vageneral08
New member
amenhotepiv;7050721 said:
That shit is funny
- Status
That shit is funny
They say that a man should never hit a woman for any reason
They say that men & women are equal
They say that we have equal protection under the law
Therefore a woman should never hit a man for any reason. Doesn't matter what Jay might have done. Lock the bitch up! He could've hit her ass w/ a stiff jab & I'd still buy the next album if it's good.
They say that men & women are equal
They say that we have equal protection under the law
Therefore a woman should never hit a man for any reason. Doesn't matter what Jay might have done. Lock the bitch up! He could've hit her ass w/ a stiff jab & I'd still buy the next album if it's good.
damobb2deep
New member
vageneral08;7050894 said:
The beginning was... it got corny round the ultimate warrior (rip) part...
Chef_Taylor
New member
Trillfate;7051457 said:
Lmao !! yo that shit was funny af.
pissedoffnobody;7051599 said:
For me it's not about gender...it's about being an adult. As children we were taught that for every action there's a reaction/consequence. As an adult if you hit someone, regardless of your gender or there's, a reasonable reaction to expect from that person is to hit your ass back. Once you hit a man you put yourself in a man's position...plain & simple. I'm all for gender equality, so if I can't hit a woman she can't hit me...if she does hit me then I have the right to hit her back w/o backlash.
I'm not saying I'd hit her like I'd hit another man though...that I don't condone
Last edited:
2stepz_ahead
New member
problem was she jumped in his shit like she knew it wouldnt be a response.
thats my problem with that shit.
why jump in the niggas face because you know he wont hit you back....
its always a bitch to ruin a nigga
thats my problem with that shit.
why jump in the niggas face because you know he wont hit you back....
its always a bitch to ruin a nigga
@obnoxiouslyfresh & @pico i got some tea on 'Ye & Khloe
www.lipstickalley.com/showthread.php?t=700396
http://www.lipstickalley.com/showthread.php?t=647688
www.lipstickalley.com/showthread.php?t=700396
http://www.lipstickalley.com/showthread.php?t=647688
damobb2deep
New member
T.Taylor;7051667 said:
The Lonious Monk
New member
LPast;7053012 said:
No it's not. White people crying about racism is BS because by and large they don't experience the negative side of racism. The double standard with men, women, and violence is real and it's something that seems to be getting worse.
The Lonious Monk;7053043 said:
But crying about a double standard implies men and women are exactly equal and should be viewed as such ---just like whites crying about racism implies we've both shared the same experiences as races, and that obvious and glaring variables like opression and slavery should be ignored...
when it comes to men/women, the obvious and glaring variable is the difference in physical strength. Let yall tell it that dont even matter.
Imo the comparisons are exact parallels.
Last edited:
The Lonious Monk
New member
They aren't exact parallels. For the most parts, whites are not victims of racism, so them crying about it makes no sense.
Regardless, of whether or not men and women are physical equals, the growing tendency of women to believe they are justified in physically attack men can be a big problem. Women don't have to be physically equal to men for it to be pointed out that they shouldn't be attacking men.
Regardless, of whether or not men and women are physical equals, the growing tendency of women to believe they are justified in physically attack men can be a big problem. Women don't have to be physically equal to men for it to be pointed out that they shouldn't be attacking men.
Last edited:
The Lonious Monk;7053043 said:
Honestly I don't even feel like what I said was an opinion.
Women have been treated as less than since the beginning of time. Even in this country. Your idea of things getting worse is a drop in the bucket.
Go volunteer at a battered women's shelter before you think men are getting the bad end of the stick.
And don't get me wrong, Solange needs to keep her hands to herself. But I don't think men need a a champion for domestic violence.
The Lonious Monk
New member
LPast;7053084 said:
Who is saying men need a champion for domestic violence? People are pointing out that its ridiculous that people basically try to destroy a man if he gets caught putting hands on a woman, but will go out of their way to come up with silly scenarios for why a woman is justified when she's caught putting her hands on a man. That's wrong. It doesn't matter if women have been abused for centuries. It doesn't matter that women make up the vast majority of victims of domestic violence. You can know that those things are wrong and still acknowledge this is wrong.
And that analogy was still a poor one because women feeling justified in attack men physically when they are mad is a thing, white people being victimized by racism in this country isn't.
The Lonious Monk;7053101 said:
Didn't I say Solange needs to keep her hands to herself? Acknowledged. Not justified.
Now moving on. if any company, customer, or domestic violence doesn't want to be associated with a man abusing a woman, what's the problem?
Why do people want to ignore history? Do you realize a lot of double standards can be explained? There is a history attached to it.
Fact: Most people don't care about female on male violence. It's usually not that serious compared to male on female violence.
That's probably never going to change.
The Lonious Monk
New member
LPast;7053133 said:
You're arguing in circles. No one has said anything was wrong with anyone distancing themselves from a man who beats on women. And no one is saying that female on male violence should be seen as just as prevalent or bad as male on female violence. Once again, people are just pointing out that its hypocritical for people to get so up in arms when a man gets caught doing anything physical towards a woman, but think it's ok when the opposite happens.
I honestly don't understand what you're protesting here. Most of the stance that you seem to be arguing against seems to be made up for the sake of your argument.
- Status
