Iphone users, what are you expecting from the Iphone 5?

[Michael_Malice]

Pre-orders for the iPhone 5 went live at midnight and, true to form, they went like hotcakes. You may remember that it took 22 hours for the iPhone 4S and about 20 hours for the iPhone 4 to sell out of its pre-order, launch-day stock.

The iPhone 5 took just about 60 minutes. Yep. One hour after pre-orders went live, Apple.com adjusted shipping expectations from one to two weeks due to the overwhelming demand.

Demand for the phone caused problems on Apple’s website and several of the wireless carriers’ sites, as many users were met with error messages when they attempted to pre-order the new iPhone. There’s always plenty of hubbub around Apple product launches, though the pre-order launch of the iPhone 4S came and went without problems on Apple.com or carrier sites. It wouldn’t be surprising if this turns out to be an indication of what’s to come.

 

[DNB1]

^^lol... But according to some niggas here, iPhone 5 got nothing to offer...

 

[Michael_Malice]

^^lol... But according to some niggas here, iPhone 5 got nothing to offer...

It's "cool" to go against the grain and be a "Apple Hater". It makes them feel like rebels.

 

[Michael_Malice]

Samsung>>>>>>IPhone>>>>>YMCMB

Lol

Stop it Five.

 

[rage]

More of that potent Ether for Samsung...what a useless company.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/14/us-samsung-apple-patent-idUSBRE88D1GJ20120914

Apple did not violate patents owned by Samsung Electronics in making the iPod touch, iPhone and iPad, a judge at the International Trade Commission said in a preliminary ruling on Friday.

Apple and Samsung have taken their bruising patent disputes to some 10 countries as they vie for market share in the booming mobile industry. Apple won a landmark victory last month after a U.S. jury found the South Korean firm had copied key features of the iPhone and awarded Apple $1.05 billion in damages.

ITC Judge James Gildea said on Friday that Apple did not violate the four patents in the case. Samsung had accused Apple of infringement in a complaint filed in mid-2011. It asked for the infringing products to be banned from sale in the United States.

The full commission is due to decide whether to uphold or overturn its internal judge's decision in January.

The patents in the complaint are related to 3G wireless technology, the format of data packets for high-speed transmission, and integrating functions like web surfing with mobile phone functions.

Apple's share price was up about 1.3 percent for the day, at $692.17.

Apple has a parallel complaint filed against Samsung at the ITC, accusing Samsung, a major Apple chip provider as well as a global rival, of blatantly copying its hot-selling iPhones and iPads. The ITC judge's preliminary decision is due in mid-October.

Samsung was the top-selling mobile-phone maker in the second quarter of 2012, with Apple in third place, according to data from Gartner Inc.

Samsung's Galaxy touchscreen tablets are considered by many industry experts to be the main rival to the iPad, though they are currently a distant second to Apple's devices.

Apple has waged an international patent war since 2010 as it seeks to limit the growth of Google's Android system. The fight has embroiled Samsung, HTC and others who use Android.

Google's Android software, which Apple's late founder Steve Jobs denounced as a "stolen product," has become the world's No. 1 smartphone operating system.

The ITC judge's decision comes just weeks after the most closely watched patent trial in years. A jury in a California federal court ordered Samsung to pay $1.05 billion in damages after finding that Samsung had copied critical features of the iPhone and iPad and could face an outright sales ban on key products.

Samsung has said it will contest that verdict and work with carriers to modify its products to keep them on the U.S. market.

The case at the International Trade Commission is No. 337-794.

(Reporting by Diane Bartz; editing by Carol Bishopric, Gary Hill)

 

[MrSoutCity]

More of that potent Ether for Samsung...what a useless company.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/14/us-samsung-apple-patent-idUSBRE88D1GJ20120914

Apple did not violate patents owned by Samsung Electronics in making the iPod touch, iPhone and iPad, a judge at the International Trade Commission said in a preliminary ruling on Friday.

Apple and Samsung have taken their bruising patent disputes to some 10 countries as they vie for market share in the booming mobile industry. Apple won a landmark victory last month after a U.S. jury found the South Korean firm had copied key features of the iPhone and awarded Apple $1.05 billion in damages.

ITC Judge James Gildea said on Friday that Apple did not violate the four patents in the case. Samsung had accused Apple of infringement in a complaint filed in mid-2011. It asked for the infringing products to be banned from sale in the United States.

The full commission is due to decide whether to uphold or overturn its internal judge's decision in January.

The patents in the complaint are related to 3G wireless technology, the format of data packets for high-speed transmission, and integrating functions like web surfing with mobile phone functions.

Apple's share price was up about 1.3 percent for the day, at $692.17.

Apple has a parallel complaint filed against Samsung at the ITC, accusing Samsung, a major Apple chip provider as well as a global rival, of blatantly copying its hot-selling iPhones and iPads. The ITC judge's preliminary decision is due in mid-October.

Samsung was the top-selling mobile-phone maker in the second quarter of 2012, with Apple in third place, according to data from Gartner Inc.

Samsung's Galaxy touchscreen tablets are considered by many industry experts to be the main rival to the iPad, though they are currently a distant second to Apple's devices.

Apple has waged an international patent war since 2010 as it seeks to limit the growth of Google's Android system. The fight has embroiled Samsung, HTC and others who use Android.

Google's Android software, which Apple's late founder Steve Jobs denounced as a "stolen product," has become the world's No. 1 smartphone operating system.

The ITC judge's decision comes just weeks after the most closely watched patent trial in years. A jury in a California federal court ordered Samsung to pay $1.05 billion in damages after finding that Samsung had copied critical features of the iPhone and iPad and could face an outright sales ban on key products.

Samsung has said it will contest that verdict and work with carriers to modify its products to keep them on the U.S. market.

The case at the International Trade Commission is No. 337-794.

(Reporting by Diane Bartz; editing by Carol Bishopric, Gary Hill)

I don't care about none of these lawsuits cause they all BS. But apple getting home court advantage..

 

[rage]

More of that potent Ether for Samsung...what a useless company.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/14/us-samsung-apple-patent-idUSBRE88D1GJ20120914

Apple did not violate patents owned by Samsung Electronics in making the iPod touch, iPhone and iPad, a judge at the International Trade Commission said in a preliminary ruling on Friday.

Apple and Samsung have taken their bruising patent disputes to some 10 countries as they vie for market share in the booming mobile industry. Apple won a landmark victory last month after a U.S. jury found the South Korean firm had copied key features of the iPhone and awarded Apple $1.05 billion in damages.

ITC Judge James Gildea said on Friday that Apple did not violate the four patents in the case. Samsung had accused Apple of infringement in a complaint filed in mid-2011. It asked for the infringing products to be banned from sale in the United States.

The full commission is due to decide whether to uphold or overturn its internal judge's decision in January.

The patents in the complaint are related to 3G wireless technology, the format of data packets for high-speed transmission, and integrating functions like web surfing with mobile phone functions.

Apple's share price was up about 1.3 percent for the day, at $692.17.

Apple has a parallel complaint filed against Samsung at the ITC, accusing Samsung, a major Apple chip provider as well as a global rival, of blatantly copying its hot-selling iPhones and iPads. The ITC judge's preliminary decision is due in mid-October.

Samsung was the top-selling mobile-phone maker in the second quarter of 2012, with Apple in third place, according to data from Gartner Inc.

Samsung's Galaxy touchscreen tablets are considered by many industry experts to be the main rival to the iPad, though they are currently a distant second to Apple's devices.

Apple has waged an international patent war since 2010 as it seeks to limit the growth of Google's Android system. The fight has embroiled Samsung, HTC and others who use Android.

Google's Android software, which Apple's late founder Steve Jobs denounced as a "stolen product," has become the world's No. 1 smartphone operating system.

The ITC judge's decision comes just weeks after the most closely watched patent trial in years. A jury in a California federal court ordered Samsung to pay $1.05 billion in damages after finding that Samsung had copied critical features of the iPhone and iPad and could face an outright sales ban on key products.

Samsung has said it will contest that verdict and work with carriers to modify its products to keep them on the U.S. market.

The case at the International Trade Commission is No. 337-794.

(Reporting by Diane Bartz; editing by Carol Bishopric, Gary Hill)

I don't care about none of these lawsuits cause they all BS. But apple getting home court advantage..

Of course you dont care about it...its not going in Samsung's favour. If Samsung was winning all these suits you'd be in here clowning on Apple. Nobody's dumb... Samsung are nothing but a bunch of snakes who are getting their just dues. Fuck em...

 

[MrSoutCity]

More of that potent Ether for Samsung...what a useless company.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/14/us-samsung-apple-patent-idUSBRE88D1GJ20120914

Apple did not violate patents owned by Samsung Electronics in making the iPod touch, iPhone and iPad, a judge at the International Trade Commission said in a preliminary ruling on Friday.

Apple and Samsung have taken their bruising patent disputes to some 10 countries as they vie for market share in the booming mobile industry. Apple won a landmark victory last month after a U.S. jury found the South Korean firm had copied key features of the iPhone and awarded Apple $1.05 billion in damages.

ITC Judge James Gildea said on Friday that Apple did not violate the four patents in the case. Samsung had accused Apple of infringement in a complaint filed in mid-2011. It asked for the infringing products to be banned from sale in the United States.

The full commission is due to decide whether to uphold or overturn its internal judge's decision in January.

The patents in the complaint are related to 3G wireless technology, the format of data packets for high-speed transmission, and integrating functions like web surfing with mobile phone functions.

Apple's share price was up about 1.3 percent for the day, at $692.17.

Apple has a parallel complaint filed against Samsung at the ITC, accusing Samsung, a major Apple chip provider as well as a global rival, of blatantly copying its hot-selling iPhones and iPads. The ITC judge's preliminary decision is due in mid-October.

Samsung was the top-selling mobile-phone maker in the second quarter of 2012, with Apple in third place, according to data from Gartner Inc.

Samsung's Galaxy touchscreen tablets are considered by many industry experts to be the main rival to the iPad, though they are currently a distant second to Apple's devices.

Apple has waged an international patent war since 2010 as it seeks to limit the growth of Google's Android system. The fight has embroiled Samsung, HTC and others who use Android.

Google's Android software, which Apple's late founder Steve Jobs denounced as a "stolen product," has become the world's No. 1 smartphone operating system.

The ITC judge's decision comes just weeks after the most closely watched patent trial in years. A jury in a California federal court ordered Samsung to pay $1.05 billion in damages after finding that Samsung had copied critical features of the iPhone and iPad and could face an outright sales ban on key products.

Samsung has said it will contest that verdict and work with carriers to modify its products to keep them on the U.S. market.

The case at the International Trade Commission is No. 337-794.

(Reporting by Diane Bartz; editing by Carol Bishopric, Gary Hill)

I don't care about none of these lawsuits cause they all BS. But apple getting home court advantage..

Of course you dont care about it...its not going in Samsung's favour. If Samsung was winning all these suits you'd be in here clowning on Apple. Nobody's dumb... Samsung are nothing but a bunch of snakes who are getting their just dues. Fuck em...

Why you think I give a shit about samsung when I don't even own none of their products.

 

[CottonCitySlim]

thats protectionism, just a us judge protecting a big american company, but....that has nothing to do with the new suit..that has to do with an old case

 

[rage]

thats protectionism, just a us judge protecting a big american company, but....that has nothing to do with the new suit..that has to do with an old case

Yeah, I'm sure it has nothing to do with the fact that Samsung fucked up...that could NEVER be what actually happened. Cuz Sammy never does anything wrong..fuck outta here.

 

[rage]

http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/14/verizon-galaxy-nexus-lose-google-wallet/

And we're supposed to believe Android phones are "open", you're not "locked" into anything right? What a load of horseshit! Android phones are some of the most locked down phones in existence. Dumb niggas just bought into Google's bullshit "open source" buzz line.

 

[The Lonious Monk]

lol Do you know how long it will take someone to find a way around that? Like 5 minutes, seriously.

 

[Dr.Chemix]

The court case argument is terrible. The law itself is vague and broad.

And that new iphone is an underwhelming piece of polished shit.

I just find it hilarious, that the iphone 5 dropped

And you know what?

It still hasn't beat the S3...

But hey, I would be happy too if they changed the pin count on my charger

That's exciting.

 

[rage]

lol Do you know how long it will take someone to find a way around that? Like 5 minutes, seriously.

Thats not the point. All fandroids been yapping about is this idiotic notion that Android is "open" and with the iOS your some how "locked" to Apple's whims. Which is all a complete joke. That Galaxy S3 piece of shit still has ICE on it...when JellyBean has already been released by google. If you go buy an S3 it has an old OS on it. Not only that you are at the mercy of the Manufacturer and THEN another barrier is the carrier if you want to update to JellyBean. You have to "root" which is NO DIFFERENT from Jailbreaking if you want to put JellyBean on it.

So you spend hundreds of dollars on that piece of shit S3 to get what? A larger S2 that is still running last years OS???? Its bullshit.

 

[rage]

A great first hands on review by a respected tech site
http://www.anandtech.com/show/6283/iphone-5-hands-on-pics-and-video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ynBpKpjq5Oo

Airplay,Passport>>>>>>any feature the S3 has.

 

[rage]

The court case argument is terrible. The law itself is vague and broad.

And that new iphone is an underwhelming piece of polished shit.

I just find it hilarious, that the iphone 5 dropped

And you know what?

It still hasn't beat the S3...

But hey, I would be happy too if they changed the pin count on my charger

That's exciting.

BWHAHAAHAHHAHAH.....stop fucking regurgitating some bullshit you heard on a blog site. The Samsung execs were caught in email and video specifically asking their engineers to copy the iPhone. The S3 is nothing but a fugazhi.

 

[ATTS]

Why are people arguing over iphone and samsung...buy what you like

 

[MrSoutCity]

lol Do you know how long it will take someone to find a way around that? Like 5 minutes, seriously.

Thats not the point. All fandroids been yapping about is this idiotic notion that Android is "open" and with the iOS your some how "locked" to Apple's whims. Which is all a complete joke. That Galaxy S3 piece of shit still has ICE on it...when JellyBean has already been released by google. If you go buy an S3 it has an old OS on it. Not only that you are at the mercy of the Manufacturer and THEN another barrier is the carrier if you want to update to JellyBean. You have to "root" which is NO DIFFERENT from Jailbreaking if you want to put JellyBean on it.

So you spend hundreds of dollars on that piece of shit S3 to get what? A larger S2 that is still running last years OS???? Its bullshit.

This will be the first and last time I cosign You.

But you right tho..

 

[Violent Words]

More of that potent Ether for Samsung...what a useless company.

The same company that is manufacturing the RAM being used for the....

wait for it.

iPhone 5.

You seem very mad.

 

[rage]

More of that potent Ether for Samsung...what a useless company.

The same company that is manufacturing the RAM being used for the....

wait for it.

iPhone 5.

You seem very mad.

Its a messageboard B, aint nobody "mad" in a thread about phones.

lol Do you know how long it will take someone to find a way around that? Like 5 minutes, seriously.

Thats not the point. All fandroids been yapping about is this idiotic notion that Android is "open" and with the iOS your some how "locked" to Apple's whims. Which is all a complete joke. That Galaxy S3 piece of shit still has ICE on it...when JellyBean has already been released by google. If you go buy an S3 it has an old OS on it. Not only that you are at the mercy of the Manufacturer and THEN another barrier is the carrier if you want to update to JellyBean. You have to "root" which is NO DIFFERENT from Jailbreaking if you want to put JellyBean on it.

So you spend hundreds of dollars on that piece of shit S3 to get what? A larger S2 that is still running last years OS???? Its bullshit.

It takes 10min to change the OS on any Android device smh. Google released JellyBean on their phones the Nexus first. Google's personal phones(Samsung makes) will always get the new OS releases first.

It takes less than 2 mins and literally the push of ONE button to Jailbreak an iPhone. So you admit your getting 2nd hand shit from google.

Oh now THIS will hurt some MAD feelings....you haters better get ready. The new A6 SMOKES the Galaxy S3's Quad Core chip. Geekbench scores...and it aint pretty...
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1030202