blackrain;7828374 said:
TheEyeronic1;7827955 said:
blackrain;7827938 said:
Rampage12;7827661 said:
tha_bride22;7825729 said:
DNB1;7825668 said:
lol...niggaz really hate Wale like that?!
Wale ain't talking about shit but it's a creative beat concept.... That should stay a concept.
Janet's music is not meant to promote girls doing drugs. She has the right to decide that as an artist. You wouldn't take 'I'll always love you " by Whitney Houston and make it a song about da coco, would you?
At least poetic justice stayed in context...
Only problem is that's not a Whitney Houston song. It's a Dolly Parton song, Whitney just covered it for The Bodyguard soundtrack.
It seems people forget that main fact whenever that song is brought up lol. Alot of people in the past generation have never no idea the Dolly Parton version even exists....but clearly you can see in this thread Wale hate makes people distort history or completely miss what his song was actually about as you can see by her also saying it's about promoting drug use when it's the exact opposite lol
Even though it's a Dolly Parton song & she would ultimately have a say in whether or not someone samples the song, Whitney Houston's version is technically a different version of the song. On a publishing level, Whitneys estate (or whoever owns the publishing of her music) would have to clear
her vocals for the sample, if that's what was to be used.
That's the diff between mechanical royalties (what Dolly Parton would receive) and performance royalties (which whitney's estate would get) for sampling Whitneys version.
@tha_bride22's original point is still legit.
I get what you're saying in terms of different versions of songs that are covered and you're right about thaylt but Bride's point is still off because part of her point revolved the song sample being rejected because of the topic of the song which she got wrong.
Nobody knows why Janet took issue with the song itself or wanted some changes made
but it wasn't because the song promotes drug use
So how do you know that wasn't the reason she took issue?
What I was saying is that Janet deserves a level of respect when handling her music. For whatever reason she didn't care for what wale did to her song and if you listen to her music, you can see his interpretation is nothing like the type of music she put out.
And I'm not knocking the concept of the song. I bet wale really thinks he did something here, lol.. But,I think a truly creative artist knows how to sample properly as well as make original music. He hasn't done either, imo... He's not worthy.
But maybe she's ok with using her music to discuss girls doing drugs.
Maybe she sees a mediocre rapper/poet trying to boost sales by riding the coattails of her success.
It's all speculation, but what we do know is that she doesn't fuck with this song. All I was saying is that I don't blame her.