I would never as a black woman...

[Billy_Poncho]

Judah Black and Judge_Judah aren't the same nigga????

 

[Splackavelli]

Nothing necessarily wrong with IR dating, IMO.

Nobody has managed to convince me otherwise.

I can't imagine why she would think her boyfriend would have no problem with her attitude toward black women or how he could have no problem with her disrespecting his mother, grandmothers, possible aunts, sisters, cousins, friends etc. She really is pretty, though. It took me by surprise (maybe on some subconscious level you sometimes expect women who are pretty to be nice, I don't think like that, though. I was just surprised for some reason).

One thing that's been irritating me is the idea that black people (either men and women or just men) have higher levels of testosterone than other groups. I don't know where this shit comes from. I haven't come across a single study claiming or demonstrating this, they might exist. The controversial psychologist who claimed that black women were "objectively" less attractive (Kanazawa, I think) claimed this but never supported it. His entire article was pure speculation and theory and a good example of junk science in psychology. From what I remember of his site he states controversial things just to state controversial things so, being controversial, it must be the 'harsh' truth. I don't think he should have been fired, though. If you can come up with a rational, thought out counter to someone's argument you don't have to censor what they say, just take the opportunity to explain why you disagree.

theres nothing attractive about those fugly skanks. I can point out so many flaws for example blondy at the bottom has a strong face with that dudly do right chin cleft and those pursed lips along with those vacant soulless lizard green eyes. whats with the army wife why is she fucking with 2 different niggas. she looks plain and old like her face would be on a bottle of surface cleaner or kitchen cleanser. the one at the top is pretty plain also I've been sweated by cuter more attractive white girls in my time. there is no way I would pick any of those hags over a black dime piece.

 

[Arya Tsaddiq]

Judah Black and Judge_Judah aren't the same nigga????

That's it...time to take this IC life seriously. This is unacceptable.

 

[zzombie]

I don't see why y'all choose to spar with zombies ignorance. Its the worst kind of ignorance, he's arrogantly ignorant. Fuckin Jamaicans man, you can't tell em shyt

Aren't you a Hebrew Israelite ??? Stick to cross dressing on the weekends and screaming bible verses at white people.The only thing you can tell me is how to look like wonder woman and spit blasphemous pig shit at crackers but sorry I am not interested

At least them niggas know how to articulate better than a fifth grader

I would much rather have articulation problems than look like a mental patient dressed me.

 

[ThaNubianGod]

EXXXXPOSED!!!! PICO IS MY REAL NAME!!!!

You're parents named you after a rundown street? Why not Labrea or Sepulveda instead?

 

[i ro ny]

EXXXXPOSED!!!! PICO IS MY REAL NAME!!!!

You're parents named you after a rundown street? Why not Labrea or Sepulveda instead?

you really think thats her name, breh?

 

[Bussy_Getta]

EXXXXPOSED!!!! PICO IS MY REAL NAME!!!!

You're parents named you after a rundown street? Why not Labrea or Sepulveda instead?

Sepulveda the worst breh

 

[Purr]

Too many coons in this thread. @zzombie is the realest. I love him.

 

[Black Boy King]

I don't see why y'all choose to spar with zombies ignorance. Its the worst kind of ignorance, he's arrogantly ignorant. Fuckin Jamaicans man, you can't tell em shyt

Aren't you a Hebrew Israelite ??? Stick to cross dressing on the weekends and screaming bible verses at white people.The only thing you can tell me is how to look like wonder woman and spit blasphemous pig shit at crackers but sorry I am not interested

At least them niggas know how to articulate better than a fifth grader

I would much rather have articulation problems than look like a mental patient dressed me.

I heard y'all having y'all first faggot parade next month, and u on here wit some nerve talking bout niggas dresses

Fucking 'ironing'

 

[Black Boy King]

Judah Black and Judge_Judah aren't the same nigga????

We mobbin out here, the family got numbers

 

[bambu]

@charlie

Wants to give me the pussy.........

 

[zzombie]

You claim to be a professor at a state university I wonder how the administration and student body would react if they heard you bullshit.

This thread turned out funny.

Speaking scientifically there are no human hybrids, no differing human breeds or races

There are no human hybrids the term hybrid has a general usage but when talking about human genetics "hybrid" does not apply to humans. Thank you for finally admitting I was right but no #2 does not match #1

#2 is a social construct and #1 is an incomplete but more correct definition.

The amount of genetics you learn studying anthropology is negligible.

Your comprehension is negligible......

HYBRID

1. an offspring of two animals or plants of different races....

I guess you are gonna argue that humans are not animals......

That debate is too basic....

@ me when you have some evidence that suggests that heterosis/hybrid vigor does not occur in humans......

There are no different human races biological speaking

Spoiler

Homo sapien was subdivided into four racial categories (Americanus, Asiaticus, Africanus, Europeanus) these were still considered the same species.....

Do you really want to open that can of worms?????

Spoiler

A lot of people misunderstand human genetic variety to mean that different human races exist. But modern science his dispelled that bullshit.

Usually only racial supremacist such as yourself and racist scientists still hold onto the kkk/Nazi eugenics ideology still attempt to use the word race in the way you are using it.

Your white side reallyv is showing now

What is the basis of all the natural faggot type shit that you speak of so often?????

There are biological differences in the races of man.....

Enough to create different classifications/races........

"Scientists, for instance, have recently identified small changes in DNA that account for the pale skin of Europeans, the tendency of Asians to sweat less and West Africans’ resistance to certain diseases.".......
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/11/us/11dna.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

When I say the white man is a natural faggot it's a cultural observation not a scientific fact And I don't know how many times I have to reiterate that.

There are no different races of man we are all homo sapien sapiens. Those small changes are not enough to qualify the existence of different races of man

I did not say that there are different species of man.....

There are different groups of the same species......

"Certain superficial traits like skin pigmentation have long been presumed to be genetic.......

But the ability to pinpoint their DNA source makes the link between genes and race more palpable......

And on mainstream blogs, in college classrooms and among the growing community of ancestry test-takers, it is prompting the question of whether more profound differences may also be attributed to DNA.....

Like changes in DNA that account for the pale skin of Europeans, the tendency of Asians to sweat less and West Africans’ resistance to certain diseases"......

That is exactly what you are saying when you use the term hybrid in relation to human beings so sound no different from those racist cracker ass cracker scientist from the early 1900's.

you can find distant genetic groups within the same "race" that is why calling mixed people hybrids is a misnomer like i keep telling you.

 

[bambu]

You claim to be a professor at a state university I wonder how the administration and student body would react if they heard you bullshit.

This thread turned out funny.

Speaking scientifically there are no human hybrids, no differing human breeds or races

There are no human hybrids the term hybrid has a general usage but when talking about human genetics "hybrid" does not apply to humans. Thank you for finally admitting I was right but no #2 does not match #1

#2 is a social construct and #1 is an incomplete but more correct definition.

The amount of genetics you learn studying anthropology is negligible.

Your comprehension is negligible......

HYBRID

1. an offspring of two animals or plants of different races....

I guess you are gonna argue that humans are not animals......

That debate is too basic....

@ me when you have some evidence that suggests that heterosis/hybrid vigor does not occur in humans......

There are no different human races biological speaking

Spoiler

Homo sapien was subdivided into four racial categories (Americanus, Asiaticus, Africanus, Europeanus) these were still considered the same species.....

Do you really want to open that can of worms?????

Spoiler

A lot of people misunderstand human genetic variety to mean that different human races exist. But modern science his dispelled that bullshit.

Usually only racial supremacist such as yourself and racist scientists still hold onto the kkk/Nazi eugenics ideology still attempt to use the word race in the way you are using it.

Your white side reallyv is showing now

What is the basis of all the natural faggot type shit that you speak of so often?????

There are biological differences in the races of man.....

Enough to create different classifications/races........

"Scientists, for instance, have recently identified small changes in DNA that account for the pale skin of Europeans, the tendency of Asians to sweat less and West Africans’ resistance to certain diseases.".......
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/11/us/11dna.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

When I say the white man is a natural faggot it's a cultural observation not a scientific fact And I don't know how many times I have to reiterate that.

There are no different races of man we are all homo sapien sapiens. Those small changes are not enough to qualify the existence of different races of man

I did not say that there are different species of man.....

There are different groups of the same species......

"Certain superficial traits like skin pigmentation have long been presumed to be genetic.......

But the ability to pinpoint their DNA source makes the link between genes and race more palpable......

And on mainstream blogs, in college classrooms and among the growing community of ancestry test-takers, it is prompting the question of whether more profound differences may also be attributed to DNA.....

Like changes in DNA that account for the pale skin of Europeans, the tendency of Asians to sweat less and West Africans’ resistance to certain diseases"......

That is exactly what you are saying when you use the term hybrid in relation to human beings so sound no different from those racist cracker ass cracker scientist from the early 1900's.

you can find distant genetic groups within the same "race" that is why calling mixed people hybrids is a misnomer like i keep telling you.

Calling a mixed person a hybrid is correct......

I am tired of posting the definition from Miriam-Webster.....

Just because it sounds racist to you does not mean that it is........

It is not a misnomer......

Distant genetic groups within the same "race" is typically referring to mixed people/hybrids.......

 

[zzombie]

You claim to be a professor at a state university I wonder how the administration and student body would react if they heard you bullshit.

This thread turned out funny.

Speaking scientifically there are no human hybrids, no differing human breeds or races

There are no human hybrids the term hybrid has a general usage but when talking about human genetics "hybrid" does not apply to humans. Thank you for finally admitting I was right but no #2 does not match #1

#2 is a social construct and #1 is an incomplete but more correct definition.

The amount of genetics you learn studying anthropology is negligible.

Your comprehension is negligible......

HYBRID

1. an offspring of two animals or plants of different races....

I guess you are gonna argue that humans are not animals......

That debate is too basic....

@ me when you have some evidence that suggests that heterosis/hybrid vigor does not occur in humans......

There are no different human races biological speaking

Spoiler

Homo sapien was subdivided into four racial categories (Americanus, Asiaticus, Africanus, Europeanus) these were still considered the same species.....

Do you really want to open that can of worms?????

Spoiler

A lot of people misunderstand human genetic variety to mean that different human races exist. But modern science his dispelled that bullshit.

Usually only racial supremacist such as yourself and racist scientists still hold onto the kkk/Nazi eugenics ideology still attempt to use the word race in the way you are using it.

Your white side reallyv is showing now

What is the basis of all the natural faggot type shit that you speak of so often?????

There are biological differences in the races of man.....

Enough to create different classifications/races........

"Scientists, for instance, have recently identified small changes in DNA that account for the pale skin of Europeans, the tendency of Asians to sweat less and West Africans’ resistance to certain diseases.".......
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/11/us/11dna.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

When I say the white man is a natural faggot it's a cultural observation not a scientific fact And I don't know how many times I have to reiterate that.

There are no different races of man we are all homo sapien sapiens. Those small changes are not enough to qualify the existence of different races of man

I did not say that there are different species of man.....

There are different groups of the same species......

"Certain superficial traits like skin pigmentation have long been presumed to be genetic.......

But the ability to pinpoint their DNA source makes the link between genes and race more palpable......

And on mainstream blogs, in college classrooms and among the growing community of ancestry test-takers, it is prompting the question of whether more profound differences may also be attributed to DNA.....

Like changes in DNA that account for the pale skin of Europeans, the tendency of Asians to sweat less and West Africans’ resistance to certain diseases"......

That is exactly what you are saying when you use the term hybrid in relation to human beings so sound no different from those racist cracker ass cracker scientist from the early 1900's.

you can find distant genetic groups within the same "race" that is why calling mixed people hybrids is a misnomer like i keep telling you.

Calling a mixed person a hybrid is correct......

I am tired of posting the definition from Miriam-Webster.....

Just because it sounds racist to you does not mean that it is........

It is not a misnomer......

Distant genetic groups within the same "race" is typically referring to mixed people/hybrids.......

Calling a mixed person a hybrid human is incorrect you can post the definition a million times it agrees with me.

 

[zzombie]

THERE IS more than one definition on the word because it's used differently, biologically speaking there is no human hybrid RACE. THERE IS ONLY ONE RACE homosapien sapien

“Race is not an accurate or productive way to describe human biological variation”

–Heather J.H. Edgar and Keith L. Hunley, Race Reconciled, 2009:2

 

[blakfyahking]

there is no legitimate excuse for this thread to be 16 pages

Pico got you niggaz trained I see

 

[bambu]

THERE IS more than one definition on the word because it's used differently, biologically speaking there is no human hybrid RACE. THERE IS ONLY ONE RACE homosapien sapien

“Race is not an accurate or productive way to describe human biological variation”

–Heather J.H. Edgar and Keith L. Hunley, Race Reconciled, 2009:2

There is one human race.....

With several sub-groups that are obviously the same race......

A human is a hybrid if they are....

1. an offspring of two animals or plants of different races, breeds, varieties, species,

2. a person whose background is a blend of two diverse cultures or traditions

3. something heterogeneous in origin or composition: composite

There is a division in the disciple of anthropology.......

Those, like you that say humans are too similar to be different races.....

And those, like me, that use evidence to illustrate the biological cause for human racial classifications......

In other words.....

An anthropologist could determine an individuals race based on their DNA alone.............

Most of the people who says there are not enough biological differences for race are usually soft or either a feminist..............

Intimidated to challenge the status quo...........

 

[God_Yunn]

Thread starter is Mufasa

 

[zzombie]

THERE IS more than one definition on the word because it's used differently, biologically speaking there is no human hybrid RACE. THERE IS ONLY ONE RACE homosapien sapien

“Race is not an accurate or productive way to describe human biological variation”

–Heather J.H. Edgar and Keith L. Hunley, Race Reconciled, 2009:2

There is one human race.....

With several sub-groups that are obviously the same race......

A human is a hybrid if they are....

1. an offspring of two animals or plants of different races, breeds, varieties, species,

2. a person whose background is a blend of two diverse cultures or traditions

3. something heterogeneous in origin or composition: composite

There is a division in the disciple of anthropology.......

Those, like you that say humans are too similar to be different races.....

And those, like me, that use evidence to illustrate the biological cause for human racial classifications......

In other words.....

An anthropologist could determine an individuals race based on their DNA alone.............

Most of the people who says there are not enough biological differences for race are usually soft or either a feminist..............

Intimidated to challenge the status quo...........

THERE ARE NO HUMAN RACES ONLY ONE HUMAN RACE THE SUB GROUPS YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT DO NOT FIT THE BIOLOGICAL DEFINITION OF RACE.

The status quo is academia has a long history of being made up of white supremacist and other racist of many kinds thankfully that is changing.

"Our results also have implications for the discussion about the existence of races in the human species from the phenotypic point of view because they support the notion of an absence of discrete biological groups. . . . The results presented here demonstrate that roughly one-third of the pairs of individuals within a population are more different than pairs of individuals between populations. This indicates that cranial morphology is less able to identify nonclinal variations among populations (which would be in accordance with the existence of biological races in the human species) than molecular data" Craniometric Similarities Within and Between Human Populations in Comparison with Neutral Genetic Data

André Strauss, Mark Hubbe

The result is a continuous straight line ranging from the darkest extremes to the lightest extremes in skin color. There are no identifiable clusters. . . . Researchers are of course free to subdivide this continuum into different groups, but such clustering would be arbitrary and subjective in terms of the number of groups and the cutoff points used to distinguish them. The lack of apparent clusters is a reflection of the fact that skin color shows a classic pattern of clinal variation. Race and global patterns of phenotypic variation John H. Relethford*

 

[Bussy_Getta]

Thread starter is Mufasa

Renounce your cracca side or gtfo my thread!