HyenaKilla;6927847 said:
U didn't answer my question...but you reply with a rigged one.
You're not righteous at all but I will play your game... it's nothin.
No it isn't more righteous to kill a man over sneakers or gang beef than to put hands on GZ as Jay-E suggested like bussing dude head....neither is it more righteous AND/OR less unrighteous to kill GZ than to kill a man over sneakers or gang beef if both decisions leads niggas ruining their lives.....
U argued otherwise stating that putting hands on GZ is a more righteous alternative despite the end game being ruinous for niggas... which then leads to an ethical dilemma...
I counter ya way of thinking & I say....either way the conclusive results of flawed logic is equally induced...despite any input of ethics into the decision-making process.
Therefore; Fallacious logic = Fail........
I didn't answer your question because it wasn't the meat of the debate. My overall definition of righteousness is irrelevant.
You may not think Black men killing each other over gang beef or sneakers is any less righteous than one of them putting hands on Zimmerman for an injustice against one of your own served down from the justice system but that's your opinion.Personally, I think the opposite. Also bear in mind Jay E never explicitly said to kill Zimmerman. He said bust his head which probably means to scruff him up a little.
But for the record I'm not advocating for any Black man to put hands on Zimmerman because that's not my place, and I don't think Jay E was either but I can't say for sure. The point is Black men are killing each other everyday right there in Florida where Zimmerman lives but not one of them won't even so much as give him a two piece? Shit, at least shock him with a hand buzzer or something. Naw, Zimmerman walks around like a celebrity whose claim to fame is killing an unarmed Black teen.
Why is that? That's the real question.