Is Steph Curry a Top 5 All Time PG ... Today?

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
Chasin Bundlez;8142493 said:
@peace

How many all D teams did Magic make bro? Oh...that argument is over now since it doesn't matter ...

Because he has a Hall of Fame fucking CAREER... Not one HOF-worthy season, dumbass

If he's not top 3 why did he make the ALL NBA 1st team...which is the FIVE best players in the game...

No... It means he was voted the top player AT HIS POSITION ... For that season.

Is Marc Gasol better than Russell Westbrook or Chris Paul?

Cmon man. This is basic shit... I didn't think it was possible for you to lose any more credibility...

 
Lol at all-nba team automatically meaning five best players in the game. Nigga is stupid.

Not to mention, it's voted on by sportswriters and broadcasters. Not the players themselves.

So it's not like being all-nba DEFINITIVELY MEANS you're the best at your position.
 
Smh...he didn't just make the all NBA first team, he along wit LB were the only ones UNANIMOUSLY voted on the team...dumbass...so on top of being the best at his position for THIS season...in the "Sportswriters and broadcasters" opinions he was one of the 2 best....but wait, they also voted him as MVP in a complete landslide lmao!

Combine those 2 things And it sounds like he was the best player THIS year!!

But wait, who are the Sportswriters and broadcasters what do they know...it's all about us the fans...but hold up just a Goddarn minute...was he voted by the FANS as starting pg over Russ and CP3 2 years straight now?

And correct me if I'm wrong....but who was the leading vote getter in the ASG THIS year? I think it was that Curry fella, no? LMAO

But who are the fans or the Sportswriters, what do they know ..it's all about us posters on the ill community lmaooo

Thread...bodied...facts.

There is no logical argument that can deny he is a top 3 player currently and hands down the best player At the GUARD position....not just pg, guard, period....word.
 
Just to show im always 100% objective:

"He didn't get mvp Cuz he shitted on he media by bringing up Riley post game conferences...press was pissed about that shit."

Great catch. Didn't think about that and that would explain ZERO votes

Everything else is horseshit tho
 
Chasin Bundlez;8142949 said:
Smh...he didn't just make the all NBA first team, he along wit LB were the only ones UNANIMOUSLY voted on the team...dumbass...so on top of being the best at his position for THIS season...in the "Sportswriters and broadcasters" opinions he was one of the 2 best....but wait, they also voted him as MVP in a complete landslide lmao!

Combine those 2 things And it sounds like he was the best player THIS year!!

But wait, who are the Sportswriters and broadcasters what do they know...it's all about us the fans...but hold up just a Goddarn minute...was he voted by the FANS as starting pg over Russ and CP3 2 years straight now?

And correct me if I'm wrong....but who was the leading vote getter in the ASG THIS year? I think it was that Curry fella, no? LMAO

But who are the fans or the Sportswriters, what do they know ..it's all about us posters on the ill community lmaooo

Thread...bodied...facts.

There is no logical argument that can deny he is a top 3 player currently and hands down the best player At the GUARD position....not just pg, guard, period....word.

All these words just to emphasize what I already wrote: These awards aren't voted on by the players, just the media and the fans.

I didn't vote. Nobody I personally knows ever votes on things like this. More people DONT vote than actually do vote. Steph got 1.5 million votes. The finals averaged something like 19 million viewers. Sooooooooooo...... What did you prove??????

Lol @ you taking anything all star related serious. Kyrie was all star mvp. So I guess he top 5 all time too? Sit yo dumb ass down
 
Chasin Bundlez;8142577 said:
...Curry ...would be the #1 option on ANY team aside from a team KD is on...

Can you believe this nigga?

We talking all time... This nigga just said Steph Curry would be the #1 offensive option on ANY Team ... Except one that includes Kevin Durant...

Carmello

Boogie Cousins

Lebron

Kobe

Anthony Davis

Harden

Dream

Jordan

Shaq

Kareem

Bird

Nique'...

LMAO

I can't complete the list.. I just can't...


1191763_o.gif


BTW, most would say that scoring is NOT the #1 Responsibility for a Point Gaurd...

That would be running the offense ...

A trait that you ignore when comparing some of the greatest PGs of all time ...

This is one of the biggest flaws in your argument

You talk like PPG / Scoring is the only metric for evaluating a great player... So much so that you balk at someone averaging 2 less PPG but 3 more APG...

Guess which stat line contributes more TOTAL points per game, bruh?

Not to mention defense, rebounding, poise, longevity, leadership, toughness etc

Stop swinging from dude's nut sack and open your eyes, family

This is turning from absolutely hilarious to a bit sad

 
Last edited:
Peace_79;8143557 said:
Chasin Bundlez;8142577 said:
...Curry ...would be the #1 option on ANY team aside from a team KD is on...

Can you believe this nigga?

We talking all time... This nigga just said Steph Curry would be the #1 offensive option on ANY Team ... Except one that includes Kevin Durant...

Carmello

Boogie Cousins

Lebron

Kobe

Anthony Davis

Harden

Dream

Jordan

Shaq

Kareem

Bird

Nique'...

LMAO

I can't complete the list.. I just can't...


1191763_o.gif


BTW, most would say that scoring is NOT the #1 Responsibility for a Point Gaurd...

That would be running the offense ...

A trait that you ignore when comparing some of the greatest PGs of all time ...

This is one of the biggest flaws in your argument

You talk like PPG / Scoring is the only metric for evaluating a great player... So much so that you balk at someone averaging 2 less PPG but 3 more APG...

Guess which stat line contributes more TOTAL points per game, bruh?

Not to mention defense, rebounding, poise, longevity, leadership, toughness etc

Stop swinging from dude's nut sack and open your eyes, family

This is turning from absolutely hilarious to a bit sad

Point Guard responsibility depends on the personnel. Curry can run an offense just fine. His value is just as high running off of screens as the eventual shooter, or the decoy.

 
804;8152974 said:
Tim Hardaway, Mark Price, Steve Nash are not better than Curry.

Wether or not those players were better in their prime than Curry now is an opinion.

The following are facts through:

1) each of those players were dynamic and very impactful (dominant in some cases) in their own era

Rings and scoring are not the only metrics for greatness

2) each has enjoyed longer, more sustained and (In most cases) more accomplished careers than Curry at this point in Curry's career

(Although Curry has a accomplished a great deal in a short amount of time)

I will use an extreme example to illustrate the point. Would you say Lynn Bias is greater than Michael Jordan? What would you think if he played his career out? Impossible to tell. But he had the makings of an All Time player. So does Curry.

But he could get hurt, he could decline. He could be twice the player he is now with even more accomplishments... Give it time

804;8152985 said:
Peace_79;8143557 said:
Chasin Bundlez;8142577 said:
...Curry ...would be the #1 option on ANY team aside from a team KD is on...

Can you believe this nigga?

We talking all time... This nigga just said Steph Curry would be the #1 offensive option on ANY Team ... Except one that includes Kevin Durant...

Carmello

Boogie Cousins

Lebron

Kobe

Anthony Davis

Harden

Dream

Jordan

Shaq

Kareem

Bird

Nique'...

LMAO

I can't complete the list.. I just can't...


1191763_o.gif


BTW, most would say that scoring is NOT the #1 Responsibility for a Point Gaurd...

That would be running the offense ...

A trait that you ignore when comparing some of the greatest PGs of all time ...

This is one of the biggest flaws in your argument

You talk like PPG / Scoring is the only metric for evaluating a great player... So much so that you balk at someone averaging 2 less PPG but 3 more APG...

Guess which stat line contributes more TOTAL points per game, bruh?

Not to mention defense, rebounding, poise, longevity, leadership, toughness etc

Stop swinging from dude's nut sack and open your eyes, family

This is turning from absolutely hilarious to a bit sad

Point Guard responsibility depends on the personnel. Curry can run an offense just fine. His value is just as high running off of screens as the eventual shooter, or the decoy.

I agree with your above statement. And I never insinuated that Curry is incapable of running an offense. But saying he is a better floor general then Isiah Thomas, John Stockton, Magic Johnson, Steve Nash etc is an assumption and a bold one at that.

You mentioned personnel. Look at Curry's teammates. He has already been playing with a much more talented and deep team than the majority of the Point Guards you compare him with. You assume he will be able to facilitate better and carry a team without that advantage - but it is not a given.

IMO, the best way to cement your individual greatness when surrounded by a great team, is to win big and win consistently; a la Jordan, Magic etc.

Curry is on the right track but he has not yet done what those legends have.

Again.. Let the dude cook for an hour before you put him in the Hall of Fame.
 
Peace_79;8153010 said:
804;8152974 said:
Tim Hardaway, Mark Price, Steve Nash are not better than Curry.

Wether or not those players were better in their prime than Curry now is an opinion.

The following are facts through:

1) each of those players were dynamic and very impactful (dominant in some cases) in their own era

Rings and scoring are not the only metrics for greatness

2) each has enjoyed longer, more sustained and (In most cases) more accomplished careers than Curry at this point in Curry's career

(Although Curry has a accomplished a great deal in a short amount of time)

I will use an extreme example to illustrate the point. Would you say Lynn Bias is greater than Michael Jordan? What would you think if he played his career out? Impossible to tell. But he had the makings of an All Time player. So does Curry.

But he could get hurt, he could decline. He could be twice the player he is now with even more accomplishments... Give it time

804;8152985 said:
Peace_79;8143557 said:
Chasin Bundlez;8142577 said:
...Curry ...would be the #1 option on ANY team aside from a team KD is on...

Can you believe this nigga?

We talking all time... This nigga just said Steph Curry would be the #1 offensive option on ANY Team ... Except one that includes Kevin Durant...

Carmello

Boogie Cousins

Lebron

Kobe

Anthony Davis

Harden

Dream

Jordan

Shaq

Kareem

Bird

Nique'...

LMAO

I can't complete the list.. I just can't...


1191763_o.gif


BTW, most would say that scoring is NOT the #1 Responsibility for a Point Gaurd...

That would be running the offense ...

A trait that you ignore when comparing some of the greatest PGs of all time ...

This is one of the biggest flaws in your argument

You talk like PPG / Scoring is the only metric for evaluating a great player... So much so that you balk at someone averaging 2 less PPG but 3 more APG...

Guess which stat line contributes more TOTAL points per game, bruh?

Not to mention defense, rebounding, poise, longevity, leadership, toughness etc

Stop swinging from dude's nut sack and open your eyes, family

This is turning from absolutely hilarious to a bit sad

Point Guard responsibility depends on the personnel. Curry can run an offense just fine. His value is just as high running off of screens as the eventual shooter, or the decoy.

I agree with your above statement. And I never insinuated that Curry is incapable of running an offense. But saying he is a better floor general then Isiah Thomas, John Stockton, Magic Johnson, Steve Nash etc is an assumption and a bold one at that.

You mentioned personnel. Look at Curry's teammates. He has already been playing with a much more talented and deep team than the majority of the Point Guards you compare him with. You assume he will be able to facilitate better and carry a team without that advantage - but it is not a given.

IMO, the best way to cement your individual greatness when surrounded by a great team, is to win big and win consistently; a la Jordan, Magic etc.

Curry is on the right track but he has not yet done what those legends have.

Again.. Let the dude cook for an hour before you put him in the Hall of Fame.

I don't know what Len Bias has to do with Steph Curry, but I'm not gonna get into that. Lol Tim Hardaway played with hall of famers. Mullins, and Richmond at the same time. Steve Nash Played on stacked teams most of his career. Mark Price played on good teams too. That team argument is BS TO me. Magic had hall of famers, Isiah had hall of famers, Stockton a really good hall of famer.

Stephen is a much better defender against opposing guards than he gets credit for. He's a better defender than Nash by a mile(who isn't it right?), and his steal numbers are almost 2 a game. That's consistent with most great guards.

Curry is well on his way to being better than most point guards to ever play the game.
 
804;8153059 said:
Peace_79;8153010 said:
804;8152974 said:
Tim Hardaway, Mark Price, Steve Nash are not better than Curry.

Wether or not those players were better in their prime than Curry now is an opinion.

The following are facts through:

1) each of those players were dynamic and very impactful (dominant in some cases) in their own era

Rings and scoring are not the only metrics for greatness

2) each has enjoyed longer, more sustained and (In most cases) more accomplished careers than Curry at this point in Curry's career

(Although Curry has a accomplished a great deal in a short amount of time)

I will use an extreme example to illustrate the point. Would you say Lynn Bias is greater than Michael Jordan? What would you think if he played his career out? Impossible to tell. But he had the makings of an All Time player. So does Curry.

But he could get hurt, he could decline. He could be twice the player he is now with even more accomplishments... Give it time

804;8152985 said:
Peace_79;8143557 said:
Chasin Bundlez;8142577 said:
...Curry ...would be the #1 option on ANY team aside from a team KD is on...

Can you believe this nigga?

We talking all time... This nigga just said Steph Curry would be the #1 offensive option on ANY Team ... Except one that includes Kevin Durant...

Carmello

Boogie Cousins

Lebron

Kobe

Anthony Davis

Harden

Dream

Jordan

Shaq

Kareem

Bird

Nique'...

LMAO

I can't complete the list.. I just can't...


1191763_o.gif


BTW, most would say that scoring is NOT the #1 Responsibility for a Point Gaurd...

That would be running the offense ...

A trait that you ignore when comparing some of the greatest PGs of all time ...

This is one of the biggest flaws in your argument

You talk like PPG / Scoring is the only metric for evaluating a great player... So much so that you balk at someone averaging 2 less PPG but 3 more APG...

Guess which stat line contributes more TOTAL points per game, bruh?

Not to mention defense, rebounding, poise, longevity, leadership, toughness etc

Stop swinging from dude's nut sack and open your eyes, family

This is turning from absolutely hilarious to a bit sad

Point Guard responsibility depends on the personnel. Curry can run an offense just fine. His value is just as high running off of screens as the eventual shooter, or the decoy.

I agree with your above statement. And I never insinuated that Curry is incapable of running an offense. But saying he is a better floor general then Isiah Thomas, John Stockton, Magic Johnson, Steve Nash etc is an assumption and a bold one at that.

You mentioned personnel. Look at Curry's teammates. He has already been playing with a much more talented and deep team than the majority of the Point Guards you compare him with. You assume he will be able to facilitate better and carry a team without that advantage - but it is not a given.

IMO, the best way to cement your individual greatness when surrounded by a great team, is to win big and win consistently; a la Jordan, Magic etc.

Curry is on the right track but he has not yet done what those legends have.

Again.. Let the dude cook for an hour before you put him in the Hall of Fame.

I don't know what Len Bias has to do with Steph Curry, but I'm not gonna get into that. Lol Tim Hardaway played with hall of famers. Mullins, and Richmond at the same time. Steve Nash Played on stacked teams most of his career. Mark Price played on good teams too. That team argument is BS TO me. Magic had hall of famers, Isiah had hall of famers, Stockton a really good hall of famer.

Stephen is a much better defender against opposing guards than he gets credit for. He's a better defender than Nash by a mile(who isn't it right?), and his steal numbers are almost 2 a game. That's consistent with most great guards.

Curry is well on his way to being better than most point guards to ever play the game.

The bold is the underlying consensus...

Those that are saying he is already there is what is premature. I think we all pretty much agree except for the trolls.
 
804;8153059 said:
Peace_79;8153010 said:
804;8152974 said:
Tim Hardaway, Mark Price, Steve Nash are not better than Curry.

Wether or not those players were better in their prime than Curry now is an opinion.

The following are facts through:

1) each of those players were dynamic and very impactful (dominant in some cases) in their own era

Rings and scoring are not the only metrics for greatness

2) each has enjoyed longer, more sustained and (In most cases) more accomplished careers than Curry at this point in Curry's career

(Although Curry has a accomplished a great deal in a short amount of time)

I will use an extreme example to illustrate the point. Would you say Lynn Bias is greater than Michael Jordan? What would you think if he played his career out? Impossible to tell. But he had the makings of an All Time player. So does Curry.

But he could get hurt, he could decline. He could be twice the player he is now with even more accomplishments... Give it time

804;8152985 said:
Peace_79;8143557 said:
Chasin Bundlez;8142577 said:
...Curry ...would be the #1 option on ANY team aside from a team KD is on...

Can you believe this nigga?

We talking all time... This nigga just said Steph Curry would be the #1 offensive option on ANY Team ... Except one that includes Kevin Durant...

Carmello

Boogie Cousins

Lebron

Kobe

Anthony Davis

Harden

Dream

Jordan

Shaq

Kareem

Bird

Nique'...

LMAO

I can't complete the list.. I just can't...


1191763_o.gif


BTW, most would say that scoring is NOT the #1 Responsibility for a Point Gaurd...

That would be running the offense ...

A trait that you ignore when comparing some of the greatest PGs of all time ...

This is one of the biggest flaws in your argument

You talk like PPG / Scoring is the only metric for evaluating a great player... So much so that you balk at someone averaging 2 less PPG but 3 more APG...

Guess which stat line contributes more TOTAL points per game, bruh?

Not to mention defense, rebounding, poise, longevity, leadership, toughness etc

Stop swinging from dude's nut sack and open your eyes, family

This is turning from absolutely hilarious to a bit sad

Point Guard responsibility depends on the personnel. Curry can run an offense just fine. His value is just as high running off of screens as the eventual shooter, or the decoy.

I agree with your above statement. And I never insinuated that Curry is incapable of running an offense. But saying he is a better floor general then Isiah Thomas, John Stockton, Magic Johnson, Steve Nash etc is an assumption and a bold one at that.

You mentioned personnel. Look at Curry's teammates. He has already been playing with a much more talented and deep team than the majority of the Point Guards you compare him with. You assume he will be able to facilitate better and carry a team without that advantage - but it is not a given.

IMO, the best way to cement your individual greatness when surrounded by a great team, is to win big and win consistently; a la Jordan, Magic etc.

Curry is on the right track but he has not yet done what those legends have.

Again.. Let the dude cook for an hour before you put him in the Hall of Fame.

Curry is well on his way to being better than most point guards to ever play the game.

This is the entire thread in one sentence...

You cannot predict the future
 

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
56
Views
301
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…