If we recognize that different breeds of dogs are more prone to different temperments

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
Q45T;3071881 said:
Because people aren't dogs...
Well evidence actually shows that certain races correlate with certain behaviors and dispositions. For example blacks have more testosterone on average than any other race which translates to a more aggressive nature . Given that they are even able to create drugs that target specific races and there is evidence showing that race is more than just a social construct despite what our head in the sand friends say (http://med.stanford.edu/news_releases/2005/january/racial-data.htm) it seems taboo to point out this fact. Also quite frankly I don't see why dogs breeds can't be analogous to human races. You're just stating the obvious but not disputing it one way or another.
 
Last edited:
The user and all related content has been deleted.
 
Last edited:
Pseudo-science doesn't count as 'evidence'. There is NOTHING inherent in the genes or DNA of any race that makes them more 'aggressive'. SMH. Are we back in the 1500's with this shit or what?
 
Last edited:
The Jamel;3071979 said:
shit, i thought i was gonna have to defend my pitbull's off in here...

whew!

Oh...and this shit. I don't have any, but I still fly the flag whenever the need arises. Lol.
 
Last edited:
I can't believe the IC still has this racist posting on here. Look through his posts. He's saying black people are inferior in every one of them.
 
Last edited:
Social conditioning and culture are HUGE in terms of temperament. It shapes the way you THINK. How you gonna think different if your thoughts are already fed to you on some deep-rooted emotional brain ish. I knew this girl at school who was full blood Ethiopian, but adopted by irish and german parents. She acted totally different from the other black girls at my school, even if they were in the same economic bracket.

I mean SHIT culture has actually up-rooted biology since genetic engineering came along. A cultural preference for blonde hair and blue eyes for your baby? You can do it now and its culture driving that preference not biology.
 
Last edited:
terrible example. A german sheperd and a rottweiler are actually two different species of dog.

A black man and a white man aren't two different species of human. Back to the drawing board....no goobs.
 
Last edited:
Idi Amin Dada;3073343 said:
terrible example. A german sheperd and a rottweiler are actually two different species of dog.

A black man and a white man aren't two different species of human. Back to the drawing board....no goobs.

No that's not true. Speciation requires that the two be so genetically distinct that interbreeding is impossible. German shepards and rottweilers can and have interbred. They are technically sub-species.
 
Last edited:
Emerald City Rolla;3073355 said:
No that's not true. Speciation requires that the two be so genetically distinct that interbreeding is impossible. German shepards and rottweilers can and have interbred. They are technically sub-species.

hmmm...well dayum. Then I don't know nigga.
 
Last edited:
I'm telling ya, social conditioning. You born in a cultural box and grow to fit it. Rarely does a person completely overcome it. I'm arab-american, but goddamn if I'm not more american for having grown up here. I'd be listening to shitty techno and dressing like euro-trash if I grew up there belee dat.
 
Last edited:
apocalyptica;3071921 said:
Well evidence actually shows that certain races correlate with certain behaviors and dispositions. For example blacks have more testosterone on average than any other race which translates to a more aggressive nature . Given that they are even able to create drugs that target specific races and there is evidence showing that race is more than just a social construct despite what our head in the sand friends say (http://med.stanford.edu/news_releases/2005/january/racial-data.htm) it seems taboo to point out this fact. Also quite frankly I don't see why dogs breeds can't be analogous to human races. You're just stating the obvious but not disputing it one way or another.

I dont know if testosterone has to do with aggressive in humans because humans can control themselves.Depends on the situation and his psich.
 
Last edited:
AAs are more aggressive, yet Aztecs took over hella land through violent, aggressive conquest. Their descendants still exist, but I guess every Mexican with some Aztec blood is somehow demure and passive. The European Whites aggressively fucked most every continent with people on the face of the Earth. Their ancestors still thrive, but I guess they've evolved into less aggressive people what with access to various drugs and calming medications and machine gunning little kids on isolated islands. Mongols, Asians, and so on, but everybody's aggression suddenly dried up except Black folks.

I wish the researchers would just keep it funky and speak plainly what they're trying to prove: "Niggers are predisposed to violence because they have more testosterone, which makes them hyper aggressive savages despite, you know, EVERY race having some hyper aggressive ancestry. Let's keep finding ways to perpetuate centuries of myths by ignoring facts, mitigating factors, and broad-stroke painting. These people are a menace and we'll have results to one day prove that."

Seriously, every race/ethnic group on the planet is predisposed to violence. Blacks are just the only group anyone actively tries to prove is irredeemably and mindlessly violent or broken down to the genetic level.
 
Last edited:
I dunno, but I'll tell you this: I'm not trying to own a dog that could beat me in a fight, I'll have like a collie or something medium sized that I could easily subdue
 
Last edited:

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
17
Views
0
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…