Got Em Shook
New member
Always wanted a M4 or a M4A1. Top 5 Rifle
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Black_Samson;6851751 said:Got Em Shook;6851742 said:Always wanted a M4 or a M4A1. Top 5 Rifle
no it aint...
just looks cool...
the shit is finicky as fuck... a speck of dust should not have the capability to take down a rifle...
really, the weapons family is a top 5 rifle. totally get it if one prefers something else, but what 5 rifles beat it out?Black_Samson;6851751 said:no it aint...
just looks cool...
Black_Samson;512103 said:www.washingtontimes.com...
The M4 has brought consistent complaints about at least three shortfalls: At a 250-yard effective-kill distance, it lacks range; its 5.56 mm round lacks killing power; and the gun requires constant maintenance — cleaning and lubricating — in sandy conditions or is prone to jamming. Soldiers also complain that the magazine dents easily and the springs break.
larger caliber also means you're carrying less rounds, which theoretically was the argumentBlack_Samson;6853066 said:the 5.56 is not the issue. a larger caliber means more costly training rounds.
right, but we're still coming back to my point: HK416s and the rest of the next-gen variants are, well, variants of the M16 family. so there's a point where i don't think you can bash it to death as a general concept and then roll with the 416 as your choice. i have no doubt it's a better rifle (a little out of a price range i can justify for myself right now, but hey), but that's arguing the 416 > M4, not that the M16 family sucks it in all respects.Black_Samson;6853066 said:are there better variants? fuck yeah...
nahBlack_Samson;6853077 said:lets all agree that these guys should be going into battle with SCARs....
if you're asking me if i personally am in the military, correct, i am not. if you're asking me if my argument is based on me fucking around with an AR15 in my yard... not so much.Black_Samson;6853707 said:@janklow are you speaking from a civilians perspective?
what's really funny though is that you have an article quoting a military guy that throws out some straight-up bullshit. so i would hope we're basing this on our logic. which is not to say we all have to agree. honestly, there's a point with almost any gun where you like what you like and you hate what you hate. and shit, if you have a bad experience with something, you're not going to forget it.Sneak Dissa;6856043 said:damn so y'all just gonna ignore a civilian?
going to be honest: all this sounds like in the absence of a reasoned argument is big internet talkpeterpiffin;6856214 said:i hate it. that rifle is just for looks. and agreed 5.56 is horrible unless you put 2 too the head which i doubt a civie knows anything about