reading. You do the knowledge on how and why a BlackMan titling himself Euro anything for whatever reasons he wishes then, is seen wearing a Custom made symbol f(rom a culture, group, ideology) that describes Euro's who originated from the the Caucus mountains as devils is a direct contradiction. And lastly how his actions is now bringing unwanted to attention to NGOE.